Pirro confirmed as D.C. U.S. Attorney amid partisan clash as Dem nominee blockade continues
The onetime New York judge and prosecutor and former Fox News host was one of the over 150 still outstanding nominees on the Senate's calendar as Senate Republicans work to find a path forward to ram through Senate Democrats' blockade of Trump's nominees, and part of a slew of picks to get a vote over the weekend. But just ahead of her confirmation vote, the path to a deal was derailed, and lawmakers opted to ram through just seven of Trump's nominees before heading home until September.
Pirro, who was confirmed by a 50-45 vote, will serve as U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, a post she has held since May on an interim basis.
Pirro previously served as the District Attorney in Westchester County, New York, for over a decade. Prior to that, she was on the bench as a judge in Westchester County in the early 1990s.
"Jeanine is incredibly well-qualified for this position, and is considered one of the Top District Attorneys in the History of the State of New York," Trump said when he nominated Pirro. "She is in a class by herself."
She was not Trump's first pick for the job, however. His first choice, Ed Martin, failed to gain enough support among Republicans earlier this year. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., effectively tanked Martin's nomination over concerns about his views on the Jan. 6, 2021 riot on Capitol Hill.
And Pirro's road to confirmation was not without its own hiccups and drama.
Senate Democrats have accused her of amplifying Trump's 2020 election fraud claims and defending him after the Jan. 6 Capitol riot during her time as a Fox News host, and warned that she would do the president's bidding in her role as Washington D.C.'s top prosecutor.
During a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing last month, Democrats staged a walkout in protest of both her and U.S. District Judge Emil Bove, who was confirmed earlier this week in a tight, 50 to 49 vote. She later advanced out of committee on a party-line vote.
"She's an election denialist, recklessly peddling President Trump's Big Lie despite even her own Fox News producers and executives warning her to reel it in," Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin, D-Ill. and the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee said of Pirro.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
4 minutes ago
- CBS News
Lowrider Lane street sign stolen from Sacramento's Miller Park
For decades, Sacramento's Miller Park has been a popular spot for cruising in cars. "When the weather's good, we come out here with our families, take a drive," said Francine Mata, president of the Sacramento Lowrider Commission. Last year, custom car clubs successfully worked with city leaders to change the name of the street that runs through the park to Lowrider Lane. But now, less than a year after the new street sign went up, it's been stolen. "It's just heartbreaking to look over there and see it's not there anymore," Mata said. Mata said her organization helped raise money to make the name change. "The community came together and donated," Mata said. "It was $10,400." She first noticed the sign missing this past Sunday and said the theft took place sometime within the last week. "I always felt that's something that you don't touch," Mata said. "It's pretty sacred for our community." Cruising had been banned in Sacramento for more than 30 years, but in 2022, the law was repealed. Mata said that renaming the street where cruisers traditionally gathered is a recognition and acceptance of Sacramento's car club history. "There are so many people that don't understand why we do what we do, don't know the culture," she said. The city said it's working on replacing the stolen sign, which will cost about $200. Mata said she has no idea if the sign was taken by a lowrider enthusiast or someone opposed to the name change. She just wants the original sign returned. "It means a lot to our entire community," she said. "Just bring it back." The city said public works crews will be placing the new street sign in a more secure bracket to deter theft.
Washington Post
9 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Alexis Martin, prominent antitrafficking activist, released from prison
AKRON, Ohio — Alexis Martin, a prominent antitrafficking activist, was ordered released from prison Monday following more than a decade of lobbying from advocates, legislators and celebrities, who argued courts should do more to protect, rather than punish, child trafficking survivors who commit crimes related to their abuse. An Ohio judge's decision to suspend Martin's sentence and free her on judicial release was the result of an agreement in which Martin pleaded guilty to lesser charges, including involuntary manslaughter, for her role in the death of her alleged abuser when she was 15. The case has been closely watched by those pushing the criminal justice system to give more leeway to trafficking victims.
Boston Globe
33 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Texas dispute highlights nation's long history of partisan gerrymandering. Is it legal?
Who is responsible for gerrymandering? In many states, like Texas, the state legislature is responsible for drawing congressional districts, subject to the approval or veto of the governor. District maps must be redrawn every 10 years, after each census, to balance the population in districts. But in some states, nothing prevents legislatures from conducting redistricting more often. In an effort to limit gerrymandering, some states have entrusted redistricting to special commissions composed of citizens or bipartisan panels of politicians. Democratic officials in some states with commissions are now talking of trying to sidestep them to counter Republican redistricting in Texas. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up How does a gerrymander work? Advertisement If a political party controls both the legislature and governor's office — or has such a large legislative majority that it can override vetoes — it can effectively draw districts to its advantage. One common method of gerrymandering is for a majority party to draw maps that pack voters who support the opposing party into a few districts, thus allowing the majority party to win a greater number of surrounding districts. Another common method is for the majority party to dilute the power of an opposing party's voters by spreading them among multiple districts. Why is it called gerrymandering? The term dates to 1812, when Massachusetts Gov. Elbridge Gerry signed a bill redrawing state Senate districts to benefit the Democratic-Republican Party. Some thought an oddly shaped district looked like a salamander. A newspaper illustration dubbed it 'The Gerry-mander' — a term that later came to describe any district drawn for political advantage. Gerry lost re-election as governor in 1812 but won election that same year as vice president with President James Madison. Advertisement Is political gerrymandering illegal? Not under the U.S. Constitution. The Supreme Court, in a 2019 case originating from North Carolina, ruled that federal courts have no authority to decide whether partisan gerrymandering goes too far. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote: 'The Constitution supplies no objective measure for assessing whether a districting map treats a political party fairly.' The Supreme Court noted that partisan gerrymandering claims could continue to be decided in state courts under their own constitutions and laws. But some state courts, including North Carolina's highest court, have ruled that they also have no authority to decide partisan gerrymandering claims. Are there any limits on redistricting? Yes. Though it's difficult to challenge legislative districts on political grounds, the Supreme Court has upheld challenges on racial grounds. In a 2023 case from Alabama, the high court said the congressional districts drawn by the state's Republican-led Legislature likely violated the Voting Rights Act by diluting the voting strength of Black residents. The court let a similar claim proceed in Louisiana. Both states subsequently redrew their districts. What does data show about gerrymandering? Statisticians and political scientists have developed a variety of ways to try to quantify the partisan advantage that may be attributable to gerrymandering. Republicans, who control redistricting in more states than Democrats, used the 2010 census data to create a strong gerrymander. An Associated Press analysis of that decade's redistricting found that Republicans enjoyed a greater political advantage in more states than either party had in the past 50 years. Advertisement But Democrats responded to match Republican gerrymandering after the 2020 census. The adoption of redistricting commissions also limited gerrymandering in some states. An AP analysis of the 2022 elections — the first under new maps — found that Republicans won just one more U.S. House seat than would have been expected based on the average share of the vote they received nationwide. That was one of the most politically balanced outcomes in years.
