Israeli flag installed outside town hall in Hampstead, Que. stirs local debate
The Israeli flag has flown outside Hampstead's town hall since October 2023 — and it's getting mixed reactions from residents of the Montreal suburb.
Among them is 25-year-old Adam Ben David, who says the flag doesn't belong on the municipal property.
'I think it's inflammatory to have a foreign flag that is not representative of every single person in this community, which is very diverse,' he said in an interview.
The flag replaced Hampstead's municipal banner, taking its place alongside the Canadian and Quebec flags.
Mayor Jeremy Levi told CTV News the move was suggested by the town's then–director general and supported by council.
'Every other government across the world had done so,' Levi said. 'We never told the DG how to do it or to remove the Hampstead flag. If Hampstead residents feel so patriotic towards the Hampstead flag, we can always install a fourth flagpole — I just don't think it's a great use of resources.'
Residents split on the issue
For some residents, the flag is a symbol of solidarity, but for others it's an inappropriate political statement for municipal grounds.
CTV News approached several people outside town hall and in a nearby park, but the vast majority declined to speak publicly. Among those who did, opinions were divided.
One woman, who asked not to be identified, said she supports keeping the flag. She described it as a sign of support, acknowledging how many communities in the Middle East are going through tragic times.
'I see nothing wrong in putting it up because it's reflecting that there's something terrible going on in Israel and we're all in mourning for that situation, collectively,' she said.
Sisters Keren and Bénédicte Paka, who have lived in Hampstead for two years, saw it differently.
'It's problematic because there are many international students here, international workers, Quebecers and other people — I don't think it has its place here,' said Keren.
Bénédicte added: 'I think to make everyone feel comfortable, the flag should be taken down — so that each person feels free and not oppressed by one community or another.'
While there's division, Levi has been clear that he will not remove the flag.
'It doesn't matter to me if there's two signatures or 2,000 signatures,' he wrote in a statement to CTV News. 'My position will not change.'
He also said he has never received a formal complaint from residents about it and, on the contrary, has received 'many compliments.'
Petition for flag removal
Ben David began knocking on doors this summer to build support for removing the flag. He has gathered roughly 40 signatures so far and said he plans to continue canvassing as the weather cools.
'The Israeli flag represents a whole host of things: politically, religiously, ethnically,' Ben David said. 'In my opinion, it's unfair for the mayor to hoist it on behalf of 7,000 people — because a flag can incite all sorts of things: happiness and joy, but also fear and despair.'
Ben David told CTV News that some residents who agreed with him refused to sign publicly. 'They're afraid of either being chastised by the mayor or other people in our community,' he said, emphasizing that 'it's an incredibly difficult time to be Jewish.'
He also questioned why the flag needed to remain permanently. 'I don't understand why it has to be permanent considering that we are a diverse plurality here,' he said.
For his part, Levi rejected the allegation that residents feared harassment.
'I have never harassed or shamed a private resident and would never do so,' Levi wrote, adding that he believed the petition was politically motivated ahead of municipal elections in less than three months.
He said residents who want the flag removed should take it up with council, which holds the vote. He insisted he will 'never back down from supporting Israel and the Jewish community,' adding: 'If residents are unhappy with that position, November 2, 2025, is their chance to make a change.'
It's a position Levi also made clear in a post on X in late July, in which he wrote: 'I will never take down the Israeli flag, if that's a problem for you, vote me out next election.'
Despite him standing firm on the decision, others, like Ben David, say they intend to push forward with their demand for the flag to come down. Ben David said he intends to bring the matter to town council next week.
