David Knight: Being fined at the faffing-about early stages of Aberdeen bus gates has had me simmering every day for three years
There are a few of them dotted around Aberdeen.
Like Daleks from Dr Who; temporarily rendered harmless, but still menacing.
I suppose it's some kind of reverse psychology going on: our brains are still wired to be wary of speed traps.
You'd think I'd speed up rather than decelerate.
Or maybe I don't really believe the 'not in use' signs and suspect it's some kind of trick.
My journalistic mind always suspects that the authorities are up to something.
My standard starting point is that they are trying to hide important things from the public and so a permanent state of scepticism is healthy.
To challenge things all the time.
After all, there is a lot to process in Aberdeen right now, especially with bus-gate and LEZ (Low Emission Zone) fines popping through letter boxes at an alarming rate.
The Post Office's immediate future as a viable going concern must surely be guaranteed thanks to this lucrative line of mail-delivery business.
I gazed at a P&J colour-coded graphic shape depicting a myriad of current traffic restrictions around Aberdeen, including bus gates and LEZs.
Stretching like a green medieval gauntlet around all the city centre's major streets – choking the life out of them, some might say.
The first salvos in a legal challenge by local businesses against the profit-draining gates are expected in the Court of Session soon.
My beef with council bus gates always has been whether correct processes – democratic and procedural – were followed.
That should interest all citizens.
Meanwhile, the first wave of data on Aberdeen LEZs is being digested on the first anniversary of their introduction.
A hefty £4.5million in LEZ fines dominates the debate, but important health information about reductions in potentially lethal emissions must also be evaluated.
My health was not helped by pondering over not one, but four fines which arrived at my door.
Two were imposed in Aberdeen, but are now a bit old.
I don't bear grudges, but I have been simmering about them every day for three years.
The other two were just a matter of weeks ago.
Not in Aberdeen, but in a galaxy far, far away in England.
Parking fines administered while I was on a mercy mission to visit a sick elderly relative.
Twice for the same offence, in effect: once the night before and again in a dawn swoop by a patrol the next day before I awoke.
They had me bang to rights, but surely not twice overnight?
With my legal magnifying glass to hand I spotted one ticket had recorded me mistakenly as being at another car park half a mile away.
It was enough: a legal technicality, but my challenge in writing was upheld and one fine was quashed on appeal.
Hardly the case of the century, but again shows that challenging things is healthy – and reading small print is always essential.
This recent saga made me think back to that old pair of fines from years before.
I managed to incur two Aberdeen bus-gate fines in the same spot within days of each other; that took a serious level of ineptitude on my part, you might think.
But shell-shocked and bewildered, I returned to the scene of my 'crime' to walk slowly through the bus-gate zone instead to discover where I went wrong.
I still couldn't make sense of it due to shambolic signage which drew much criticism.
I thought of this again after the lawyer leading the legal battle reckoned bus-gate fines would have to be refunded to motorists if he won in court.
However, he was only talking about fines dating back to when the 'experimental' status of the current bus-gate layout was made permanent earlier this year.
But what about me and many others?
I fell foul of what I describe as a 'pre-experiment' experimental stage of this troubled project when a pilot bus-gate was trialled temporarily at one end of Union Street.
It was the embryonic forerunner of what you see today, but also triggered a furore of protest and many fines.
I hate to take issue with the legal expert, but surely as these people were punished during an earlier chaotic faffing-about stage of bus gates – before they became legally binding – they actually have a stronger argument for recompense?
Paying a fine is hardly a matter of life or death, you might say.
But it might be if you were breathing in exhaust emissions in what are now LEZs. Early evidence shows some reductions.
Good news, but we must bear in mind that the smallish Aberdeen LEZs seem harsher and more intense than elsewhere in Scotland.
So it begs a challenging question: have they got the balance right?
