logo
Aston Martin Vanquish Volante

Aston Martin Vanquish Volante

Yahoo3 days ago
Introduction
It's 90kg heavier. Anti roll bar stiffness and rear spring rates have been upped by 7%. And the roof goes up and down. There you go. The material differences between the coupe and this Aston Martin Vanquish Volante.
Long gone are the days where ripping the roof off ruined the rigidity of a car. The foundational structure, Aston's chief engineer Simon Newton, reassures me, is basically the same between the regular Aston Martin Vanquish and the Volante.
The interior, too, is the same as the regular car, and it continues with that car's raison d'être. This is a two-tonne bruiser of a super GT-cum-supercar. A 5.2-litre V12-engined £360,000 2.0-metre wide screaming flare that signals 'I am doing very well for myself'.
Design & styling
It's surprisingly delicate. The roof's K-fold mechanism (named after its elegant folding procedure) stacks very tightly with a super low lid. So it doesn't ruin the lines of that gorgeous kamm tail rear.
Simon says the articulation index (a new one for me - essentially a measure of speech intelligibility) with the roof up is low, which is very good. If I had a passenger with me during my drive I would have found them easy to understand, although they'd likely be a touch annoyed by the squeaking coming from the roof.
The weight gain is from underbody bracing, which helps make this roofless Vanquish some 75% stiffer laterally than the DBS Volante it replaces, Simon is also keen to point out. Weight distribution is slightly closer to 50:50 now, too.
Interior
The interior is basically untouched compared with the regular car. Which means it's neatly laid out, expensively put together with physical controls for most things. The view out is reassuringly straight forward considering the size of the car.
The roof can be opened in 14-seconds and closed in 16-seconds. It works at up to 31mph and can be remotely operated via the key fob too.
With the roof closed there's 219 litres worth of space in the boot - some 29 litres less than the coupe - and with it stowed there's a mere 187 litres worth. This is tiny. You can just about fit a couple of overnight bags in there and not much else.
Elsewhere inside you'll find the latest Apple CarPlay system, Ultra. Tim Cook's tentacles now extend from the infotainment screen to the driver's display. There are a few different design options, all of which are neat and easy to read.
Climate controls on the infotainment are controlled by Apple, but Aston Martin also has physical cylindrical rollers that control temp and fan speed. Saying that, the temperature control is permanently synced to the left-hand side of the infotainment screen. It is overlaid everything. Which means if you're on an app that has some info down the left hand side, let's say Google Map's speed warning for instance, you cannot see it. Aston assured me a fix is in the works.
Engines & performance
824bhp and 738lb ft of torque means 214mph is achievable. The 0-62mph time of 3.4 secs almost seems a bit quaint compared with 1000bhp four-wheel drive EVs of today. Almost.
Insanely fast electric cars make it feel like the world is hurtling towards you in a kind of impassive way you have no control over. Whereas with this V12 you are actively dragging everything in front of you behind you Michael Phelps style. Except instead of a wake there is a swell of deep, guttural noise that crescends into a wall. This is from the engine. The noises coming from my mouth were mostly high pitched laughs of fun and joy. Perhaps this being the largest difference between EV and V12 powertrains.
Peak bhp doesn't kick until 6500rpm and when it arrives it hits hard. A clever bit of torque shaping (Aston is loath to call it cutting or throttling) in GT mode helps the power arrive cleanly and linearly through the first four gears.
In the racier modes it gets real. Fast. It's easier than with the old Aston Martin DBS 770 or a Ferrari 812 Superfast but you have to have a bit of bottle to spin it all the way out to its 7000rpm limit on UK roads as the car hunkers down and your hands become busy.
The ZF 'box comes with a bespoke Aston setup. It can be a touch hesitant to kick down. But manual mode means manual and it rifles through your paddle-shift commands cleanly. There's no knack to these carbon-ceramic discs either; no bite to get through or squeaks and judders to contend with. Just hugely impressive and easy braking force. The kind of brakes you get used to after a few hours in the car, and need a bit of time to adjust back to regular cars after.
Ride & handling
The drive modes play a good part in this car's ride. GT is pure plush. Lots of squidge and travel from the suspension. In its raciest mode, Sport +, things get stiffer and more rampant. Yet, it's a drive mode that is still genuinely usable in the right circumstances on UK roads.
OK I wouldn't use it on a tight, single lane road, but on the right A-road (preferably something with very few blemishes!) It feels good. Tight, responsive, entertaining, furiously quick, but with a ride that won't give you backache. Makers of try-hard hot hatches, take note.
Steering is exceptional. Some might complain that it is not quite up to Ferrari standards of response. But if you're the type of person who thinks having things a touch slower makes it more measured and easier to control, you'll get on with the Vanquish very well. The electronically controlled Bosch diff comes in early but is subtle in its workings. It is certainly flattering.
Verdict
Sadly, the Volante is one of these cars that sounds better from outside than in, probably not helped by just a touch of augmented sound scaping in the car. The boot is tiny. And while the interior is expensively crafted, there's no getting round the fact it's much the same as a Vantage.
There's about a £15,000 walk up from the Coupe and £360,000-£400,000 is a lot of money for a car. Even for billionaires. Especially one with a few annoying foibles.
But really I'm nitpicking now because it is wonderful.
]]>
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Drivers risk £5,000 fine over little-known temporary traffic light rule
Drivers risk £5,000 fine over little-known temporary traffic light rule

