Stampede at India's Kumbh Mela Hindu mega-festival leaves at least 30 people dead, police say
Prayagraj, India — A pre-dawn stampede at the world's largest religious gathering killed at least 30 people in India on Wednesday, with many more injured after a surging crowd spilled out of a police cordon and trampled bystanders.
Deadly crowd incidents are a frequent occurrence at Indian religious festivals, including the Kumbh Mela, which attracts tens of millions of devotees every 12 years to the northern city of Prayagraj.
As pilgrims rushed to participate in a sacred day of ritual bathing, people sleeping and sitting on the ground near the rivers told AFP they were trampled by huge swells of devotees coming towards them in the darkness.
"The entire crowd fell on top of me, trampling me as it moved forward," pilgrim Renu Devi, 48, told AFP. "When the crowd surged, elderly people and women were crushed, and no one came forward to help."
Rescue teams carrying victims from the accident site weaved through piles of clothes, shoes and other discarded belongings. Police were seen carrying stretchers bearing the bodies of victims draped with thick blankets.
"Thirty devotees have unfortunately died," senior police officer Vaibhav Krishna told reporters during an evening news conference at the festival. "Ninety injured were taken to the hospital."
Krishna's briefing came nearly 18 hours after the stampede and was the first official death toll given by authorities.
Festivities had otherwise been allowed to continue almost as normal during the day, with millions still trekking to the riverbanks to immerse themselves in the water.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi called the stampede "extremely sad" and offered his "deepest condolences" to relatives of those killed, adding his wishes "for the speedy recovery of all injured."
Dozens of relatives were anxiously waiting for news outside a large tent serving as a purpose-built hospital for the festival near the disaster site.
The six-week Kumbh Mela is the single biggest milestone on the Hindu religious calendar. Wednesday marks one of the holiest days in the festival, when saffron-clad holy men lead millions in a sin-cleansing ritual of bathing at the confluence of the Ganges and Yamuna rivers in tandem with a planetary alignment in the Solar System.
Officials had attempted to divert crowds away from the disaster site, instructing them to bathe at other locations.
"We humbly request all devotees do not come to the main bathing spot," said one festival staffer, his voice crackling through his megaphone.
"Please cooperate with security personnel."
But even as news of the stampede spread, crowds pushed through cordons to move towards the river, shrugging off aggressive orders from police to turn back.
Officials from the Uttar Pradesh state government, responsible for staging the festival, said millions had participated in the ritual bathing through the day.
Indian opposition leader Rahul Gandhi blamed the disaster on poor crowd control that prioritised the comfort of distinguished visitors.
"Mismanagement and the administration's special focus on VIP movement instead of common devotees are responsible for this tragic incident," he wrote on social media.
Railway police superintendent Ashtabhuja Singh told AFP that special train services taking pilgrims to Prayagraj were still running, after earlier reports that they had been halted due to crowding in the city.
"My family got scared, so we're leaving," attendee Sanjay Nishad told AFP.
The Kumbh Mela is rooted in a mythological Hindu battle between deities and demons for control of a pitcher containing the nectar of immortality.
Organizers have likened the scale of this year's festival to a temporary country, forecasting up to 400 million pilgrims would visit before the final day on February 26.
Police this year installed hundreds of cameras at the festival site and on roads leading to the sprawling encampment, mounted on poles and a fleet of overhead drones.
The surveillance network feeds into a sophisticated command and control centre meant to alert staff if sections of the crowd get so concentrated that they pose a safety threat.
"If you see advertisements it seems like the government is providing world class facilities," university student Ruchi Bharti told AFP not far from the riverbank.
"But this stampede proved that was all a lie."
