Time4Learning Announces New Cinema Series Curriculum for Middle and High School Students
Starting late summer, Time4Learning students will have access to a comprehensive slate of Cinema Series courses powered by Subject. The courses will span Mathematics, Science, English, History, Government, and a wide array of electives like Financial Literacy, Intro to Engineering, Music Production & Digital Media, and more.
Cinema Series courses offer innovative story-driven instruction, relatable teachers and short-form visual content to maximize engagement. Interactive tools like drag-and-drop assessments apply proven pedagogical strategies to boost retention and rigor. Creative submission options such as videos or written reflections help bring lessons to life.
'Let's face it—kids today are growing up in a completely different media environment,' said Cheryl Dodge, President of Time4Learning. 'When learning looks and feels relevant, when it speaks their language, it sticks. With Cinema Series, we're delivering a curriculum that's not only rigorous and standards-aligned, but also incredibly cool. With a 94% student completion rate and a 13% average increase in student scores, we're confident that cinematic instruction doesn't just engage, it delivers.'
Subject's unique approach to building Cinema Series courses leans into multimodal learning, offering flexibility for how students learn and demonstrate knowledge. Each course is built for accessibility, making it easy for all students to participate and thrive.
'Time4Learning has always been at the forefront of supporting the unique needs of each individual learner,' said Michael Vilardo, CEO and President of Subject. 'We're thrilled to bring our high-impact curriculum to a platform that reaches so many families looking for flexible, modern education options. Together, we're reimagining learning to be as engaging as Hollywood feature films.'
Time4Learning supports a wide variety of learners, including homeschoolers, hybrid and remote students. This partnership reflects Time4Learning's continued commitment to evolving with the needs of students and families. As school choice grows across the country, it's never been more crucial to provide flexible, high-quality learning options outside traditional classrooms.
Families can begin exploring Cinema Series on Time4Learning starting this summer. For more information, visit https://www.time4learning.com/pages/lp-cinema-series.
About Time4Learning
Time4Learning is a leading online education platform that has supported over one million students since 2004. Offering a comprehensive, standards-based curriculum from PreK–12, Time4Learning empowers families with flexible, effective home education solutions. Time4Learning is proud to be part of Cambium Learning Group.
About Cambium Learning Group
Cambium Learning Group is the education essentials company, providing award-winning education technology and services for K-12 educators and students. With an intentional collection of respected global brands, Cambium serves as a leader, helping millions of educators and students feel more seen, valued, and supported every day. In everything it does, the company focuses on the elements that are most essential to the success of education, delivering simpler, more certain solutions that make a meaningful difference right now.
To learn more, visit www.cambiumlearning.com or follow Cambium on Facebook, LinkedIn, and X. The Cambium family of brands includes: Cambium Assessment, Lexia, Learning A-Z, ExploreLearning, and Time4Learning.
About Subject
Subject is a fully accredited digital learning platform offering standards-aligned, cinematic curriculum for middle and high school students. With content approved by UC–AG, NCAA, and the College Board, Subject supports students through flexible learning paths, creative expression, and world-class instruction that feels as engaging as the media they consume every day.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Why geopolitical alliance between the US and India is on ice
President Trump's announcement of sweeping new tariffs on India, totaling 50%, should dispel illusions that the US–India relationship is a warm alliance of like-minded democracies. The move marks a sharp escalation in what is now openly a trade war. Trump cited India's ongoing imports of discounted Russian oil, accusing New Delhi of helping fund Moscow's war machine and selling refined Russian crude on the open market for profit. India responded sharply, hinting at retaliation. Yet Trump pressed on: The first 25% tariff takes effect this week, with another 25% kicking in later this month. This is one of the harshest tariff regimes the US has ever imposed on a major trading partner — and it's aimed at a country Washington claims to view as a key ally. 5 President Trump's announcement of sweeping new tariffs on India, totaling 50%, should dispel illusions that the US–India relationship is a warm alliance of like-minded democracies. Trump is seen here with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. REUTERS On paper, India looks like the perfect partner. It's the world's most populous democracy, largely English-speaking, and deeply embedded in the US economy. Bilateral trade in goods and services hit $212 billion in 2024, with the US trade deficit at about $46 billion. India serves as a key manufacturing hub for pharmaceuticals, apparel and tech. The US sees India as a counterweight