I'm 81 but I've no plans to retire yet' - Matalan worker of 40 years
Janice said: "When I first stepped in to see the first store, it was like an aircraft hanger and I thought, 'how are we going to fill this?' - but we did.""As it was a new company, they didn't know what to pay me, so I said £1.47 an hour and they rounded it up to £1.50."Four years later I got a rise and it went up to £2.23. I've still got the contracts."Others that work here say I should have said a bit more."Janice also still has the memorabilia handed out to advertise the opening of the store."All the big companies were allowed to come in at first and then eventually the public were allowed if they bought a card for £1," she said.Janice said she started doing two mornings a week "because there wasn't really a lot to do"."Eventually I went up to five days a week," she said. "And I've done all sorts of hours over the years."Janice, who now works one day a week, said: "It's a pleasure to come to work"."I really enjoy coming and I've got so many friends here," she said. "Even people who've worked here and left, when they meet me in the street the first thing they say is 'are you still there?'"And she said customers were, on the whole, "really good". "So nothing's put us off yet," she added.
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Lancashire on BBC Sounds and follow BBC Lancashire on Facebook, X and Instagram and watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
27 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Sky Sports launches ‘multiview' in revamp of Premier League coverage
Sky Sports is to give its viewers the opportunity to watch four Premier League games at once this season, introducing a 'multiview' feature to accompany a record number of live matches in the top flight. The initiative, which echoes the NFL's 'red zone' coverage where the pictures shift to where the action is, forms part of an expanded offering by Sky as the broadcaster seeks to hold off the challenges of piracy and adapt to a changing media environment. Multiview will be used when Sky has the rights to show as many as five games at a time. This will mostly be on Sundays as a result of rescheduling for Thursday European fixtures. With one main match and three smaller screens lined up alongside, one commentary team will move across all the games. Each of the matches will also be broadcast individually on different channels. The format may also be used for coverage of the WSL this season. Sky's director of football, Gary Hughes, said the service would offer viewers more choice. 'The question for us has been how can we enhance what we've got? And how can we utilise the new rights?' he said. 'Having four simultaneous games, we might even have five on some midweeks, means it's just the best way we can offer the best use of the assets that we've got. There could be some chaos to it, but that's the beauty of having all those games at once.' The broadcaster also announced it had recruited Mark Chapman as a presenter for its league coverage, with Chapman joining Kelly Cates in working for both Sky and the BBC's Match of the Day this season. There will also be a new analysis show on Sunday nights, presented by Jamie Carragher, and a wide-ranging reboot of Sky Sports News which will bring the return of the formerly cancelled shows Goals on Sunday and the Sunday Supplement. Roman Kemp will host a show on the channel on Friday evenings. Sky will show a minimum of 215 live Premier League matches this season as it enters the first of a new four-year £6.7bn rights deal. It comes into effect amid a decline in the value of sports rights across Europe, and ubiquitous online piracy. The company reported a doubling of financial losses in its most recent accounts, but Jonathan Licht, Sky's chief sports officer, said Sky Sports was a 'growth business', with record audiences recorded in April when Rory McIlroy won the Masters. He said new developments in its programming would give non-subscribers a chance to 'reappraise' the brand. Licht called on tech companies, who are increasingly interested in sports rights, to 'get the right side' of the issue of piracy. 'I think it's everyone's responsibility,' he said. 'I think we certainly look at big tech to take that on and we look at the government to help. There is a feeling that if certain players were minded to do more, they could do more. If these players are going to want to be global sports players, they're going to have to try and get the right side of piracy. It is a serious issue, it's value destructive so we take it seriously.'
Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Number of people claiming Universal Credit hits record high of 8M
This is the highest level since the benefit was first introduced in 2013. Universal Credit is a payment to help with living costs and is available for people in work who are on low incomes, but also those who are out of work or cannot work. The steep rise in the number of claimants over the past year has been driven almost entirely by people who are not required to work. The number of people on Universal Credit with 'no work requirements' reached 3.7 million in July this year - an increase of 39 per cent or 1 million since July 2024. It means 46 per cent of all Universal Credit claimants are not expected to do anything to prepare or to look for work. This can include those in full-time education, over the state pension age, someone with a child aged under one, and those considered to have no prospect of work. The number of working people on Universal Credit rose to 2.2 million last month, up slightly from 2.1 million in July last year. Sir Keir Starmer last month saw his attempt to cut Britain's ballooning benefits bill derailed by a major rebellion among Labour MPs. The Prime Minister was forced to scrap most of his planned welfare changes in the face of a huge Labour revolt. He ditched Labour's proposed restrictions to Personal Independence Payment (PIP), which is the main disability payment in England, until after a review. A humiliated Sir Keir was instead left to push through slimmed-down legislation in the House of Commons, now only referred to as the Universal Credit Bill. As part of the Bill, the basic Universal Credit standard allowance will rise at least in line with inflation until 2029-30. The latest data for July is largely unchanged from the previous month, again showing that the majority (83.8 per cent) of claimants were British and Irish nationals and those who live or work in the UK without any immigration restrictions. Of this group, 99.9 per cent are UK citizens and around a third were in work, DWP said. Almost one in 10 (9.6 per cent) people on Universal Credit were those with EU Settlement Scheme settled status who have a right to reside in the UK, while 2.7 per cent were people who had indefinite leave to remain in the UK. Refugees accounted for 1.5 per cent of Universal Credit claimants, while 0.7 per cent were people who had come by safe and legal humanitarian routes including under the Ukraine and Afghan resettlement schemes. Around 0.9 per cent of those on Universal Credit had limited leave to remain in the UK, covering those with temporary immigration status. The rest were either no longer receiving Universal Credit payments or had no immigration status recorded on digital systems, DWP said. Previous figures have shown how nearly £1 in every £10 spent on Universal Credit last year was wrongly paid. DWP admitted £6.35billion was overpaid in Universal Credit in 2024-25, which was almost 10 per cent of the £65.3billion of total expenditure on Universal Credit.
