Prominent Cape Town attorney accused of demanding payment for father to see his children
Kaamilah Paulse is under intensifying scrutiny as fresh allegations emerge that her firm, acting for a mother in a heated custody dispute, allegedly demanded a R300 000 payment in exchange for a father to see his children.
Image: Supplied
Herold Gie Inc, Kaamilah Paulse is under intensifying scrutiny as fresh allegations emerge that her firm, acting for a mother in a heated custody dispute, allegedly demanded a R300 000 payment in exchange for a father to see his children. The fresh allegations are made by the father, Asif Casoojee, and his attorney, Nazeer Parker of Nazeer Parker and Associates.
The claim, described by legal experts as 'unprecedented' and 'deeply unethical if proven,' has now been added to the Legal Practice Council (LPC) investigation on Paulse.
The dispute stems from Casoojee's application to the Western Cape High Court earlier this year, seeking permission for his children to attend his brother's wedding in Johannesburg. The father, separated from his children who live in Cape Town, argued that an interim court order entitled him to 'as much contact as possible' with them.
Despite the children allegedly expressing enthusiasm for the trip—including the daughter choosing outfits and sending them to her father — Paulse, acting on behalf of the mother, refused the request.
In a shocking twist, Parker claims that Paulse's team, through Advocate Adri Heese, made a settlement offer to him before the court hearing: Casoojee could have access to the children that weekend, if he paid R300 000 into the trust account of Herold Gie Attorneys.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
'My client firmly instructed that his children are not items for sale and he was not prepared to pay over such a sum to Paulse in exchange for his children attending his brother's wedding,' Parker told the court. 'We were stunned. As legal practitioners, we have never been asked by an opposing side for money in return for access to one's own children.'
The Western Cape High Court heard the urgent application in February 2025. Though the Family Advocate's office supported the trip, noting it would 'strengthen familial bonds,' the matter remains unresolved, and contact between Casoojee and his children continues to be contested.
This latest controversy comes on the back of a damning March 2025 ruling by the LPC Appeals Tribunal, which found prima facie evidence of professional misconduct by Paulse. The ruling has led to formal disciplinary proceedings.
The Tribunal found Paulse improperly obtained a protection order against Casoojee without proper service or due process and allegedly contributed to parental alienation by obstructing his access to school, medical, and emotional communication with his children.
The Tribunal also flagged Paulse's alleged use of unlawfully obtained financial documents and her participation in a WhatsApp group where personal details about Casoojee's business were circulated.
The Casoojee matter is not isolated. Paulse also faces allegations in a separate case brought by businessman Zamer Harneker, who has accused her of similar conduct during his custody battle. Harneker alleges Paulse interfered with his rights as a parent, citing instances of alienation and misuse of confidential financial information.
On a call with The Star's editor, Paulse denied all accusations. 'Adri Heese did no such thing. I will send a complete pack of what happened. Mr Casoojee gave you the wrong information. It is not my side of the story; it is my client's side of the story. What he's alleging is not true'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
11 hours ago
- IOL News
Prominent Cape Town attorney accused of demanding payment for father to see his children
Kaamilah Paulse is under intensifying scrutiny as fresh allegations emerge that her firm, acting for a mother in a heated custody dispute, allegedly demanded a R300 000 payment in exchange for a father to see his children. Image: Supplied Herold Gie Inc, Kaamilah Paulse is under intensifying scrutiny as fresh allegations emerge that her firm, acting for a mother in a heated custody dispute, allegedly demanded a R300 000 payment in exchange for a father to see his children. The fresh allegations are made by the father, Asif Casoojee, and his attorney, Nazeer Parker of Nazeer Parker and Associates. The claim, described by legal experts as 'unprecedented' and 'deeply unethical if proven,' has now been added to the Legal Practice Council (LPC) investigation on Paulse. The dispute stems from Casoojee's application to the Western Cape High Court earlier this year, seeking permission for his children to attend his brother's wedding in Johannesburg. The father, separated from his children who live in Cape Town, argued that an interim court order entitled him to 'as much contact as possible' with them. Despite the children allegedly expressing enthusiasm for the trip—including the daughter choosing outfits and sending them to her father — Paulse, acting on behalf of the mother, refused the request. In a shocking twist, Parker claims that Paulse's team, through Advocate Adri Heese, made a settlement offer to him before the court hearing: Casoojee could have access to the children that weekend, if he paid R300 000 into the trust account of Herold Gie Attorneys. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ 'My client firmly instructed that his children are not items for sale and he was not prepared to pay over such a sum to Paulse in exchange for his children attending his brother's wedding,' Parker told the court. 'We were stunned. As legal practitioners, we have never been asked by an opposing side for money in return for access to one's own children.' The Western Cape High Court heard the urgent application in February 2025. Though the Family Advocate's office supported the trip, noting it would 'strengthen familial bonds,' the matter remains unresolved, and contact between Casoojee and his children continues to be contested. This latest controversy comes on the back of a damning March 2025 ruling by the LPC Appeals Tribunal, which found prima facie evidence of professional misconduct by Paulse. The ruling has led to formal disciplinary proceedings. The Tribunal found Paulse improperly obtained a protection order against Casoojee without proper service or due process and allegedly contributed to parental alienation by obstructing his access to school, medical, and emotional communication with his children. The Tribunal also flagged Paulse's alleged use of unlawfully obtained financial documents and her participation in a WhatsApp group where personal details about Casoojee's business were circulated. The Casoojee matter is not isolated. Paulse also faces allegations in a separate case brought by businessman Zamer Harneker, who has accused her of similar conduct during his custody battle. Harneker alleges Paulse interfered with his rights as a parent, citing instances of alienation and misuse of confidential financial information. On a call with The Star's editor, Paulse denied all accusations. 'Adri Heese did no such thing. I will send a complete pack of what happened. Mr Casoojee gave you the wrong information. It is not my side of the story; it is my client's side of the story. What he's alleging is not true'

IOL News
17 hours ago
- IOL News
No justification for violence: Court dismisses appeal in intimate partner violence case
The repeat offender, who had previously also served a prison sentence for murder, argued that he was provoked and could not foresee the death of his girlfriend after the violent assault which occurred after a night where the couple had consumed alcohol. Image: File A man who beat and kicked his partner to death in an alcohol-induced rage will continue to serve his 20 years imprisonment term after his appeal against his sentence failed in the Western Cape High Court. The repeat offender, who had previously also served prison sentence for murder, argued that he was provoked and could not foresee the death of his girlfriend after the violent assault which occurred after a night where the couple had consumed alcohol. Bafana Khumalo, co-executive director at Anti-GBV NPO Sonke Gender Justice, said they welcomed the court's decision and said there is no justification for violence. Khumalo said they welcomed the seriousness with which the court handled the matter and for denying the appeal against sentence. 'This indicates the seriousness that the court considered this matter. The judgment affirms the fact that there can be no justification for violence. Alcohol and anger can never be an excuse,' said Khumalo. Khumalo added that it amplifies how the law should deal with perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence (IPV). 'This judgment strengthens our jurisprudence on how IPV matters should be handled. There is a strong message to all of us in society that such acts of brutality will not be tolerated and where there has been violation as in this case there will be accountability. 'The lesson for all of us is that we need to redouble our efforts in ensuring that in our prevention programmes such cases should serve as teaching moments particularly for boys and men that there is no justification for using violence. Where there's a difference of opinion parties should engage in dispute resolving mechanisms that do not include any form of violence,' said Khumalo. It emerged in court that the couple became involved in an argument which revolved around the man's consumption of wine which the girlfriend had bought and her accusation that the man failed to contribute financially to their joint household. The man argued that he was provoked and angry but could distinguish between lawful and unlawful actions and act according to such knowledge. In a plea statement he pleaded not guilty to murder but guilty to an alternative charge of culpable homicide. 'He also stated that the deceased threw wine at his face and threatened to return to her estranged husband and have more children with him. Consequently, the appellant became angry at the accusation and started hitting the deceased with fists in her face. 'She fell to the ground, and he started kicking the deceased in her face and on her body. The appellant explained that the deceased lost consciousness. The appellant fetched a jug of water and poured the water over her face. According to the appellant, the deceased regained consciousness and he informed her that he would be leaving. The appellant then left the house,' the judgment read.