to China in the Indo-Pacific. But India doesn't see the relationship through sentimental eyes. Since the Cold War, New Delhi has pursued a doctrine of non-alignment, which has evolved into strategic autonomy. It joins US-led forums like the Quad — in which, alongside Japan and Australia, they aim to promote a free and open Indo-Pacific without demanding formal allegiance. But India is also a member of the BRICS group of developing nations and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. It buys weapons from the US and France, but also Russia, maintaining friendly ties with Iran and boycotting no one. 5 Russia is a long-time defense partner and energy supplier. India now imports more than a third of its oil from Russia, totaling over $50 billion annually — which is a huge spike since 2021. Modi is seen here with Russia's President Vladimir Putin. AP That instinct is rooted in deep historical memory. Colonized by Britain and sidelined by US Cold War support for Pakistan, India emerged with a fierce desire to avoid foreign dependency. Especially under the nationalist Prime Minister Narendra Modi, it sees itself not as a junior partner in a Western-led order but as a civilizational power asserting its own sovereignty. This helps explain India's refusal to isolate Russia over the Ukraine war. Russia is a long-time defense partner and energy supplier. India now imports more than a third of its oil from Russia, totaling over $50 billion annually — which is a huge spike since 2021, meaning India has taken advantage of Russia's discounts, and which makes it the largest importer of Russian crude ahead of China and Iran. Some of that oil is refined and re-exported to Western markets through a sanctions loophole. It's a lucrative arrangement India has no intention of abandoning — and it keeps Vladimir Putin in business. That's the connection driving events these past few weeks: As Trump has lost faith in Putin's willingness to engage on ending the Ukraine war, so has his impatience with Modi gone through the roof. 5 The US wants India's help in containing China and securing global supply chains. Modi is seen here with China's President Xi Jinping. Getty Images But Trump's response — tariffs as geopolitical punishment — is unusual. Tariffs are typically used to protect domestic industry. Using them to enforce foreign policy aims introduces a different logic. Is it madness? Not entirely. Tariffs are one of the few levers a president can pull unilaterally. But the India case exposes the risks of this approach. India is unlikely to cave. With 1.4 billion people (the most in the world), a $4.2 trillion economy (tied with Japan for fourth in the world) and decent economic growth, it doesn't take kindly to coercion. Worse, this tactic invites charges of hypocrisy. Other countries still trade with Russia in fertilizer, chemicals and refined products. There's also blowback. Tariffs generally raise prices for US consumers, particularly in sectors like generic drugs and clothing. They also threaten to undermine supply chain shifts away from China. Companies like Apple have moved production to India — only to find their new base hit with punitive tariffs. Meanwhile, India may retaliate against US exports in energy and aerospace. 5 The US sees India as a counterweight to China in the Indo-Pacific. But India doesn't see the relationship through sentimental eyes. Carlo – American policymakers of the pre-Trump era spoke of a shared democratic identity and mutual values. But the real relationship is transactional. The US wants India's help in containing China and securing global supply chains. India wants American technology, markets and investment. That's why cooperative efforts like the iCET tech partnership and semiconductor joint ventures may succeed where talk of 'friendship' falls flat. The signs of this can be subtle. For example, Trump has been bragging in recent weeks about having averted war between India and Pakistan earlier this year. Putting aside the likely exaggeration, it did not escape notice in New Delhi that he was placing India — an imperfect but pluralistic democracy — on equal footing with its less-than-democratic rival. For a country deeply conscious of its global standing, this surely reinforced the perception that the Trump administration views India not as a partner of principle, but as just another actor to be cajoled as the situation demands. So it is no surprise that trade negotiations have repeatedly stalled over tariffs and market access. India maintains high barriers on agricultural imports and resists regulatory alignment. The US complains of protectionism; India sees imperialism. Neither is entirely wrong. India's foreign policy is rational, pragmatic, occasionally aggressive and ruthlessly self-interested. Trump's tariffs may sting, but they won't alter that fact. 5 In 1949, President Herbert Hoover met with Indian activist Mahatma Gandhi in New Delhi. Bettmann Archive The discomfort lies in letting go of the fantasy that India is a democratic soulmate. If both sides accept that the relationship is not built on shared values but overlapping interests, then real partnership is still possible. For the likes of Trump and Modi, that's about the best that you can hope for. Dan Perry led Associated Press coverage in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, and served as AP's special international editor. He publishes Ask Questions Later on Substack.
