logo
Edinburgh Council agrees private hire survey

Edinburgh Council agrees private hire survey

A survey to determine whether there are too many private hire cars in Edinburgh has been approved by Edinburgh councillors.
It comes after a group of taxi drivers in the capital handed over a petition to city councillors last month, asking for a review to be carried out.
The drivers had also asked for a pause to be placed on issuing new private hire licences while the survey was carried out.
But at Friday's meeting of the Regulatory Committee, councillors did not back a Green group amendment that would have called for that.
According to council regulatory services head Andrew Mitchell, tendering for a survey would take about 12 weeks, and data collection would take place in the first half of 2026.
Taxi drivers passed the petition in to the council last week
In a deputation to the committee, city taxi driver Keith Auld told councillors: 'We believe every passenger deserves a professional journey. But we are undergoing unsustainable pressure.
'This is not healthy competition, it is over-saturation. And it is already having real consequences. We need fair, sustainable and regulated competition.'
Mr Auld and other city black cab drivers say that private hire drivers, many of whom carry out work for apps like Uber and Bolt, end up undercutting their trade.
According to them, this comes down to the lower cost to buy and run a hire car, with the vehicles allowed for use as taxis being very expensive and requiring public hire insurance.
In addition, fares for black cabs are set by the council, while Uber, Bolt and other private hire providers have no minimum charge.
They also argued in their petition that due to the low incomes drivers get from those rideshare services, many of them work for dangerously long hours.
Officers said that 2,982 private hire cars were presently operating in the capital, while 1,090 taxis were also running.
Mr Auld said that three new private hire cars were being added in the city every day, and that the number would reach 4,000 'in no time'.
After the survey is returned to councillors next year, they may consider putting a cap on the number of private hire cars allowed in the city.
In the meeting, councillors were supportive of the idea of a survey, but the committee stopped short of supporting the temporary freeze on licence grants.
Green councillor Susan Rae put forward an amendment that would have called for this, but Mr Mitchell said that if the committee voted for it, the law could be broken.
He said: 'There is no legal power to issue a moratorium. There would be no basis in law to refuse to consider an application on the basis of overprovision [without evidence].
'In my view, an immediate moratorium is not something that would be competent.'
Liberal Democrat councillor and committee convener Neil Ross endorsed his group's motion, which called for a survey to be conducted.
He said: 'It would be helpful if we had a workshop for committee members to discuss other issues and elements of concern around the current numbers of private hire vehicles.
'I would be grateful if that were factored in. I'm proposing that we proceed with the consultation and overprovision survey.
'I'm also proposing that officers are alert to concerns raised by all members of the trade who have issues around long working hours.
'I think this is a sensible way forward, it follows the guidance that we have been given by the Scottish Government, it is a legally robust way of approaching the question.'
Labour councillor Margaret Graham put forward an amendment for the city's administration, which asked that any survey look at the number of private hire cars parked in city streets.
Conservative councillor Joanna Mowat said: 'I'm probably alone in this committee in having very great nervousness about interfering in the market.
'There is an element with any cap that is introduced with numbers, the danger of creating protected markets.
'I'm uncomfortable with that, from a political point of view, my natural mean is to be uncomfortable with protecting markets.
'I do think the terms of the petition that has been brought here today, about the public safety element, is something that means we should probably consider this.
'I don't for one minute think this is going to produce the information that everyone else seems to think this is going to produce.
'But we're not going to know that unless we carry out an overprovision survey.'
The Labour group added the Green amendment to their addendum, and the Liberal Democrat group added a portion of the administration addendum to their amendment.
Both positions were tied, and as convener, Cllr Ross made a tiebreaking vote that saw the Liberal Democrat position win out.
By Joseph Sullivan Local Democracy Reporter
Like this:
Like
Related
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Ludicrous' to blame gig economy for mass migration, insists Lord Cameron
‘Ludicrous' to blame gig economy for mass migration, insists Lord Cameron

