logo
Nevada considers strengthening protections against paramilitary groups

Nevada considers strengthening protections against paramilitary groups

Yahoo13-03-2025

Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes speaks to the press in the Cannon Rotunda on January 22, 2025 in Washington, DC. Rhodes, was among the roughly 1,500 criminal defendants who were charged in the January 6 attacks on the Capitol and pardoned by President Donald Trump. (Photo by)
Nevada state lawmakers are considering legislation designed to crack down on paramilitary organizing and activities.
Assembly Bill 119 is sponsored by Assembly Speaker Steve Yeager but was presented on Wednesday to the chamber's judiciary committee by Assemblymember Erica Roth. The bill authorizes the state attorney general to investigate paramilitary activities and seek from a court injunctive relief against them. It also establishes the right to seek civil penalties if harmed by such activities.
The idea is to give the state the power to intervene before any disruptive and illegal activities occur, said Mary McCord, executive director of the Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection, which has worked on anti-paramilitary legislation across the country.
Criminal penalties for paramilitary activity already exist in state law but are 'a blunt tool' that can only hold people accountable after the fact, she told lawmakers. 'This seeks more useful mechanisms for public safety.'
McCord and Roth emphasized the bill is 'ideologically neutral' and focuses on actions rather than the beliefs held by such groups.
Actions, according to the bill language, include public patrolling while armed with a deadly weapon, substantial interference with government operations while armed with a deadly weapon, assuming functions of local or federal law enforcement agents, and preventing or attempting to interfere with the legal rights of others.
'In recent years we have witnessed a troubling rise in extremist ideologies and anti-government sentiments across the country,' said Roth. 'The spread of violent rhetoric and increasing visibility of armed groups have created a climate of fear and intimidation in some communities.'
McCord, a professor at Georgetown Law, said courts have long interpreted 'well regulated militia' in the Second Amendment as meaning regulated by the government, meaning it is already illegal to organize into a paramilitary group. Forty-eight states have prohibitions against paramilitaries written into their constitutions, and more than half have laws criminalizing paramilitary activities. Nevada has both.
Republicans on the committee questioned whether the bill would apply to groups of ranchers or church members who might train together to protect their properties or congregations.
McCord pointed out that Nevada already regulates security services, which would likely apply in those hypotheticals, and that their activities would not fall under the new state law unless the intent was paramilitary in nature.
'It would be very difficult to accidentally fall within this,' she added.
Roth said Nevada has 'real-life examples' highlighting 'the difference between protection of personal property and anti-government activity.'
'Let's say there's an unnamed rancher in the state of Nevada who is just patrolling their property and making sure it's safe. That's fine. That does not fall under this chapter,' she said. ' If that same rancher, who may or may not have actually existed, starts to form a militia for the purpose of anti-government work, then that falls under this category.'
In 2014, a longstanding dispute over illegal cattle grazing in Bunkerville came to a head when rancher Cliven Bundy led an armed standoff between Bureau of Land Management agents. Bundy was aided by members of far-right militia groups, most prominently from the Oath Keepers, which was founded in Las Vegas in 2009.
In 2016, Bundy's son Ammon also tapped into paramilitary groups when he carried out an armed takeover of a wildlife refuge in Oregon. (Oregon passed an anti-paramilitary bill similar to what's now being considered in Nevada. That law went into effect last year.)
More recently, in Nevada, unfounded conspiracy theories about election fraud have led to an increase in armed paramilitary activities. Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes was convicted of seditious conspiracy for his involvement with the Jan. 6, 2021 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, though his 18-year sentence was commuted by President Donald Trump the day he took office.
Roth also noted that 'links between militia groups and officials' in Nevada has also been documented.
Across the country reports of armed vigilantes appearing at public demonstrations, school board meetings and drag brunches have increased and come with the threat of violence.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump is under water on some of his top issues — including immigration, poll shows
Trump is under water on some of his top issues — including immigration, poll shows

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump is under water on some of his top issues — including immigration, poll shows

President Donald Trump is under water on some of his most favorable issues — immigration and the economy — according to a new Quinnipiac University poll released Wednesday. The poll shows Trump's approval rating at 38 percent among registered voters, a three point drop from April. He's also losing support on subjects that were crucial to his November victory. On immigration — an issue that the president hammered on the campaign trail — Trump's approval rating dropped five points from April, to 43 percent. His already low approval rating on the economy did not budge, remaining at 40 percent. The results show a majority of voters, 54 percent, disapprove of Trump's handling of the issue. The poll surveyed 1,265 self-identified registered voters from June 5-9, and has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.8 percent. The results come as Trump's approval has been steadily picking up since it dropped significantly in April, according to RealClearPolitics' polling average. The negative polling did not stop at the president himself. A majority of the voters polled also had objections to his premier piece of legislation, the 'big, beautiful bill' making its way through Congress. Fifty-three percent of the voters polled did not support the legislation. Divided among party lines, 67 percent of Republicans supported, while 89 percent of Democrats and 57 percent of independents opposed it. On Medicaid funding, an issue that has become Democratic messaging priority, 47 percent of those surveyed thought funding should increase, while 40 percent think it should stay about the same, and just 10 percent think federal funding should decrease. The bill as passed by the House is estimated to end Medicaid coverage for millions of people. Quinnipiac also asked voters what they think of billionaire Elon Musk, and his approval rating is crashing among Republicans following his very public breakup with Trump. Among Republicans, 62 percent had a favorable view of Musk, a 16 point drop from April. But while Trump's approval languishes, it's not clear Democrats will be able to take advantage of it. A vast majority of voters — 70 percent — disapprove of the way Democrats in Congress are doing their jobs, while 20 percent approved. That's 12 points lower than how voters viewed Republicans in the survey.

