Two teenagers sentenced to nine years for the murder of Tristan Sherry
Two teenagers have been jailed for nine years each for the 'brutal' murder of gunman Tristan Sherry, who was beaten to death after he shot and fatally wounded gangland figure Jason Hennessy Snr in a busy restaurant on Christmas Eve two years ago.
Before their trial commenced last year, the High Court found that a law requiring that the pair face a mandatory term of life imprisonment should they be convicted and reach the age of 18 before their sentencing hearing was unconstitutional.
They are also the first two defendants to be sentenced after a landmark Supreme Court ruling earlier this year that a life sentence is not mandatory in the case of child murderers and should only be used in exceptional cases.
Three others, including Hennesy Snr's son, Brandon Hennessy (22), were jailed for a combined eight years and four months for violent disorder during the attack on Sherry.
READ MORE
David Amah (19) of Hazel Grove, Portrane Road, Donabate was convicted of murder following a trial at the three-judge, non-jury Special Criminal Court.
Mr Justice Kerida Naidoo today sentenced Amah to 12 years with the final three years suspended. He noted that Amah was 17 at the time of the offence and therefore is not subject to the mandatory term of life imprisonment for murder.
Mr Justice Naidoo said the offence did not involve any pre-planning and a probation report put Amah at a low risk of reoffending.
The judge imposed a similar sentence on an 18-year-old also convicted of murder but who cannot be named because he was a minor when he first came before the court.
Both Amah and the unnamed accomplice stamped on Tristan Sherry and stabbed him repeatedly. Their actions were deliberate, Mr Justice Naidoo said, and took place during a 'sustained and brutal attack on an unarmed, defenceless man lying on the ground'.
On Monday, Mr Justice Naidoo sentenced Brandon Hennessy of Sheephill Avenue, Dublin 15 to four-and-a-half years with the last six months suspended for one year. The judge accepted that the killing of his father was a mitigating factor in Hennessy's favour.
Jonas Kabangu (19) of Corduff Park, Blanchardstown, received a sentence of four years in prison with the final 12 months suspended for two years.
Mr Justice Naidoo sentenced the third violent disorder defendant, an 18-year-old who can't be named because he was a child when he came before the courts, to two years and four months, with the final year suspended for two years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Domestic abuse victims say their ordeals continue or even worsen despite family law proceedings
Adult and child victims of domestic abuse are being 'retraumatised' during family law proceedings, research suggests, with almost all those affected being subjected to abuse after separation and during court cases. While the prevalence of domestic violence and abuse (DVA) in all family law cases is disproportionately high, the Irish family law system as a whole 'is not sufficiently DVA informed or responsive', according to the research report. Women's Aid , which commissioned the research, said this 'systemic blind spot' left victims feeling disbelieved, silenced and at risk from further abuse. The study, which involved almost 440 victims of DVA, was carried out by Trinity College Dublin and University College Cork . READ MORE Victims described their experience of family law proceedings as 'horrific', 'retraumatising' and 'relentless', with one woman saying: 'It's essentially a stage for the abuse to continue.' The study argues that the courts and the family law system often operate under the 'flawed assumption' that once a couple separate then any violence or abuse is considered to be historical. 'This premise can lead to decisions and judgments that may not fully account for the ongoing risks or impacts of abuse on the victim-survivors, as it overlooks the possibility that abuse can continue even after separation,' it said. Among participants who were victims of DVA, 91 per cent of women and 93 per cent of men indicated that abuse continued or began post-separation and while proceedings were under way. 'The abuse never stopped after separation, it just changed,' one woman said. A common perception among participants was that perpetrators were able to 'play' the system to maintain control or cause disruption to inflict harm on former partners by repeat summoning or through multiple adjournments. Researchers found that the court's 'neutral stance' regularly failed to capture subtle, nuanced patterns of abuse. Most victims also indicated that forms of abuse such as coercive control, emotional abuse, financial abuse and stalking increased post-separation. Victims managing court-ordered access, meanwhile, reported intimidation and threats while handing their children over, with 78 per cent of victims experiencing ongoing problems or abuse connected with access arrangements. To avoid being charged with violating court-ordered access, victims were required to engage with their abuser, which 'frequently provided court-sanctioned opportunities for further abuse to occur'. Some women reported assaults, threats, intimidation and manipulation, while others perceived court-ordered access being used by abusers as an 'ongoing tactic of control and abuse'. Women also reported being wrongly accused of 'parental alienation' when they said their children did not wish to go on visits because of their experiences of DVA. A common theme arising from interviews with child participants was feeling unsafe during access or contact with their father, with a 14-year-old girl saying: 'You just don't know what he's going to do next.' Most children perceived their experiences as being discounted or disbelieved and their wishes being ignored throughout proceedings. Trinity College Professor Stephanie Holt, the chief investigator for the study, said it provided evidence and insights into a 'fundamentally flawed' family law system when dealing with victims of domestic abuse. 'The findings paint a predominantly negative picture of that journey through the family law system for adult and child victim-survivors of domestic violence and abuse,' she said. Sarah Benson, chief executive of Women's Aid, said while there were some examples of informed practices, it was 'completely inadequate when the system itself is not attuned and responsive to the tactics and impacts of domestic abuse post-separation'. Women's Aid is urging the Government to 'fundamentally reform' the family law system in a DVA-informed manner which would include compulsory domestic abuse training for all professionals.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Irish Army rangers risked their lives in boarding cargo ship carrying cocaine, court hears
