‘A nightmare every damn day': farmer
Invercargill poultry farmer Nigel Hewitson is living a "nightmare every damn day".
Mr Hewitson spoke at the public forum of the Invercargill City Council's community wellbeing and regulatory committee meeting last week .
Mr Hewitson said since September last year the noise from a nearby housing development had disturbed the 5000 hens on his Tisbury poultry farm, causing him and his employees distress.
"The noise and vibration of the development stressed the hens out," he said.
"They were attacking each other."
The hens lost their appetite and their condition, and egg production dropped.
In particular, the machine used to compact the construction site was "like earthquakes" to the hens.
Hens had no muscles in their feet and felt the vibration throughout their bodies, he said.
It was very upsetting for staff members to pick up the dead bodies of the chickens, he said.
"I'm living this nightmare every damn day and it plays on you."
When he talked to a council staff member in November he was told the project complied with the Resource Management Act (RMA), he said.
"I'm tired of fighting people because all I ever get out of the city council office is 'there's nothing we can do ... oh, this is a unique situation'."
He could not understand why the RMA part of the consent had been signed off as not affecting anyone else, he said.
He believed the council was remiss because the welfare of animals had not been considered when the consent was approved.
The poultry farm was established on the property in 1938 and was one of the oldest businesses in the region, he said.
He was also concerned where the stormwater from the 40-plus houses in the development would go.
Mr Hewitson said the birds were now so affected by noise even a cough or sneeze caused them to panic and run to the end of the shed, where they piled up.
Some had died of smothering as a result of the pile-up.
Mr Hewitson said he had been advised by a council staff member to contact the Ministry for Primary Industries as the noise was an animal welfare issue.
After an MPI staff member visited they issued a compliance order to the developer giving it 14 days to work with him to resolve the issue, Mr Hewitson said.
When the company failed to do so, he appealed to the High Court as his "only option", he said.
"I was picking up deceased animals all the time and I had to do that because nobody had my back."
The emotional and financial toll of the situation was high.
He was still feeding the hens the same amount of food, but production was halved and there were lawyer's fees as well.
Cr Grant Dermody asked how Mr Hewitson would like to see the situation resolved.
Mr Hewitson said the only way he could make a living from the land was through poultry farming and he did not want to give up his business.
Cr Dermody then asked if Mr Hewitson could co-exist with the development until it was finished.
Mr Hewitson said it was possible.
However, there would need to be give and take and at present it seemed like he was the only one giving, he said.
After Mr Hewitson's presentation, committee chairman Darren Ludlow said it was important to acknowledge the distress Mr Hewitson was experiencing.
Council consenting and environment group manager Jonathan Shaw was investigating the matter.
Mr Shaw spoke to the meeting and said while he had met Mr Hewitson it was too soon for him to report what he had found out.
Cr Ludlow asked for a timeline of when Mr Shaw would make his report.
It was agreed Mr Shaw would share his findings with Mr Hewitson within 14 days and report back to the committee when it met next month.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
22-07-2025
- NZ Herald
Utilising and protecting Bay of Plenty's geothermal taonga
Bay of Plenty Regional Council's geothermal programme leader Penny Doorman said the resource was a taonga that was generally well managed, and there was even scale for greater use at some sites. But she said ongoing reform to the Resource Management Act – legislation that ordered 'outdated' management plans be reviewed – resulted in the regional council pausing the wider regional management plan for the systems. 'We've had to pivot a little bit because with the resource management reforms that are under way, council decided not to progress the region-wide plan change, they thought it would be better to wait until there's a bit more certainty about that. 'But they have agreed to still go ahead with the changes to the Rotorua part of that regional plan change.' Up to 29% of overall use of geothermal water in the Tauranga system was for horticulture, and made up 96% of geothermal water allocated to non-geothermal activities. In a submission, fruit and vegetable growers raised concerns that changes to geothermal systems management might result in further costs and compliance for users. However, Doorman said access to water for horticultural irrigators in Tauranga was not changing and the plan was progressing, however, it would consider changes to allocation limits in Rotorua. 'We have made some recommendations for changes to the allocation [in Rotorua]. There's always been a limit to how much geothermal water can be taken from the system and not reinjected, and that limit has just been reviewed through some careful monitoring,' she said. 'We're basically saying if you're taking geothermal water out of the system to take heat, then you've got to reinject it.' She said it identified a system-wide cap to the amount of heat that could be taken off the system. 'The reason for that is that because it's really important to keep your water levels and your geothermal aquifer high but also hot because that's what our geyser system relies on,' she said. 