With the latest census data showing about 40 per cent of Hampstead residents are not Jewish, the flag remains a lightning rod in the small, predominantly Jewish suburb.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
31 minutes ago
- CBC
Rally outside Winnipeg CBC building protests broadcaster's Gaza coverage
A large rally in front of the CBC building in downtown Winnipeg on Saturday protested the national broadcaster's coverage of the Israel-Hamas war and ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza. The protest, which began around noon and saw protesters line the sidewalk and boulevard from Young Street to Balmoral Street, in front of the CBC building and the University of Winnipeg campus, called on the public broadcaster to launch an independent, public review of the conflict's coverage since October 2023, commit to consistently using the word "genocide" in its coverage, and centre Palestinian voices and direct eyewitness accounts. A social media post by the Canadian Palestinian Association of Manitoba called for "an end to the shameful complicity of the media," accusing media outlets like CBC of "continuing to censor, obfuscate and neglect the truth being broadcast from on the ground." Winnipeg demonstrator Alex Boulley pointed to human rights organizations that have called the crisis a genocide, saying "it's the right use of the word." "I think that not using the word is unfortunately undercutting the severity of the situation, and it is causing it to appear less dire than it is," they said, stressing language choices could lead to misunderstandings around the situation. Human rights groups, including Amnesty International and Doctors Without Borders, have described the situation as a genocide. Israel has repeatedly denied committing a genocide, recently calling growing international condemnation a "global campaign of lies." In a statement to CBC Manitoba, a CBC spokesperson said the term "genocide" carries a "precise definition under international law." "For CBC to make a legal determination, or to take a side in this debate, before a conclusive legal finding would violate the principle of impartiality, one of the core tenets of our Journalistic Standards and Practices," the spokesperson said. "CBC does quote, feature, interview, profile, with clear attribution and context, organizations and governments that do make that declaration. CBC also reports, again with attribution and context, the views of individuals, organizations and governments that deny Israel is committing genocide." The war began on Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas-led militants stormed into southern Israel, killing 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages, according to Israeli figures. Most of the hostages have been released in ceasefires or other deals, but 50 remain inside Gaza. Israel believes around 20 of them to be alive. Since then, Israel's retaliatory campaign has killed more 61,700 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which does not specify how many were fighters or civilians but says around half were women and children. The Health Ministry also says there have been more than 200 malnutrition-related deaths. according to the United Nations. More on-the-ground coverage needed: protester The war has also become deadly for those reporting on it, with 192 journalists killed since the war began, according to the non-profit Committee to Protect Journalists. Among them are six journalists, including prominent Al Jazeera correspondent Anas al-Sharif, who were killed in a targeted Israeli airstrike on Aug. 10. During Saturday's protest — which was attended by upwards of 200 people, according to a rough CBC head count — some demonstrators wore blue signs with the word "Press" and red paint. Doha Smaha, a Grade 12 student who is originally from Algeria, said CBC News should do more in-depth reporting on the journalists killed while working in the war zone. "A lot of press members are being killed and CBC was just covering [up] the truth. So we're trying to show them the reality and the truth," Smaha said. Marianne Jantz, a nurse from Winnipeg, said she would like to see more CBC journalists on the ground in Gaza, highlighting international correspondent Margaret Evans's reporting from the West Bank. Protester Byron Rempel-Burkholder said coverage on CBC Manitoba's Weekend Morning Show has shed light on the situation. Host Nadia Kidwai has interviewed journalists on the ground in Gaza, including Al Jazeera reporter Tareq Abu Azzoum and citizen journalist Mansour Shouman. The show has also featured interviews with aid workers in Gaza, Israeli youth jailed for refusing military service, UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese and two Gazan families who came to Manitoba for life-changing medical care. But Rempel-Burkholder said he is "disturbed" by much of the Western press coverage of Gaza. "In terms of CBC's approach, I think there needs to be a shift toward much greater empathy, sympathy for the Palestinian intergenerational trauma that they've experienced at the hands of Israel," he said, encouraging journalists to seek out "deeper causes to this conflict." In its statement, CBC says the broadcaster is "committed to covering the conflict in all its complexity," including the war's humanitarian impact, the Israeli military's actions, the role of Hamas and how to define the situation, including accusations of genocide.
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Jobs minister says it's 'critical' for Air Canada, union to keep negotiating
Social Sharing Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu is urging Air Canada and the union representing its flight attendants to get back to the negotiating table, suggesting she's not ready to intervene in a dispute that has upended hundreds of flights. In an interview with The Canadian Press, Hajdu said it's "critical" that the two parties "return to the table" to forge a deal on their own. The minister said the union has indicated many of its demands have been met, suggesting there is a path forward to a deal. "The union said themselves that many of their demands have been met. However, right now, they're not at the table," she said. "It's very important that both the union and the corporation return to the table, roll up their sleeves and finish this deal." Hajdu's comments came just hours before a deadline of 1 a.m. ET Saturday, when some 10,000 flight attendants were in a position to walk off the job without an agreement in place. Opposing blame for bargaining impasse The country's largest airline and the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) have blamed each other for their bargaining impasse, with the union rejecting a request for binding arbitration and the company imposing a lockout. The Air Canada component of CUPE said it is eager to avoid a work stoppage by sitting down to negotiate, while the airline has requested Hajdu step in and direct the parties to enter binding arbitration. Business groups have meanwhile warned of the damage a protracted dispute will do to the economy and have called on the government to consider all its options for ending the dispute — including imposing binding arbitration. Cross Country Checkup is asking: How will you be affected by an Air Canada strike? What should be done about it? Leave your comment here and we may read it or call you back. Hajdu acknowledged the economy is "stressed" and said this is a time for "Canadians to pull together — and I expect corporations and unions to do that, too." She also said it's not up to her to "resolve the issues in the collective agreement," but the minister did not rule anything out, either. "It's very important that we stay focused on the two parties. They have the primary responsibility to solve this. This is a corporation and a union who have all the tools they need, as well as tools from the federal mediation service, to get this deal done," Hajdu said. "Canadians are watching with a high degree of empathy ... and a high degree of anxiety, and I think the country is depending on these parties to do their work and to be diligent about turning over every stone." In a statement posted on social media, the minister said she met with both parties together on Friday evening and told them to work harder to reach a deal. "It is unacceptable that such little progress has been made," Hajdu said. Air Canada warned Friday it is cancelling around 500 flights previously scheduled in anticipation of the work stoppage, with a full halt expected to start Saturday. The airline has said that customers whose flights are cancelled will be offered a full refund. Air Canada said it is also allowing customers to change their travel plans without a fee if they choose to do so.