Irish Army rangers put their lives at risk when they boarded the MV Matthew in treacherous weather while the crew of the vessel manoeuvred to evade capture, the Special Criminal Court has heard. Det Supt Keith Halley told a sentencing hearing on Tuesday that it took 'great bravery' to board the vessel, but despite the danger the rangers reacted quickly to prevent the 2.25 tonnes of cocaine on board from being destroyed by fire in September 2023. The court also heard an organised crime group in Dubai instructed the crew of the ship as it attempted to evade law enforcement and deliver the drugs to an Irish vessel. Despite repeated warnings from the Irish Naval Service, including warning shots, the person overseeing the operation told the crew to keep going and head for Sierra Leone, west Africa. READ MORE The original plan was that MV Matthew would deliver the drugs to a second ship, The Castlemore, but rough seas and technical difficulties caused the Irish vessel to miss the connection and it later run aground, with the two men on board winched on to the LE William Butler Yeats. Eight people were before the court on Tuesday for a sentencing hearing, having previously pleaded guilty to offences arising out of the seizure of an estimated €157 million worth of cocaine on board. Those appearing in front of the three-judge non-jury court were: Ukrainians Mykhailo Gavryk (32) and Vitaliy Vlasoi (33); Iranians Soheil Jelveh (52) and Saeid Hassani (39); Filipino Harold Estoesta (31); Dutch national Cumali Ozgen (50); Ukrainian national Vitaliy Lapa (62) and Jamie Harbron (31), of South Avenue, Billingham, in the UK. The court previously heard that while the MV Matthew was sailing under the flag of Panama, it was owned by a Dubai-based company known as Symphony Marine. It departed from Curacao, off the Venezuelan coast, and sailed across the Atlantic before arriving in Irish territorial waters. Det Supt Halley said he was working with the Drug and Organised Crime Bureau in 2023 and was part of a multinational effort to disrupt drug trafficking networks using intelligence reports from agencies around the world. Through that, the MV Matthew was identified as potentially being used to transport drugs across the Atlantic. The vessel used a technique called 'spoofing' to misrepresent its real location as it travelled from Venezuela and picked up the drugs at sea, using a crane to lift the heavy bales from one vessel to the other. On the afternoon of September 26th, 2023, the ship appeared to be heading for the open sea and a Naval Service commander took over the operation and issued several warnings. Mr Estoesta messaged the Naval Service saying they wanted to co-operate, but they were scared. To his crew he demanded they 'prepare for fire'. Det Halley said this was a clear instruction to destroy all the drugs. When the Army helicopter appeared, the MV Matthew began to manoeuvre to prevent the rangers from boarding. The movements of the ship made it almost impossible for the helicopter to position itself to allow for a safe boarding. Despite what they faced, the Army rangers boarded safely, saw the fire and put it out, Det Halley said. The sentencing hearing continues.
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Son is sentenced to life in prison for murdering his ill mother in her home
The brother of a man who murdered their ailing 58-year-old mother has told the Central Criminal Court that 'someone who should have protected' her had instead taken her life in the 'most cruel, violent and sadistic way possible'. In a victim impact statement on Tuesday, Angela Canavan's son Keith Canavan said his brother Nigel did not just take their mother's life, but had also tried to take her dignity in the way he had killed her 'using the one method she feared the most'. Keith also said his brother had 'portrayed her in the courtroom not as the woman she truly was, but as someone he could scapegoat to protect himself'. He said his mother always had a fear of anyone touching her neck and 'to think that this was the way she died in the one way she had a deep fear of' was 'unthinkable' and 'beyond comprehension' to him. READ MORE Keith said Nigel had denied their mother 'even the smallest grace, both in her final moments and in how he spoke about her after'. In his statement, Keith also said that anyone who would have known Nigel would have known how much he loved their mother, but his actions had not shown love. Mr Justice Kerida Naidoo said Ms Canavan was a well-loved and accomplished person and he said it 'must be beyond any mother's darkest imaginings that they would die at the hand of the child they gave birth to'. Angela Canavan previously had a 'glittering career' as a psychotherapist. Photograph: On Tuesday Nigel Canavan (39) was sentenced to life imprisonment after he was convicted last month of murdering his mother. Desmond Dockery SC, defending, said the defendant's brother Keith had made a passing reference in his victim impact statement that despite the violence inflicted by Nigel on their mother, anyone who knew Nigel would have known how much he loved his mother. On May 16th, a jury convicted Nigel of murder, rejecting his claim he was provoked and defending himself from an attack by his mother, whom he strangled and smothered to death in her own home. Nigel claimed that stab wounds to each of Ms Canavan's thighs, one of which tracked to 13.5cm in depth, were self-inflicted by his mother, who the trial heard had a 'glittering career' as a psychotherapist before succumbing to alcoholism. Nigel also claimed he had acted in self-defence when his mother, who had a brain injury from a fall four years before her death, attacked him by swinging her open hands at him and trying to kick him. Taking the stand during his trial, Nigel further accused his mother of deliberately provoking him by calling him the 'worst son in the world' and saying during a heated argument how she wished she had never had him. The jury also rejected a suggestion by Nigel's defence that his mother's alleged insults so provoked him that he could be found guilty of manslaughter rather than murder. A pathologist found that, besides being strangled and smothered, Ms Canavan had suffered a laceration to the top of her head, bruises to her face, body, arms and legs and three broken ribs. Some injuries indicated she tried to defend herself from an attack, and bruises to her chest suggested she had been manhandled before her death, the court heard. Nigel, with an address at Erris Gardens, Crossmolina, Co Mayo, had pleaded not guilty to his mother's murder at her home in St John's Terrace, Sligo, on May 1st, 2023.
