Health minister defends taxpayer-funded trip to Thredbo Ski Resort
Park travelled from Sydney to Jindabyne on Thursday, 29 August 2024.
The trip coincided with the lead-up to the Interschools Snowsports Championships at Perisher Ski Resort from September 3 to 8, where his son was competing.
Ministerial diaries show that Park held only two official meetings between August 29 and September 2, one with a caravan business representative and another with the CEO of the mental health charity ManWalk.
And it's not the first time Park has used a government car to visit the ski fields.
Travel logs show similar trips to Thredbo in both November and December 2024, with the private driver completing round trips of nearly 1,000km each time, delivering Park to the Snowy Mountains and returning to Sydney without any passengers.
When questioned about the taxpayer-funded trips, Park defended the travel.
'The trips allowed me to reunite with family while undertaking work on a handful of other occasions,' he said in a statement.
Park maintained that everything he had done was within the rules.
'These trips were in accordance with the rules at the time, and I've always followed the relevant guidelines,' he told The Guardian.
'We inherited guidelines for ministerial driver use that had too many grey areas. But we accept those guidelines needed to be tightened, and the Premier has since changed those guidelines.'
The government updated the rules in February 2025, after former Transport Minister Jo Haylen resigned over her own misuse of ministerial drivers.
Haylen had directed a taxpayer-funded driver to chauffeur her to a lunch at Brokenwood Wines and deliver her children to weekend sport around Sydney.
One trip, a private long weekend getaway to the Hunter Valley with Housing Minister Rose Jackson, their husbands, and two friends, cost taxpayers $750.
The group dined at the high-end restaurant The Wood, while the driver waited outside for three hours. In total, the driver worked a 13-hour shift and drove 450km.
All of Park's ski trips occurred before the new rules were introduced.
Under the revised guidelines, drivers can only be used for official business.
'Any use of a driver for private purposes must be incidental to the discharge of the minister's official duties,' the new rules state.
'Incidental use' is defined as minor, work-related errands or quick stops, such as dropping off or picking up a child from school en route to official duties.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
12 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Man jets off to exotic destinations for just 24 HOURS... flying across the globe and back in one day
A day trip to Egypt? Lunch in Ireland? A morning walk in Rome? Kevin Droniak has experienced it all and gotten home in time for supper. The 28-year-old travel influencer has jetted off on 14 'day-trips' throughout 2025, flying from his home in New York City to an exotic destination across the globe and returning home within 24 hours. He books red-eye flights to various countries, explores them for one day, and then heads back home that evening. He's been documenting it all on his TikTok and Instagram, teaching his 300,000 followers how to save time and money while traveling the world. 'I weigh out the activities in that location and how much am I going to have to spend on the ground,' he dished. He's taken day trips to Paris, France, Rome, Italy, Costa Rica, the Bahamas, and even Iceland. He breaks down the cost in his videos. Trips range from $200-$1,000, including food, activities, and transportation, and most average around $500. One of his most expensive day trips was an $800 round-trip to Cairo, Egypt, but he said it was totally worth it as he couldn't pass up spending a day at the pyramids. But his 24-hour trip to Ireland, which ended up costing him almost $900 thanks to a flat tire that ate up his time, may not have been worth the price tag. Still, 'It's more fun to have a flat tire in Ireland than just being bored at home,' he said. His cheapest day trip cost him about $120 - a round-trip flight to Puerto Rico allowed him to spend the day at the beach and make it back to sleep in his bed that night. Finding affordable flights is a challenge, especially when the round trip takes place within one day, so Droniak monitors Expedia and Google Flights ahead of his trips. He likes to use the 'explore' or 'map' features to see which destinations are cheapest on days he's hoping to travel. If an airline ticket is below the average cost, he considers the journey worth it. 'I think that's another essential thing if you're trying to find a cheap flight, is being flexible with your dates,' he explained. 'I probably book my trips between two weeks and a month in advance.' While embarking on a day trip, he recommended just pick one or two things to do, and don't expect yourself to see the whole city in one day. 'When you land, you wanna jam everything in, but I try not to have too much planned since the time is fleeting,' he said. 'I believe that you can experience a place on the ground for just a day because there's nowhere else to go. You don't have a hotel. There's no time to just sit and scroll on your phone.' To save money, he finds cheap or even free activities. He walks, takes public transportation, and eats cost-efficient meals. Droniak started day-tripping not only to see the world, but to embrace solo-travel. 'I was tired of waiting around for people to go on trips with me,' he said. 'I think day-tripping is great because you get a little taste of solo traveling, there's not much of a risk… It's less commitment and you're able to learn about yourself.' But Droniak said day trips are not a vacation - they're not supposed to be relaxing, and often, they're exhausting. 'It's like a race with time,' he joked. Getting as much sleep as possible on the plane is crucial. On one of his first trips, he watched movies instead of resting, and it turned out to be a bitter mistake. 'You don't want to be overly tired walking around the next day. You need energy, so just make sure you're able to get some shut-eye on the plane there,' he recommended. Despite the potential for exhaustion, Droniak pointed out that jet lag is never an issue. 'You don't have enough time there to acclimate to that time zone,' he dished. He hopes to spend more time in these bucket list locations, but Droniak loves the rush of a short trip. And his followers do too. 'Right now I'm just getting such a thrill out of popping around and seeing new places in a short amount of time,' he said. In the end, he encouraged aspiring day-trippers to be flexible and adventurous like him. 'It's just unpredictable, [you] have to be down for anything,' he concluded.
