
Nasa's futuristic observatory could finally find ALIENS as it hunts for hidden habitable worlds, say experts
Or, it may uncover a darker fact: that we humans are completely alone, on the unique oasis we call Earth.
Advertisement
6
Planet K2-18b, which astronomers believe has water in its atmosphere, orbits within the habitable zone of a distant star
Credit: ESA/UCL
6
Scientists will be looking for signs of oxygen, ozone and methane in a planet's atmosphere, as these are the chemicals that suggest there might be life on the surface
Credit: NASA
The ambitious project, slated to arrive sometime in the 2040s, will require technologies that are yet to be developed and demonstrated.
Fortunately, plans for those technologies are underway as part of an international effort.
The Habitable Worlds Observatory (HWO) will be tasked with scouting out some of the nearly 6,000 exoplanets that have been discovered since the early 1990s.
'If we're going to find evidence of alien life beyond our solar system in our lifetime, the Habitable Worlds Observatory represents our best opportunity," Dr Caroline Harper, head of space science at the UK Space Agency, told The Sun.
Advertisement
READ MORE ON SPACE
SKY HIGH I lost my leg in tragic accident & now I'm set to make space history for Britain
"This groundbreaking mission could finally answer one of humanity's most profound questions: are we alone in the universe?"
Dr Shyam Balaji, a theoretical physicist at King's College London, said that finding a planet with a stable atmosphere and potential signs of life would be "a turning point".
"It would reshape how we see our place in the cosmos, and even short of detecting life," he said. "Simply confirming that other habitable worlds exist would profoundly change our understanding of the universe and of our own planet's uniqueness."
The HWO will look for chemical patterns - what scientists call biosignatures - around Earth-sized planets that lie within the habitable zones of nearby stars.
Advertisement
Scientists will be looking for signs of oxygen, ozone and methane in a planet's atmosphere, as these are the chemicals that suggest there might be alien life on the surface.
The relative abundance of these three molecules in Earth's atmosphere, for example, cannot be explained by any non-biological processes.
Best-ever sign of ALIEN life found on distant planet as scientists '99.7% sure of astounding biological activity signal'
"With the Habitable Worlds Observatory, we'll be able to examine their atmospheres directly, looking for chemical patterns like oxygen and methane coexisting that are difficult to explain without biology," Dr Balaji explained.
"That wouldn't be absolute proof of life, but it would be the strongest evidence we've had yet."
Advertisement
The HWO will not only try to find signs of life on distant worlds, but it will even take photos of them.
It should be able to beam back pictures of planets human astronauts could only dream of laying their eyes on.
While thousands of exoplanets have been detected, only a handful have been directly photographed.
Instead, we often rely on painted impressions of distant worlds - where artists are guided by scientists as to what the data says a planet might look like.
Advertisement
6
An artist's impression of Kepler-186f, an Earth-size planet orbiting a distant star
Credit: NASA Ames/JPL-Caltech/T. Pyle
Current plans indicate that HWO - a large spacecraft similar to Hubble or Webb space telescopes - should be able to image a planet that is 10billion times fainter than its host star.
Scientists also believe that HWO will also be able to detect Earth-like moons of giant extrasolar planets, and spot eclipses of giant planets and their lunar satellites.
Funding pressures are real. And such ambitious missions are always vulnerable to delays.
Dr Shyam Balaji, a theoretical physicist at King's College London
The idea for HWO was first pitched some 15 years ago, and has since snowballed into becoming "the first specifically engineered to identify habitable, Earth-like planets… and examine them for evidence of life," according to Nasa.
Advertisement
By the time project jumps from paper into real-life, tangible tech, the HWO - or the core parts of the idea, at least - will be roughly 50 years old.
That's if the mission survives President Donald Trump's proposed cuts to Nasa, in which the US space agency is forecast to lose nearly 20 per cent of its workforce.
But experts are cautiously hopeful that HWO will make it off the ground.
"Funding pressures are real," said Dr Balaji. "And such ambitious missions are always vulnerable to delays."
Advertisement
"But the scientific case is compelling and public interest is high," he added.
"So I think it has a good chance of moving forward even if the schedule slips."
Deputy executive director of the Royal Astronomical Society, Dr Robert Massey, said: "I think the value of it is so big, that it's just a really exciting mission.
"I don't want to sit there and say this should be funded over something else, because that's the thing we have to avoid doing. But if it goes ahead, it will be an incredibly exciting project."
