Cheniere Energy reports jump in second-quarter profit on strong LNG demand
The U.S. is the world's largest exporter of liquefied natural gas and had shipped 11.9 billion cubic feet per day (bcfpd) of the supercooled fuel in 2024.
Commercial activity in the sector has gained further momentum after U.S. President Donald Trump lifted a moratorium on new LNG export permits after taking office in January.
The country exported 884.1 bcf of LNG in April and May, compared with 671.5 bcf from a year earlier, according to U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) data.
The company's LNG revenue was at $4.52 billion in the quarter, compared with $3.04 billion a year earlier.
The company reported net income attributable to Cheniere of $1.63 billion, or $7.30 per share, for the quarter ended June 30, compared with $880 million, or $3.84 per share, a year ago.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
a few seconds ago
- Daily Mail
Experts reveal the mortgage number that could save US housing market
The housing market is under strain with prices falling as families are unwilling to move and refinance their mortgages at current rates. However, a glimmer of hope arrived when the average daily mortgage rate fell to 6.57 percent on Monday — the lowest in 10 months — according to a new report from Redfin. However, experts have revealed that it will take much lower rates to revive the flagging market. Nationwide mortgage rates would have to fall more than two percent to 4.43 percent to make the typical home affordable for a median-income family, a new report from Zillow claims. The analysis defined affordable monthly payments to be less than 30 percent of a household's income, and assumed a 20 percent down payment. The two percentage point drop would make cities such as Dallas, New Orleans and Nashville affordable, according to the study. On the other hand cities with extortionately high housing costs - such as New York, Los Angeles and Miami - would not become affordable even if rates fell to 0 percent. On the other end of the spectrum areas of the US where home prices are much lower would remain affordable even if rates climbed higher than they are now. For example, the report cites Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania where the average home is $244,928 compared to the national average of $369,147. A median-income family could still buy a home there even if rates jumped to 9 percent, Zillow found. Birmingham Alabama, Detroit, Michigan and Buffalo, New York are also areas that would remain affordable if rates surged above 7 percent again. Even with rates falling Zillow expects prices to end the year two percent lower than the start. 'That small decline won't be much of a setback to most homeowners' equity following the 49 percent increase since 2019,' Zillow economist Anushna Prakash wrote. 'It also won't move the needle very far for first-time buyers priced out of the market,' she explained. 'Home prices and/or mortgage rates would need to drop by massive amounts to make a typical home affordable for a median-income family.' Prakesh added that those waiting for a price crash large enough to make buying affordable shouldn't hold their breath. Without an alarming slowdown in economic growth and a rise in the unemployment rate a correction is unlikely. Investors are now waiting with bated breath to see if the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates at its September meeting. Fed chair Jerome Powell has provoked the wrath of Trum p by continuing to hold benchmark rates between 4.25 and 4.5 percent. The most recent jobs report showed hiring growth dropped dramatically last month and unemployment ticked up , a key metric that may entice the Fed to cut rates. Non-farm payrolls added 73,000 in July, far lower than the 100,000 expected by analysts. The unemployment rate also ticked up to 4.2 percent. Last year the 'Oracle of Wall Street' Meredith Whitney told the Daily Mail that rates need to drop below 6 percent to get the market moving .