Telegraph

time2 hours ago

  • Telegraph

‘Ludicrous' to blame gig economy for mass migration, insists Lord Cameron

Lord Cameron has hit out at 'ludicrous' claims that he contributed to the small boats crisis by embracing a wave of loosely-regulated gig economy apps. The former prime minister denied that his backing for the expansion of firms such as Uber and Deliveroo helped create a thriving black market for jobs. His comments come amid revelations that asylum seekers are making money illegally as couriers and food delivery drivers in the so-called gig economy of lightly regulated part-time work. Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, has vowed to crack down on the practice, warning it 'undermines honest business and undercuts local wages'. Lord Cameron's government pledged to become a global centre for tech companies involved in the gig economy 11 years ago, courting some of the biggest players. Lee Anderson, the Reform UK MP, suggested the Coalition's stance had allowed illegal migrants 'to roam the streets on e-bikes and make a living'. A spokesman for the former prime minister denied the claims, insisting Lord Cameron was 'proud' of having brought investment into the UK. He said: 'Lord Cameron remains incredibly proud of everything he and the governments he led did to ensure the UK established itself as a truly successful global tech hub – attracting global businesses, creating jobs, and boosting economic growth. 'To link this success story to the legitimate issues of illegal immigration is ludicrous. 'Indeed, it's a legacy we should be proud of and successive governments should build on, as we seek to ensure the UK remains an attractive place to do business; attract talent and innovation; and secure our place as a global centre for tech and entrepreneurialism.' The Coalition government, which was led by Lord Cameron, commissioned a review into what was then called the 'sharing economy' in 2015. It had the aim of making Britain the 'global centre' of the new wave of services such as Uber and Deliveroo, and lifting regulations on the sector. But the delivery apps have become controversial, with accusations they are attracting illegal migrant labour. Their delivery drivers are classed as self-employed workers, rather than employees, which has meant they have been subject to fewer checks. There have also been issues around the use of 'substitute' drivers – where people who are legitimately in the UK own a delivery account with one of the companies but then subcontract it out to illegal workers for a fee. The Home Office has announced plans to tighten up the system, forcing delivery firms to carry out more illegal working checks on riders working for them. On Friday, ministers announced that hundreds of delivery drivers had been arrested in a single week last month as part of a new crackdown on illegal migrants. A total of 1,780 people were intercepted at locations across Britain for suspected illegal working activity between July 20 and 27. The Home Office said 280 people were detained in areas including Hillingdon in north-west London, Dumfries in Scotland, and Birmingham. Of these, 53 are now having their asylum support reviewed, which could lead to it being withdrawn, the Government said. The findings follow a Telegraph investigation that revealed asylum seekers housed in Home Office hotels were paying off debts to people smugglers by illegally working as bike couriers. The Telegraph found that migrants were making up to £500 a week by working for delivery services such as Deliveroo, Just Eat and Uber Eats, even though many of them were banned from working because of their immigration status. Illegal work carried out by asylum seekers has become a political flashpoint amid growing public anger over the failure to stop small boat crossings. The Tories and Reform have criticised Labour for having a soft touch approach, with the number of illegal arrivals on course to break records. More than 25,000 people had crossed the Channel by the end of June, the earliest in the year at which that figure has been reached. Lee Anderson, the Reform chief whip, said: 'Labour and the Tories have completely lost control of the asylum system and taxpaying Britons are footing the bill. 'Not only are these unidentified fighting-age males being welcomed and housed in luxurious hotels, they are also able to roam the streets on e-bikes and make a living. 'The fact that this is being allowed to happen without a serious crackdown is appalling'.

Why ‘dynamic pay' is the new way to rip you off
Why ‘dynamic pay' is the new way to rip you off

