logo
Trump alleges 'genocide' in South Africa. At an agricultural fair, even Afrikaner farmers scoff

Trump alleges 'genocide' in South Africa. At an agricultural fair, even Afrikaner farmers scoff

Independent20-05-2025

Days before South Africa's president meets with U.S. President Donald Trump at the White House this week, Afrikaner farmers at the center of an extraordinary new U.S. refugee policy roamed a memorial to farm attacks in their country's agricultural heartland, some touching the names of the dead — both Black and white.
Here in Bothaville, where thousands of farmers gathered for a lively agricultural fair with everything from grains to guns on display, even some conservative white Afrikaner groups debunked the Trump administration's 'genocide' and land seizure claims that led it to cut all financial aid to South Africa.
The bustling scene was business as usual, with milkshakes and burgers and tow-headed children pulled in wagons.
The late President Nelson Mandela — South Africa's first Black leader — stood in Bothaville over a quarter-century ago and acknowledged the increasing violent attacks on farmers in the first years following the decades-long racial system of apartheid. 'But the complex problem of crime on our farms, as elsewhere, demand long-term solutions,' he said.
Some at the agricultural fair said fleeing the country isn't one of them.
'I really hope that during the upcoming visit to Washington, (President Cyril Ramaphosa) is going to be able to put the facts before his counterpart and to demonstrate that there is no mass expropriation of land taking place in South Africa, and there is no genocide taking place," John Steenhuisen, minister of agriculture, told The Associated Press. He will be part of the delegation for Wednesday's meeting.
The minority white Afrikaner community is in the spotlight after the U.S. granted refugee status to at least 49 of them claiming to flee racial and violent persecution and widespread seizures of white-owned land — despite evidence that such claims are untrue.
While many at the agricultural fair raised serious concerns about the safety of farmers and farm workers, others were quick to point out that crime targeted both Black and white farmers and farm workers, as shown by South Africa's crime statistics.
Thobani Ntonga, a Black farmer from Eastern Cape province, told the AP he had been attacked on his farm by criminals and almost kidnapped but a Black neighbor intervened.
'Crime affects both Black and white. ... It's an issue of vulnerability," he said. 'Farmers are separated from your general public. We're not near towns, we are in the rural areas. And I think it's exactly that. So, perpetrators, they thrive on that, on the fact that farms are isolated."
Other farmers echoed his thoughts and called for more resources and policing.
'Crime especially hits small-scale farmers worse because they don't have resources for private security,' said Afrikaner farmer Willem de Chavonnes Vrugt. He and other farmers wondered why they would leave the land where they have been rooted for decades.
Ramaphosa, himself a cattle farmer, also visited the agricultural fair for the first time in about 20 years — to buy equipment but also do outreach as many in South Africa puzzle over the Trump administration's focus on their country.
'We must not run away from our problems,' the president said during his visit. 'When you run away, you're a coward.'
Applying to be a refugee
The fast-tracking of the Afrikaners' refugee applications has raised questions about a system where many seeking asylum in the U.S. can languish for years, waiting.
The State Department has not made details of the process public, but one person who has applied to be resettled told the AP the online application process was 'rigorous.'
Katia Beeden, a member of an advocacy group established to assist white South Africans seeking resettlement, said applicants have to go through at least three online interviews and answer questions about their health and criminal background.
They are also required to submit information or proof of being persecuted in South Africa, she said. She said she has been robbed in her house, with robbers locking her in her bedroom.
'They've already warned that you can't lie or hide anything from them. So it's quite a thorough process and not everyone is guaranteed,' she said.
By the numbers
Violent crime is rife in South Africa, but experts say the vast majority of victims are Black and poor. Police statistics show that up to 75 people are killed daily across the country.
Afrikaner agriculture union TLU SA says it believes farmers are more susceptible to such attacks because of their isolation.
Twelve murders occurred on farms in 2024, police statistics show. One of those killed was a farmer. The rest were farm workers, people staying on farms and a security guard. The data don't reflect the victims' race.
Overall across South Africa last year, 6,953 people were killed.
Government data also show that white farmers own the vast majority of South Africa's farmland — 80% of it, according to the 2017 census of commercial agriculture, which recorded over 40,000 white farmers.
That data, however, only reflects farmers who have revenue of $55,396 a year, which excludes many small-scale farmers, the majority of them Black.
Overall, the white minority — just 7% of the population is white — still owns the vast majority of the land in South Africa, which the World Bank has called 'the most unequal country in the world.'
According to the 2017 government land audit, white South Africans hold about 72% of individually owned land — while Black South Africans own 15%.
Associated Press writer Michelle Gumede in Johannesburg contributed to this report. ____