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Flight attendants ordered back to work say labour law violates right to strike
Social Sharing The Canadian government has once again used a contentious section of labour law to stop a major strike — a move unions say sets a dangerous precedent for labour relations in this country. Federal jobs minister Patty Hajdu has invoked Section 107 of the Canada Labour Code to send Air Canada flight attendants back to work, less than 12 hours after they walked off the job. Section 107 gives the minister unilateral authority to order the end of a work stoppage to "maintain or secure industrial peace." "This is not a decision that I have taken lightly but the potential for immediate negative impact on Canadians and our economy is simply too great," Hajdu said at a press conference in Ottawa Saturday. Hajdu used her powers to direct the Canada Industrial Relations Board to order both sides to return to work and to impose binding arbitration to reach a new collective agreement. WATCH | What is Section 107 of the Canada Labour Code?: What is Section 107 of the Canada Labour Code? 4 hours ago Air Canada had been asking the minister to stop the strike for days, pointing to recent government interventions in other labour disputes. The union had urged her not to, saying her decision "sets a terrible precedent." "The Liberal government is rewarding Air Canada's refusal to negotiate fairly by giving them exactly what they wanted," the Air Canada Component of the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) wrote in a statement Saturday afternoon. Law gives minister broad powers to stop strikes Until recently, Section 107 was a relatively unknown piece of legislation. But last year the Liberal government invoked it in several major disputes — sending unionized employees back to work at ports, railyards and at Canada Post. "It really is a troubling development," said Barry Eidlin, an expert on labour and social movements at McGill University. "Section 107 basically just allows the labour minister this unilateral power to intervene to order workers back to work against their will. And that is extremely concerning." Unions are taking the federal government to court for its repeated use of Section 107, arguing it violates Canadians' constitutional right to strike and sours the bargaining process. "We have a real concern that employers are getting the message that they can simply surface bargain, let the issues run to impasse and at that point the government will intervene," said Chris Roberts, director of social and economic policy at the Canadian Labour Congress. He said Ottawa's use of Section 107 is emboldening companies and other levels of governments — Quebec has introduced similar legislation modelled after the federal law. Until recently, Ottawa has usually relied on back-to-work legislation to force striking workers to return to the job. While unions oppose that level of intervention, Roberts said unlike Section 107, there was more accountability. "At least it forced the government to introduce legislation in the House of Commons, to have that legislation scrutinized by the opposition parties, and the media, and by the public," he said. But Craig Munroe, a Vancouver lawyer that represents companies with unionized workers, said the government isn't bypassing Parliament if it's using Section 107 as it was intended. "It has quite broad language there in terms of allowing the minister to do, essentially, whatever the minister feels is necessary and expedient in terms of resolving industrial disputes," Munroe said. "That's really what a lot of the dispute is about," he said. "Does Section 107 actually provide the government with the ability to do the kinds of things that it's been doing?" Munroe believes governments do need a way to get involved and act in the public interest. "The Supreme Court of Canada has said while there's a right to strike, that right isn't absolute," Munroe said. "My view is that ultimately there needs to be some capacity for the government to resolve the tension that exists between the right to strike and the impact that that strike might have on the broader public, and the national economic interest." Liberal government not 'anti-union': Hajdu Hajdu defended her government's intervention on Saturday, saying Canadians had already paid a high price during other recent strikes and had sacrificed a lot in this uncertain economy. " I absolutely reject the notion that our government is anti-union," she said. "In a case like this, where multiple efforts have been made to conclude an agreement that satisfies both parties, and it is clear that they are at an impasse, it is very clear they need some help in arbitrating the final items." WATCH | Jobs minister defends her decision to end Air Canada dispute: 'I absolutely reject the notion that our government is anti-union': Hajdu 2 hours ago Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu said early Saturday afternoon that she has invoked Section 107 of the Canada Labour Code to order binding arbitration between Air Canada and its union and has ordered operations to resume, hours after 10,000 flight attendants went on strike. But Eidlin said the federal government is putting unions at a huge disadvantage by constantly turning to Section 107. "Workers have one tool at their disposal, which is the power to withdraw their labour," Eidlin said. "If you undermine that power, that tilts the playing field, and makes it much harder to reach an agreement at the bargaining table because it removes the incentive of the employer to actually come to the table." While Section 107 may be a quick fix to get people back to work, government intervention isn't a long-term solution, he said. "Even if you impose a settlement by binding arbitration, it doesn't resolve the fundamental issues that are driving the conflict," he said. "It just kicks the can down the road and they just bubble up later. That's why on the ports we've seen every few years another flare up." That's been the case with the government's use of Section 107 to send striking Canada Post employees back to work last December during the busy holiday season. The Canadian Union of Postal Workers continue to refuse overtime and no collective agreement is on the horizon.