Advertisement
6
This artists impression shows a view of the surface of the planet Proxima Centauri b
Credit: Getty
While Earth is the only planet known to host life, scientists estimate there could be hundreds of millions of potentially habitable worlds in our galaxy, the Milky Way.
These worlds are very far away from Earth - with the closest potentially habitable world, Proxima Centauri b, located 4.2 light-years away.
To spot these planets, even through the glare of their nearest star, HWO will need some next-generation instruments on board.
Advertisement
Of the many instruments that HWO will have installed, it will need a tool to block out scattered light.
"If you put your thumb up in front of the sun, you can sort of look around it. The problem you have is that we've got an atmosphere so all the sunlight scatters," Dr Massey explained.
"But if you do that in space, block out the light of the star, there's no atmosphere.
"If you get the size of that right, then you could see planets in orbit around that star - and actually study them and look for the chemistry of their atmosphere."
Advertisement
6
Of the many instruments that HWO will have installed, it will need a tool to block out scattered light
Credit: NASA
Like Hubble and Webb, HWO will have a large mirror to help with detecting and imaging distant worlds.
The primary mirror will be at least six metres in diameter, so it needs to be segmented one way or another.
No decisions have yet been made on the detailed design of either mirror, telescope or spacecraft.
Advertisement
Whether we find life or not, the implications will be transformational - not just for space science, but for our understanding of humanity's place in the universe.
Dr Caroline Harper, head of space science at the UK Space Agency
Though HWO is expected to be pretty large - and will require a powerful rocket like Nasa's Space Launch System, SpaceX's Starship or Blue Origin's New Glenn to launch it into space.
The European Space Agency (ESA) and UK Space Agency (UKSA) are interested in becoming partners in the project, just like they are on the Webb telescope.
Speaking at Nasa's Habitable Worlds Observatory conference in Washington, DC, earlier this week, Dr Harper promoted the UK's ambition to lead an instrument on the mission.
"The UK has developed exceptional expertise in exoplanet science and cutting-edge instrumentation," she said.
Advertisement
"We now have the chance to build on these strengths and take part in what could be the most significant scientific discovery in human history.
"Whether we find life or not, the implications will be transformational - not just for space science, but for our understanding of humanity's place in the universe.'
6
Rocky planet Earth-like planet, Proxima Centauri b
Credit: Getty
All you need to know about planets in our solar system
Our solar system is made up of nine planets with Earth the third closest to the Sun. But each planet has its own quirks, so find out more about them all... How old is Earth? Plus other facts on our planet
How many moons does Mercury have?
What colour is Venus?
How far away is Mars to Earth? And other facts on the red planet
How big is Jupiter?
How many moons does Saturn have?
Does Uranus have rings?
How many moons does Neptune have?
How big is Pluto?
How hot is the Sun?

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Daily Star
7 hours ago
- Irish Daily Star
White House orders NASA to deliberately destroy two important satellites monitoring climate change
NASA has been given orders by the White House to destroy two major satellites in space that are used by farmers, scientists, as well as oil and gas companies. NASA has been given orders by the White House to destroy two major satellites in space that are used by farmers, scientists, as well as oil and gas companies. According to NPR, the data from the satellites provides detailed information about carbon dioxide and crop health. The outlet stated that the objects are the only two federally used satellites that provide information built to specifically monitor planet-warming greenhouse gases. It is currently unclear why the Trump administration seeks to destroy the satellites, as they are state-of-the-art and were expected to last for several more years. In 2023, an official data review found that the data stored there was "of exceptionally high quality," and they recommended continuing the mission for at least three more years. It comes after a chilling map revealed the US regions where 75% of people will die in a nuclear World War 3. Both missions, known as the Orbiting Carbon Observatories, reportedly used identical measurement devices to measure carbon dioxide and plant growth around the globe. While the devices were identical, one of the satellites is actually attached to the International Space Station. Should NASA choose to comply with the directive, the standalone satellite will burn up in the Earth's atmosphere. The mission has since been dubbed Phase F, per David Crisp, a longtime NASA scientist who designed the instruments and managed the missions until he retired in 2022. "What I have heard is direct communications from people who were making those plans, who weren't allowed to tell me that that's what they were told to do," Crisp said to NPR. "But they were allowed to ask me questions." "They were asking me very sharp questions. The only thing that would have motivated those questions was [that] somebody told them to come up with a termination plan," he added. According to Crisp, it makes no sense why Trump would order the termination of the satellites. Crisp commented that it makes "no economic sense to terminate NASA missions that are returning incredibly valuable data." According to the expert, maintaining the two observatories only costs $15 million per year, barely a dent in the agency's $25.4 billion budget. Two other NASA scientists have confirmed that the Trump administration had contacted mission leaders to make plans for the termination of other projects that would lose funding under Trump's proposed budget for the next fiscal year. Several scientists have expressed outrage at the proposal and argued that it could precipitate an end to the US's leadership in prevent this, lawmakers have attempted to draw up a counter to Trump's plan to keep NASA's budget roughly in line. "We rejected cuts that would have devastated NASA science by 47 percent and would have terminated 55 operating and planned missions," said Senator and top appropriator Chris Van Hollen, per Bloomberg. "Eliminating funds or scaling down the operations of Earth-observing satellites would be catastrophic and would severely impair our ability to forecast, manage, and respond to severe weather and climate disasters House representative and Committee on Science, Space and Technology ranking member Zoe Lofgren Article continues below "The Trump administration is forcing the proposed cuts in its FY26 budget request on already appropriated FY25 funds," she added. "This is illegal." It comes after a Trump family member revealed his body is 'rotting inside' as she delivered a terrifying update on the president's health.