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mahmoud Khalil: US judge denies release of detained Palestinian activist
Mahmoud Khalil: US judge denies release of detained Palestinian activist

The Guardian

time3 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Mahmoud Khalil: US judge denies release of detained Palestinian activist

A federal judge declined to order the release of Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil, a setback for the former Columbia University student days after a major ruling against the Trump administration's efforts to keep him detained. Khalil, a green-card holder who has not been charged with a crime, is one of the most high-profile people targeted by the US government's crackdown on pro-Palestinian campus activism. Despite key rulings in his favor, Khalil has been detained since March, missing the birth of his son. His advocates were hopeful earlier in the week that he was close to walking free. On Wednesday, Judge Michael E Farbiarz ruled the Trump administration could no longer detain Khalil on the basis of claims that he posed a threat to US foreign policy. The federal judge in New Jersey said efforts to deport him based on those grounds were likely unconstitutional. Farbiarz had given the US government until Friday morning to appeal against the order, which the Trump administration did not do. Khalil's lawyers then argued he must be released immediately, but the government said it would keep him detained in a remote detention facility in Louisiana. The administration argued it was authorized to continue detaining him based on alternative grounds – its allegations that he lied on his green-card application. On Friday, Farbiarz said Khalil's lawyers had failed to present enough evidence that detention based on the green-card claims was unlawful, suggesting attorneys for the 30-year-old activist could seek bail from a Louisiana immigration judge. Khalil's have strongly rejected the government's assertions about problems with his green-card application, arguing the claims were a pretext to keep him detained. 'Mahmoud Khalil was detained in retaliation for his advocacy for Palestinian rights,' Amy Greer, one of his attorneys, said in a statement on Friday evening. 'The government is now using cruel, transparent delay tactics to keep him away from his wife and newborn son ahead of their first Father's Day as a family. Instead of celebrating together, he is languishing in [immigration] detention as punishment for his advocacy on behalf of his fellow Palestinians. It is unjust, it is shocking, and it is disgraceful.' Khalil has previously disputed the notion that he omitted information on his application. In a filing last week, he maintained he was never employed by or served as an 'officer' of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees, as the administration claims, but completed an internship approved by the university as part of his graduate studies. Khalil said he also stopped working for the British embassy in Beirut in December 2022, when he moved to the US, despite the administration's claims that he had worked in the embassy's Syria office longer. The Friday ruling prolonging his detention came the same day a group of celebrity fathers filmed a video reading Khalil's letter to his newborn son. The Father's Day campaign, published by the American Civil Liberties Union, called for Khalil's freedom and included actors Mark Ruffalo, Mahershala Ali, Arian Moayed and Alex Winter. Earlier in the week, when there was a ruling in Khalil's favor, Dr Noor Abdalla, his wife, released a statement, saying: 'True justice would mean Mahmoud was never taken away from us in the first place, that no Palestinian father, from New York to Gaza, would have to endure the painful separation of prison walls like Mahmoud has. I will not rest until Mahmoud is free.' Marco Rubio, the US secretary of state, has previously claimed Khalil must be expelled because his continued presence would harm American foreign policy, an effort that civil rights advocates said was a blatant crackdown on lawful free speech.

