
Land swaps with Russia are not only unpopular in Ukraine. They're also illegal
That's why President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has categorically rejected any deal with Moscow that could involve ceding land after U.S. President Donald Trump suggested such a concession would be beneficial to both sides, ahead of his meeting Friday with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska.
Zelenskyy said over the weekend that Kyiv 'will not give Russia any awards for what it has done,' and that 'Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier.' The remarks came after Trump said a peace deal would involve swapping of Ukrainian territories by both sides 'to the betterment of both.'
For Zelenskyy, such a deal would be disaster for his presidency and spark public outcry after more than three years of bloodshed and sacrifice by Ukrainians. Moreover, he doesn't have the authority to sign off on it, because changing Ukraine's 1991 borders runs counter to the country's constitution.
For now, freezing the front line appears to be an outcome the Ukrainian people are willing to accept.
A look at the challenges such proposals entail:
Russia occupies about a fifth of Ukraine, from the country's northeast to the Crimean Peninsula , which was annexed illegally in 2014.
The front line is vast and cuts across six regions — the active front stretches for at least 1,000 kilometers (680 miles) — but if measured from along the border with Russia, it reaches as far as 2,300 kilometers (1,430 miles).
Russia controls almost all of the Luhansk region and almost two-thirds of Donetsk region, which together comprise the Donbas, as the strategic industrial heartland of Ukraine is called. Russia has long coveted the area and illegally annexed it in the first year of the full-scale invasion, even though it didn't control much of it at the time.
Russia also partially controls more than half of the Kherson region, which is critical to maintain logistical flows of supplies coming in from the land corridor in neighboring Crimea, and also parts of the Zaporizhzhia region, where the Kremlin seized Europe's largest nuclear power plant.
Russian forces also hold pockets of territory in Kharkiv and Sumy regions in northeastern Ukraine, far less strategically valuable for Moscow. Russian troops are gaining a foothold in the Dnipropetrovsk region. These could be what Moscow is willing to exchange for land it deems more important in Donetsk, where the Russian army has concentrated most of its effort.
'There'll be some land swapping going on. I know that through Russia and through conversations with everybody. To the good, for the good of Ukraine. Good stuff, not bad stuff. Also, some bad stuff for both,' Trump said Monday.
Ukrainian forces are still active in the Kursk region inside Russia, but they barely hold any territory there, making it not as potent a bargaining chip as Kyiv's leaders had probably hoped when they launched the daring incursion across the border last year. Swapping Ukrainian controlled territory in Russia, however minuscule, will likely be the only palatable option for Kyiv in any land swapping scenario.
Surrendering territory would see those unwilling to live under Russian rule to pack up and leave. Many civilians have endured so much suffering and bloodshed since pro-Moscow forces began battling the Ukrainian military in the east in 2014 and since the full-scale invasion in 2022.
From a military standpoint, abandoning the Donetsk region in particular would vastly improve Russia's ability to invade Ukraine again, according to the Washington-based think tank Institute for the Study of War.
Bowing to such a demand would force Ukraine to abandon its 'fortress belt,' the main defensive line in Donetsk since 2014, 'with no guarantee that fighting will not resume,' the institute said in a recent report.
The regional defensive line has prevented Russia's efforts to seize the region and continues to impede Russia's efforts to take the rest of the area, ISW said.
Ukraine's constitution poses a major challenge to any deal involving a land swap because it requires a nationwide referendum to approve changes to the country's territorial borders, said Ihor Reiterovych, a politics professor in the Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv.
'Changes in territorial integrity can be done only by the decision of the people — not the president, the cabinet of ministers or the parliament can change it,' he said. 'In the constitution it is written that only by referendum can changes to Ukraine's territory be conducted.'
If during negotiations Zelenskyy agrees to swap territory with Russia, 'in the same minute he will be a criminal because he would be abandoning the main law that governs Ukraine,' Reiterovych said.
Trump said he was 'a little bothered' by Zelenskyy's assertion over the weekend that he needed constitutional approval to cede to Russia the territory that it captured in its unprovoked invasion.
'I mean, he's got approval to go into a war and kill everybody, but he needs approval to do a land swap?' Trump added. 'Because there'll be some land swapping going on. I know that through Russia and through conversations with everybody.'
Zelenskyy is still trying to regain the people's trust that was damaged when he reversed course on a law that would have diminished the independence of Ukraine's anti-corruption watchdogs. The move was a red line for those citizens who are protective of the country's institutions and are suspicious of certain members of Zelenskyy's inner circle.
Analysts like Reiterovych dismiss a land swap as a distraction. Freezing the conflict along the current front line is the only option Ukrainians are willing to accept, he said, citing recent polls.
This option would also buy time for both sides to consolidate manpower and build up their domestic weapons industries. Ukraine would require strong security guarantees from its Western partners to deter future Russian aggression, which Kyiv believes is inevitable.
Still, freezing the conflict will also be difficult for Ukrainians to accept.
