Researchers launch new search to find Amelia Earhart's plane
On Wednesday, researchers at Purdue University announced a new expedition that hopes to find some material evidence of Earhart's airplane.
Using satellite imagery, the researchers have identified a spot on the tiny, remote island of Nikumaroro in Kirabati which they believe may be the final resting place of Earhart's plane, according to NBC News.
The expedition was announced on July 2, exactly 88 years after Earhart and navigator Fred Noonan disappeared during their famed attempt to circumnavigate the world in her airplane.
Earhart worked for Purdue University, and the institute helped to fund her historic, if tragic, final flight. Purdue said it plans to send a team in November to examine the site and, hopefully, find evidence of her Lockheed Electra 10E airplane.
'We believe we owe it to Amelia and her legacy at Purdue to fulfill her wishes, if possible, to bring the Electra back to Purdue,' Steve Schultz, Purdue's general counsel, said in a statement.
The satellite photo fueling the new expedition was captured in 2015, just one year after a powerful tropical cyclone shifted the sands at the island, potentially revealing the plane, according to Richard Pettigrew, the executive director of the nonprofit Archaeological Legacy Institute in Oregon.
Pettigrew took the satellite imagery to Purdue, which kickstarted the upcoming expedition.
According to Pettigrew, the size and composition of the object matches parts of Earhart's plane, and the island's location is close to Earhart's planned flight path, and almost exactly where four of her last radio calls for help originated.
'It satisfies all the criteria,' he said. 'Everything fits.'
Earhart's disappearance was a tragic final act after a decade of newspaper and radio stories documenting her record-setting flights.
On June 17, 1928, at the age of 30, she became the first woman to pilot a plane — a bright red Lockheed Vega 5B, which she called "old Bessie, the fire steed"— across the Atlantic. The endeavor made headlines across the nation.
Later, she became the first person to complete a solo flight across the Pacific, traveling from California to the Hawaiian islands in 1934.
Earhart was initially treated as an aviation oddity due to her gender; news reports at the time called her the first "girl" to fly across the Atlantic, and another referred to her as an "aviatrix.'
But as she continued to prove her prowess in the cockpit, she gained notoriety as a great pilot, rather than as a curious outlier. Even still, she used her growing prominence to push for equality in the skies; in an interview with the Evening Star in 1929, Earhart pleaded with the public to "give women a chance in the air."
"Women can qualify in the air as in any other sport. Their influence and approval are vital to the success of commercial aviation," she said at the time. "Women and girls write to me by the thousands to learn the truth about aviation and what women's chances are. There is nothing in women's make-up which would make her inferior to a man as an air pilot. The only barrier to her swift success is her lack of opportunity to receive proper training."
After numerous successful and record-setting flights in the late '20s and early '30s, Earhart set her sights on a new goal: becoming the first woman to circumnavigate the planet in an aircraft.
Following her disappearance, the public remained somewhat hopeful that she would be found to fly again another day. But, after a two-month search that turned up no trace of her or Noonan, the pair were presumed dead.
Pettigrew has been trying to find the remains of Earhart's flight for years. He has visited Nikumaroro, and said that a period-appropriate medical vial and American-made tool were found on the island, suggesting someone from the West — perhaps Earhart — had been on the island in some capacity around the time of her disappearance.
According to National Geographic, four forensic dogs and a team of archaeologists with the International Group for Historic Aircraft Recovery traveled to the island in 2017. During that trip, the dogs reportedly detected the scent of human remains, though none were actually found. No one lives on Nikumaroro, and there is scant evidence of there ever being continuous inhabitation on the island.
Two years later, famed ocean explorer Robert Ballard led an expedition to locate Earhart's plane or evidence that it had landed on the island. After days of searching both the island's cliffs and the surrounding waters, Ballard found no evidence of a wreck on the island.
"We felt like if her plane was there, we would have found it pretty early in the expedition," Allison Fundis, Ballard's chief operating officer for the expedition, told The New York Times.
The Executive Director of the International Group for Historic Aircraft Recovery, Richard Gillespie said he doubts the Purdue expedition will turn up any evidence of Earhart's plane on their upcoming expedition.
'We've looked there in that spot, and there's nothing there,' he told NBC News.
Gillespie has launched a dozen expeditions over the last 35 years searching for Earhart, including searches of Nikumaroro. He said the satellite image guiding the Purdue expedition shows an overturned coconut palm tree with a root ball that had been washed up by a storm.
'I understand the desire to find a piece of Amelia Earhart's airplane. God knows we've tried,' he said. 'But the data, the facts, do not support the hypothesis. It's as simple as that.'