'If we can keep heat within this safe operating space, then we know that we can protect the mauri or the health of the geothermal system.' Meanwhile, in its submission, industry group Horticulture New Zealand said consent conditions should be reasonable and proportional to the environmental risks at the key Tauranga site. 'The council's science has shown that the water quantity will run out before heat in the Tauranga system, so volume is the limiting factor rather than the heat source,' it said. 'Given that this is the case, non-geothermal uses of war water such as irrigation should not be restricted on the basis of retaining the heat source.' It said consent conditions should also be 'mindful of cumulative compliance cost on users'. It added that there was significant potential for low-temperature geothermal water to be used with ground-source heat pumps for zero-carbon greenhouse vegetable growing in future. Growers were also exploring new heat sources for their greenhouses in areas like geothermal, because of the rising cost and limited availability of gas. GNS Science, now functioning as Earth Sciences New Zealand with Niwa, developed a geothermal and groundwater interactive map to help greenhouse growers switch to geothermal heating. Doorman said investigations were ongoing, including into the potential of Tauranga's low-temperature geothermal system. She said collaboration with mana whenua was key to managing the natural resources. - RNZ
RNZ News
21-07-2025
- RNZ News
Two MPI beagles need new homes after not making the grade
Beagles Bernard and Ozzy didn't make the grade as sniffer dogs so are now looking for new homes. Photo: Supplied A pair of Auckland sniffer dogs who could not pass their training have had dozens of offers for new homes. The Ministry for Primary Industries says beagles Bernard and Ozzy are better suited for a life of leisure than the high pressure world of border control. But they are in high demand, with 50 households inquiring for adoption in just 24 hours after the ministry said they were available. Biosecurity NZ commissioner for the North Island Mike Inglis said sniffer dogs needed to work fast and be resilient. "From time to time, some dogs just aren't cut out or suitable for that type of work," he explained. "There's a variety of reasons, but sometimes the work is very quick. They need to work in different environments, airport, on the ports. The biggest thing, they do need to be able to work in quite loud environments over a particular period of time." Inglis said the biosecurity training programme had a pass rate of about 85 percent, and the two beagles could not quite make the cut. He said Bernard's cruisy personality did not fit the fast-paced environment. "Bernard's a typical beagle. He loves to take life easy and relaxed, and for a working dog that's not always the best," he said. "He did the job well, but he was too slow and wasn't able to keep up with that nature of it. He also had a little bit of naughtiness, which is a classic beagle trait." Meanwhile, Ozzy's independent streak made him a troublesome employee. "Ozzy is a very independent dog with a lot of personality. He loves a good adventure and is very, very cute, and he's got one of the softest coats around, which will make him a great buddy for particularly families with children." Inglis said that despite their quirks, the dogs were in high demand, with emails from dozens of interested households flooding the Ministry's inbox. "We tend to always be successful with rehoming these dogs, irrespective of whether they made it as working dogs," he said. "We train them very well, obedience-wise, and we also provide support [for their new owners], so we always get a good response. So we've already had 50 enquiries." That was no surprise for dog trainer and animal behaviourist Mark Vette. He said dogs trained by Biosecurity NZ were very well behaved and made for great pets. "You know, most people will take the easy road, and any of those, whether it's guide dogs, MPI or whatever it is, you've normally got a pretty good head start if you've got one of their dogs." But Vette said there were plenty more dogs out there that needed a home. He said training them might take a little bit more work, but they were worth it. "There's a lot of people that do rescue dogs, which is wonderful. But I'd like to see more," Vette said. "There's a lot of dogs out there that need good homes, and cats. It's one of those things that we encourage anyone to grow their skills a little bit more, and anyone can do it, but it does take some effort sometimes." Vette said rescue dogs were among the most loyal and loving pets around. He hoped more people would be willing to put in that extra bit of effort to find a diamond in the "ruff." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Newsroom
19-07-2025
- Newsroom
Throwaway culture is a recent privilege we just can't afford
Opinion: Images of the Gordon Wilson flats on the Terrace in Te Aro, Wellington, may have persuaded many readers that Chris Bishop was right to amend the RMA so that the flats, owned by Victoria University, would be eligible for demolition. Bishop states: 'The flats sit as an ugly scar on the Wellington skyline,' and that they are, 'emblematic of a failed planning system that prioritises preservation of heritage, no matter the economic cost'. He got one part of that sentence right: the building is emblematic of a failed planning system, that allowed the building to fall into such disrepair that it was perceived widely as a scar on the skyline – a process that many have described as demolition by wilful neglect. It is not my intention here to argue in favour of the flats' heritage status; interested readers can read more about the McLean and Gordon Wilson Flats on Heritage New Zealand's website. Whether you think they are ugly or brutalist or represent