Appeals court judges grapple with whether Trump unlawfully federalized members of California's National Guard
A three-judge panel of the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals did not immediately decide on a request from the Trump administration to pause a federal judge's ruling that required Trump to relinquish control of the guardsman.
Judge Charles Breyer last week directed the president to do so after concluding that Trump had violated several provisions of the law he invoked in order to take control of the troops, including one that requires presidents to issue an order 'through the governor' when they want to federalize state troops.
But at least two members of the panel, both appointed by Trump, appeared skeptical of that finding as they probed an attorney for California over his arguments that Trump wrongly sent the order to the state's top general.
'It would seem like the state has made the adjutant general effectively the substitute for the governor in this context. So why wasn't it enough that they sent it to that officer?' Judge Mark Bennett told Samuel Harbourt, an attorney for California.
Judge Eric Miller said he found the state's arguments represented a 'very roundabout way of imposing a consultation requirement' that he didn't seem to think existed in the law.
California has argued that the law, at a very minimum, required the president to give the order directly to Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, who would then have a chance to consult with Trump about his plans.
The two judges also pressed an attorney for the Trump administration about whether Trump violated other provisions of the law at issue, including ones that require there to be certain factual predicates before he federalized the troops.
But the attorney repeatedly made clear that he didn't think federal courts had a role to play in second-guessing the president's determinations – an argument Breyer rejected last week.
This story is breaking and will be updated.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell moved to Texas prison
Ghislaine Maxwell, an associate of child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, has been transferred from a prison in the southern US state of Florida to a lower security facility in Texas, the Bureau of Prisons announced Friday. Maxwell's lawyer, David Markus, also confirmed to the Reuters news agency that she had been transferred to the new facility. Maxwell is currently serving a 20 year sentence behind bars on charges of child sex trafficking. She is accused of grooming underage girls for Epstein to sexually abuse. US authorities did not explain the reason why Maxwell was transferred to a new facility in Bryan, Texas. She was earlier imprisoned at FCI Tallahassee in Tallahassee, Florida. The minimum-security Federal Prison Camp Bryan where Maxwell is now housed has better conditions than the low-security FCI Tallahassee in Florida. Federal Prison Camp Bryan has little to no perimeter fencing and a lower staff-to-inmate ratio, whereas FCI Tallahassee has double-fenced perimeters fencing and more prison staff on site. How have Epstein and Maxwell victims reacted? Victims of Epstein and Maxwell have condemned Maxwell's move to a lower-security prison. "Ghislaine Maxwell is a sexual predator who physically assaulted minor children on multiple occasions, and she should never be shown any leniency," Annie and Marie Farmer and the family of Virginia Giuffre said in response to the transfer. They said the transfer "smacks of a cover up." Annie and Marie Farmer have accused Epstein of molestation, whereas Giuffre has alleged that she was sex trafficked by Epstein to Prince Andrew, a member of the British royal family. Giuffre took her own life in April. Maxwell's transfer comes as Trump admin faces 'Epstein files' firestorm The transfer occurred after Maxwell recently met with US Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. It comes as Maxwell is appealing her prison sentence and the US President Donald Trump's administration is facing criticism over its handling of the Epstein case. Last month, the US Justice Department said that Epstein did not have a "client list" and that he did indeed kill himself in his prison cell in 2019. Both of those claims were met with skepticism from many Trump supporters, who urged the Trump administration to release more information on the Epstein case. The scandal regarding the so-called "Epstein files" is of a personal nature for Trump, who once was friends with Epstein. The disgraced New York financier had even said he was Trump's "closest friend" in recordings released by author Michael Wolff last year. The meetings between Blanche and Maxwell recently have sparked rumors that Trump could use presidential pardon powers to legally forgive Maxwell's federal charges. Trump has claimed he has the authority to pardon Maxwell, although Virginia Giuffre's family have urged him not to do so. Trump said in an interview with conservative US outlet Newsmax that "nobody's asked" him to pardon Maxwell. Edited by: Rana Taha
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
CNN Data Chief Names The 1 Way Dems Look Like A 'Complete And Utter Mess' Ahead Of 2028
CNN's chief data analyst Harry Enten on Friday broke down how the Democratic Party is 'historically divided' ahead of the 2028 presidential election. 'It is a complete and utter mess,' said Enten, in a segment with CNN's Kate Bolduan. Enten noted that no possible Democratic presidential candidates are polling at 25% or higher in early national polling on the 2028 election. It's the first time such a scenario has occurred since the 1992 presidential election. Since then, Al Gore (2000/2004), Hillary Clinton (2008/2016) and Joe Biden (2020) all led by 25% or higher in early polling ahead of presidential elections where an incumbent Democrat didn't run. 'The water is quite warm. If you're a Democrat potentially thinking about running in 2028, jump right in because at this point there is no frontrunner,' Enten said. Although more American adults on average identified with Democrats in the second quarter of this year, the party's favorability has been historically abysmal. 'One of the reasons why there is no frontrunner — nobody wants to put anybody up at the top of their ballot list — is because at this particular point, the Democratic brand is in the basement,' he said. 'It is total and complete garbage in the mind of the American public.' In July, the party's net favorable rating (percent in favor minus percent not in favor) was -26 in both Gallup and CNN polling, while the figure dropped to -30 in The Wall Street Journal's polling. All three of those figures are record lows and, Enten argued, the numbers are mainly being driven by 'discontent within the Democratic base.' 'The Democratic base wants something different. We'll ultimately end up seeing who they choose. It will be quite the thing, who ultimately gets the rose,' he said. The segment arrives after former Vice President Kamala Harris, in an interview on 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert' on Thursday, explained her decision not to run for governor of California while also leaving open the possibility of a 2028 presidential bid. Enten noted that Harris had just a 6% chance of being the 2028 Democratic presidential nominee on Thursday, per the Kalshi prediction market. California Gov. Gavin Newsom has the highest chance on the platform at 20% while Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg have a 15% and 9% chance, respectively. H/T: Mediaite Related... Trump Gets Mocked Online For Self-Own After Leveling This 'Appalling' Jab At Kamala Harris Kamala Harris Stuns Colbert With Candid Admission: 'To Hear You Say That… Is Harrowing' Trump's MAGA Influencer Ally Launches 'Tip Line' To Purge 'Disloyal' Government Workers
Fox News
12 minutes ago
- Fox News
CNN guru says Democrats are 'historically divided' with no 2028 frontrunner
CNN senior political data reporter Harry Enten showed how the Democratic Party continues to repulse voters after their loss in November.
