logo
Half of Americans dissatisfied with how much Epstein info government has released, CNN poll finds

Half of Americans dissatisfied with how much Epstein info government has released, CNN poll finds

CNN11 hours ago
Half of Americans say they are dissatisfied with the amount of information the federal government has released about the Jeffrey Epstein case, according to a new CNN poll conducted by SSRS in the days after the Justice Department released a memo saying there is no evidence the convicted sex offender kept a so-called client list or was murdered.
Almost no one is content with the amount the government has shared: Just 3% of Americans say they are satisfied with it. A sizable chunk of the public either says it doesn't matter to them either way (29%) or that they haven't heard enough about the case to say (17%).
Trump's most ardent supporters online have been in revolt since the Justice Department memo's release, even as the president has implored them to move on from Epstein and publicly backed Attorney General Pam Bondi.
The poll shows Republicans at large are less likely to say they are dissatisfied with the information shared than Democrats or independents. Overall, 56% of Democrats and 52% of independents say they are dissatisfied. Among Republicans, 40% are dissatisfied. Nearly as many Republicans say it doesn't matter to them either way (38%), a larger group than the roughly one-quarter who felt that way among Democrats (27%) or independents (26%).
That follows a pattern going back to Trump's first term: Polling has often found large shares of Republicans saying they don't know or don't care about a particular issue when a Trump position has proved broadly unpopular.
Epstein was a disgraced financier and convicted sex offender whose criminal case has long captured significant public attention in part because of his ties to wealthy and high-profile people. In August 2019, while he was awaiting trial in a federal criminal case, Epstein was found unresponsive in his New York City jail cell. He was taken to a hospital, where he was pronounced dead. His death was ruled a suicide.
The death was heavily scrutinized, and during his 2024 campaign, Trump said he would consider releasing additional government files on the case. Many of the president's supporters hoped that release would implicate other high-profile figures or undercut the notion that Epstein killed himself. But FBI Director Kash Patel, who suggested before taking office that there was hidden evidence, has since said Epstein committed suicide. And Bondi denied the existence of an Epstein 'client list' despite answering a question in an earlier interview about whether a list would be released by saying it was on her desk to review.
Men express deeper dissatisfaction with the information released than women (55% vs. 45%). Younger Americans are more likely to be dissatisfied than are older people (56% younger than 35 say they are dissatisfied vs. 47% among those age 35 or older).
There are divides within both parties that suggest dissatisfaction with what's been released on Epstein links the far ideological ends on each side.
Very conservative Republicans and Republican-leaning independents are far more likely to be dissatisfied than are those who consider themselves somewhat conservative (48% vs. 40%). At the same time, Democratic-aligned liberals are also more likely than moderates or conservatives who at least lean toward the party to express dissatisfaction (70% vs. 52%).
And in both parties, independents who lean toward either party are more dissatisfied than are self-identified partisans: 68% of Democratic-leaning independents are dissatisfied and 53% of Republican-leaning independents are dissatisfied. In both cases, dissatisfaction among independents leaning toward a party outpaces dissatisfaction among self-identified partisans by double digits.
The CNN poll was conducted by SSRS from July 10-13 among a random national sample of 1,057 US adults drawn from a probability-based panel. Surveys were either conducted online or by telephone with a live interviewer. Results among all adults have a margin of sampling error of ±3.5 percentage points.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

North Texas mom seeks help to identify "Peeping Tom" seen at teen daughter's window
North Texas mom seeks help to identify "Peeping Tom" seen at teen daughter's window

CBS News

time5 minutes ago

  • CBS News

North Texas mom seeks help to identify "Peeping Tom" seen at teen daughter's window

An East Plano mom said a "Peeping Tom" has shown up at her teenage daughter's window at least 10 times over the past few months. She's gone to the police and is now asking for the public's help in identifying him. Nedra Bounds said that at first, it was a man's face suddenly appearing in her 13-year-old daughter's window, then he started to linger. "He'll come, he's stumbling drunk," she said. "He's clearly at this point targeting her." Determined to protect her daughter, she installed blackout curtains, floodlights, and additional security cameras, hoping it would scare him off. "We've made about four to five phone calls to police at this point, and it just keeps escalating," she said. Bounds said the man exposed himself. "That's really the most concerning thing is that is that he's been caught with his pants down, he's seeking her window," she said. "She's a little girl. She doesn't want to think about those things." Bounds posted a picture of the man on social media, hoping someone would be able to identify him. She said the response has been overwhelming. "Everybody is just, 'I'll give you a camera,'" she said. "'Can I bring you a camera?' 'I'll sit outside your house.'" Plano police confirm they're investigating and detectives are reviewing the videos of the man.

