Teen accused of Phoenix Pride terror plot wants bond lowered from $1M
The teen accused of plotting a terror attack on a Phoenix Pride event wants his $1 million bond lowered.
Marvin Jalo's lawyer argued in Maricopa County Superior Court on Monday that not all the facts were presented during the initial bond hearing.
Jalo, 17, faces one count of providing assistance or direction to an act of terrorism and one count of organizing an act of terrorism.
Jalo expressed his intent to carry out an attack in October 2024 and mentioned receiving financial backing from 'Islamic State supporters," according to police. Maricopa County Attorney Rachel Mitchell in October said Jalo acquired materials to create an explosive device.
Albert Duncan, Jalo's attorney, said Monday that no evidence showed Jalo was directly affiliated with terror groups. Duncan also said the state's claims that Jalo owned volatile substances were misleading because the substances were hydrogen peroxide and acetone, common household products.
Jalo's life had been stabilizing since his online posts, Duncan said, explaining he worked at a grocery store and was attending school to become a barber before his arrest.
'I don't think the FBI or anyone contacted Albertsons to see if there had been any change of behavior, any specific behavior at his employment there," Duncan said. "He got reviewed while working there."
Superior Court Judge Joseph Kiefer indicated he was contemplating lowering the bond but expressed concerns about Jalo staying with his father.
'There are suggestions that the father may have certain leanings," Kiefer said. "There's a suggestion by the state that that may have influenced Marvin in some way."
Duncan contended that those suggestions were unreliable. They were made by Jalo's mother, who is divorced from Jalo's father, amid a family court case between the two, he said.
Maricopa County prosecutor Edward Leiter argued that new evidence from Jalo's search history showed he had been researching homemade explosives and ghost gun schematics as recently as September.
Leiter said the state was concerned about Jalo posting bond, as prosecutors believed he posed a serious risk to the community.
'If the court, as indicated, is leaning toward lowering the bond, it should be substantial,' Leiter said, advocating for any reduced bond to be a significant sum still.
Kiefer did not rule Monday but indicated he would by the end of the week.
This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: Marvin Jalo, accused of Phoenix Pride terror plot, wants bond lowered
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
26 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Judge strikes reference to Madigan's personal fortune of more than $40 million from sentencing record
A federal judge on Tuesday struck from the court record a reference to former Democratic House Speaker Michael Madigan's personal net worth of more than $40 million, agreeing with his defense team that it should have been kept private, even as the attorneys acknowledged the move was 'hollow' given that it was already widely publicized. U.S. District Judge John Robert Blakey said he didn't find any 'bad faith' on the part of the federal prosecutors who included the figure in a filing last week ahead of Madigan's highly anticipated sentencing on Friday, but found that common practice would be to file such personal information under seal. Blakey's ruling came before the attorneys delivered arguments over sentencing guidelines at the Dirksen U.S. Courthouse, technically kicking off the sentencing process. Blakey took the matter under advisement until Friday's hearing. Federal prosecutors made Madigan's net worth public for the first time in a response to a sentencing memorandum filed by his attorneys, arguing that the defendant's 'greed is even more appalling given his law firm's success.' Daniel Collins, an attorney for Madigan, called the inclusion of the former speaker's personal fortune improper and a 'gratuitous effort' to publicly identify his net worth. 'It is not necessary to include the number in order for the government to make an argument about greed,' Collins said. But Assistant U.S. Attorney Sarah Streicker countered to the judge that the defense left the door open by arguing in filings that Madigan was solely motivated by a desire to help people. She also said the figure is relevant as the government seeks a fine in the case. 'It's fair for the government to rebut that narrative and show the defendant was motivated by greed not need,' Streicker said. 'This is a defendant that enjoyed every advantage and significant financial wealth and still turned to bribery and fraud.' In February, Madigan was convicted of 10 of 23 counts, including marquee allegations that he agreed to squeeze lucrative, do-nothing contracts from ComEd for pals such as former Ald. Frank Olivo and Ald. Michael Zalewski and precinct captains Ray Nice and Edward Moody, all while the utility won a series of major legislation victories. Madigan was also convicted on six of seven counts — including wire fraud and Travel Act violations — regarding a plan to get former Ald. Daniel Solis, a key FBI mole who testified at length in the trial, appointed to a state board. Jurors deadlocked on all six counts related to Madigan's co-defendant former ComEd lobbyist Michael McClain.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration asks federal court not to dismiss charges against Milwaukee County judge
Protesters gather outside of the Milwaukee FBI office to speak out against the arrest of Milwaukee Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan (Photo by Isiah Holmes/Wisconsin Examiner) Prosecutors for the Trump administration filed a brief Monday requesting that a federal judge not dismiss the government's indictment against Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan. Dugan faces criminal charges after Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, along with agents from the Drug Enforcement Agency and FBI, arrived in the Milwaukee County Courthouse April 18 to arrest 31-year-old Eduardo Flores-Ruiz for being in the country illegally. Flores-Ruiz was set to appear in Dugan's courtroom that day for a status hearing on misdemeanor charges against him. When Dugan learned that the agents were outside her courtroom, she confronted them and learned they only had an administrative warrant, which was issued by an agency official and not a judge. An administrative warrant doesn't allow agents to enter private spaces in the courthouse such as Dugan's courtroom. Later, while the agents were waiting for Flores-Ruiz in the hallway outside the main courtroom door, Dugan sent him and his attorney out a side door into the hallway. One of the agents rode down the elevator with Flores-Ruiz and he was later arrested on the street. Dugan-DOJ-Filing Dugan was charged with concealing an individual to prevent arrest, a misdemeanor, and obstruction, which is a felony. Last month, Dugan's attorneys filed a motion to dismiss the case against her, arguing she was acting in her official capacity as a judge and therefore immune from prosecution for her actions and that the federal government is impinging on the state of Wisconsin's authority to operate its court system. The case drew national attention, with Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and FBI Director Kash Patel both making public statements about Dugan's arrest before she'd even been indicted. Legal experts have questioned the strength of the federal government's case and accused Trump officials of grandstanding to make a political point. In the Monday filing, federal prosecutors argued that dismissing the case would ignore previously established law that allows judges to face criminal charges. 