Pope Leo XIV described as 'man with the smell of sheep' by Peru bishop
US-born Robert Prevost, an American who also has Peruvian nationality and did years of missionary work in the South American country, was appointed Bishop of Chiclayo on September 26th, 2015 by Pope Francis.
Advertisement
He left the city in north-west Peru after being called to Rome in January 2023.
Chiclayo's current Bishop, Monsignor Edinson Edgardo Farfan Cordova, used the sheep analogy to describe the new Pope as a 'shepherd among people' in his glowing appraisal of the 69-year-old who is the 267th occupant of the throne of St Peter.
Reacting to the news of his election, he said: 'I am convinced Pope Leo XIV will continue the line of communion and closeness to the poor that marked the pontificate of Francis.
'I am certain the new Pope will give continuity to this work in his preferential option for the poor. He has been marked by the reality of our peripheries and by the synodal spirit promoted by Francis.
Advertisement
Speaking after photos were published in Peruvian newspapers overnight showing Robert Prevost as a younger man on horseback during his time in the South American country, he added: 'There are photos of him crossing the Piura hills.
'He was a shepherd among people, a man with the smell of sheep.
'Leo XIV is not only a pope for the world, he is also a spiritual son of Peru, a shepherd who knows our mountains, our parishes, our hopes.'
Peru's president has described Pope Leo XIV as Peruvian 'by choice and conviction' despite the fact he was born in Chicago to a United States Navy World War II veteran of Italian and French descent and a mum who was the daughter of Louisiana Creole parents of African, French and Spanish descent.
Advertisement
She said: 'He chose to be one of us, to live among us and to carry in his heart the faith, culture and dreams of this country' before adding: 'The pope is Peruvian; God loves Peru.'
In his first appearance from the Vatican balcony, Leo XIV briefly switched from Italian to Spanish to address the faithful 'from my beloved diocese of Chiclayo, in Peru', where he served as bishop for nearly a decade.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
5 hours ago
- The Independent
Bolivia will choose a new president but environmental activists see little hope of progress
Bolivia's upcoming presidential election will mark a shift from nearly two decades of socialist rule, but many Indigenous and environmental leaders doubt it will bring progress in stopping deforestation, fires or pollution in the Amazon. The Oct. 19 runoff pits centrist Sen. Rodrigo Paz against right-wing former president Jorge 'Tuto' Quiroga — two contenders promising change but rooted in an economic model critics say has long fueled environmental damage in one of South America's most biodiverse nations. The Amazon spans nine countries and plays a crucial role in absorbing carbon and regulating climate patterns worldwide. Approximately 8% of the Amazon is in Bolivia. Scientists warn that deforestation is pushing parts of the forest toward a tipping point where it could shift into savanna. The election feels like a choice between two threats, according to Ruth Alipaz Cuqui, coordinator of the Indigenous alliance CONTIOCAP and a member of the Uchupiamona community. She said governments of all stripes have ignored Indigenous well-being. 'Agreements are signed, commitments are made, laws and decrees are passed, but in the territory there is absolutely nothing applied," she said. Quiroga's campaign told The Associated Press he would tighten controls on forest fires, promote sustainable agriculture, expand biofuel production, and encourage reforestation to curb high deforestation rates. He also calls for using carbon and green bonds — tools to raise money to fund conservation efforts. Paz's team did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Environment has paid a price for economic policies Evo Morales — Bolivia's first Indigenous president — often invoked Pachamama, the Indigenous concept of Mother Earth as a living being that sustains life, and rose to power by championing Indigenous rights and environmental protection. But his socialist governments also expanded exports of soy, beef, gas and minerals to fund social programs. And his administration allied with agribusiness and ranching elites, loosened land-clearing restrictions and promoted infrastructure projects that opened new frontiers in the Amazon. Bolivia is one of the Amazon basin's fastest-deforesting countries. Forest loss spiked in 2019, when Morales eased burning rules and legalized agricultural clearing, fueling massive wildfires that wiped out nearly a million hectares (about 3,860 square miles). The destruction has continued as cattle ranching, soy farming, logging and mining push deeper into Indigenous lands. In 2024, fires scorched more than 10 million hectares — about 38,600 square miles, or roughly the size of Iceland — and Bolivia recorded the world's second-highest tropical primary forest loss after Brazil, according to Global Forest Watch. Vincent Vos, a Dutch-Bolivian researcher based in the Amazonian department of Beni, said communities are confronting overlapping crises. 