Daily Maverick
4 days ago
- Daily Maverick
Business community reels after kidnapping incident: Nelson Mandela Bay's security crisis deepens
On Saturday morning at 6 am, Gqeberha resident Lindsay Knowlden, 65, was kidnapped from the Fresh Produce Market in Markman Industrial Area. While the kidnapping has sent shockwaves through the Nelson Mandela Bay community, frustrated business owners, whose businesses are under threat from protection rackets, have been calling for improved security in that area for more than two years. For the past two years, members of the Markman Business Forum and business owners have been pleading with the Nelson Mandela Bay municipality for improved security infrastructure, more specifically a 300m fence to improve the safety of those who work in the area, spokesperson Graham Taylor said on Sunday. On Saturday, the business community was shocked after Peter and Lindsay Knowlden were attacked in the underground parking at the Fresh Produce Market. Peter Knowlden was assaulted with a firearm and his wife Lindsay was kidnapped. 'We have been battling now for close on two years, and you almost get the feeling that the municipality is trying its best to avoid us,' Taylor said. Taylor said that a meeting had been held earlier this month with acting city manager Ted Pillay and 'some commitments were made'. 'The boundaries of Markman Industria are incredibly porous,' Taylor said. 'Vulnerable' 'We are vulnerable on three sides of the area. We need a 300m fence. That corner where the Fresh Produce Market is has always been a problem,' he said. He said that to the municipality's credit, it had tried to improve the security at the Fresh Produce market and had built a wall around the facility. 'But personally, I have never seen security guards there. The problem is that it remains completely accessible from the back,' Taylor said. He said the area was monitored by private security, but it urgently needed a fence. 'That way we can introduce proper access control.' He said that currently, anybody could enter the area. 'That Addo corridor is a major challenge,' he said, referring to the road that runs from the N2 through Motherwell to Addo. 'We have been having meetings with logistics service providers and industry stakeholders just to address crime,' Taylor said. 'Businesses have the solution, but people need to start listening.' He said that as a result of the deteriorating security situation in the area, the cost of business had shot up. Some businesses now had to pay R300,000 a month for security. 'Protection racket' Taylor said a protection racket was being run in the area, and any vehicle leaving without security would be followed and hijacked, especially those transporting food. 'Demanding protection money has become a trend,' he said. 'People know exactly what is in those vehicles.' Wayne Hart from Atlas Security said they had been called in on Saturday after Lindsay Knowlden was kidnapped, as the couple were clients. 'As you, we are deeply concerned about the kidnapping of Lindsay Knowlden, which took place in the early hours of Saturday morning. Atlas Security was first on the scene, and our team responded immediately after being alerted. 'Our control room and teams have been working closely with the local authorities, using our extensive network of CCTV cameras across Nelson Mandela Bay to assist in the investigation. We can confirm that the vehicle involved was flagged, but in the interest of the ongoing investigation, further details cannot be shared at this time. 'We are aware that the Hawks have received a ransom demand for Lindsay's safe return. The case is now in the hands of the Hawks and SAPS, and Atlas Security will continue to cooperate fully with all roleplayers as the investigation unfolds. 'Our thoughts are with Lindsay's family and loved ones during this incredibly difficult time. We urge anyone with information to contact SAPS,' Atlas said. SAPS spokesperson Captain Andre Beetge confirmed the incident, and that the case had been transferred to the Hawks. The Fresh Produce Market is a Nelson Mandela Bay municipal facility, but by last night, municipal spokesperson Sithembiso Soyaya had not responded to questions about security measures there. Earlier this month, Sanral construction manager Victor Ngcobo was kidnapped from Addo Road, 3km from the latest abduction. He was released unharmed.