The Who frontman Sir Roger Daltrey admits he's 'not going to be here much longer' in health update
The Who frontman Sir Roger Daltrey has admitted that he's 'not going to be here much longer' as he admitted some health battles in a new interview. The 81-year-old was recently embroiled in a row over the sacking of Ringo Starr's son Zak Starkey as drummer in The Who.
However in an interview in The Times Daltrey said he had more pressing health concerns, explaining that catching meningitis nine years ago is having a major health impact on him. And he added that he is suffering from 'incurable' macular degeneration, meaning he can't see autocues properly and described his sight as 'not good.
Firstly he spoke about his getting a Knighthood on the back of annual fundraising concerts at the Royal Albert Hall for Teenage Cancer Trust, which was set up in 1990 to provide specialist units for young people suffering from cancer.
He said he was delighted to help as long as he could as he's 'not going to be here much longer': 'Of course, but the honours system is in desperate need of updating. It's a weird club to be a part of and I'm not entirely comfortable with it.
"Still, I'm not going to be here much longer. If I live another ten years it will be way past anyone in my family, and it's important for Teenage Cancer Trust to continue. We were seeing teenagers put in wards alongside two-year-olds or geriatrics and the isolation was devastating. The environment of someone suffering from a serious illness is every bit as important as a good drug.'
He explained main problem is the effects of contracting meningitis nine years ago. 'It's done a lot of damage,' he says. 'It's buggered up my internal thermometer, so every time I start singing in any climate over 75 degrees I'm wringing with sweat, which drains my body salts. The potential to get really ill is there and, I have to be honest, I'm nervous about making it to the end of the tour.'
Wrking in a sheet metal factory in Acton when he was 16 might have destroyed his hearing at an early stage. At the Teenage Cancer Trust concert in March, he revealed that not only was he going deaf but he was losing his sight too. If he lost his voice, he told the audience, he would 'go the full Tommy'.
Unlike many rockers his age, Daltrey doesn't use an Autocue. 'There's no point. Can't f***ing see it!' he roars. How is his sight now? 'Not good,' he replies, from behind tinted shades. 'I've got an incurable macular degeneration.' All these years later, Daltrey is determined to rock until he drops, whether the Who keep touring or not. 'Never, never retire. You'll be dead in three years. Daytime TV will kill you.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
3 days ago
- ITV News
MPs to consider reduced drink-drive limit and compulsory tests for drivers over 70
The drink-drive limit may be reduced and drivers over the age of 70 may face mandatory tests as part of an overhaul of road safety laws. Ministers are set to consider whether compulsory eye tests should be introduced every three years for drivers over the age of 70 with people to be banned from driving if they fail, according to a report in The Times. The UK is one of only three European countries to rely on self-reporting of eyesight problems that affect driving. Under the reported plans being considered by Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander, the drink-drive limit in England and Wales will also be reduced to come into line with Scotland. The drink-drive blood alcohol limit is currently 0.05 per cent in Scotland, compared to 0.08 per cent in England and Wales. Ministers will also consider tougher penalties for uninsured drivers and people failing to wear a seatbelt. The proposals come amid concern about the number of people being killed or seriously injured on UK roads. Last year, 1,633 people were killed and almost 28,000 seriously injured in traffic incidents, costing the NHS more than £2 billion per year. The proposal, which is due to be published and consulted on in Autumn, is also expected to allow police to prosecute for drug-driving based on roadside saliva tests rather than blood tests.