'Santa Cruz has already lost 68% of their water reserves… we've got 30% less rainfall than a decade ago,' he said. 'Our fish is really completely contaminated by mercury already and people are really suffering from high levels of mercury poisoning.' Campaign hasn't centered on environmental issues While environmental issues have not been a central focus of the campaign, both candidates have outlined some proposals. Paz has proposed a $15 billion 'green government' funded by carbon credits, which can be generated from projects like forest-planting that aim to reduce emissions; tighter controls on agricultural burns and a crackdown on illegal gold mining. Quiroga vows to make Bolivia a leader in decarbonization, protect parks, restore fire-hit ecosystems, and expand agriculture 'appropriately' — a stance critics warn could still spur deforestation. Nick Fromherz, a Bolivian-based adjunct professor at Lewis & Clark Law School in Portland who specializes in Latin American environmental law, said both candidates have spoken broadly about fighting wildfires and managing the agricultural frontier. But they've offered few solutions to less visible crises like mercury contamination from gold mining, he said. Mercury, widely used in gold mining, flows into rivers and contaminates fish, a dietary staple for Amazonian communities. Studies have found alarmingly high mercury levels in people living along Bolivian rivers, echoing concerns across the Amazon basin. For Stasiek Czaplicki, a Bolivian environmental economist who has studied forest policies, the danger lies not only in policy direction but in the state's ability to enforce protections. He said Quiroga 'would be worst for the institutions that defend the environment.' He cited proposals to end collective Indigenous land titles — opening them to private sales — and to expand soy and cattle production in the east. Critics warn those moves would accelerate deforestation and weaken agencies tasked with curbing it. Local costs, global consequences Fromherz said environmental concerns are still viewed as secondary in Bolivia's politics, even as they shape the lives of millions. For Vos, the gap between rhetoric and reality is measured in disappearing rivers, vanishing fish and poisoned communities. 'People are really suffering,' Vos said. Alipaz says years of unmet commitments have left the Amazon´s communities doubtful that the election will bring significant change. 'What happens to us is that we are stripped of our territory, poisoned with smoke and mercury, and also deprived of the means of life such as water, soil, and food,' Alipaz said. 'The life of Indigenous peoples in Bolivia has gone from bad to worse. We will continue defending. It's not just our lives, it is our very existence that is at stake.' ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
How towering dominance of Bolivia's socialist party came tumbling down
Amid the almost monochrome landscape of bare-brick buildings in the high-altitude Bolivian city of El Alto, taller structures painted in garish colours and mirrored glass stand out, topped with giant statues of pop culture figures such as Batman and Iron Man. The extravagant structures are known as 'cholets', a blend of chalet and cholo, the term used for people of Indigenous roots who moved to urban areas while retaining their cultural traits. These buildings once symbolised the rise of a new Aymara bourgeoisie that emerged during the commodities boom that fuelled the natural gas exports in the early years of Bolivia's first Indigenous president, Evo Morales. Now, however, they have become a symbol of how the leftist Movimiento al Socialismo (Mas) lost support among its base – and has gone from hegemony to the brink of obliteration. After nearly 20 years of Mas government, the party's presidential candidate won just 3.16% of the vote in Sunday's election – only a whisker above the 3% threshold set by the electoral court for a party to remain eligible. Bolivia now faces a runoff vote in October between two rightwing candidates: the senator Rodrigo Paz Pereira and former president Jorge 'Tuto' Quiroga. Meanwhile, after winning two-thirds of Congress in past elections, preliminary estimates suggest Mas will now have only one member of the lower house and no senators. 