'Such a ruling would give state court judges carte blanche to interfere with valid law enforcement actions by federal agents in public hallways of a courthouse, and perhaps even beyond,' the prosecutors argued. 'Dugan's desired ruling would, in essence, say that judges are 'above the law,' and uniquely entitled to interfere with federal law enforcement.' Dugan is set to appear for trial on July 21. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republican state AGs seek ‘game plan' from FBI, DOJ amid ‘growing wave of antisemitic domestic terrorism'
FIRST ON FOX – Republican attorneys general from at least 27 states want to coordinate a "game plan" with the FBI and the Department of Justice to "root out antisemitic domestic terrorism." Fox News Digital first obtained a copy of their letter to FBI Director Kash Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi on Tuesday requesting "assistance in the fight against antisemitic domestic terrorism in the United States." "We hope to meet with you personally to discuss ways that the states can support the excellent work of the FBI and partner with the Department of Justice to ensure those who are committing these egregious acts are held accountable to the fullest extent of the law," the letter, spearheaded by South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson, says. "Like you, we were horrified by the Hamas terrorist attacks against the people of Israel on October 7, 2023, and we are concerned with the increase in antisemitism that has unfolded since that fateful day," the state attorneys general wrote. "Domestic terrorists have become more emboldened to commit horrific crimes against Jews and supporters of Israel since October 7, and our collective response will impact the trajectory of that development." Trump Says Boulder Terror Attack 'Will Not Be Tolerated,' Deportations Must Continue The letter references how two staff members of the Israeli Embassy in Washington, D.C., were shot and killed outside the Lillian & Albert Small Capital Jewish Museum on May 21. The victims – 30-year-old Yaron Lischinsky and 26-year-old Sarah Milgrim – were leaving an event hosted by the American Jewish Committee when they were attacked. The couple was reportedly set to be engaged. Read On The Fox News App The alleged gunman, 31-year-old Elias Rodriguez of Chicago, shouted, "I did it for Palestine, I did it for Gaza," when he was taken into custody, according to authorities. Wilson – along with the attorneys general for Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Wyoming and West Virginia – said the attack is a "sobering reminder of the persistence and growth of antisemitism in the United States." Their letter also references how Mohamed Sabry Soliman, an illegal immigrant from Egypt, is accused of setting victims on fire in Boulder, Colorado, on June 1, "while they peacefully rallied on behalf of Israeli hostages still being held by Hamas in Gaza." The suspect was reportedly heard yelling, "Free Palestine," and other anti-Israel slogans. The victims range from ages 52 to 88. The letter cites how one of the burning victims is reportedly a Holocaust survivor. "We applaud the FBI for wasting no time in investigating both of these recent incidences of antisemitic domestic terrorism," the letter says. "Senseless violence and the incitement of such violence is also becoming rampant on college campuses. Those who revel in the October 7 attacks show public hostility to the point where many Jewish students do not feel safe living everyday lives. Standing up to antisemitism on college campuses is something the states care about as well." Patel Sounds Alarm As Chinese Nationals Charged With Smuggling 'Agroterrorism Agent' Into Us: 'Direct Threat' The letter commends the work of the FBI and the DOJ's creation of "Joint Task Force October 7" to investigate antisemitism as "recent evidence of the Trump Administration's resolve to be a force for good in the fight against hate-inspired criminal activity." President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Jan. 29 establishing the mandate for his administration "to combat antisemitism vigorously, using all available and appropriate legal tools, to prosecute, remove, or otherwise hold to account the perpetrators of unlawful antisemitic harassment and violence." He has also sought to empower state and local law enforcement by instructing "appropriate heads of executive departments" to "take all appropriate action to maximize the use of federal resources" to increase the "collection, distribution and uniformity of crime data across jurisdictions," the letter says. "After all, 'preparedness is most effectively owned and managed at the State, local and even individual levels, supported by a competent, accessible, and efficient federal government.'" "As our states' chief legal officers, we see firsthand how effective use of investigative tools aid in the prosecution and prevention of criminal activity," the letter says. "And we want to work with the FBI and the Department of Justice to be part of the solution to the growing wave of antisemitic domestic terrorism. That's why we write to encourage further cooperation between federal law enforcement and the states, and for a chance to discuss what such a partnership could look like." The letter says the "tips and leads amassed by the FBI could be shared with state and local law enforcement to stop domestic terrorism in its tracks." The attorneys general went on to say that the "FBI is world-renowned for its investigative expertise, and the states appreciate the FBI's current efforts to disseminate threat intelligence to state and local law enforcement." "At the same time, increased partnership between state, local and federal law enforcement to share intelligence on antisemitic threats could help stem the tide of domestic terrorism," the letter says. "We would welcome the chance to meet with you in the coming weeks to discuss a potential partnership between the FBI, the Department of Justice and the states. Together we can create a game plan to root out antisemitic domestic terrorism."Original article source: Republican state AGs seek 'game plan' from FBI, DOJ amid 'growing wave of antisemitic domestic terrorism'