More than 400 people died after they were trampled or drowned at the Kumbh Mela on a single day of the festival in 1954, one of the largest tolls in a crowd-related disaster globally. Another 36 people were crushed to death in 2013, the last time the festival was staged in Prayagraj.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
42 minutes ago
- New York Post
Zelensky dismisses Trump's verdict on Putin as ‘personal opinion': ‘Trust me'
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky insisted that he understands the 'mentality of the Russians' better than President Trump and his officials — as he issued a warning to the president. Zelensky roundly rejected Trump's conclusion that Vladimir Putin wants to stop his bloody war on Ukraine, cautioning his Washington counterpart about the Russian tyrant's true motives. 'With all due respect to President Trump, of course. I think it's just his personal opinion maybe,' Zelensky told ABC New's 'This Week' in an interview that aired Sunday. Advertisement 'Inside his [Putin's] mind, it's impossible to end this war without total defeat of Ukraine. If Ukraine is not defeated, he will not feel that it's a victory for him,' he continued. 'Trust me, we understand the Russians much better, the mentality of the Russians, than the Americans understand the mentality of [the] Russians. I know for sure that Putin doesn't want to stop the war.' Zelensky's comments come after Trump told since-suspended ABC News correspondent Terry Moran in April, 'I think he does,' when asked if Putin wants peace. 4 Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is seeking to build support in the US for a new sanctions package against Russia. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement 4 Russian leader Vladimir Putin has been keen on at least capturing the Donbas region. POOL/AFP via Getty Images Last week, however, Trump had a roughly 75-minute phone call with Putin, which he described as a 'good conversation' but conceded it would not lead to 'immediate peace.' Trump has grown increasingly critical of Putin in the public eye, blasting the dictator for the onslaught of drone and missile attacks near civilian enclaves in Ukraine. Advertisement Still, the president has balanced that with his desire to be a third-party mediator in the years-long war, pivoting from the Biden administration's policy of standing steadfastly behind Ukraine. Zelensky, for his part, continues to rally for Trump to further tighten the screws on the Kremlin as a way to force Putin to stop the bloodhsed. 'They will remain very, very pragmatic if very hard pressure is applied on them, then they will stop the war,' he predicted of the Russians. 'But then the question, the next question will be for how long they will stop this war? Advertisement 'We know the Russians very well. Without proper securities, strong security guarantees, if we have such, then the peace will be sustainable and long. If there are weak security guarantees, it will just be a pause.' 4 President Trump has made ending the war in Ukraine one of his top foreign policy objectives. AFP via Getty Images Zelensky previously agreed to the Trump administration's proposal for a 30-day ceasefire, which Russia rejected. As the stalemate continued, Ukraine carried out a daring surprise attack deep in Russian territory at the beginning of June, wiping out dozens of nuclear 'doomsday' bombers, as well as other aircraft with drones. The stunning 'Operation Spider's Web' attack is believed to have debilitated a substantial proportion of the Russians' air force capabilities. Ukraine did not give the Trump administration advance notice of the attack, Axios reported. 'Well, they gave Putin a reason to go in and bomb the hell out of them last night. That's the thing I didn't like about it. When I saw it, I said, 'Here we go, now it's going to be a strike,'' Trump told reporters of the top secret operation. In response, Russia launched about 500 drones on Ukraine overnight Sunday in its largest aerial bombardment since the war began in February 2022, according to Kyiv. Ukrainian forces claimed to have downed about 460 of the 479 drones that pummeled them. 4 The Russians have pummeled civilian enclaves in Ukraine. Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images Advertisement Zelensky also hit back at Trump's suggestion that Ukraine and Russia are like children 'fighting in a park, and you try and pull them apart.' 'We are not playing in the park with the Russians like two boys, two kids. Putin is not a kid,' Zelensky countered. 'So we can't compare, and we cannot say, 'OK, let them fight for a while. 'It's not about President Trump,' he went on. 'Anyone living thousands of miles away can't fully understand the pain, even parents who live in Ukraine cannot feel the pain of those who lost their children.' Advertisement Zelensky also acknowledged that Trump believes the Russians are winning the war and disputed that notion. 'It's not true. It's not a victory when you spent, really spent 1 million people,' Zelensky stressed. The Ukrainian leader also claimed that the Trump administration had diverted some 20,000 anti-drone missiles away from Ukraine. Zelensky's interview comes amid a growing bipartisan push in Congress to significantly ramp up sanctions on Russia.