'I voted for Mas in the past, but this time I chose the right,' said Ronnyxh Oliver Mamani Figueredo, 34, an Aymara carpenter and pharmacy owner who has a seven-storey, Knights of the Zodiac-themed cholet that cost more than $1m. Figueredo is still repaying the construction loans, but amid Bolivia's worst economic crisis in four decades, he has been forced to cut the rental price of the building's 400-capacity event hall from 5,000 bolivianos (£540) to 2,500 (£270). He voted for the centre-right business tycoon Samuel Doria Medina, who ended up in third place. 'The majority of cholet owners I speak to no longer support Mas,' said Figueredo. A similar impression comes from Ramiro Sirpa, 47, a sought-after sculptor of the giant fibreglass statues that adorn the fronts of the cholets and cost between 25,000 and 60,000 bolivianos. 'The cholet owners tell me that at the start of Mas's government, they were doing well, but in recent times it has been total disappointment,' he said. Gonzalo Chávez Álvarez said that, even though they were seen as Mas's natural constituency, many Indigenous businessmen were never socialists. 'They always followed a popular, cutthroat capitalism,' he said. 'Once Mas began to get in the way of business, the support evaporated.' While analysts recognise the many social advances that took place under Mas, they say the causes of the party's decline are wide-ranging and have gathered momentum over the years – particularly after Bolivia's natural gas reserves dwindled in the final years of Morales's presidency. A common criticism is that the party failed to use the energy boom years to invest in other sectors, instead spending on controversial projects such as the new presidential palace, which cost $34m in 2018. Public trust was eroded by a string of corruption scandals, environmentally controversial projects, authoritarian-style control – and above all, the recent deep economic crisis of fuel and dollar shortages and soaring inflation. 'Mas has been knocked out,' said the political analyst Daniel Valverde. 'But it was the obstinate fratricidal war between Morales and [outgoing] President Luis Arce that destroyed them,' he added. Morales sought a fourth term that was widely seen as unconstitutional in 2019. On election night, he was ahead but not by enough to win outright; after a blackout, the resumed count showed him as the winner. The country erupted in violent protests, he resigned and fled the country. A new election was held in 2020. Morales's former finance minister, Arce, was chosen to stand for Mas and won. Morales returned, but soon fell out with Arce after failing to wield the influence he wanted. The party split, and by 2023 the rupture was clear when Morales announced plans to run in this year's elections; Arce blocked him and seized control of Mas. In the meantime, a case that had surfaced during the 2019 campaign re-emerged: Morales was accused of fathering a child with a 15-year-old girl – an act that, under Bolivian law, constitutes statutory rape. A prosecutor reopened the case in 2024 and issued an arrest warrant for Morales, who has since remained in the coca-growing Chapare region, shielded by hundreds of growers preventing his detention. Asked last week why police had not enforced the warrant, Arce told the Guardian: 'If the Bolivian police go ahead with the arrest, how many Bolivians will die? Is it worth many others dying for one person?' Barred from running under another party by constitutional and electoral court rulings, Morales called on his supporters to cast blank votes, which ended up far higher than the historic average of under 5%, reaching 19%. In Cochabamba, where the Chapare is located, blank votes reached 32.8%, more than those cast for Paz Pereira, who received 28.6%. But in other regions where Mas had also historically prevailed, such as El Alto, Paz Pereira, a senator and the son of a former president, came out on top. 'Paz Pereira was the only candidate who reached out to deep Bolivia – artisans, small business owners, farmers, transport workers – and who tried to forge alliances with popular sectors,' said analyst Valverde, noting that in the past it was Mas that managed to connect with these groups. 'Mas risks disappearing if it doesn't reinvent itself and make the mea culpa it has long resisted,' he added.