Times

time12 hours ago

  • Times

Why ‘dynamic pay' is the new way to rip you off

Workers are having their wages cut by new 'dynamic pay' schemes, unions and academics have warned. The practice of surge pricing came under fire after firms used demand to drive up the cost of Oasis reunion tickets. Some gig-economy workers, including Uber drivers and Deliveroo workers, are having their own problems with surge pricing, because their pay is adjusted based on real-time demand. The pay models are based on algorithms. Instead of receiving a predictable, formula-based fee per task, workers are being offered personalised payments for each job. A University of Oxford study published in June found that Uber's 'dynamic pay' system, introduced in 2023 and which alters pay as well as passenger fares, is cutting driver earnings on higher-value trips. Unlike the familiar surge pricing that bumps up fares during busy times to get more drivers on the road, the 'dynamic' system also tweaks how the fare is split, often meaning Uber takes a bigger cut and drivers end up with less. Reuben Binns, an associate professor at Oxford's Department of Computer Science, said: 'The higher the value of the trip, the more of a cut Uber takes. So the more the customer pays, the less the driver actually earns per minute. • What is Ticketmaster, the $22bn music giant under fire for 'dynamic pricing'? 'Workers try all sorts of things to cope — switching apps, refusing certain jobs, tracking their own data — but they're always a step behind the algorithm. 'Platforms are getting more secretive over time. They've moved from a relatively transparent system to a much more complicated one. If this model becomes widespread, it raises big questions about how workers can plan their finances.' Katie Wells, an academic from Georgetown University in Washington DC who studies algorithmic pay systems, said similar models are appearing in other sectors, including healthcare in the US where nurses bid for shifts. She said: 'Uber's personalised wages and prices echo what's happening with grocery prices, plane tickets, and other goods increasingly being priced with granular data.' One London-based Uber driver, who asked to remain anonymous, said: 'I have noticed that our fares or the amount we receive have gone down. Plenty of the drivers I know complain that Uber is deducting more than expected. Many drivers are getting frustrated. 'One of my fellow drivers said he wants to quit Uber because he feels like it's tormenting him as he works so hard just to make £140 a day. I reject a lot of jobs based on fares now. You have to see what job brings you more money.' The former Uber driver Ronak Kazi, 39, said the pay system often felt unpredictable. 'We would get very different amounts for very similar jobs,' he said. Henry Chango Lopez, general secretary of the Independent Workers' Union of Great Britain (IWGB), said: 'The spread of dynamic pricing models should worry us all. These systems keep workers in a constant state of anxiety — forced to make hundreds of snap decisions a day without any transparency into how pay is calculated. It's not just that the game is rigged, it's that workers aren't even allowed to know the rules.' Lopez said that many drivers were working 70-hour weeks under the model and still struggling to cover basic costs, noting that Uber's adoption of dynamic pay preceded the largest driver strike in UK history. • Read more money advice and tips on investing from our experts The GMB union says the lack of transparency in how platforms calculate pay highlights the inequalities between workers and operators, increasing insecurity in already low-income roles. Alex Wood, an assistant professor in economic sociology at the University of Cambridge, said: 'Platforms use dynamic pricing to manage supply and demand, but these systems are highly opaque. It's impossible for workers to know how much they will earn, causing insecurity and anxiety in a population where many already earn below the minimum wage.' A Deliveroo spokesperson said: 'Our rider pay model is designed for flexibility and transparency. All riders have access to information on how orders are offered and how fees are calculated on our website. Riders have the freedom to determine when, where and whether they will work and earnings are measured based on factors such as the time riders spend on each order.' An Uber spokesman said: 'We do not recognise the figures in this report. We're focused on offering people a safe, affordable and easy option to get where they need to go and are proud that thousands of drivers continue to make the positive choice to work on Uber as passenger demand and trips continue to grow.'

Trump drug price plans could harm patients claim Welsh Lib Dems
Trump drug price plans could harm patients claim Welsh Lib Dems

South Wales Argus

time13 hours ago

  • South Wales Argus

Trump drug price plans could harm patients claim Welsh Lib Dems

This is the claim of the Welsh Liberal Democrats who said the move could harm the Welsh NHS and the thousands of people working in Wales' pharmaceutical sector. The life sciences sector in Wales employs more than 12,000 people across more than 250 companies, including PCI Pharma Services in Tredegar and a growing cluster of specialist producers in Newport. It contributes approximately £2.6 billion to the Welsh economy annually. The party said reports revealed Trump had written to global pharmaceutical companies, including AstraZeneca and GSK, demanding they lower drug prices for American patients. It said the UK government had reportedly already agreed to review NHS drug pricing as part of wider UK–US trade negotiations. Welsh Liberal Democrat leader Jane Dodds MS said: 'We must stand up to Trump's bullying. This time, he is not just picking a fight; he is putting the health of people in Wales at risk. "From threatening drug price hikes to imposing tariffs on essential medicines, his tactics could lead to shortages, rising NHS costs and real harm to Welsh patients. "The UK government must stop rolling over and urgently convene a task force, in full coordination with the Welsh Government, to put an emergency plan in place. "That means preparing for stockpiling and protecting our medicine supply chains by standing up for our domestic pharmaceutical industry and the Welsh workers it employs.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store