Buzz Feed
3 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
Top Mispronounced Words That Will Make You Laugh
When it comes to spelling, the English language can be confusing at times. Like, why is 'gym' pronounced the same way as 'Jim'? If you've ever been let down by phonics, you're not the only one. In one Reddit thread (which you can see here), people shared the words and phrases they've mispronounced their entire lives, and honestly, I'm guilty of mispronouncing some of these exact words, too. Here are 19 words and phrases that people have butchered their whole lives: "Albeit. I used to pronounce it as 'all bite' for years. 😭" "It wasn't until I was 21 that I learned that it was 'hand me downs.' I've been saying 'hammy downs.'" "I thought the phrase 'dog-eat-dog' as in 'it's a dog-eat-dog world' was DOGGY DOG until I was a full-grown adult." –SecretMusician8485 "I used to think sci-fi was pronounced 'sky-fi' until I said it in front of my dad and he laughed at me and then told me it's actually pronounced like 'sigh-fi.'" "I was an adult when I learned it's 'chest of drawers' and not 'chester drawers.'" "Manslaughter is not pronounced 'man's laughter.'" "I'll never forget the day someone pointed out to me that I was saying 'lie-berry' instead of 'library.'' –ArizonaKim "I almost died of embarrassment my first day of grad school when I pronounced the word 'hegemony' as 'Hedgey-Money' because I had only ever read the word." "Melancholy. I pronounced it 'melon chollie' until I heard someone else pronounce it 'melankolly,' and it clicked." "I had been pronouncing 'epitome' as 'eh-pi-tome' (like how it's spelled) for decades. I genuinely thought 'uh-pi-tuh-mee' (which is the correct pronunciation) was an entirely different word this whole time." "I pronounced the 't' in pestle until like two years ago. I'm 56. I called it a mortar and pest-le." –Used-Currency-476 "Hyperbole. I was pronouncing it 'hyper-bowl' until I was 26, and I met my now-husband, who politely and sweetly corrected me on it!" "Until I was 20, I pronounced museum as 'mu-zam,' but one conversation I had with my brother exposed my error. I definitely felt that embarrassment as well, and I still have a slight anxiety when it comes to having wrong pronunciations of other words." "I was in my early 20s before I realized a footrest is called an ottoman. I always thought it was 'audiment.'" –Kribix_ "I once knew a girl who said 'oldtimers' instead of 'Alzheimer's.' I thought she did it jokingly, but she genuinely thought that's what it was called. She said it just made sense to her because it happened to old timers." "I was dating a literal physics-related PhD candidate (who was successful in getting it!) who would say 'minus well' instead of 'might as well.' Like he typed it out several times, I never told him." "I didn't realise until last year that I was saying 'pronounciation' instead of 'pronunciation.' Ironic, when you think about it." "For years, I thought dachshund (dash-hound) was a different breed than the one pronounced 'doxin.' I KNOW dachshund is 'doxin' now, but I still say dash-hound in my head when I see it." –Euphoric_Map_6653 "I went the majority of my life saying 'miss-rus' for Mrs., instead of 'missus.' No one ever corrected me." Do you have a word or phrase that belongs on this list? Let me know in the comments!
