It's time for a new American agenda
Acrimonious partisanship only deepens in Washington, DC, and our state capitols. Renewed calls for a third party are heating up, while Democrats plan to spend tens of millions of dollars to understand voters better, as if they had just discovered some new civilisation. It's like we're collectively stuck in the Tower of Babel, unable to understand one another and what we share in common, according to the Tribune News Service.
Yet when I engage with Americans of all political persuasions and backgrounds, I am struck by what we do hold in common. From the food bank employee in small-town Connecticut to the business owner in Northern California, to the librarian in suburban Florida, to the philanthropic leader in North Carolina, and everyday Americans all across this nation, the aspirations I hear people articulate form something akin to a new American agenda. Not a political party platform. Not a new think-tank treatise. Not a recipe for mass resistance. Not an excuse to stay on the sidelines or simply disengage altogether.
This is something fundamentally different and more hopeful. The Americans I meet want a new agenda. One that calls us to greatness. One that involves:
* Acknowledging our past and telling the truth about it, knowing that American history is complex and multifaceted* Ensuring basic needs like food, housing, and safety are met in ways that bring us together rather than being used as political wedges
* Focusing on concerns people are ready to work on, and which require shared action in our local communities, such as education and youth opportunities, senior care, affordable housing, loneliness and mental health, and belonging, among other things
* Safeguarding our most cherished civic assets, like libraries, museums, and public media
* Making our communities and the country work for all of us, not just some of us
* Finding ways to come together, even amid our real differences, to become builders, doers, creators, and innovators again
We have lost sight of the pursuit of this kind of greatness amid the distracting power of our toxic politics. With no meaningful alternative, we find ourselves held hostage, unable to move forward.
Meanwhile, our societal challenges continue to grow: a loss of control and agency in our civic lives, widespread mistrust, and too much hatred and bigotry. Furthermore, many of us can no longer discuss certain topics with one another, especially with our close friends and family. We live and work in fragmented and siloed ways. Our civic culture is atrophied, making it much harder to accomplish things together.
The trend lines on all these pain points date back decades. They aren't new. But they are accelerating. And they are amplified. Meanwhile, the issues people care deeply about — and which animate the agenda I outlined above — get pushed aside.
Moreover, no national or statewide legislation alone can address these issues. They demand local action. People intuitively know that. It's why I'm traveling the country this year on a civic campaign to show community after community how getting on a new civic path can help us reclaim these issues from a political frame and instead focus on what matters to people in their daily lives. This new civic path — not more divisive politics — is a practical and more hopeful way to activate this new American agenda, repair our broken civic culture, and restore our belief in one another and our nation.
In just the past month, I've visited a booming suburb in Florida, one of the poorest communities in North Carolina, a working-class community in Connecticut, one of the most diverse communities in all of New England, and multiple communities across Northern California, where literal militias still exist. I'm heading to Selma, AL, and communities throughout Maryland, Virginia, Georgia, and Ohio over the coming weeks.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Etihad
a day ago
- Al Etihad
Jordan to host Jordanian-Syrian-American meeting on Tuesday to discuss rebuilding of Syria
10 Aug 2025 17:37 CAIRO (Reuters)Jordan will host a Jordanian-Syrian-American meeting on Tuesday to discuss ways to support the rebuilding of Syria, Jordan's foreign ministry said in a statement on Sunday. The meeting will be attended by Syrian foreign minister Asaad Hassan Al-Shibani, US envoy to Syria Thomas Barrack and the US ambassador to Turkey, Jordan's foreign ministry added.
Gulf Today
a day ago
- Gulf Today
How is the US economy doing after Trump tariffs?
The June 2025 trade figures for imports and exports indicate that the imports have fallen substantially, and the exports inched up, and the resultant narrowing of trade deficit is to be seen as good news for the American economy. But the figures that are being highlighted are for a narrow period of time, and it has to be seen whether the trend will continue for a longer period. The overall trade gap came down to 16 per cent in June to $60.2 billion. The trade deficit in goods went down to 10.8 per cent, the lowest since September 2023. American exports of goods and services stood at $277.3 billion, down from $278 billion in May. The imports fell to $337.5 billion in the month of June, consumer goods fell by $8.4 billion, industrial supplies and materials by $2.7 billion, auto and parts by $1.3 billion. The reduced trade deficit is seen as a contributory factor to the rise in GDP. The economy has expanded by 3 per cent in the second quarter after contracting 0.5 per cent in the first. This looks like clutching at straws. The trade deficit with China came down to $9.5 billion, the lowest since 2004. Imports from China dropped to $18.9 billion, the lowest since 2009. China has been the main target of President Trump's tariff fury. The question remains as to whether by unleashing punitive tariffs against all the trade partners, has Trump strengthened the American economy? The jury is out on that issue. Inflation is slightly above the mandatory 2 per cent. People are feeling the pinch of inflation. Jobs have not grown. Trump realizes that there will be pain in the transition. He is promising that in the long term, his trade policy will make the American economy strong. Trade deficit has certainly declined because imports into the country have gone down. Is it because the countries that export to America have held back because of the high tariffs, or the demand in the American markets has gone down because the Americans were not willing to buy the higher prices caused by the higher tariffs? It looks like that both the United States and its major trading partners will have to adjust to the new conditions. Reducing trade deficit may be a good thing for a short period and range. If there is local demand, especially for the industries in terms of material inputs, then the American industries will suffer. Similarly, if the import of consumer goods has fallen steeply, either the domestic producers should benefit in the long term, or the American consumers will have to cut back on their needs. It is not possible for American producers to meet the domestic consumer demand, and the tariffs make the imports costlier for the American consumer. The consequences of high tariffs will play out gradually, and they cannot be seen immediately. The long-term effects of high tariffs are likely to be harmful than beneficial for international trade as well as domestic economies. There is no denying the fact that the tariff regime in the US has been liberal. The fact that the US is the most indebted country and this is being traced to the low tariffs and the flood of imports. The connection looks plausible but it is not accurate. The reason for American indebtedness is due to internal social and economic weaknesses. The limited educational levels of most Americans and the difficulty in employing them in frontier technology enterprises. The remedy for American problems does not exactly lie in high tariffs. It lies in the social sphere. And impromptu Trump solutions do not work.
