logo
Death By Fungi: Cashing In On Erin Patterson

Death By Fungi: Cashing In On Erin Patterson

Scoop09-07-2025
She has become a notorious figure of international interest, shamelessly exploited for news cycles, commercial worth and career advancement. After a trial lasting nine weeks, conducted at the Latrobe Valley Law Courts in Morwell, Victoria, Erin Patterson, a stocky, thick set mother of two was found guilty for three murders and an attempted murder. Date: July 29, 2023 in the town of Leongatha. Her weapon in executing her plot of Sophoclean extravagance: death cap mushrooms (Amanita phalloides) served in a beef Wellington. Her targets: in-laws Don and Gail Patterson, Gail's sister, Heather Wilkinson, and Heather's husband, Ian Wilkinson. Of the four, only Ian survived the culinary killings - barely. Prudently, estranged husband Simon chose not to attend.
News outlets thought it useful to produce graphics about this Australian's terminating exploits. CNN produced one with voyeuristic relish, making it appear much like a Midsomer Murders episode. Details aplenty are provided, including the gruesome end for the victims. 'Gail and Heather died on August 4 [2023] from multiorgan failure, followed by Don on August 5 after he failed to respond to a liver transplant.' Fortunately, Ian Wilkinson survived, but the rumour mongering hack journalist can barely take it, almost regretful of that fact: 'after almost two months of intensive treatment', he was discharged.
Having an opinion on this case has become standard fare, amassing on a turd heap of supposition, second guessing and wonder. The range is positively Chaucerian in its village variety. The former court official interviewed about the killer's guilty mind and poisoning stratagems, stating the obvious and dulling. The criminologist, keen on career advancement and pseudo-psychology, attempted to get into Patterson's mind, commenting on her patent ordinariness.
One example of the latter is to be found in The Conversation, where we are told by Xanthe Mallett with platitudinous and forced certainty how Patterson, speaking days after the incident, 'presented as your typical, average woman of 50.' If attempting to kill four people using fungi is a symptom of average, female ordinariness of a certain age, we all best start making our own meals. But Mallett thinks it is precisely that sense of the ordinary that led to a public obsession, a mania with crime and motivation. 'The juxtaposition between the normality of a family lunch (and the sheer vanilla-ness of the accused) and the seriousness of the situation sent the media into overdrive.'
This is certainly not the view of Dr. Chris Webster, who answered the Leongatha Hospital doorbell when Patterson first presented. Realising her link to the other four victims suffering symptoms of fungi poisoning, Webster explained that death cap mushrooms were suspected. Asking Patterson where she got them, she replied with one word: 'Woolworths.' This was enough for the doctor to presume guilt, an attitude which certainly gave one of Australia's most ruthless supermarket chains a graceful pardon. 'She was evil and very smart to have planned it all and carried out but didn't quite dot every 'i' and cross every 't'.'
The marketer, thrilled with branding and promotion, suggests how Patterson Inc. can become an ongoing concern of merchandise, plays and scripts. (Think of a shirt sporting the following: 'I ate beef Wellington and survived'.) The ABC did not waste much time commissioning Toxic, a show created by Elise McCredie and Tony Ayres, aided by ABC podcaster Rachel Brown. Ayres hams it up by saying that, 'True stories ask storytellers to probe the complexities of human behaviour. What really lies beneath the headlines? It's both a challenge and a responsibility to go beyond the surface – to reveal, not just to sensationalise.' Given that this project is a child of frothy publicity born from sensationalism and hysteria, the comment is almost touching.
The media prompts and updates, mischaracterising Patterson as 'The Mushroom Murderer', leave the impression that she really did like killing fungi. But an absolute monster must be found, and the press hounds duly found it. Papers like the Herald Sun preferred the old Rupert Murdoch tactic: till the soil to surface level to find requisite dirt. According to a grimy bit of reporting from that most distinguished of Melbourne rags, 'the callous murderer, whose maiden name was Scutter before marrying Simon Patterson in 2007, was secretly dubbed 'Scutter the Nutter' among her training group.' The Australian was in a didactic mood, unhappy that the judge did not make it even more obvious that a crime, committed by a woman involving poison and 'not a gun or a knife', was equally grave.
To complete matters was an aggrieved home cook, Nagi Maehashi, who also rode the wave of publicity by expressing sadness that her recipe had become a weapon for lethal effect. (Presumably, Maehashi did not have lethal mushrooms in her original recipe, but precision slides in publicity.) Overcome with false modesty in this glare of publicity, Maehashi did not wish to take interviews, but felt her misused work deserved a statement. 'It is of course upsetting to learn that one of my recipes – possibly the one I've spent more hours perfecting than any other – something I created to bring joy and happiness, is entangled in a tragic situation,' she moaned on Instagram. Those familiar with Maehashi will note her tendency to megalomania in the kitchen, especially given recipes that have been created long before she turned to knife and spatula.
The ones forgotten will be those victims who died excruciatingly before their loved ones in a richly sadistic exercise. At the end of it all, the entire ensemble of babblers, hucksters and chancers so utterly obsessed with what took place in Leongatha should thank Patterson. Her murders have excited, enthralled and given people purpose. She will start conversations, fill pockets, extend careers and, if we are to believe some recent reporting, make meals for her fellow inmates in prison.
Dr. Binoy Kampmark was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, Cambridge. He currently lectures at RMIT University. Email: bkampmark@gmail.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ghislaine Maxwell's arrival at Texas prison camp sparks tension and restrictions
Ghislaine Maxwell's arrival at Texas prison camp sparks tension and restrictions