David Knight is the long-serving former deputy editor of The Press and Journal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Press and Journal
9 minutes ago
- Press and Journal
Alex Salmond's north-east adviser rubbishes Nicola Sturgeon book claims
A north-east political adviser who worked closely with Alex Salmond in government claims Nicola Sturgeon has spread 'falsehoods' in her new book. Geoff Aberdein took aim at three allegations in Frankly, including that the late SNP leader was against same-sex marriage. 'That one really actually gets my goat,' he said on the Holyrood Sources podcast. Like Ms Sturgeon, he had a ring-side seat during the Mr Salmond's time as first minister. On her side of the story, Ms Sturgeon wrote: 'What started as a calm discussion very quickly descended into a shouting match. Alex very rarely raised his voice to me – or vice versa – so I knew that I had a real battle on my hands to get him to agree. He was implacably opposed. But Mr Aberdein, who went on to help set up strategic advisory firm True North in Aberdeen, says that claim was demonstrably false. Another claim he disputes is the allegation Mr Salmond did not read the pro-independence blueprint before the 2014 referendum, known as the 'white paper'. 'To suggest, as I think was the purpose of this story, that he wasn't engaged in the process of a prospectus for independence is utterly nonsense,' he added. Mr Aberdein also rejected the idea that Mr Salmond could have possibly leaked details of his own alleged sexual misconduct – something Ms Sturgeon speculated about in the run-up to her book publication. Asked if he read the memoirs, he said: 'No I haven't and no I won't.' On the excerpts he has read about, he told the podcast: 'There was falsehoods at worst, fabrications at best. 'I was brought up that you didn't speak ill of the dead. But if you are going to speak ill of the dead, at least make your claims are accurate.' The claims come days after Mr Salmond's widow, Moira Salmond, from Strichen in Aberdeenshire, is suing the Scottish Government over its botched handling of an investigation into sexual harassment allegations levelled against him. Mr Salmond died of a heart attack in North Macedonia in October last year, aged 69. He previously lodged a claim in the Court of Session alleging misfeasance – the wrongful exercise of lawful authority – by civil servants. In her book, Ms Sturgeon laments losing Mr Salmond as a friend, which she compared with a grieving process. 'I had occasional, vivid dreams in which we were still on good terms. I would wake up from these feeling utterly bereft,' she added.
The Courier
a day ago
- The Courier
EXCLUSIVE: Tony Banks hits out at former Tayside Aviation owners
Tony Banks has reignited his war of words with the former owners of Tayside Aviation after a senior engineer admitted falsifying flight records. Stuart McPherson, 67, is awaiting sentence after showing a 'blatant disregard' for aircraft safety by making bogus logbook entries at the now-defunct Dundee flight school. Mr Banks has now revealed he raised the alarm, before spending a six-figure sum on ensuring the planes were safe for students to use. He has broken his silence on the issue less than a month after a separate court case which ruled the company's previous owners James and Kathleen Watt had not 'fairly and accurately disclosed' a change in their firm's accounting policy. The Secret Millionaire star says this judgment vindicated him from being seen as responsible for Tayside Aviation's collapse. A second hearing regarding possible compensation will be held at a later date. Mr Banks, who found fame on the Channel 4 show, has maintained for years he was not to blame for the collapse of Tayside Aviation. When the air training school collapsed in April 2023 under his ownership, 22 people found themselves suddenly unemployed and students were left thousands of pounds out of pocket. He claims he was misled by husband and wife James and Kathleen Watt — claims they defended at the Court of Session. Speaking to The Courier this week, Mr Banks said: 'When we took over Tayside Aviation, we uncovered issues with the maintenance of aircraft and the recording process used under the management of the previous owners, James and Kathleen Watt. 'We reported our concerns to the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) as soon as we found out what was going on and then spent hundreds of thousands of pounds ensuring the aircraft were safe for students to use. 'We have not been able to talk about this until now for obvious legal reasons. 'However, this prosecution, coupled with the judgement issued by Lord Braid last month that ruled the previous owners breached a warranty that led to us being misled during the sale of the business, shows that the collapse of Tayside Aviation was sadly unavoidable. 'We invested around £1.5 million into the business to address the aircraft safety issues and to deal with cashflow problems caused by the accounting process, but, in the end, we simply couldn't save Tayside Aviation. 