The Guardian
16 hours ago
- The Guardian
Young Australians may endure worse lives than their parents, ‘worried' productivity chief warns
Young Australians may endure worse lives than their parents, the nation's productivity chief has warned. Danielle Wood, chair of the productivity commission, said young people are facing a future of lower wages, increased costs and the impacts of climate breakdown without major government action to tackle major economic challenges. Wood also urged the government to not put new regulations on AI, claiming existing rules on fraud, safety and discrimination are already sufficient – an argument running counter to human rights experts and unions calling for greater protections against abuse and for workers. On the eve of the Albanese government's economic reform summit, with its key focus on productivity, Wood will address the National Press Club in Canberra on Monday. She said Australia must adopt a 'growth mindset' and boost productivity to solve looming problems for future generations, saying it was 'the only way to sustainably lift wages and opportunities over time'. 'Overwhelmingly, young people today believe they won't live better lives than their parents did. As chair of the Productivity Commission, I'm worried too,' Wood will tell the Press Club, according to a speech notes released ahead of the address. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Wood's speech blames recent Australian governments for key challenges facing young people, pointing to 'policy choices' for house prices growing faster than incomes, and claiming politicians have 'for so long avoided the lowest cost policy choices' in dealing with climate change. Wood will say that productivity comes from better skills and training, new technologies, and policy settings making it easier to switch jobs or run a business. The commission has, in the lead up to the roundtable, released several major reports suggesting changes to tax settings, workforce issues and training, and technology among others. Amid criticism of the summit before it had even been held, the treasurer, Jim Chalmers, maintained the exercise had already been a success, claiming it had helped focus Australians' attention on productivity and the economic challenges faced by the government. A YouGov survey of 1,500 people, conducted for community organisation Amplify, last week found 73% of Australians either did not know or were unsure about the summit, and only 29% were confident it would lead to meaningful change. Around two-thirds of people surveyed believed productivity increases would mean people had to work harder, with the benefits going to bosses, but the same percentage believed it would lead to more job opportunities. 'We've focused the country on the productivity challenge. We've gotten people accustomed to dealing with the economic and fiscal trade‑offs that governments deal with every day,' Chalmers said on Sunday. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Among the key issues to be discussed through the roundtable is AI. Business and tech groups have urged the government to embrace a light-touch approach to legislating it, saying over-regulation could stunt the productivity benefits associated with the new technology. The government is still debating how best to respond to AI, with a diversity of views among Labor voices. The former industry minister Ed Husic had set out plans for a standalone AI act to regulate the field, while the new minister, Tim Ayres, has spoken about regulation and legislation among plans still to be decided. It is unclear what Labor will settle on. The commission has set out proposals for how tech, including AI, could be regulated and treated in Australia, suggesting it could add up to $116bn to Australia's GDP. However, the commission was strongly criticised last week for suggesting big tech companies be allowed to mine Australian copyright content – including music, literature, art and journalism – to train their AI models, an idea advanced by the Tech Council of Australia and its chair, the Atlassian co-founder Scott Farquharson. The Tech Council on Monday released its submission to the roundtable, where it again called for 'copyright reform' including 'narrowly tailored text‑and‑data‑mining exceptions and increased access to high‑quality Australian datasets' to help train AI models. 'Australia's current copyright frameworks are restricting frontier AI innovation. Training foundation models depends on text and data mining,' the submission read. Wood's speech notes contain no repeat of the PC's controversial suggestion for a copyright carveout, but she will again call on the government to not over-regulate AI. 'While managing the risks is important, we do not think that a new and overarching regulatory framework for AI is the way to go. That's because the risks posed by AI are mainly existing risks,' she will say. 'AI may make it cheaper, easier and faster for bad actors to create harms, but most of these harms – from product safety, to discrimination, to fraud – are already covered by regulatory frameworks.'