Gulf Today
a day ago
- Gulf Today
DOJ's push to collect your data is a fishing expedition
With his approval rating sinking lower and lower, and facing the prospect of losing control of the House to Democrats, President Donald Trump is engaged in an unprecedented attempt to manipulate the midterm elections. Not only has he demanded that Texas redraw its congressional districts, he's now got Attorney General Pam Bondi and the Department of Justice embarking on another insidious strategy: Building a dossier of private information on every voter that Trump can use for political advantage. Over the past several weeks, the DOJ Civil Rights Division has sent letters to more than a dozen states demanding they hand over their voter lists, including sensitive private information — such as driver's license and Social Security numbers linked to names, home addresses and, in many cases, dates of birth. The DOJ is telling state election officials that it needs the data to check their compliance with the National Voter Registration Act and the Help America Vote Act — presumably to hunt for illegal voting — and it reportedly intends to contact all 50 states. But while federal law gives the Justice Department the ability to require states to put procedures in place to comply with those laws and remove ineligible voters from voter rolls, it doesn't give the federal government authority over election administration — and that includes reviewing and maintaining the rolls themselves, said David Becker, executive director of the Center for Election Innovation & Research. 'We're seeing an unprecedented effort to seize power that is not granted under the Constitution, to realign the balance of power between the executive branch and the judiciary and, especially, the states,' he said. There's another reason the DOJ may want the data. NPR reported recently that the administration is building a searchable national citizenship data system to be used by state and local election officials to root out noncitizen voting — something election experts say is an inconsequential problem. A report released last week from Becker's organisation concluded that in states that have investigated the issue, incidents of noncitizen voting are minuscule and random. By all indications, the DOJ data call is a massive fishing expedition. 'They are just looking for any kind of indication of wrongdoing or error that they can point to, to further fuel the federal government's intrusion into election administration,' said Jonathan Diaz, director of voting advocacy and partnerships at the Campaign Legal Center, a nonpartisan organisation that advocates for government accountability. Yet Michael Whatley, the Republican National Committee Chair, obliquely defended the effort as about 'election integrity' and trying to ensure 'safe and secure elections in key states.' That's obfuscation. It sounds to me — and to the election experts I've talked with from both parties — that this exercise isn't really about election integrity, but about laying the groundwork for a political strategy for the midterm elections. That strategy could take many frightening forms, the experts told me. Trump could suggest that states can't be trusted and use that to justify a state of emergency that allows him to seize control of state voting operations or suspend voting in certain states. (Never in American history have we suspended federal elections, Becker says — and that includes during wars, pandemics and natural disasters.) Or Trump could distort the voter data he collects and use it to continue to spread false claims and conspiracy theories about the security of US elections. One result of these conspiracies, as we've learned, is that many Americans distrust any election where their candidate loses. Even just collecting the data may scare some people into staying away from the polls. There are many people who might decide not to vote if they think federal access to their personal data could be used to intimidate them. What's especially troubling is that the DOJ's action could undermine the decentralised elections system 'that makes our elections so resilient and so resistant to things like foreign interference,' Diaz told me. The Constitution intentionally gives election administration exclusively to the states because 'the founders were very skeptical of a sort of all-powerful executive — having just thrown off the shackles of a king.' For states to comply with these letters, they would have to violate a federal law that prohibits the sharing of driver's license numbers and, in many cases, also violate their state constitutions. According to a list assembled by the National Conference of State Legislatures, many states have stricter privacy protections for their voter files than the federal government does. Another troubling development is that while states have developed strict protocols for protecting this information, the DOJ hasn't said how it will keep the data safe from hackers and cybersecurity breaches. The agency has an obligation to protect individuals, including elected officials, judges, domestic violence victims and others whose personal information is under a protective order or exempt from public disclosure and it owes the public an explanation for how it's going to handle the data if it gets it. Trump tried to intimidate states like this in his first term, when he created a special commission that told states to turn over their voter files so the federal government could audit them. Election officials forcefully pushed back. Members later admitted the group was set up to validate Trump's voter fraud claims. The commission was disbanded. This time, that resistance may be quieter, but election officials in both red and blue states appear to be defying the DOJ request and turning over only the parts of their voter files that are already public. In a letter to the DOJ, New Hampshire's Republican Secretary of State David Scanlan pointed to a state law that says the voter database 'shall be private and confidential' and not subject to any records requests. And Utah's Republican Lieutenant Governor Deidre Henderson told the Salt Lake City Tribune on Thursday that the state turned over its public voter list to federal officials, but 'if they want protected data, there's a process for government entities to request it for lawful purposes.' Then there's Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows, a Democrat, who said this week that her state law doesn't allow her to release the data and suggested Trump's DOJ 'go jump in the Gulf of Maine.' If Bondi has a good reason to force states to turn over the voter data, she should state the reason and ask Congress to change federal law to do it. Until then, every American should be concerned about the president trying to exercise power that he doesn't have so he can invade your privacy because you decided to vote.