Despite his skepticism, Purdue will undertake the expedition regardless. The Purdue Research Foundation has extended a credit line of $500,000 to the first phase of the expedition, according to Shultz.
The expedition members will depart in November and spend six days traveling to reach Nikumaroro. From there, they'll have five days on the island to investigate the object from the satellite imagery and determine whether or not it is evidence of Earhart's missing plane.
'If we hopefully solve the mystery and confirm that it is, then there will be further efforts to bring it back, hopefully to a permanent home,' Schultz said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Scientists just rediscovered a rare insect we thought went extinct 20 years ago
If you purchase an independently reviewed product or service through a link on our website, BGR may receive an affiliate commission. Scientists have managed to find a rare insect after it supposedly went extinct more than two decades ago. The Behningia baei, a species of mayfly that hasn't been seen since 2002, were rediscovered in the Mae Chaem River in Thailand this past year. This rediscovery ends a long gap in humanity's entomological records. Until now, B. baei had vanished from every expedition since its formal description in 2006, with no actual sightings since 2002. The main difference between this study and others looking for the creature is that the team behind the find didn't look to the skies for fluttering adults. Instead, they searched beneath the surface. Today's Top Deals XGIMI Prime Day deals feature the new MoGo 4 and up to 42% off smart projectors Best deals: Tech, laptops, TVs, and more sales Best Ring Video Doorbell deals One reason for this is because these mayflies only tend to live a matter of hours or days in their final form — the form we most often see fluttering around if you live anywhere near mayfly territory. However, by using kick nets to stir the sandy riverbed, the researchers were able to uncover juveniles of the species, called nymphs, like little hidden grains of rice in the sand. These juvenile mayflies spend nearly their entire lives buried in fine sediments, making them much easier to locate than their short-lived adult forms. The rediscovery of this rare insect is important for more than just telling scientists where it lives. Mayflies are essential to freshwater ecosystems, as they move nutrients from algae to fish, birds, and other animals. They're also an important indicator of the health of a stream or river as their gills require clean, oxygen-rich water. As such, their discovery in the Mae Chaem confirms that the river remains a healthy habitat. Future work, like DNA barcoding, will confirm the species' identity and rule out any hidden relatives. The team also plans to explore nearby tributaries before the rainy season begins. Meanwhile, they're training local students to help with future surveys. This widespread community involvement could turn rare finds of the insect juveniles into a regular means of monitoring data about the mayflies. Considering the current state of the world's climate, and the fact that common farm chemicals might be killing off many insects, this discovery is a massive win for conservationists. More Top Deals Memorial Day security camera deals: Reolink's unbeatable sale has prices from $29.98 See the
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Researchers develop new technology to destroy hazardous substances in drinking water: 'Will fundamentally alter our approach'
While being able to drink clean water is as easy as turning on the faucet for some, many others struggle with the challenges of contaminated water and poor water quality. However, a team of researchers out of Purdue University has announced a development in water technology that it believes can bridge that gap. According to a news release from the Purdue Research Foundation, professors and students from multiple campuses as well as industry insiders helped create "an energy efficient, ambient temperature solution" that tackles contamination in both residential and industrial applications. As noted by the researchers, testing indicated that the technology effectively destroyed a number of hazardous chemicals. These chemicals ranged from fuel additives to pharmaceuticals. The team sent samples to two third-party testing laboratories in California that confirmed the removal of "forever chemicals," or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances. In 2019, the World Health Organization released a report estimating that more than 2 billion people around the world lack access to safely managed clean drinking water. "Mere access is not enough. If the water isn't clean, isn't safe to drink, or is far away, and if toilet access is unsafe or limited, then we're not delivering for the world's children," said Kelly Ann Naylor, associate director of water, sanitation, and hygiene at UNICEF. Following the success of the water purification technology, Rene Ramirez, founder of Fino Advisors, chose to fund the early-stage development in partnership with the university. This has led to the creation of Frellmann Water Technologies to further develop the technology. According to PitchBook, the company is already in the "generating revenue" stage. Fred Berry, professor at the Purdue Polytechnic Institute's School of Engineering Technology, applauded the success of the development and its potential. "This initiative will fundamentally alter our approach to water treatment, showcasing the powerful outcomes that arise when diverse talents unite," Berry said. The technology will be utilized in multiple Central California locations before potentially becoming available nationwide at a later date. How often do you worry about the quality of your drinking water? Never Sometimes Often Always Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
How do airplane toilets work?