The Guardian
16 hours ago
- The Guardian
The roundtable is a test of Labor's courage and vision. Will it rise to the occasion?
Remember when governments took bold steps – deregulating the dollar, introducing the GST, freeing up trade and rolling out the NDIS? Not any more, even though the need is greater than ever. Treasury explicitly advised Jim Chalmers in its post-election advice that the budget settings are 'unsustainable', that personal and company tax are too high and that 'indirect taxes' are a solution for reform. Addressing the intergenerational inequity in our tax system requires courage and vision. At this rate, we will be passing on a lower standard of living, diminished health and education outcomes, and a degraded environment to younger Australians. The most recent federal election was defined by embarrassing small-mindedness from the major parties – promises of $7 off your weekly fuel bill or a $5 tax cut. These are not serious solutions to the structural challenges we face. When you combine these small target strategies with the increasing need to show an electoral 'mandate' before tackling any policy issue, how will we ever address the big challenges? Sign up: AU Breaking News email There are two schools of thought about how reform happens: one argues that it requires a strong majority government; the other believes it will take a minority government pushed by a principled crossbench. The fact that overall support for the major parties fell again with 33.6% of voters supporting community independent or minor party candidates demonstrates increasing frustration at the major parties' unwillingness to confront Australia's long-term challenges. The election of independents to the crossbench was driven by two decades of gridlock on economic reform, coupled with a lack of a coherent approach to climate change mitigation. During the 2022 election campaign and immediately after, I spoke of the urgent need for broad tax reform. In the last parliament, I raised this issue in the house 10 times. Allegra Spender spoke about it 21 times. The major parties avoided the topic entirely. I was heartened by the treasurer's decision to expand the agenda for the economic reform roundtable to include tax reform. Could this be the moment when the government finally confronts the structural challenges in our budget and the demographic shifts ahead? It was refreshing to hear the treasurer push back against the 'rule in, rule out' game that has stifled meaningful debate for years. But unfortunately, the prime minister is managing our expectations down to tinkering. The case for tax reform is compelling and GST provides an opportunity. Our current tax system disproportionately burdens younger Australians. Bracket creep – the stealthy tax increase on workers – is our only plan for addressing the deficit. We need to explore alternatives with productivity in mind. The economist Chris Murphy has shown that, per extra dollar of revenue raised, the GST causes the least economic harm, followed by personal income tax, and then company tax. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Yet our GST is among the narrowest and lowest in the OECD. It applies to just 7.5% of the economy, compared to an OECD average of over 11%, and its rate is half the OECD average. Broadening the base and increasing the rate could allow us to shift the tax burden from those who work to those who spend. In anticipation of the roundtable, the economist Richard Holden and I revisited our 2023 work and asked the Parliamentary Budget Office to model a 'progressive GST' – a way to relieve pressure on personal income tax while protecting low and middle-income earners. Under our model, the GST rate would increase to 15% and exemptions would be removed. To ensure equity, every Australian adult would receive a $3,300 annual payment, effectively making the first $22,000 of spending GST-free. PBO modelling shows that this could leave the bottom 60% of income earners better off, even before accounting for the personal income tax cuts enabled by the additional $24bn in revenue. This is the test. The Labor government has a 19-seat majority. If a comfortable margin is truly a prerequisite for reform, now is the time to act. If we see no action now and the major parties decide an electoral mandate is required, they are now on notice. The voters are on to you. You have three years to build community support for a bold and viable plan to fix our tax system. Any party that wants to be taken seriously as a contender for government in 2028 must come to the election with a tax plan that is fair, future-focused, and fit for the demographic changes ahead. The small target game is over. Australians are ready for courageous action to secure a prosperous future for our children. Kate Chaney is the independent member for Curtin