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Why some Canadians are alarmed by Mark Carney's pledge to act with urgency
Canadians elected Prime Minister Mark Carney's Liberal government based on its pledge to act with urgency and fix things — the country's economy, its security and its standing on the world stage. But with the unveiling of a bill to supercharge the economy and early efforts to improve the country's adversarial relations with India and China, there's growing concern that Carney's plans to boost Canada could involve unsavoury trade offs. Ask Indigenous leaders who were left out of 'nation-building' meetings or were given just a week to comment on legislation that will fast track infrastructure projects reasonably expected to pass through their treaty-protected territories. Ask Sikh-Canadian leaders who have seen their members targeted for death or violence, allegedly on orders from Indian government agents. Last Friday, they listened as Carney defended his G7 invitation to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi as one that 'makes sense' based on India's economic power, population and key role in international 'supply chains.' Ask foreign aid organizations, perhaps, if Canada commits to radically increasing defence spending along with NATO allies at a leaders' summit planned for later this month. Carney is not alone in his apparent willingness to step on toes if it means he can move further and faster in responding to the sense of emergency at hand. It's part of a global movement with governments invoking looming threats and emerging risks to push through all sorts of questionable — and sometimes contestable — priorities. The most blatant example is the one that has sparked the economic emergency in Canada. U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs on imports have been pushed through not with legislation that can be studied, debated and voted upon, but through presidential executive orders invoking real or imagined national emergencies at the Canada-U. S. border. They are premised upon risks from America-bound migrants, fentanyl, steel and cars and, despite initial court rulings that tranches of the tariffs are illegal under U.S. law, they remain in effect. Likewise, the generalized panic that Russia's three-years-and-counting war against Ukraine has instilled in Europe. There is legitimate reason to worry about the longer-term intentions of Russian President Vladimir Putin, a leader who has been unwilling to agree to a ceasefire despite sanctions, despite diplomatic isolation, despite the more recent appeals, threats and exhortations of the Trump administration. But preparations for a potentially wider conflict on the European continent now have German officials talking about rehabilitating long-abandoned bunkers, Poland vowing to build up 'the strongest army in the region,' and Swedish households receiving an alarming 32-page pamphlet from their government entitled: 'In case of crisis or war.' 'To all residents of Sweden: we live in uncertain times,' the booklet begins ominously. It goes on to cover everything from securing one's home to digital safety to instructions on how to stop bleeding to advice about handling pets and talking to children. This is the political and emotional backdrop against which Canada and other NATO member states later this month are expected to back an agreement to steeply increase in their national defence budgets, moving to five per cent of GDP from two per cent. If agreed to, it will result in many billions of dollars going to weapons, tanks, planes and soldiers' salaries. But before those purchases can go ahead, there will be many difficult choices made about how to come up with the funds. Governments always talk about finding budget efficiencies for unexpected priorities, though saving is not a specialty for which politicians are well suited. Even Donald Trump and Elon Musk came up spectacularly short of their savings pledges through the Department of Government Efficiency. More frequently, governments end up robbing Peter in order to pay Paul, as the saying goes — cutting spending in on domain to increase it in another. That is exactly what the United Kingdom did with blunt effect when it announced earlier this year that it would slash foreign aid spending drastically in order to increase the defence budget. 'Few countries have articulated such a direct, one-to-one trade off before between those two areas of public spending,' noted a report from ODI Global , a think tank, that criticized the British government for thinking of defence and foreign-aid spending as an either-or choice. Similar potential trade offs are cause for concern in Canada. Will the urgency to build oil pipelines and assert the country as an 'energy superpower' in new markets come at the cost of Canada's fight against global warming? Carney's reputation as a climate-change warrior is well-established, but his use of the oil-and-gas industry's ' marketing speak ' at a recent meeting first ministers' meeting with provincial premiers has some worried about the economy taking priority over the environment. Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, the national association representing Canadian Inuit, wasn't even invited to the first ministers' meeting, which concluded with a statement about the need to 'unlock the North's economic potential.' 'It is troubling that in 2025, the Government of Canada is so comfortable with empty rhetoric in place of rightful participation,' the Inuit association said in a news release . The legislation to get Carney's economic fast-track transformation under way — one that the Liberal government wants to pass into law by Canada Day — was decried by the Assembly of First Nations, which had just seven days to provide any concerns about the bill, APTN News reported . There are those who will defend a go-fast approach to governing in extraordinary times. They will warn that there is a greater risk in being sunk by the status quo — the never-ending consultations, the delays, red-tape entanglements. 'The advantage of a wartime mentality lies in the sense of urgency it introduces, and the readiness it encourages to push aside unnecessary bureaucratic barriers,' wrote Lawrence Freedman, an emeritus professor of War Studies at King's College London, in a piece about Russia, Ukraine and Europe. It's a line that can be applied as equally to Ottawa as to Moscow, Kyiv, Paris, Brussels or London. But one person's bureaucratic barrier is the next person's guard rail — a measure ensuring confidence, protecting against damaging errors, saving lives. Moving at high speeds, it can be difficult to spot the difference.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