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
BP defies Ed Miliband to reopen North Sea oil field
BP is to reopen a key North Sea field and pump new oil and gas for at least a decade, despite Ed Miliband's attempts to cut back the offshore industry. The energy giant is reviving the Murlach field, which was declared uneconomic and taken out of use in 2004, has now become viable partly due to new technologies. BP won agreement to reopen Murlach, 120 miles east of Aberdeen, under the previous government and has since been installing equipment, with production potentially restarting next month. The milestone comes despite efforts by the Energy Secretary to bring an end to new fossil fuel production in the North Sea. Mr Miliband and his predecessors have almost doubled the taxation rate on oil and gas profits and banned the issuing of licences for new exploration and production. BP said the Murlach field contained 20 million barrels of recoverable oil and 600 million cubic metres of gas – enough to keep it in production for 11 years. 'Murlach is expected to produce around 20,000 barrels of oil and 17 million cubic feet of gas per day,' it said. It means BP can partially reverse the decline in North Sea output, which has seen oil production fall from 96,000 barrels per day in 2020 to 70,000 last year. Gas production has fallen from 221m square feet a day to 197m. North Sea 'on death's door' The move has infuriated environmental campaigners, who say BP and other energy companies should leave oil and gas in the ground. Dr Doug Parr, Greenpeace UK's policy director, said: 'The North Sea is on death's door. Reserves are drying up and what's left and untapped is barely enough to keep it on life support. The only sensible thing to do is to pivot [from] the North Sea to something we have an abundance of, and something that will never run out – wind.' BP's success at Murlach follows a similar story at Shell, which restarted production from its Penguins oil field north of Shetland earlier this year – despite Greenpeace protesters boarding its new production vessel. The field went into production in 2003 but had to be shut down in 2021 when the Brent Charlie production platform was decommissioned. Production restarted this year with Shell expecting 45,000 barrels a day once in full flow. Mike Tholen, of trade body Offshore Energies UK, said: 'Redevelopment of decommissioned fields is now a feature of the North Sea as new and innovative technologies make such opportunities possible. 'Looking ahead, the independent Climate Change Committee says the UK will need 13 billion to 15 billion barrels by 2050 come what may. We could produce half of this at home. But at the moment only four billion barrels are on track to be realised, which means imports will have to rise and the UK economy will miss out as jobs and capital move overseas.' Recent research from the North Sea Transition Authority, the Government's oil and gas regulator, found that there were over three billion barrels of oil and gas in fields already in production – with another six billion in known potential developments. Another 3.5 billion barrels of potential resources have been tentatively identified as exploration targets. Abandoned oil and gas fields could offer some of the richest opportunities. Robin Allan, chairman of BRINDEX, which represents the UK's smaller independent oil and gas producers, said: 'There are significant oil and gas reserves and resources left in the UK North Sea but output is declining largely because of government policy, not geology. 'We need a policy which incentivises oil and gas exploration and production. The windfall tax should be removed immediately and the ban on exploration removed.' A spokesman for Mr Miliband said: 'We are committed to delivering the manifesto commitment to not issue new licences to explore new fields because they will not take a penny off bills, cannot make us energy secure, and will only accelerate the worsening climate crisis. 'We are delivering a fair and orderly transition in the North Sea, with the biggest ever investment in offshore wind and two first of a kind carbon capture and storage clusters.'
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Trump administration threatens to strip Harvard University of lucrative patents
The latest phase of the Trump administration's offensive against Harvard University is a comprehensive review of the university's federally funded research programs, and the threat to strip the school's lucrative portfolio of patents. In a letter to the Harvard president, Alan Garber, posted online on Friday, Donald Trump's commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, accused Harvard of breaching its legal and contractual requirements tied to federally funded research programs and patents. Lutnick also said the commerce department has begun a 'march-in' process under the federal Bayh-Dole Act that could let the government take ownership of the patents or grant licenses. 'The Department places immense value on the groundbreaking scientific and technological advancements that emerge from the Government's partnerships with institutions like Harvard,' Lutnick wrote. He said that carried a 'critical responsibility' for Harvard to ensure that its intellectual property derived from federal funding is used to maximize benefits to the American people. Harvard did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Friday's letter ratchets up White House pressure on Harvard, which it has accused of civil rights violations for failing to take steps dictated by the administration in response to accusations that student protests against Israel's assault on Gaza were antisemitic. Harvard sued in April after the administration began stripping or freezing billions of dollars of federal research money. In his letter, Lutnick demanded that Harvard provide within four weeks a list of all patents stemming from federally funded research grants, including how the patents are used and whether any licensing requires 'substantial US manufacturing'. As of 1 July 2024, Harvard held more than 5,800 patents, and had more than 900 technology licenses with over 650 industry partners, according to the Harvard Office of Technology Development. Other universities faced with federal research funding losses have signed settlement agreements with the government, including Columbia University, which agreed to pay more than $220m, and Brown University, which agreed to pay $50m. Harvard's president reportedly told faculty that a New York Times report that the university was open to spending up to $500m to settle with the government was inaccurate and had been leaked to reporters by White House officials. The bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act was sponsored by senators Birch Bayh of Indiana and Bob Dole of Kansas and signed into law by Jimmy Carter near the end of his term. Carter said at the time it was important that industrial innovation promote US economic health, and the legislation 'goes far toward strengthening the effectiveness of the patent incentive in stimulating innovation in the United States'. Many civil rights experts, faculty and White House critics believe the Trump administration's targeting of schools for supposedly failing to address antisemitism is a pretext to assert federal control and threaten academic freedom and free speech.