Reuters
7 hours ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: Judge in US crosshairs warns Brazil banks not to apply sanctions locally
BRASILIA, Aug 20 (Reuters) - Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who recently had sanctions imposed on him by the U.S. government, told Reuters that courts could punish Brazilian financial institutions for seizing or blocking domestic assets in response to U.S. orders. Those remarks raise the stakes in a standoff that has hammered shares of Brazilian banks caught between U.S. sanctions and the orders of Brazil's highest court. In a late Tuesday interview from his office in Brasilia, Moraes granted that U.S. law enforcement regarding Brazilian banks that operate in the United States "falls under U.S. jurisdiction." "However, if those banks choose to apply that law domestically, they cannot do so — and may be penalized under Brazilian law," he added. His remarks underscore the potential consequences of a Monday ruling by fellow Supreme Court Justice Flavio Dino, who warned that foreign laws cannot be automatically applied in Brazil. That ruling was followed by a sharp rebuke from the U.S. State Department's Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs, which warned on social media hours later that Moraes was "toxic" and that "non-U.S. persons must tread carefully: those providing material support to human rights abusers face sanctions risk themselves." The U.S. Treasury Department slapped the sanctions on Moraes last month under the Global Magnitsky Act, a law designed to impose economic penalties on foreigners deemed to have a record of corruption or human rights abuse. The order accused him of suppressing freedom of expression and leading politicized prosecutions, including against former President Jair Bolsonaro, a staunch Trump ally on trial before Brazil's Supreme Court on charges of plotting a coup to reverse his loss in the 2022 election. Bolsonaro has denied any wrongdoing and denounced the case as politically motivated. In his interview, Moraes said decisions by foreign courts and governments can only take effect in Brazil after validation through a domestic process. He said it is therefore not possible to seize assets, freeze funds or block the property of Brazilian citizens without following those legal steps. The global reach of the U.S. financial system means foreign banks often restrict a wider range of transactions to avoid secondary sanctions. Moraes said he was confident that the sanctions against him would be reversed via diplomatic channels or an eventual challenge in U.S. courts. But he acknowledged that for now they had put financial institutions in a bind. "This misuse of legal enforcement places financial institutions in a difficult position — not only Brazilian banks, but also their American partners," he said. "That is precisely why, I repeat, the diplomatic channel is important so this can be resolved quickly - to prevent misuse of a law that is important to fight terrorism, criminal organizations, international drug trafficking and human trafficking," he added. The U.S. State Department did not immediately respond to request for comment. Moraes had "engaged in serious human rights abuse," said a Treasury Department spokesperson. "Rather than concocting a fantasy fiction, de Moraes should stop carrying out arbitrary detentions and politicized prosecutions." The clash could have serious consequences for Brazilian financial institutions, said two bankers in Brazil, who requested anonymity to discuss the matter candidly. Most large banks are supervised by the U.S. government in some way due to their international presence or exposure, either through a foreign branch or issuance of foreign securities, said the former director of an international bank in Brazil. The choice for these banks, under pressure from the U.S., may be to invite sanctioned clients to seek a different institution to keep their assets, the banker added. The director of a major Brazilian bank said that, in practice, Monday's court ruling means any action taken by Brazilian banks based on rules involving the U.S. Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control, which oversees U.S. sanctions, will need approval from Brazil's Supreme Court. At the same time, he added, failing to comply with an OFAC decision could cut a bank off from the international financial system. "Brazil doesn't really have a choice," said the banker. "Given how interconnected everything is, and the disparity in economic power between the U.S. and Brazil, we're left in a position of subordination. There's not much we can do." He stressed that the court would need to come up with a solution "that doesn't put the financial system at risk." Shares of state-run lender Banco do Brasil, where most federal officials including judges receive salaries, fell 6% on Tuesday, the largest drop among Brazil's three biggest banks. The bank said in a Tuesday statement it was prepared to deal with "complex, sensitive" issues involving global regulations.