What's At Stake As Leaders Gather At U.N. Oceans Conference
France's President Emmanuel Macron delivers a speech ahead of the third U.N. Ocean Conference in Nice, on June 8, 2025. Credit - CHRISTIAN HARTMANN/POOL/AFP—Getty Images France's bucolic Côte D'Azur, with its pine-forested hills and picturesque harbors, is rarely the site of fractious politics. But this week, hundreds of scientists and government officials from across the world have converged on the Mediterranean city of Nice for the United Nations' weeklong Oceans Conference, grappling over how to stave off calamitous ocean warming, rising sea levels, and an accelerating destruction of marine life—all without the participation of a crucial global power and the world's biggest economy, the United States. While President Trump opted to skip the conference, his actions since returning to the White House in January overshadow almost every conversation among delegates and activists, in meeting rooms and halls erected around the old Port of Nice, with its yachts glimmering in the sun. Opening the conference's first session on Monday morning, French president Emmanuel Macron, who is cohosting the event with the president of Costa Rica, bluntly criticized Trump's decisions. This includes an executive order from the U.S. president in April allowing deep-sea mining in international waters, which would seemingly violate global treaties that are currently being negotiated among governments. In signing the executive order, Trump described deep-sea mining as 'the next gold rush.' The ultra-deep international waters are thought to contain rich deposits of strategic metals like copper, nickel, and cobalt. Read more: Fishing Communities in the Philippines Are Fighting for their Future as Waters Rise Macron also struck out at Trump's stated desire to acquire Greenland, whose warming Arctic sea has opened the potential for hugely lucrative new shipping routes. More personally for Macron, Trump has ordered the U.S. out of the global climate accord known as the Paris Agreement, which was negotiated in the French capital in 2015, and for which Macron has regularly expressed pride. 'The deep sea is not for sale, neither is Greenland for sale, nor Antarctica,' Macron told hundreds of delegates, including about 60 heads of state or governments. 'The climate, like biodiversity, is not a matter of opinion,' he said. 'It's a matter of scientifically established facts.' Governments will spend this week thrashing out a 19-page 'ocean action plan,' negotiated within the U.N. over the past two years. On paper, it commits the world to a wide range of initiatives to protect oceans, including investing heavily in coastal conservation, reining in large-scale fishing operations and cutting fishing subsidies, and implementing a global freeze on deep-sea mining. The document describes oceans as facing a 'global emergency,' ravaged by warming temperatures, plastic pollution, and the extinction of wildlife. U.N. officials and scientists say that could profoundly impact human life, since the oceans provide about half the world's oxygen, and absorb most of the excess heat from carbon emissions. Despite the sense of urgency, the U.N.'s labyrinthine summitry has frustrated activists and environmentalists, many of whom have gathered in Nice. At least 60 countries need to ratify a new global treaty governing international waters in order for it to come into force. But as of Monday afternoon, only 30 countries had done so. Also lagging is funding: about $175 billion a year is needed for the next five years in order to roll out major global ocean controls; so far, barely $10 billion has been allocated for the next four years, according to the U.N. 'The wider geopolitical state of play represents an additional challenge to come up with an ambitious Nice consensus that can represent a decisive step forward for the protection and restoration of the ocean,' the Nice action plan states. Activists put the problems with the action plan more plainly. 'There are a lot of warm words,' Megan Randles, head of Greenpeace International's delegation to the Nice conference, told TIME. 'It recognizes that we are in a climate and ecological emergency, that things are very, very, very bad,' she says. 'However, there is a significant lack of action, even though it is called an action plan.' Yet few people in Nice this week question the potentially dire situation facing oceans. 'We're not talking anymore about what might be coming,' Peter Thomson, the U.N.'s special envoy for the ocean, who is from Fiji, told reporters. 'We've altered the earth's system.' Thomson urged countries to drastically reduce carbon emissions, in order to limit global warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels—the ambitious goal of the Paris Agreement. Scientists believe global warming could be on track to eventually rise by 3°C above pre-industrial temperatures. 'Our grandchildren, when they are taught geography, will be looking at a different map of the world than we were taught when we were kids,' Thomson says. 'Our grandchildren will live in a different world just in the shape of our coastlines.' Read more from TIME's Ocean Issue The World Isn't Valuing Oceans Properly 'Ignorance' Is the Most Pressing Issue Facing Ocean Conservation, Says Sylvia Earle Meet the Marine Biologist Working to Protect Our Oceans from Deep-Sea Mining Geopolitical Tensions are Shaping the Future of our Oceans Contact us at letters@
