Donald Trump's thinly-veiled threat to Anthony Albanese over defence spending
Australia should boost its defence spending in line with NATO partners, according to a new diktat from the White House which sets Anthony Albanese on a collision course with Donald Trump, who he is yet to meet.
Members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation - which Australia is not a part of - agreed to lift their defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP over 10 years during a summit in The Hague, the Netherlands, this week.
The move was triggered by pressure from the US President who had has long called for European allies to boost their defence spending.
It was a win for Trump who had his ego massaged at the meeting of world leaders when Nato Chief Mark Rutte referred to him as 'daddy'.
But now the US Commander-in-Chief has indicated he expects his allies in the Asia-Pacific - including Australia - to also increase their defence funding.
'Yeah, look, if our allies in Europe and our NATO allies can do that, I think our allies and our friends in the Asia Pacific region can do it as well,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Friday.
Ms Leavitt said she would leave the 'specific relations and discussions' for individual countries to Trump.
This means that Albanese may be pressured to increase defence spending if he hopes to secure a carve-out from the punishing tariffs imposed by the US on imports, including a 50 per cent levy on steel and aluminium.
He will also be hoping to shore up the $368bn AUKUS submarine deal, which is currently under threat from a 30-day review by the Pentagon.
The Australian government is weighing up whether to increase its defence funding from 2 per cent of GDP but has so far resisted the 3.5 per cent US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has been pushing for.
Spain was the only NATO member not to agree to lift its defence spending above 2.1 per cent of GDP, with Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez arguing it was 'incompatible with our welfare state and our vision of the world'.
This triggered Trump's ire, with the US President vowing to hit Spain with higher tariffs.
'They want a little bit of a free ride, but they'll have to pay it back to us on trade, because I'm not going to let that happen,' Trump said.
Albanese's planned meeting with Trump at the G7 summit in Canada failed to eventuate when the US President had to dash back to Washington to deal with the Israel-Iran crisis.
Many had expected him to go in Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles place to the NATO summit this week to secure a meeting but instead he stayed in Australian.
Marles risked Trump's ire by insisting Australia would not follow NATO members by lifting its defence spending to five per cent of GDP.
'Look, obviously, a very significant decision has been made here in relation to European defence spending, and that is fundamentally a matter for NATO,' Marles said.
'We've gone through our own process of assessing our strategic landscape, assessing the threats that exist there, and the kind of defence force we need to build in order to meet those threats, to meet the strategic moment, and then to resource that.
'And what that has seen is the biggest peacetime increase in Australian Defence spending.
'Now that is a story which is... understood here and we'll continue to assess what our needs are going forward. And as our prime minister has said, we will resource that.'
Marles did not speak directly with Mr Trump, nor US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, despite intensive efforts by government officials to tee up a first face-to-face meeting of an Australian minister with the US President.
Opposition Defence spokesman Angus Taylor called on the government to lift defence spending by at least three per cent of GDP on Friday morning.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
37 minutes ago
- The Independent
Asian shares are mostly higher after US stocks rise to the brink of a record
Asian were mostly higher on Friday after U.S. stocks ran up to the edge of another record. U.S. futures and oil prices also logged slight gains. Investors were watching for further details after President Donald Trump said the U.S. and China had signed a trade deal. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in an interview on Bloomberg TV that the deal was signed two days ago, but he gave no details, saying 'The president likes to close these deals himself.' Worries about Trump's higher tariffs have receded since the president shocked the world in April with stiff proposed levies, but they have not disappeared. The wait is still on to see how big the tariffs will ultimately be, how much they will hurt the economy and how much they will push up inflation. Hong Kong's Hang Seng index was barely changed at 24,333.43, while the Shanghai Composite index lost 0.2% to 3,441.30. Tokyo's Nikkei 225 index surged 1.6% to 40,215.36 as the government reported that consumer prices eased slightly in May. South Korea's KOSPI Composite Index slid 0.7% to 3,050.01. Markets have settled somewhat after the upheavals of the Israel-Iran war and its aftermath. On Thursday, the S&P 500 climbed 0.8% to 6,141.02 and was sitting just 0.05% below its all-time closing high set in February. It briefly topped the mark during the afternoon in the latest milestone for the index at the heart of many 401(k) accounts, which had dropped roughly 20% below its record during the spring on worries about President Donald Trump's tariffs. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rallied 0.9% to 43,386.84, and the Nasdaq composite gained 1% to 20,167.91. Reports Thursday added to evidence the U.S. economy is holding up despite higher tariffs and other challenges, though it has slowed. Orders for washing machines and other manufactured goods that last at least three years grew by more last month than economists expected. Another report said fewer U.S. workers filed for unemployment benefits last week, a potential signal of fewer layoffs. A third report said the U.S. economy shrank by more during the first three months of 2025 than earlier estimated. But many economists say those numbers were distorted by a surge in imports as companies tried to get ahead of tariffs. They're expecting a better performance in upcoming months. Following the reports, Treasury yields swiveled up and down in the bond market before easing. The yield on the 10-year Treasury fell to 4.24% from 4.29% late Wednesday. The two-year Treasury yield, which more closely tracks expectations for what the Federal Reserve will do, fell to 3.71% from 3.74% late Wednesday. Analysts said yields may have felt pressure because of a report from The Wall Street Journal saying Trump could name his nominee to replace Fed Chair Jerome Powell unusually early, in an attempt to undermine him. That could hurt confidence among investors about the Fed's capability to make unpopular decisions when it comes to fighting inflation. On Wall Street, spices company McCormick jumped 5.3% after delivering a better-than-expected profit report and giving a full-year profit forecast that topped analysts' expectations, including planned efforts to offset increased costs caused by tariffs. Over the longer term, it's been big technology stocks that have led the market for years and since the S&P 500 hit a trough in April. Chip company Nvidia, which has been the poster child of the frenzy around artificial-intelligence technology, added 0.5%. It's the most valuable company in the U.S. stock market after rushing 61% higher since April 8, towering over the S&P 500's gain of 23%. Another AI darling, Super Micro Computer, rose 5.7% to bring its gain since April 8 to 55%. In other dealings early Friday, the U.S. benchmark crude gained 35 cents to $65.59 per barrel. Brent crude, the international standard, added 36 cents to $67.05 per barrel The U.S. dollar rose to 144.45 Japanese yen from 144.40 yen. The euro fell to $1.1699 from $1.1703. ___ AP Business Writer Stan Choe contributed.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
How nearly ONE THIRD of a country's population have applied to get a visa in Australia because of an Albo program
Amost a third of citizens in the Pacific nation of Tuvalu are seeking a landmark visa in the context of climate change to live in Australia as rising seas threaten their palm-fringed shores, official figures show. Australia is offering visas to 280 Tuvalu citizens each year under a climate migration deal Canberra has billed as 'the first agreement of its kind anywhere in the world'. More than 3,000 Tuvaluans have already entered a ballot for the first batch of visas, according to official figures on the Australian program – almost a third of the nation's population. One of the most climate-threatened corners of the planet, Tuvalu will be uninhabitable within the next 80 years, scientists fear. Two of the archipelago's nine coral atolls have already largely disappeared under the waves. 'Australia recognises the devastating impact climate change is having on the livelihoods, security and wellbeing of climate vulnerable countries and people, particularly in the Pacific region,' Australia's foreign affairs department said. Australia and Tuvalu signed the groundbreaking Falepili Union in 2024, part of Canberra's efforts to blunt China 's expanding reach in the region. Under that pact, Australia opened a new visa category specially set aside for adult citizens of Tuvalu. Already, there are signs the program will be hugely oversubscribed. Official data on the program shows 3,125 Tuvaluans entered the random ballot within four days of it opening last week. 'This is the first agreement of its kind anywhere in the world, providing a pathway for mobility with dignity as climate impacts worsen,' a spokesperson for Australia's foreign affairs department said. Tuvalu is home to 10,643 people, according to census figures collected in 2022. Registration costs A$25 ($16), with the ballot closing on 18 July. The visa program has been hailed as a landmark response to the looming challenge of climate-forced migration. 'At the same time, it will provide Tuvaluans the choice to live, study and work in Australia,' Australia's foreign affairs department said. But it has also fanned fears that nations like Tuvalu could be rapidly drained of skilled professionals and young talent. University of Sydney geographer John Connell warned that a long-term exodus of workers could imperil Tuvalu's future. 'Small states do not have many jobs and some activities don't need that many people,' he said. 'Atolls don't offer much of a future: agriculture is hard, fisheries offer wonderful potential but it doesn't generate employment.' The Falepili pact commits Australia to defending Tuvalu in the face of natural disasters, health pandemics and 'military aggression'. 'For the first time, there is a country that has committed legally to come to the aid of Tuvalu, upon request, when Tuvalu encounters a major natural disaster, a health pandemic or military aggression,' Tuvalu's prime minister, Feleti Teo, said at the time. 'Again, for the first time, there is a country that has committed legally to recognise the future statehood and sovereignty of Tuvalu despite the detrimental impact of climate changed-induced sea level rise.' The agreement also offers Australia a say in any other defence pacts Tuvalu signs with other countries, raising concerns at the time that the Pacific nation was handing over its sovereignty. Tuvalu is one of just 12 states that still have formal diplomatic relations with Taipei rather than Beijing. Australia's prime minister, Anthony Albanese, said last year that his country shared a vision for a 'peaceful, stable, prosperous and unified region'. 'It shows our Pacific partners that they can rely on Australia as a trusted and genuine partner.'