The Guardian
27 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Why have we let side-hustle private landlords seize control of our housing – and our politics?
In the 1970s, private landlordism in the UK was a fringe part of the market – and a dying one. With council housing plentiful and house prices within the range of those with decent, working-class jobs, we did not need private landlords. In the mid-1970s, the Conservative Policy Council had written that their decline was 'quite irreversible' and that within a generation they would be 'as extinct as the dinosaur'. This prediction has proved to be among the worst ever made about the UK housing market. Since then, our reliance on private landlords has exploded. They are now the first port of call for everyone in the market who cannot afford to buy: students, graduates, families, pensioners, refugees and more. There are 2.8 million private landlords in Britain – almost twice as many people as work for NHS England and almost four times the UK's entire workforce of teachers. How did we go from one extreme to the other? We chose it. In 1979 Margaret Thatcher arrived with a new vision for the country. As she defunded and sold off council housing, her plan was that the private market would take its place. A big-bang deregulation of private renting in 1988 swept away rent control and introduced short tenancies where the tenant could be evicted at the end without the landlord needing a reason. Her expectation was big, strategic investment from the corporate world – there was demand for rented housing, so there would be supply. Competition would drive up standards. The state just needed to get out of the way and let it happen. But instead, something else happened. In 1996, 'buy-to-let' mortgages were launched, targeting everyman investors with a bit of spare cash. Previously, the only way to build up a property portfolio was to take out a commercial mortgage. This new product was available to anyone with a deposit, the repayments were interest only and the mortgages could be written off against tax. This came at a time when a global collapse of interest rates left lots of people without a viable pension plan, which meant it was suddenly the most obvious, and perhaps only, route to financial security. By 2001, the number of private landlords had exploded, but a survey revealed that only 9% of landlords saw the profession as their full-time occupation. It was the dawn of what the lawyer and writer Nick Bano terms 'the small-time side hustler'. Today, we live in the wreckage of this policy failure. The thirst for investment assets has driven house prices far beyond the reach of ordinary first-time buyers, especially in big cities. Meanwhile, rents have soared – as landlords make use of Thatcher's 'no-fault evictions' to create an effective ratchet system, where they can quickly and easily evict tenants in favour of whoever can pay the most. We have some of the lowest protections for renters in the developed world, and are, according to the London School of Economics 'at one end of the international spectrum on rent control' – ie the end that gives most freedom to landlords. The consequences of this are plain – people on lower incomes can no longer afford to live in the cities where they need to work; those who fall into homelessness are stuck in temporary accommodation indefinitely; and pensioners and families who cannot buy or find council housing are left without security. It is a great failure of policymakers of all parties over the past 35 years that they have simply sat back and let this happen. All of which brings me to Rushanara Ali. The homelessness minister resigned last Thursday after the revelation that she had kicked tenants out of her private rental property, before putting it back on the market at a significantly increased rent. This was, in effect, a classic example of the 'ratchet effect' of rent increases, and a major driver of the homelessness she is supposed to prevent. Ali resigned as minister, but retains the Labour whip and returns to the backbenches, where she will join the Labour MP for Ilford South, Jas Athwal, who was exposed last year for renting out properties with black mould and ant infestations. They are among 83 landlord MPs in the House of Commons – a list that includes the foreign secretary, David Lammy, and the chancellor, Rachel Reeves. Labour has more landlords among its ranks than any other party, with 43. And this is before we get into the House of Lords – a chamber previously made up exclusively of landowners. There are at least 134 landlord peers in the upper house, although the true number is likely to be much higher – with many holding properties via a trust. All of this poses a big problem in policy terms. Listen to the landlord lobby and you would imagine that policy has turned decisively in favour of tenants in recent years, with landlords' representative arm warning that forthcoming changes to tax, law and environmental requirements will drive 24% of its members to sell up. The legal change they are worried about is the Renters' Rights Act, which will abolish no-fault evictions and impose tougher standards for fixing serious disrepair – in other words, attempting to tackle the behaviour of Ali and Athwal respectively. But these laws have been desperately slow coming through. They are a package of changes first announced in April 2019, under the government of Theresa May. That they took six and a half years and a change of government to finally become law owed something to the Conservative party's fear of its backbenches, as Tory MPs pushed back hard against the removal of no-fault evictions. We will now get the act, with royal assent likely in September and implementation from 2026. It makes steps towards a more stable, European-style rental market. That it is coming at all shows progress, and perhaps the start of a break in the dominance of the landlord influence in parliament. That it has taken so long shows the control that force has had over our politics until now. Labour does also appear likely to impose a requirement to bring private rented homes up to a moderate standard of environmental efficiency by 2030 – though this faces continual challenge and was previously scrapped by the Conservatives after landlord pressure. Rental reforms, though, remain off limits, despite support from figures outside parliament such as Sadiq Khan and Andy Burnham. Labour called even limited rent control 'cowardice' before the election. Over the past 35 years, we have dug ourselves into a pit. The dominance of the rental market by small-time side hustlers makes any reform perilous: if these landlords sell up, those who need somewhere to rent will be left in the lurch. If we want a functional housing market again, we need a long-term housing strategy that ends our reliance on side hustlers to meet complex housing needs and encourages an economy that treats homes as places to live, not an investment asset to replace a pension. But we are unlikely to ever see such a strategy when it is the side hustlers themselves entrusted to write it. Peter Apps is a contributing editor at Inside Housing and the author of Show Me the Bodies: How We Let Grenfell Happen