Migrant 'wrongly' deported by Trump appears back in US courthouse...but gets bad news about bid for freedom
Migrant 'wrongly' deported by Trump appears back in US courthouse...but gets bad news about bid for freedom

Daily Mail​

time6 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Migrant 'wrongly' deported by Trump appears back in US courthouse...but gets bad news about bid for freedom

Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the migrant who had been deported to El Salvador in March by the Trump administration, will remain in jail for now ahead of his trial on criminal charges of human smuggling. At the conclusion of a hearing on Friday in federal court in Nashville, U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes said she would rule at a later date on Abrego Garcia's bid to be released on bail pending trial. Robert McGuire, the U.S. attorney in Nashville, said Abrego would be placed into immigration detention even if Holmes orders his release. Garcia pleaded not guilty on Friday to the charges with his wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, and a gaggle of protesters on hand. The detention hearing was the first chance the Maryland construction worker has had in a U.S. courtroom to answer the Trump administration's allegations against him since he was mistakenly deported in March to a notorious prison in El Salvador. Facing court orders and mounting pressure to return Abrego Garcia, the Republican administration brought him back to the U.S. last week. But it was to face criminal charges related to what federal prosecutors said was a human smuggling operation that transported immigrants across the country. Abrego Garcia´s attorneys have characterized the smuggling case as a desperate attempt by the Trump administration to justify his mistaken deportation three months after the fact. The charges stem from a 2022 traffic stop in Tennessee during which Abrego Garcia was driving a vehicle with nine passengers. His lawyers have called the allegations 'preposterous.' In briefings before the hearing, U.S. attorneys described him as a danger to the community and a flight risk, while his public defenders said the charges aren´t serious enough for detention. The charges against Abrego Garcia are human smuggling. But in their request to keep Abrego Garcia in jail, U.S. attorneys also accused him of trafficking drugs and firearms and of abusing the women he transported, among other claims, although he is not charged with such crimes. Friday's proceeding included testimony from a Department of Homeland Security agent who quoted three unnamed witnesses who spoke to a grand jury about Abrego Garcia´s alleged actions. Special agent Peter Joseph said that the witnesses saw Abrego Garcia trafficking people, guns or drugs and that Abrego Garcia earned upwards of $100,000 a year. One man said he saw Abrego Garcia bothering underage girls in a sexual way, Joseph testified, while a woman said Abrego Garcia had solicited nude photos of her when she was 15 and believed he was in the MS-13 gang. During cross examination, Abrego Garcia´s attorneys raised questions about possible conflicts of interest. One man is a felon who´d been previously deported and was serving a 30-month sentence when investigators contacted him, Joseph acknowledged. That witness is now living in a halfway house and on his way to getting work authorization. The second man is a very close relative of the first witness and 'said he would help in return for his release from jail,' said Richard Tennent, an assistant federal public defender. The third witness had previously been compensated for her work with law enforcement. Tennent pointed out that one of the witnesses told investigators that Abrego Garcia would drive roundtrip between Maryland and Houston - nearly 24 hours each way - two or three times per week. The witness said that Abrego Garcia nearly always had two of his children and his wife with him. Tennent pointed out that Abrego Garcia has three children, two of whom are autistic. Abrego Garcia is a citizen of El Salvador who had been living in the United States for more than a decade before he was deported. The expulsion violated a 2019 U.S. immigration judge´s order that shielded him from deportation to his native country because he likely faced gang persecution there. Proteseters gather for a protest before an arraignment and detention hearing for Kilmar Abrego Garcia at the US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee in Nashville While the Trump administration described the mistaken removal as 'an administrative error,' officials have continued to justify it by insisting Abrego Garcia was a member of the MS-13 gang. His wife and attorneys have denied the allegations, saying he's simply a construction worker and family man. Before Friday´s hearing began in Nashville, Abrego Garcia´s wife told a crowd outside a church that Thursday marked three months since the Trump administration 'abducted and disappeared my husband and separated him from our family.' Her voice choked with emotion, Sura said she saw her husband for the first time on Thursday. She said, 'Kilmar wants you to have faith,' and asked the people supporting him and his family '`to continue fighting, and I will be victorious because God is with us.´' During a Saturday phone interview with NBC News' Kristen Welker, Donald Trump was asked what went into his decision to bring Garcia back. 'Well, that wasn't my decision. The Department of Justice decided to do it that way, and that's fine, as far as -- there are two ways you could have done it, and they decided to do it that way,' Trump told Welker. 'I think for speed, and, you know, it should be a very easy case,' Trump continued. Welker then further pressed the Commander in Chief, asking, 'you think, you think he's going to be convicted-- you think it's going to be an easy case?' US Senator Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) holding a meeting with Salvadoran migrant Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a US resident wrongfully deported to his home country, at a hotel in San Salvador on April 17, 2025 'I think it should be. It should be. You have two different cases. This would go faster,' Trump replied. Welker then asked Trump what he thought of Democrats who advocated for Garcia's return, including Senator Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), who made a public case for Garcia being denied due process. 'He's a loser. The guy's a loser. They're going to lose because of that same thing. That's not what people want to hear,' Trump responded. 'He's trying to defend a man who's got a horrible record of abuse, abuse of women in particular. No, he's a total loser-- this guy,' Trump concluded. The decision to charge Abrego Garcia criminally prompted the resignation of Ben Schrader, who was chief of the criminal division at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Middle District of Tennessee. He did not directly address the indictment and declined to comment when reached by The Associated Press. However, a person familiar with the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a personnel matter confirmed the connection. The smuggling charges stem from a 2022 traffic stop in Tennessee for speeding. Body camera footage released by Tennessee Highway Patrol shows a calm exchange between officers and Abrego Garcia. It also shows the officers discussing among themselves their suspicions of human smuggling before sending him on his way. One of the officers says, 'He´s hauling these people for money.' Another says Abrego Garcia had $1,400 in an envelope. Although the maximum sentence for smuggling one person is ten years, and Abrego Garcia is accused of transporting hundreds of people over nearly a decade, his defense attorneys point out there´s no minimum sentence. The average sentence for human smuggling last year was just 15 months, according to court filings.