Hegseth says troops in LA are lawful. He just can't explain why.
Hegseth says troops in LA are lawful. He just can't explain why.

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Hegseth says troops in LA are lawful. He just can't explain why.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Wednesday insisted the Pentagon's deployment of troops to Los Angeles was lawful. He just couldn't cite the law he was following. The Pentagon chief clashed with several lawmakers at a Senate budget hearing as he sought to defend President Donald Trump's decision to send thousands of troops, including 700 active-duty Marines, to California in response to mass deportation protests. But when asked to explain the legal underpinning that justifies the Marine deployment, the Defense secretary blanked. 'I'd have to pull up the specific provision,' he told Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.). 'But our Office of General Counsel, alongside our leadership, has reviewed and ensured, in the order that we set out, that it's completely constitutional for the president to use federal troops to defend federal law enforcement.' When Baldwin pushed again, Hegseth said, 'It's in the order, ma'am, but we'll make sure we get it to you as well.' Hegseth, a former Fox News anchor who appears calm in front of the camera, faced a tougher time at Wednesday's Senate defense appropriations subcommittee than he did at a House budget hearing the day before. Democrats peppered him with questions about the domestic deployments, research budget cuts and the impact of tariffs on the defense industrial base. Republicans largely avoided focusing on Los Angeles, although they lashed out at him on Trump's tardy budget and approach to Ukraine. The Defense secretary argued the deployments to Los Angeles and along the southern border, where the military has 13,000 National Guard and active-duty troops, are necessary to protect the country. 'We very much support President Trump's focus on defending [the] homeland on our southern border,' he said, 'as well as supporting law enforcement officials doing their job in ICE in Los Angeles who deserve not to be assaulted, accosted and rioted while rounding up one of the 21 million illegals allowed in as an invasion under the previous administration.' But Democrats questioned whether the moves violated laws that govern the use of the military on U.S. soil. Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) pressed Hegseth and Joint Chiefs Chair Gen. Dan Caine about the argument underpinning the orders. 'Is the United States being invaded by a foreign nation?' he asked. 'I don't see any foreign state-sponsored folks invading,' Caine replied. Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) raised concerns about Trump politicizing the military, asking Hegseth whether he supported deploying the National Guard to the Capitol in response to the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection that sought to overturn the election. Hegseth would not say. 'All I know is it's the right decision to be deploying the National Guard in Los Angeles to defend ICE agents,' he said. Murphy called Hegseth's response evidence of a double standard. 'You are not willing to defend against attacks made on our democracy by supporters of the president, but you are willing to deploy the National Guard to protect against protestors who are criticizing the president,' he said. But it was Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.), the usually restrained Senate Armed Services Committee's ranking member, who was the most forceful in tone. He raised alarms about the Los Angeles deployment, as well as several Homeland Security requests for 20,000 more troops to assist at the border, for 'military forces to detain or arrest American citizens,' and to provide drone surveillance. 'Is it your intent to approve these requests?' Reed asked. 'Are you prepared to authorize DHS to use drones and also to authorize military forces to detain or arrest American citizens?' Hegseth did not respond directly, but defended the administration's actions. 'Every authorization we've provided the National Guard and the Marines in Los Angeles is under the authority of the President of the United States — is lawful and constitutional,' he said. 'They are assisting in defending law enforcement officers … executing their job in the city of Los Angeles.'

Cramer: GOP has no ‘stomach' for Medicare changes in Trump megabill
Cramer: GOP has no ‘stomach' for Medicare changes in Trump megabill

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Cramer: GOP has no ‘stomach' for Medicare changes in Trump megabill

Senate Republicans appear less likely to try to make changes to Medicare Advantage as part of their massive tax and spending bill, Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.) said Wednesday. Cramer raised the idea of targeting Medicare Advantage for additional savings last week after a closed-door caucus meeting, saying the program is ideal for reform because it is rife with waste, fraud and abuse. The House-passed bill would cut more than $800 billion from Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program, but some GOP lawmakers argue that other mandatory spending programs, such as Medicare, should also be reviewed for 'waste' to further reduce the cost of the bill. But Medicare has long been considered a political third rail, and Cramer on Wednesday said he doesn't think Republicans want to try to go near it — even though Medicare Advantage changes have bipartisan support. 'I don't think there's a stomach for it. I think that the president doesn't want to touch Medicare,' Cramer said. When Republicans first floated the idea of Medicare changes last week, Senate Democrats jumped to open a new line of attack. Politically, it didn't matter that Republicans were discussing bipartisan legislation sponsored by Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) and Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) that would save billions of dollars by reducing overpayments to private Medicare Advantage plans. The legislation would crack down on a practice called 'upcoding' through which insurers classify patients as sicker so the government will reimburse them at a higher rate. Cramer noted it's difficult for members to try to talk about the changes. 'To be honest, I'm the only one I know that talks about it,' Cramer said. 'I just don't know how we get to where we want to get without going after some of the bigger drivers of the debt and deficit.' Senate Republicans will be briefed by Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) on Wednesday afternoon, ahead of the release of legislative text. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store