Irish Independent
a day ago
- Irish Independent
US wants to put a nuclear reactor on the moon, Nasa chief says
The space agency's chief Sean Duffy has expedited the timeline to build the reactor, and wants it to have at least 100 kilowatts of power – enough to run about 80 homes – and be ready to launch by 2030. The directive, first reported by Politico, mentions China and Russia's joint-effort to place a reactor on the moon by the mid-2030s. The two US adversaries first announced their plans in March last year. 'The first country to do so could potentially declare a keep-out zone which would significantly inhibit the United States from establishing a planned Artemis presence if not there first,' Mr Duffy warned in the directive. Nasa is working with the US energy department and the broader space industry to design a fission power system that would provide at least 40 kilowatts of power. The space agency has already mentioned the benefits of developing fission surface power (FSP) on the moon and Mars. 'Relatively small and lightweight, fission systems are powerful and could enable robust operations on the moon and Mars,' Nasa states on its website. Nasa's Artemis campaign aims to establish the first long-term presence on the moon. During Mr Trump's inaugural address, he said the US would launch astronauts 'to plant the stars and stripes on the planet Mars'. 'It is about winning the second space race,' a Nasa senior official also told Politico. In Duffy's new timeline, a fission surface power programme executive will be designated within 30 days of the directive. The executive 'is empowered to provide reporting and updates with maximum transparency directly to the administrator,' the Nasa chief wrote. Within 60 days, Nasa will ask for industry proposals for the nuclear reactor, according to the directive. The directive mentioned Trump's budget request for the 2026 fiscal year, which includes $350m for a new programme 'that will accelerate the development of high priority technologies for Mars'. The funding would increase up to $500m starting in 2027.


RTÉ News
a day ago
- RTÉ News
Mission to MARS - Jennifer Walshe on her acclaimed space opera
Composer Jennifer Walshe introduces Irish National Opera's production of her opera MARS, composed by Jennifer with a libretto by Mark O'Connell, which runs at the Abbey Theatre this August following an acclaimed World Premiere at this year's Galway International Arts Festival. I recently read an interview with the astronaut Chris Hadfield where he noted that he has been as astronaut for over 20 years, but has spent only a precious six months in space. I'd like to think this opera has something in common with Hadfield's experience. A mere two hours long, it's nonetheless the result of years of thinking about Mars, a fascination which began for me as a child looking at photos of the red planet in a copy of Carl Sagan's Cosmos. Along the way my research led me to the sounds of NASA's Perseverance rover trundling over the regolith of Mars, recordings of whistlers, plasma waves and cosmic background radiation, sonifications of light curves of exoplanets millions of miles away. I spent weeks trying to figure out how to use musical instruments to simulate the sonic environment inside a spacesuit, how many balloons to tie to a double bass bow to simulate Martian gravity, which is 38% that of Earth's. I downloaded lists of the synth-heavy music astronauts uploaded to the International Space Station (a lot of Mike Oldfield and Vangelis), read mission transcripts from the Gemini and Apollo missions, discussed how a trumpet might degrade over time in a Martian habitat on the Space Exploration Stack Exchange. I held a Martian meteorite in my hands at the Oxford University Museum of Natural History, read countless sci-fi books, left livestreams of spacewalks playing on a screen in the corner of my studio as I worked. I considered a life where communication with loved ones back home can only ever be through text messages and voicemails. The fact that on the night of the opera's Dublin opening at the Abbey Theatre, a message leaving Earth will take 14 minutes and 54 seconds to reach Mars.