Along with the illegal annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the partial occupation of Luhansk and Donetsk after that, it would require accepting that the Ukrainian military is not able to retake lost territories militarily. Kyiv accepted its inability to retake these territories but never formally recognized them as Russian. A similar scenario could unfold in the new regions taken by Russian forces.
It also is not a viable long-term solution.
'It is the lesser evil option for everyone and it will not provoke protests or rallies on the streets,' Reiterovych said.
—-
Associated Press journalist Volodymyr Yurchuk contributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
a few seconds ago
- Fox News
If you're a mayor, the goal should be to make the city happy: Joey Jones
'The Five' co-hosts discuss the results of President Donald Trump's first night of cracking down on crime in Washington, D.C.


Fox News
20 minutes ago
- Fox News
Republicans ready to support Trump's move to skirt Congress in DC crime crackdown
President Donald Trump signaled he may skirt Congress to extend his takeover of the Washington, D.C., police, and some congressional Republicans are heeding the call. Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan., said he would vote for extending Trump's authority but didn't believe that Senate Democrats would budge and support giving the president more time. "I'm absolutely in favor of President Trump doing whatever he needs to do," Marshall told Fox News Digital. "Of course, we want to follow the Constitution, and I need to go back and read what he can do and not do, but I think it'll take a 60-vote threshold in the Senate to pass this resolution." The provision allows for the president to effectively federalize the local police force for up to 30 days, unless Congress, through a joint resolution, grants him an extension. But questions remain over whether that kind of resolution would hit the Senate's typical 60-vote threshold or if it could pass through a simple majority. Trump on Monday invoked a section of the Home Rule Act that governs the district to give himself the authority to take control of the Metropolitan Police Department and has since sent in National Guard troops, alongside FBI and DEA agents, to patrol the streets. Republicans control 53 seats in the upper chamber, meaning Democrats may be needed to grant Trump an extension beyond the 30-day window. But Trump, during a press conference Wednesday announcing new Kennedy Center honorees, said that he would be asking for "long-term extensions" and believed Democrats would not "do anything to stop crime." Trump also noted he may not need Congress. "Well, if it's a national emergency, we can do it without Congress," Trump said. "But we expect to be … before Congress, very quickly. "We're going to do this very quickly, but we're going to want extensions," he added. "I don't want to call a national emergency. If I have to, I will, but I think the Republicans in Congress will approve this pretty much unanimously." House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer, whose committee oversees the district, enthusiastically backed Trump's move to take control of D.C.'s police force Monday. When asked by Fox News Digital if he would back Trump leapfrogging Congress to continue his hold on the local police, a spokesman said, "We support the president's actions to complete the mission." Both Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., and House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., initially supported the president's move to crack down on crime in the district, which was spurred by a recent attack on a former Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) staffer. When asked for comment on Trump's latest remarks regarding an extension, Thune's office referred Fox News Digital to his previous statement on social media in which the GOP leader lauded the administration's move. "Washington, D.C., should be a place where people can safely live, visit, work, and raise a family, and [Monday's] announcement is a positive step in that direction," he said. Fox News Digital reached out to Johnson's office for comment but did not hear back. A clearer picture of where lawmakers stand will likely have to wait, given that they are out of town in their respective states and districts for much of the 30-day window. But the issue will likely be front of mind when they return after Labor Day. Still, Trump already has some public support from Republicans for extending his timeframe. Sen. Jim Banks, R-Ind., told Fox News Digital in a statement he fully supported "President Trump's plan to make D.C. safe again, and will back up his efforts in the Senate." And Sen. Mike Lee, who has a bill that would repeal the Home Rule Act and federalize the district, similarly would support extending the 30-day window, "with the ultimate goal of working with him to pass the BOWSER Act and restore full Congressional oversight of the city." "The safety and sanity of our nation's capital should not depend upon having good presidents in the Oval Office, but I'm glad we have one now," the Utah Republican told Fox News Digital in a statement.