Tom's Guide
4 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
Voice cloning, celebrity impersonations and the need for safeguarding — Hume's CEO sounds off on the world of AI voice generation
On a Wednesday afternoon, I'm sitting on a video call listening to Ricky Gervais tell me a joke about voice cloning. Then, Audrey Heburn follows up to tell me her opinions on artificial intelligence. Unsurprisingly, neither of these people were actually on the call. Instead, it's Hume's CEO and chief scientist, Dr Alan Cowen, on the other side. He's showing off the latest update to his company's AI voice creation service EVI 3. Given just 30 seconds of audio, the tool can create a near-perfect replica of someone's voice. Not just their tone or accent, this new feature captures and replicates mannerisms and personality, too. Ricky Gervais telling me jokes about voice cloning features has his same dry wit and sarcastic tone. And Audrey Heburn is wistful and intrigued, while talking in a softer British accent of the time. But it's not just celebrities. This tool can take and replicate any voice in the world, all from just one small audio clip. Obviously, a tool like this has the benefit of changing the world, both for the better and the worse. Cowen sat down with Tom's Guide to explain this new tool, his background, and why his team wants to revolutionize the world of AI voice cloning. Hume operates in an area of AI that oddly doesn't come up as much. They are a voice generation software, making the claim of being 'the world's most realistic voice AI'. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. I think this is the fastest evolving part of the AI space. There are competitors from OpenAI and Google, but what we've done with Evi 3 is take the technology to the next step. It has come a long way over the years, now offering text-to-speech with a range of preset voices, as well as the ability to design a voice from a description. Now, with this latest update, the company can also clone any and all voices. 'I think this is the fastest evolving part of the AI space. There are competitors from OpenAI and Google, but what we've done with Evi 3 is take the technology to the next step,' Cowen explained on the call. 'Previous models have relied on mimicking specific people. Then you need loads of data to fine-tune for each person. This model instead replicates exactly what a person sounds like, including their emotions and personality.' This is achieved by using Hume's large backlog of voice data and reinforcement learning so that they don't have to mimic specific people. Give the model a 30-second clip, and it can recreate it from scratch. This allows the model to learn your specific inflections, accent and personality, while training it against a huge backlog of voice data to fill in the gaps. Of course, a model like this works best when given a good representation. A muffled clip of you talking in a monotone voice won't match your personality much. However, it currently only works for English and Spanish, with plans for more languages in the future. If, like me, your first thought at hearing all of this is concern, then surprisingly you have something in common with Cowen. 'I think this could be very misused. Early on at Hume, we were so concerned about these risks that we decided not to pursue voice cloning. But we've changed our mind because there are so many people with legitimate use cases for voice cloning that have approached us,' Cowen explained. 'The legitimate use cases include things like live translation, dubbing, making content more accessible, being able to replicate your own voice for scripts, or even celebrities who want to reach fans.' While these use cases do exist, there are just as many negative ones out there as well. Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, recently warned of the risks of AI voice cloning and its ability to be used in scams and bank voice activations. This technology, paired with video and image generation could be the push deepfakes have needed for a while to become truly problematic. Cowen explained that he was aware of these concerns and claimed that Hume was approaching it as best as they could. 'We are releasing a lot of safeguards with this technology. We analyze every conversation ,and we're still improving in this regard. But we can score how likely it is that something is being misused on a variety of dimensions. Whether somebody is being scammed or impersonated without permission,' Cowen said. 'We can obviously shut off access when people aren't using it correctly. In our terms, you have to comply with a bunch of ethical guidelines that we introduced alongside the Hume Initiative. These concerns have been on our mind since we started, and as we continue to unroll these technologies, we are improving our safeguarding too.' The Hume Initiative is a project set up by the Hume company. It's ethos is that modern technology should, above all, serve our emotional well-being. That is somewhat vague, but the Initiative lists out six principles for empathetic technologies: Of course, while these are good guidelines to follow, they are subjective, and only beneficial when followed. Cowen assured me that these are beliefs that Hume stands by and that, when it comes to voice cloning, they are well aware of the risks. Early on at Hume, we were so concerned about these risks that we decided not to pursue voice cloning. But we've changed our mind because there are so many people with legitimate use cases for voice cloning that have approached us. 'We are at the forefront of this technology and we try to stay ahead of it. I think that there will be people that don't respect the guidelines of this kind of tool. I don't want people to walk away thinking there is no danger here, there is,' Cowen explained. 'People should be concerned about deepfakes on the phone, they should be wary of these types of scams, and it something that I think we need a cross-industry attempt to address.' Despite being aware of the risks, Cowen explained that he thought this was a technology that they had to build. 'The AI space moves so fast that I don't doubt that a bad actor in six months will have access to something like this technology. We need to be careful of that,' Cowen said. Cowen spent a lot of our chat focusing on guidelines and the legitimate concerns of this kind of technology. His background is in Psychology and strongly believes that this kind of technology will have more of a positive effect on people's wellbeing than negative. 'People have been really enjoying cloning their voices with our demo. We've had thousands of conversations already, which is remarkable. People are using it in a really fun way,' Cowen said, after discussing what he thinks people get wrong about this kind of technology. He strongly believes that it can be used for fun, to help build people's confidence and can even be used for training purposes or for voice acting needs in films as well as dubbing. Of course, just like with many other areas of AI, the positive benefits are competing with the negative. Being able to have a generic voice read a script is useful, but rather uneventful in risk. Being able to accurately recreate any voice in the world comes with a long list of concerns. For now, Cowen and his team are way ahead in this venture, and seem committed to the ethical side of the debate, but we remain early into the life of this kind of technology.