a period in New Zealand history that should be preserved, is beside the point. Its heritage listing is being used as a scapegoat. The cold, hard, fact is that there are tons of embodied energy locked in the building, along with 87 housing units, at a time when there is a desperate shortage of housing. Yes, it needs to be refurbished but the fit-out costs would be the same whether it is a new building or a refurbishment. Demolishing this building would be a despicable act of waste – much of the developed world would be appalled. It would fly in the face of many international initiatives, such as the retrofit first policy, now adopted by three London boroughs, and gaining traction elsewhere. The policy is designed to discourage new buildings and encourage a circular economy, reliant on building reuse. Under the policy, developers are required to consider a whole life carbon assessment early in the feasibility stages of a project and assess varying degrees of retrofit, prior to considering demolition and re-build. The priority is on retaining at least 50 percent of the existing building's superstructure, because nearly 50 percent of a typical, large building's embodied carbon lies in the superstructure, with a further, nearly 20 percent, locked in the substructure. Circularity is also soon to be a legal requirement in Brussels, where Article 4 of the Regional Urban Planning Regulations states that: 'Every existing building will be conserved and, if necessary, renovated.' A similar legal framework is also proposed in the EU. Why do we in New Zealand feel that we should be exempt from these progressive principles – are carbon atoms somehow different down under? Sustainability architect Carl Elefante said in 2007 the 'greenest building is the one that is already built'. We now know that that the greenest building is the one that already exists and has been remediated to ensure it performs efficiently. The Gordon Wilson Flats were built as a model of high-density inner-city housing, close to employment and transportation routes. Photo: Wikimedia Commons Operational carbon emissions from buildings account for approximately 28 percent of global energy-related carbon emissions, according to the World Green Building Council. It also states: 'Towards the middle of the century, as the world's population approaches 10 billion, the global building stock is expected to double in size. Carbon emissions released before the built asset is used, what is referred to as 'upfront carbon', will be responsible for half of the entire carbon footprint of new construction between now and 2050, threatening to consume a large part of our remaining carbon budget.' Therefore, when building new, the target should be net zero or, ideally, carbon negative – the latter being an ambitious target that has yet to be achieved in New Zealand. But working with what already exists will always be achievable because we already have it – we have paid for it both in terms of carbon emissions and dollars. Why waste it? Wastefulness is a recent and poorly exercised privilege – one that was inconceivable to, for example, my grandparents, who managed to narrowly survive WWII, and then maintained a frugal existence for ever after, having learnt the hard way what going without really means. Our throwaway culture is exacerbating the climate crisis. Therefore, it is astounding that such a significant and substantial building is being considered for demolition. Yes, we could build new with 'sustainable materials' but as the UK engineer and contributor to Building Design, Anna Beckett, said, this is comparable to a fad diet: 'Ultimately, to consistently reduce carbon we have to build less.' The challenge is building less but delivering more, she explains, and this is where re-purposing existing buildings is so important. The Architecture Centre is currently working on a proposal that illustrates how the Gordon Wilson Flats could be seismically strengthened and refurbished so that the building envelope meets high thermal performance expectations and low operational carbon emission targets. In its proposal, an externally installed, mass timber structure, with steel dampers, would enclose the building, offering a reinterpretation of the original facade. This would ensure high thermal performance as well as increasing the ductility of the building, ensuring that it performs well in an earthquake, achieving at least 67 percent New Building Standard. Initial engineering advice suggests that this is not only a relatively simple solution, but a cost-effective one too. The internal spaces could be retained in their existing form. Retaining the superstructure of the building will save considerable money as the construction time would be reduced and the superstructure would not have to be demolished and re-constructed. Furthermore, this proposal also ensures that concerns about the 'ugly' aesthetic of the building are addressed. The building would be re-envisioned much like the Cité du Grand Parc, in Bordeaux, by Lacaton & Vassal has been, illustrated below. In this way, the site's most significant heritage values would also be retained. It would continue to be used as housing and the important legacy of the flats as a significant piece of New Zealand's social housing history would also be retained. The re-envisioned building could serve as much-needed (and highly desirable), post graduate housing or faculty housing, similar to the Symonds Street flats, which are owned by the University of Auckland and were refurbished for this purpose. The re-envisioned building would be an exemplar of how a large mid-century building can be both seismically strengthened and thermally efficient, one which Victoria University could showcase as a truly sustainable development it could be proud of.