The Hill
29 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump presses Nobel Peace Prize case: ‘The pressure's on'
President Trump is raking up global support in his push for a Nobel Peace Prize — garnering nominations from Pakistan, Cambodia, Israel and GOP lawmakers as he touts his role in talks to end various global conflicts. Friday may be Trump's biggest diplomatic test yet when he sits down with Russian President Vladimir Putin to talk about ending the war in Ukraine, something the president has struggled to settle between the two adversaries. But Trump has succeeded in other long-standing conflicts. The leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan, who have been at war over territory shared by their two countries for decades, floated a joint nomination for Trump when they visited the White House recently for a U.S.-brokered peace summit. The White House is publicly arguing it is 'well past time' Trump gets the prize. A source close to Trump World said the White House is 'very serious' about getting Trump the prize, adding that 'on the merits, it's pretty straightforward.' The list of those who agree has been growing. Pakistan nominated Trump for the prize for his mediation of a ceasefire between the country and India in May. After he ended another conflict between Cambodia and Thailand, the former said this month it would nominate Trump for the prize. Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) in March said he would nominate Trump for the award, and Rep. Buddy Carter (R-Ga.) nominated him in June, citing his role in brokering a ceasefire agreement between Iran and Israel. The award is given annually in December by the Norwegian Nobel Committee to someone who has worked to establish peace between nations. A former aide in Trump's first term said senior State Department officials have the Nobel Peace Prize in the back of their heads at all times, an idea that shapes how they think about the big picture. 'There's no question the pressure's on,' the former aide said. 'Trump sees this prize as the ultimate capstone to how history will remember him.' Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet lauded Trump's 'historic contributions to advancing world peace,' in an announcement this week on the Nobel nomination. Similarly, Pakistan praised Trump for 'pragmatic diplomacy and effective peace-building' when it nominated him. India has denied that Trump played a role in its military decisions. White House trade adviser Peter Navarro in July said Trump deserves a Nobel Prize specifically for restructuring the international trade environment with his aggressive tariff plan. And the president himself said he deserved the prize after a deal was announced in June to end the conflict between Rwanda and Congo. 'I'm not politicking for it. I have a lot of people that are,' Trump said Friday about the award. However, peace in two of the world's major wars — between Russia and Ukraine, and Israel and Hamas — has proven elusive for Trump, who set high expectations for his negotiating acumen. Trump has increasingly grown frustrated that he can't end the fighting in Ukraine after promising on the campaign trail to achieve peace 'on Day 1.' He has pulled various levers, like imposing new sanctions on Russia and sanctions on India for buying Russian oil. The White House has tempered expectations for the Trump-Putin meeting in Alaska on Friday, at times calling it a 'listening session.' Trump has said this week that he would know in a matter of minutes whether Putin was serious about a peace deal. The White House has also largely avoided predicting any deliverables. When it comes to Israel, Trump showed rare daylight with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during recent remarks in which he acknowledged the starvation in Gaza, vowing to increase aid. Netanyahu in July, on a visit to the White House, presented Trump with a letter he sent to the Nobel Prize committee. 'It's nominating you for the peace prize, which is well-deserved. And you should get it,' Netanyahu said. The two leaders have not always seen eye-to-eye in public over the war in Gaza, which like in Ukraine, has no end in site with several ceasefire proposals falling apart this year. Bill O'Reilly recently told NewsNation that Trump feels the Ukraine-Russia war is the key to his prize. 'I know exactly what Trump is aiming for. He would like to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize,' O'Reilly said on NewsNation's ' On Balance.' 'That may or may not happen. That's not the most honest organization over in Norway, but he wants to get this thing settled.' Other conservatives also questioned if the effort is worth it. 'Trump is obsessed with the Nobel Prize. He shouldn't be. He talks about a new type of leadership so why does he need an affirmation by a bunch of Norwegian progressives? He needs to decide whether he wants to Make America Great Again, or if he wants to be Jimmy Carter v. 2.0,' Michael Rubin, senior fellow with the conservative Washington think tank the American Enterprise Institute, told The Hill. Former President Carter was awarded the prize post-presidency, in 2002, for his work to find peaceful solutions to international conflicts. Former President Obama received the award in the first year of his presidency, in 2009, for his work to strengthen international diplomacy. Only two other presidents have won it — former President Wilson in 1920 and former President Theodore Roosevelt in 1906. Former Vice President Al Gore won it in 2007 for his work on combating climate change. 'Trump seems much more ideologically flexible than I think a lot of Republicans in D.C. would like him to be. And it's drive in pursuit of ego and the idea that he clearly wants to go down in history as some kind of celebrated deal-maker,' one former national security aide to former President Biden said. The former aide added, 'He promised to end the Russia-Ukraine war famously in 24 hours, failure. He inherited a ceasefire in Gaza, failure. That's fallen apart … he said he would try to get a nuclear deal with Iran, failure.' Marc Siegel, a professor of medicine at NYU Langone Health, argued in an op-ed this week that Trump deserves the prize for Operation Warp Speed, which got the COVID-19 vaccine off the ground at the end of his first term. On the foreign policy front, Trump has sought to bring an end to both erupting conflicts and long-simmering disputes. The White House on Friday touted the Armenia and Azerbaijan peace deal to end a decades-long conflict in the south Caucuses. At that event, the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan argued Trump would be worthy of the Nobel Prize for his efforts. 'I think President Trump deserves to have the Nobel Peace Prize. … We will promote for that,' Armenia Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. 'President Trump deserves the Nobel Peace Prize many times over – his direct involvement in major conflicts, leveraging tools from America's military might to our superior consumer market, has brought peace to decades-long wars around the world,' spokesperson Anna Kelly said, adding the 'success is exemplified' by the Azerbaijan-Armenia peace summit. 'The President's legacy is already cemented as Peacemaker-in-Chief, and he has received multiple nominations because America is respected again with him in office,' she said. The former Biden national security aide argued that the previous administration had done the vast majority of the groundwork in many diplomatic deals, adding that Trump 'parachuted in' to close them. 'I think he's interested in any deal he can slap his name on and say look what I got done,' the former aide said.