'We have always been unfairly blamed for Tayside Aviation going under but this prosecution and the Court of Session judgement show that blame lies firmly elsewhere.' The relationship between Mr Banks and the Watts wasn't always turbulent. In 2022, when it was announced the Balhousie Care founder had bought the flight school, Mr Watt was originally staying on to run it. They had both served in the armed forces — Tony Banks is a veteran of the parachute regiment and the Falklands War, while aviator Jim had been in the Royal Navy. But their relationship unravelled publicly in 2023 after Tayside Aviation plunged into administration, culminating in a series of court actions. Last month we reported on a judgement made by Lord Braid, which ruled the Watts had not disclosed a change in their firm's accounting policy. Mr Banks also says he paid hundreds of thousands of pounds to fix the 'aircraft safety issues' uncovered after former employee Mr McPherson falsified log book entries in his role as continuing airworthiness manager. The engineer is awaiting sentence after admitting making bogus records. Mr Banks says he invested £1.5m trying to rescue Tayside Aviation. In 2023, after its collapse, he told us it had cost him £3m. Interpath's latest administrators report lists Mr Banks as a secured creditor owed £110,000. In July, we reported on a civil case ruling made at the Court of Session. It centred around how tuition fees paid in advance by students had been presented in the Tayside Aviation accounts prior to him buying the firm. Lord Braid found Mr Banks had failed to prove four of the warranties had been breached. But a fifth — that accounts prepared in 2020 had not followed the same accounting policy of those prepared in 2017 — had not been 'fairly and accurately disclosed' to the businessman. Lord Braid said the evidence presented by Mr Banks, including a key spreadsheet and expert testimony, was unreliable or inadmissible due to methodological flaws, was missing primary documents and had a lack of clear factual grounding. Last year an employment tribunal ruled Tayside Aviation failed to follow correct redundancy procedures as the company went into administration. James 'Jim' Watt bought Tayside Aviation in 2004, while wife Kathleen was appointed a director in 2015. The school was founded on a strip of grass in 1962. Mr Watt advocated for plans to launch Scotland's first international aviation academy in the empty former water board building next to the airport, unveiled the morning after the UK voted for Brexit. These stalled when Tayside Aviation went bust, despite funding promises in the Tay Cities Deal. Mr Watt is now managing director of Fife Airport, where he and Kathleen run Fife Flight School. After being approached by The Courier to see if he wanted to respond to Mr Banks, Mr Watt sent a copy of an inspection report from Education Scotland for Tayside Aviation, dated June 2021 when he still owned the company. He added: 'Mr Banks is not worthy of any comment.' The CAA said it would not be appropriate to comment on McPherson's conviction until after he is sentenced.
Reuters
a day ago
- Reuters
S&P affirms 'AA+' credit rating for US, cites impact of tariff revenue
Aug 19 (Reuters) - S&P Global on Monday affirmed its "AA+" credit rating on the U.S., saying the revenue from President Donald Trump's tariffs will offset the fiscal hit from his massive tax-cut and spending bill. Trump signed the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" into law in July after it was passed by the Republican-controlled Congress. The bill, which delivered new tax breaks, also made Trump's 2017 tax cuts permanent. "Amid the rise in effective tariff rates, we expect meaningful tariff revenue to generally offset weaker fiscal outcomes that might otherwise be associated with the recent fiscal legislation, which contains both cuts and increases in tax and spending," S&P said in a statement. "At this time, it appears that meaningful tariff revenue has the potential to offset the deficit-raising aspects of the recent budget legislation." The U.S. reported a $21 billion jump in customs duty collections from Trump's tariffs in July, but the government budget deficit still grew nearly 20% in the same month to $291 billion. Interest on the public debt also continued to grow, hitting $1.013 trillion in the first 10 months of the fiscal year, an increase of 6%, or $57 billion, over the prior-year period due to slightly higher interest rates and increased debt levels. Since returning to power in January this year, Trump has launched a global trade war with a range of tariffs that have targeted individual products and countries. The Republican president has set a baseline tariff of 10% on all imports to the U.S., as well as additional duties on some items and trading partners. S&P, which became the first ratings agency to cut the pristine U.S. government rating in 2011, said the outlook on the U.S. rating remains stable. The ratings agency said it expects the Federal Reserve, which Trump has criticized this year for not cutting interest rates, "to navigate the challenges of lowering domestic inflation and addressing financial market vulnerabilities." It projected the country's general government deficit to average 6.0% of GDP during the 2025-2028 period, down from 7.5% in 2024 and from an average 9.8% of GDP in 2020-2023. S&P said it could lower the rating over the next two to three years if already high deficits increase. "The ratings could also come under pressure if political developments weigh on the strength of American institutions and the effectiveness of long-term policymaking or independence of the Federal Reserve," it said. S&P, however, said it could raise the U.S. rating in the event of sustained economic growth and adjustments to the U.S. fiscal profile that would diminish recent increases in the country's debt burden. There was no reaction in markets on Tuesday to S&P's credit rating affirmation, which follows a U.S. sovereign credit downgrade by Moody's in May, when that ratings agency cut the triple-A U.S. rating by one notch, citing rising debt levels. The U.S. national debt load surged above a record $37 trillion last week. James Ragan, co-chief investment officer and director of investment management research at D.A. Davidson, said the S&P rating affirmation was an acknowledgment of the meaningful tariff revenue generated so far. "That's all good revenue (coming) in, but that's also a drag on the economy, so I think we don't know the impact of that going forward," he said.