The GENIUS Act Killed Yield-Bearing Stablecoins. That Might Save DeFi
The GENIUS Act Killed Yield-Bearing Stablecoins. That Might Save DeFi

Yahoo

time7 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The GENIUS Act Killed Yield-Bearing Stablecoins. That Might Save DeFi

Congress may pass the most consequential crypto law of the decade this week while drawing a bright red line through one of DeFi's murkiest gray areas: yield-bearing stablecoins. At first glance, the GENIUS Act appears to be a straightforward regulatory win. It will finally grant over $120 billion in fiat-backed stablecoins a legal runway, establishing clear guardrails for what qualifies as a compliant payment stablecoin. But dig into the details and it becomes clear this isn't a broad green light. In fact, under the law's rigorous requirements—segregated reserves, high-quality liquid assets, GAAP attestations—only about 15% of today's stablecoins would actually make the cut. More dramatically, the Act explicitly bans stablecoins from paying interest or yield. This is the first time U.S. lawmakers have drawn a hard line between stablecoins as payment instruments and stablecoins as yield-bearing assets. Overnight, it turns decades of crypto experimentation on its head, pushing DeFi to evolve or risk sliding back into the shadows. For years, DeFi tried to have it both ways: offering 'stable' assets that quietly generated returns, while dodging securities treatment. The GENIUS Act ends that ambiguity. Under the new law, any stablecoin paying yield, whether directly through staking mechanics or indirectly via pseudo-DeFi savings accounts, is now firmly outside the compliant perimeter. In short, yield-bearing stablecoins just got orphaned. Congress frames this as a way to protect U.S. banks. By banning stablecoin interest, lawmakers hope to prevent trillions from fleeing traditional deposits, which underwrite loans to small businesses and consumers. Keeping stablecoins yield-free preserves the basic plumbing of the U.S. credit system. But there's a deeper shift underway. This is no longer just a compliance question. It's a total rethink of collateral credibility at scale. Under GENIUS, all compliant stablecoins must be backed by cash and T-bills with maturities under 93 days. That effectively tilts crypto's reserve strategy toward short-term U.S. fiscal instruments, integrating DeFi more deeply with American monetary policy than most people are ready to admit. We're talking about a market currently around $28.7 trillion in outstanding marketable debt. Concurrently, the stablecoin market exceeds $250 billion in circulation. Therefore, even if just half of that (about $125 billion) pivots into short-term Treasuries, it represents a substantial shift, pushing crypto liquidity directly into U.S. debt markets. During normal times, that keeps the system humming. But in the event of a rate shock, those same flows could reverse violently, triggering liquidity crunches across lending protocols that use USDC or USDP as the so-called 'risk-free leg.' It's a new type of monetary reflexivity: DeFi now moves in sync with the health of the Treasury market. That's both stabilizing and a fresh source of systemic risk. Here's the irony: by outlawing stablecoin yield, the GENIUS Act might actually steer DeFi in a more transparent, durable direction. Without the ability to embed yield directly into stablecoins, protocols are forced to build yield externally. That means using delta-neutral strategies, funding arbitrage, dynamically hedged staking, or open liquidity pools where risk and reward are auditable by anyone. It shifts the contest from 'who can promise the highest APY?' to 'who can build the smartest, most resilient risk engine?' It also draws new moats. Protocols that embrace smart compliance, through embedding AML rails, attestation layers, and token flow whitelists, will unlock this emerging capital corridor and tap institutional liquidity. Everyone else? Segregated on the other side of the regulatory fence, hoping shadow money markets can sustain them. Most founders underestimate how quickly crypto markets reprice regulatory risk. In traditional finance, policy shapes the cost of capital. In DeFi, it will now shape access to capital. Those who ignore these lines will watch partnerships stall, listings vanish, and exit liquidity evaporate as regulation quietly filters out who gets to stay in the game. The GENIUS Act isn't the end of DeFi, but it does end a certain illusion that passive yield could simply be tacked onto stablecoins indefinitely, without transparency or trade-offs. From here on out, those yields have to come from somewhere real, with collateral, disclosures, and rigorous stress tests. That might be the healthiest pivot decentralized finance could make in its current state. Because if DeFi is ever going to complement, or even compete with, traditional financial systems, it can't rely on blurred lines and regulatory gray zones. It has to prove exactly where the yield comes from, how it's managed, and who bears the ultimate risk. The GENIUS Act just made this law. And in the long run, that could be one of the best things to ever happen to this industry.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store