US judge orders Trump to reinstate fired product safety commissioners
US judge orders Trump to reinstate fired product safety commissioners

Reuters

time8 hours ago

  • Reuters

US judge orders Trump to reinstate fired product safety commissioners

June 13 (Reuters) - A federal judge on Friday ruled that the Trump administration unlawfully removed three Democratic members of the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission and ordered the agency to reinstate them. U.S. District Judge Matthew Maddox in Maryland said in his ruling, opens new tab that Republican U.S. President Donald Trump's administration overstepped its authority when it dismissed commissioners Mary Boyle, Alexander Hoehn-Saric and Richard Trumka Jr. Boyle, Hoehn-Saric and Trumka Jr., who sued the administration in May, were appointed to the five-member commission by Democratic former President Joe Biden. The president can remove commissioners only for neglect of duty or malfeasance. Maddox said the plaintiffs 'have performed ably in their roles' and that the administration had not presented a justification for terminating them. "The court finds it to be in the public interest to have the persons duly appointed to occupy these key leadership positions resume their roles," Maddox wrote. The White House and Justice Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The ruling can be appealed to the Richmond, Virginia-based 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. A lawyer for the commissioners, Nick Sansone, welcomed Maddox's ruling in a statement. 'Congress structured the CPSC as an independent agency so that the safety of American consumers wouldn't be subject to political whims and industry pressure,' Sansone said. 'The court's ruling upholds that sound legislative choice.' The commission was founded in 1972 and tasked by Congress with shielding consumers from injury or death from defective or harmful products. Trump has faced lawsuits over his efforts to remove members of other agencies. In May, the U.S. Supreme Court said the administration could bar two Democratic members of federal labor boards from serving in their posts while they challenge their dismissal by the administration.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store