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Drivers risk £5,000 fine over little-known temporary traffic light rule

Drivers risk breaking the Highway Code and being hit with a staggering £5,000 fine for ignoring "dangerous" headlight rules. Drivers have been warned that some temporary traffic lights operate on sensors rather than timers - but road users are being told not to flash their lights to get them to change green. Graham Conway, managing director at Select Car Leasing, said: "Nobody enjoys being stuck at a traffic light waiting for it to turn green - but we suspect many motorists simply aren't aware that their own driving habits could be making the problem worse. "Many temporary traffic lights use radar sensors that require a vehicle to be close enough to trigger the light change. If a vehicle isn't near enough, the lights will prioritise traffic coming from another direction where they can sense cars - leaving you unnecessarily stuck on red for ages." READ MORE: Older drivers face new medical rules because current laws 'ineffective' READ MORE: UK drivers may need to retake test even if they've passed READ MORE Next UK heatwave about to begin with 34C but will be restricted to 'three areas' He warned that this can cause traffic to build in one direction, "which can take many rotations of the lights to clear, and potentially cause anger and frustration all around". "Frustratingly, the same issue can be caused if a driver stops too close to the light itself, beyond the sensor," he added. Conway said: "The sensors in modern traffic lights don't respond to the light frequencies emitted by headlights - so it's pointless flashing your lights at them in an attempt to speed up the colour change process." Rule 114 states: "You must not use any lights in a way which would dazzle or cause discomfort to other road users, including pedestrians, cyclists and horse riders." Drivers caught misusing headlights can be hit with a £100 fine and points on their driving licence, although more serious cases could see a £5,000 fine and "the threat of a driving ban". A spokesperson from added: "Flashing headlights is commonly used by drivers to signal other motorists, but many are unaware that this practice can land them with a substantial fine. "A simple headlight check can ensure that you are not unintentionally dazzling other road users or creating dangerous driving conditions. It's vital that headlights are used responsibly, especially in low-visibility conditions, to keep the roads safe for everyone."

EV chargers to be fitted onto city streets soon but is Newport getting a fair share?
EV chargers to be fitted onto city streets soon but is Newport getting a fair share?

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

EV chargers to be fitted onto city streets soon but is Newport getting a fair share?