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Why an independent Scotland should stay well away from Nato
Even more nauseating was the shameless brown-nosing of Nato secretary general Mark Rutte, who offered Trump his 'congratulations' on what he called the US president's 'decisive action in Iran'. Trump's spectacularly dangerous and inflammatory assault on the Islamic Republic was, Rutte snivelled, 'truly extraordinary and something no-one else dared to do. It makes us all safer'. On the 5% commitment, Rutte grovelled: 'You will achieve something NO American president in decades could get done. Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your win.' READ MORE: Humanitarian aid must be allowed to reach Gaza, John Swinney says Rutte, with this display of arse kissing, has given Keir Starmer a run for his money where obsequious flattery towards the president is concerned. What Rutte means by European member states paying in a 'BIG way' for their Nato membership is that their citizens will pay the price in cuts to health, education and other social spending. When the Spanish delegation dared to suggest that its fiscal sovereignty belongs not to Nato but to its own parliament, Trump threatened Spain with economic sanctions. The US president is keen to be seen as a strongman. He left The Hague able to boast that he forced a deal whereby the US only agreed to uphold Nato's totemic Article 5 (the 'one for all, and all for one' clause that ensures collective defence among Nato members) after extracting the 5% commitment. However, the agreement reflects not the US's strength, but its relative weakness. Despite its seeming victory over the old Soviet Union, the US empire has suffered a long period of decline. Catastrophic defeats in Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan have exposed the dangers of imperial overreach on the part of a US federal state that thought it had an unchallengeable global hegemony. (Image: Julia Demaree Nikhinson, via REUTERS) Trump's foreign policy – which, ironically, is based upon former president Barack Obama's 'pivot to Asia' – involves a tacit acknowledgement that a rising China threatens the US's position as the dominant world power. It is also an admission that the great US imperium cannot attempt to counter Chinese power in the South China Sea and the wider Asia-Pacific region while maintaining its current level of military expenditure in Europe. That is the fundamental reason for the 5% agreement. Trump's bullying is par for the course for a Western nuclear alliance that was established in 1949 as a belligerent creature of the Cold War. Now as then, Nato is predicated not on peacemaking diplomacy, but upon a sabre-rattling, militarist stance against its perceived enemies. In 1949, those enemies were the Soviet Union and its allied Warsaw Pact countries. Today they are Vladimir Putin's Russian Federation and Alexander Lukashenko's Belarus. (Image: Sergey Bobylev via REUTERS) Far from being a defender of the 'free world', the founding states of Nato included the brutal fascist dictatorship of António de Oliveira Salazar in Portugal. Following their coup d'état in 1967, the Greek colonels' fascistic junta was accepted readily as a Nato member. Little has changed. In the Nato 'family photo' taken in The Hague this week Starmer is – appropriately enough – sandwiched between two semi-fascists: namely, Trump and Türkiye's authoritarian president Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. Standing behind them is the ideological talisman of the global far right, Hungary's dangerously racist and antisemitic prime minister Viktor Orban. By contrast, standing on the outer edge of the group is Canadian prime minister Mark Carney. Having pledged Canadian 'elbows up' in the face of Trump's threat to his country's sovereignty, Carney stands, elbows down, having agreed to the US's 5% demand. All of which poses tough questions for the current party of Scottish government. The SNP aspire for an independent Scotland to be a member of Nato, yet also free of nuclear weapons. As this week's Nato summit underlines, the SNP's desire to join Nato would involve our country relinquishing a significant proportion of its hard-won economic sovereignty. READ MORE: Wee Ginger Dug: Keir Starmer's in an historic mess. There's only one person to blame Scotland's admission would be dependent upon 5% of GDP being spent on the military, with devastating implications for spending on social goods such as health, social care, education and housing. If the fiscal implications of Nato membership are deeply worrying, the idea that an independent Scotland could join while simultaneously removing British nuclear submarines from the Firth of Clyde is naive at best. It is impossible to imagine Scotland's accession to Nato being granted without Holyrood agreeing, at the very least to lease the Faslane nuclear base to the UK Government for an extended period. The rationale would be that the Westminster administration would require Faslane until such time as it identified a site for, and then built, a new nuclear submarine base. In any case, it is hard to imagine a scenario in which a UK lease on Faslane was not negotiated and renegotiated in perpetuity, keeping nukes on the Clyde on a permanent basis. Nato membership would make the SNP's longstanding opposition to nuclear weapons a dead letter. From its highly dubious beginnings to its current recalibration in the face of the decline of the American empire, Nato is not a club that any progressive government should want to belong to. An independent Scotland would do well to follow the lead of our Irish neighbours and keep well out of it.