Wales Online
6 days ago
- Wales Online
Man who shouted 'f*** the Queen' in front of her was blown away by response
Man who shouted 'f*** the Queen' in front of her was blown away by response John Davidson was awarded an MBE by the Queen in 2019, and he certainly made an impression during the ceremony, when he shouted "f*** the Queen" in front of her. Youth worker John Davidson had an unforgettable moment in July 2019 when he received an MBE from Her late Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. (Image: Samir Hussein, WireImagevia Getty Images) Youth worker John Davidson had an unforgettable moment in July 2019 when he received an MBE from Her late Majesty Queen Elizabeth II at Holyrood, but instead of a typical expression of thanks, he blurted out: "F*** the Queen!". John suffers from a severe form of Tourette's Syndrome, which is characterised by involuntary vocalisations and movements known as tics, which can include coughing, whistling, or in John's case, sudden swearing. You can read more about a student with Tourette's who struggles to gain control over her condition here. The campaigner shared with The Times: "The tic urge often comes when I'm anxious, stressed or tired." Stay informed on the latest health news by signing up to our newsletter here . John continued: "Then it's an exhausting mental battle telling myself, 'John, that's the absolute worst thing you could do in this moment,' and then trying not to do it." The gravity of the event at Holyrood Palace began to affect John almost as soon as he arrived. During a routine security check where police used mirrors to inspect for explosives under his car, John couldn't hold back and yelled: "A bomb! I've got a f***ing bomb!". Additionally, while walking through one of the palace's tapestry-lined corridors, he exclaimed: "I'm a paedo!" Despite these outbursts, Her Majesty remained composed. John recalled: "Her Majesty was very kind. She was as calm and assured as my granny. She was very good about it." Tourette's Syndrome campaigner John Davidson after receiving his MBE from Queen Elizabeth II during an Investiture ceremony at the Palace of Holyroodhouse in Edinburgh. (Image: PA) John first came into the public eye in 1989, featuring in a BBC TV documentary titled John's Not Mad, which significantly heightened awareness of Tourette's syndrome, though The Times noted it also sparked "nationwide playground mocking campaigns." A group of religious fanatics, having seen the programme, appeared at his home brandishing crucifixes, attempting to "exorcise the demon" they believed was responsible for John's involuntary outbursts. At the time, John was attending to his pet rabbit Snowy and remembers telling them: "Look, I need to deal with my rabbit so will you just f*** off?" making it clear that his words were driven by irritation rather than his condition. Despite some adverse reactions, John has been acknowledged as a "nationally known ambassador for the condition". He has collaborated with support organisations such as Tourette Scotland and the national charity Tourettes Action, visiting schools, giving talks, and running workshops on living with Tourette syndrome. His tireless advocacy efforts led to recognition from Her Majesty. "The MBE was the proudest moment of my life," he expressed. "I never thought I'd even have a life, let alone be able to help people and get recognised for it." John's contributions have been honoured through a book and an upcoming documentary film, both entitled "I Swear." His first meeting with the film's director, Kirk Jones, was notable for one of his spontaneous outbursts when he offered the filmmaker a cup of tea and abruptly declared: "I used spunk for milk." John's contributions have been honoured through a book and an upcoming documentary film, both entitled "I Swear." (Image: John Davidson) Article continues below
The National
6 days ago
- The National
Trans people face 'total ban from single-sex spaces under EHRC rules'
While services will not be compelled to provide single-sex spaces, The Times reported that trans people could be barred from accessing any that do exist – whether those spaces align with their birth sex or their acquired one. The difficulty stems from the fact that trans people will not be allowed to use facilities that align with their acquired gender – but can also be banned from using facilities that align with their birth sex if they look too much like their acquired gender. READ MORE: Trans toilet rules 'may force Scottish museums to close' Draft EHRC guidance states: 'For example, a trans man [who was born a female] might be excluded from the women-only service if the service provider decides that, because he presents as a man, other service users could reasonably object to his presence, and it is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim to exclude him.' The Times reported that the finalised guidance would have the same effect as this draft guidance. It will apply to organisations that provide public services, including shops, museums, gyms, prisons, and NHS departments, among others. The statutory guidance, which will have to be approved by Labour's Equalities Minister Bridget Phillipson, is further expected to say that trans people can be excluded from single-sex sports, and that people could object to trans people's 'presence' if they feel it is a vulnerable situation, such as changing clothes. Services will be allowed to request to see people's birth certificates to decide whether they are allowed in a single-sex space – but will have to tread carefully as doing so insensitively could be considered discrimination, The Times reported. However, services will also have to provide suitable facilities for trans people to use, meaning a separate space may be the only option many places have. The EHRC is facing a legal challenge over its draft guidance, with a full hearing due in November. Good Law Project, who are bringing the challenge, claim the EHRC guidance goes 'far beyond' the Supreme Court's ruling, which said in April that sex must be considered biological under the 2010 Equality Act. 'It amounts to a bathroom ban for trans people, violating people's right to privacy in their everyday lives,' Good Law Project said. READ MORE: EHRC changes guidance on single-sex toilets after legal challenge People have privacy rights under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which campaigners argue may be breached by having to reveal biological details to use the toilet. 'We'll be arguing in November that the EHRC was wrong to say employers can only provide gendered toilets based on 'biological sex', and wrong to ignore ways that companies and the public sector can provide trans inclusive men's and women's facilities,' Good Law Project said. The EHRC has also faced criticism for the speed at which it has consulted on its draft guidance, using artificial intelligence to sift through 50,000 representations at a reported rate of 1850 per day. A legal challenge against the short consultation period was thrown out in June. A spokesperson for the EHRC said: 'The code of practice has not yet been finalised. We received an extremely high volume of responses to the consultation and are grateful to everyone who shared their feedback. 'To ensure we give these responses the consideration they merit, we are working at pace to analyse them and are amending the draft code of practice text where necessary to make it as clear and helpful as possible. The news comes after a Scottish Government report found that negative media and political attention around trans people is impacting on gender healthcare, making it harder to recruit and retain staff. 'But our code will remain consistent with the law as set out by the Supreme Court.'