Newport City Council is charging ahead with plans to boost electric vehicle use, a key step in its climate change plan to hit net zero by 2030. A major part of this effort involves expanding public EV infrastructure across the Newport. In April 2025, the council began installing 98 new charging points into existing street lights, specifically targeting streets where residents lack off-street parking such as driveways or garages. These compact chargers, installed by Urban Fox, are among the first streetlight-style units in Wales and allow for network expansion without taking up significant street space. The rollout of EV infrastructure across the UK remains uneven. A recent Freedom of Information request by Compare the Market revealed stark differences between councils. Westminster City Council leads with 2,468 chargers, while Milton Keynes and Birmingham follow with 956 and 613 respectively. Newport's numbers are more modest, and the installation of new chargers has led to some loss of parking spaces, though figures have not yet been publicly disclosed. Public hesitancy around EV adoption remains high and was clearly on display when the Argus spoke to city centre shoppers. Despite the upcoming 2035 ban on new petrol and diesel car sales, 69% of UK drivers still use traditional fuel vehicles. Only 12% currently own a fully electric car, and 13% drive plug-in hybrids. Alarmingly, 47% of drivers are unaware of the 2035 ban, suggesting a lack of urgency in transitioning to cleaner transport. Cost is the biggest barrier. According to Compare the Market's research, over half of drivers say EVs are too expensive, and most would be more likely to buy one if cheaper models were available. Charging infrastructure is another concern. Around 37% of drivers say they would consider switching if more public chargers were available locally, and 30% believe public chargers should be free or subsidised. Nearly half (41%) feel there are not enough incentives, such as grants or tax exemptions, to support the switch. Even current EV owners face challenges. While 59% have installed home chargers, many still rely on public infrastructure. The average EV driver is willing to travel just over five miles to reach a charger, but issues like long wait times, slow charging speeds, and difficulties with payment systems are common. Nearly a third report being blocked by non-EV vehicles parked in charging bays, according to Compare the Market. Newport's chargers are operated by various providers, including Dragon Charging and PodPoint. Users may need a compatible plug-to-plug cable and can access chargers via RFID (Radio Frequency ID) cards or mobile apps. Costs vary by location and operator, and standard parking fees apply in off-street car parks. The council has invested in upgraded software to offer flexible payment options and user-friendly interfaces. Disabled access is also a priority. Newport complies with PAS 1899 (disability accessibility) standards where possible and is home to Wales's first EV WAV (Wheelchair Accessible Vehicle) bay. Maintenance is handled by Silverstone Green Energy, and support is available via phone or email. To help drivers navigate the EV landscape, has launched an electric charging map showing all public chargers in the UK. This tool aims to make EV ownership more accessible and reduce confusion around infrastructure availability. Newport City Council has been asked for comment on the total number of spaces that will be rolled out and how many parking spaces could be lost. For more information, visit the Energy Saving Trust, Dragon Charging.

'Outstanding' new electric SUV achieves record-breaking safety score: 'We've raised the bar for ourselves'
'Outstanding' new electric SUV achieves record-breaking safety score: 'We've raised the bar for ourselves'

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

'Outstanding' new electric SUV achieves record-breaking safety score: 'We've raised the bar for ourselves'

Electric car manufacturer Lynk & Co. International recently shattered records with the highest-ever Euro NCAP safety score for a compact SUV, CleanTechnica reported. The European New Car Assessment Programme is an independent nonprofit organization that tests and rates automobiles on a five-star safety system. And Lynk & Co.'s 02, a fully electric compact SUV with a 200-kilowatt engine, clinched the spot as the safest vehicle in its class in 2025. "With outstanding results across all assessment categories — including the highest-ever recorded rating of 89% for Safety Assistance — the 02 is setting a new safety benchmark in its segment," CleanTechnica stated. The vehicle also achieved "outstanding" scores in Adult Occupant Protection, Child Occupant Protection, and Vulnerable Road User Protection. "Safety has always been a core pillar of our product strategy, and with the Lynk & Co. 02, we've raised the bar for ourselves — and for the entire segment," vice president of product and strategy David Green said in a news release. "This recognition reinforces our commitment to building vehicles that are not only innovative and sustainable but also among the safest on the road." Another often overlooked aspect of vehicular safety is air pollution, both inside and outside of the car — but it's one category wherein all electric vehicle models excel. That's because these vehicles don't burn oil for fuel, so they don't release the polluting gases that have been linked with severe health impacts and global heating. To put it in perspective, one MIT study found that diesel-burning cars emit nearly twice as much pollution per mile over their lifetimes than EVs — a difference of 350 grams of carbon dioxide per mile to 200. In addition to improved health and safety, many drivers are choosing to upgrade to EVs for the ease of ownership and lower costs. Since EVs don't have engines, they need far less expensive maintenance over their lifetimes. And obviously, they have no associated gasoline costs. Making the switch is a particularly savvy move for those with home solar panels, as charging a car with solar power brings both car and energy costs down to near zero. If you're interested in getting a quote from a vetted local installer, the free tools at EnergySage are a great place to start — using them helps the average person save up to $10,000 on a solar installation. Would you be more likely to get an EV if it came with a free home charger? Definitely Depends what the car costs Depends how fast it charges Not really Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store