Even in an age where flying is a fairly regular occurrence, there are some things that you never forget about your first journey on an visceral thrill of being pushed back into your seat as the plane accelerates toward take-off, the jitters that accompany your first bout of turbulence, and the SLUUUUURP sound in the lavatory. The alarming noise ensues when you press the 'flush' button in an airplane toilet and the bowl's contents are magically sucked away into oblivion. With the noise and essentially 'clean' bowl as a result, there's clearly some sort of vacuum cleaner-type effect at how do aircraft toilets work? Aerospace engineer Bill Crossley, the head of the School of Aeronautics and Astronautics at Purdue University in Indiana, explains to Popular Science that the answer is as simple as it is ingenious. The system relies on one simple fact. 'When you go up to high altitude and you're flying fast, the pressure outside the cabin is a lot lower than it is inside,' he says. The laws of physics—and specifically the ideal gas law—dictate that the contents of a region with relatively high pressure will tend to flow into a region with relatively low pressure. Flushing the toilet on an airplane opens a valve between the pressurised cabin and a tank that remains at atmospheric pressure. That process creates exactly this sort of pressure differential. In other words, 'when you flush the toilet, you're basically opening a valve to the outside, and the pressure differential sucks away whatever's in the bowl,' Crossley says. The beauty of the system is that it doesn't require vacuum pumps or other complications to create the pressure differential. It simply makes use of the existing difference in pressure between the aircraft's interior and exterior at altitude. Of course, this requires that there is a pressure difference. On the ground, Crossley says, the system uses a vacuum pump. The pump remains in use until the plane reaches an altitude where the atmospheric pressure allows the system to work without it, at which point it is switched off. The idea itself is simple and has remained largely unchanged since it was first patented in 1975. However, retired aircraft engineer Nigel Jones explains that the complexity of the implementation still varies from aircraft to aircraft. Some planes' systems evacuate every toilet to a single tank, while others use multiple smaller tanks. Some use complex piping arrangements, while others opt for simpler configurations. [ Related: How does a composting toilet work? Ditch the flush.] Then there's the Lockheed TriStar, an airliner built between 1968 and 1984 that remains Jones' favorite to this day. The TriStar's toilets were famously arranged in a circle, and they were as idiosyncratic behind the scenes as they were to passengers. '[The TriStar] had a logic system to manage flushing,' he says fondly. 'It had a tank at the front for the forward toilets and another for the five or six toilets at the back. The system had three, I think it was three toilet pumps, and it would flush pumps in turn that the logic box would if say toilet five wanted to flush, the logic box would say, 'Right, it's pump one's turn.' It was incredibly complicated, and all just to flush the toilet.' Some might argue that this system sounds perhaps a little over-engineered. 'We did feel that way every time there was a problem and looking at the pump didn't fix it,' Jones concedes. 'If we had to go in and look at the logic box, we'd have to lie on top of the tank. This was… well, it was not pleasant.' While such complexity may be overkill–and is rarely found in modern airliners–Jones notes that some degree of twisting and turning in the system's piping is important for one simple reason: it slows down the waste. 'It's not a straight run [from toilet to tank], and it can't be,' Jones says. 'The vacuum pressure means that the drawing speed is such that if there were no bends in the pipes, the waste would hit the wall of the tank with considerable force.' How considerable? According to Jones, it would be 'enough that you could potentially break the tank.' Even without such a catastrophic outcome, he notes dryly, 'the noise would be most alarming.' Prior to the advent of the vacuum-based flush, planes used chemical systems similar to those that remain in use today in portable toilets, where the bowl connects directly to a tank full of the dreaded blue liquid. This also explains the origin of the term 'blue ice', which refers to waste that somehow escapes the tank—at high altitude, any such waste freezes immediately, and remains frozen until it returns to the ground, at which point it reveals its true nature to anyone unfortunate enough to cross its path. Such systems are vanishingly rare today, remaining in use only on aircraft large enough for aviation regulations to require the presence of a toilet, but small enough that a vacuum system is more trouble than it's worth. Crossley says that the only planes to fall into this category are small business aircraft, which are sometimes equipped with what he describes as a 'fancy port-a-potty.' On larger planes, he says, the vacuum system really is the only game in town. 'It's everything you want an airplane system to be: first, it's safe; second, it's reliable; and third, it's lightweight.' This story is part of Popular Science's Ask Us Anything series, where we answer your most outlandish, mind-burning questions, from the ordinary to the off-the-wall. Have something you've always wanted to know? Ask us.