RNZ News

time16 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Ghislaine Maxwell's arrival at Texas prison camp sparks tension and restrictions

By Katelyn Polantz , CNN Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted of sex trafficking minors following a trial in 2021 and sentenced to 20 years in prison. Photo: AFP / Getty Images Ghislaine Maxwell's arrival to the federal prison camp in Bryan , Texas, this month has sent a shot of tension across its minimum-security all-female units, even while her lawyer says she's in a safer facility as there is intense political inquiry around Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking ring. While Maxwell's living conditions will be less restrictive in Bryan, it's still a difficult situation, where the Epstein conspirator won't get all the benefits of an easy or short stay that other inmates might, like access to puppies to train or the ability to leave the facility for work, according to more than a half dozen people familiar with the Bryan prison, the programmes and the inmates there. The inmates inside Bryan, who are largely non-violent white-collar offenders, were warned recently by prison staff to use discretion talking about Maxwell since she arrived, according to two people who represent inmates in the Bryan prison camp. "She's not making any friends," Sam Mangel, a prison consultant who works with clients at the prison camp, said to CNN this week. "Radioactive." The relaxed nature of the camp became more tense when Maxwell arrived, which is typical of high-profile inmates on the inside, Mangel said. "Nobody's going to rock the boat there. They want to serve the remainder of their sentences with whatever modicum of comfort Bryan provides," he added about other inmates. The Daily Telegraph wrote last week that a prisoner at Bryan said she was "disgusted" by Maxwell's transfer there, in a comment provided to the publication through the inmate's husband. Since that comment was published, prison officials pulled that inmate, Julie Howell, out of a puppy-training class in the camp then transferred her out of the facility, according to her lawyer. Howell is now at a federal detention center in Houston, the lawyer and Bureau of Prisons records say. "Nobody's going to say anything about Ghislaine Maxwell now, are you kidding?" Howell's lawyer Patrick McLain said to CNN on Thursday. Two inmates who were released from FPC Bryan in the past year haven't heard anything yet on how Maxwell is faring inside, or even which of the three units in the camp she is housed in. One of the recently released inmates, Jill Ford, told CNN she would have been concerned with Maxwell's presence there around visitation time. Many of the women inside the prison have children who visit them frequently, where the families are also able to be seen by other inmates in the visitation rooms. It's not known what level of visitation ability Maxwell has. Maxwell was convicted of sex trafficking minors following a trial in 2021 and sentenced to 20 years in prison, with a release date set for 12 years from now, according to federal prison and court records. This undated trial evidence image shows British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell and US financier Jeffrey Epstein. Photo: AFP / US District Court for the southern district of New York The infamous Epstein conspirator's transfer from a more restrictive prison in Florida to the prison camp in Texas also continues to raise questions this week around the Justice Department's reasons for her move and the treatment she may receive inside her new home. On Thursday, Maxwell's attorney David O Markus offered a reason: The transfer happened because Maxwell needed a "safer placement," according to a post he wrote on X. "I'm surprised to hear my progressive friends criticizing more humane prisons and Ghislaine's transfer to a safer facility, especially after she faced serious danger in Tallahassee," he wrote. "The outrage machine wants to turn a safer placement into a scandal." Maxwell would have been housed potentially around women convicted of violent crime in the low-security Federal Correctional Institution in Tallahassee, where she was until earlier this month, according to people familiar with the BOP system. While the prison camp in Bryan is an even less-secure facility, designated as minimum-security by BOP, it houses non-violent offenders who largely have committed only white-collar federal crimes. It is highly unusual for a person convicted of a sex crime to be transferred to a federal prison camp, where women convicted of non-violent white-collar crime are able to move about relatively freely inside and bunk together in dormitory-style rooms. It's also usually not allowed for an inmate with as many years as Maxwell still had left on her sentence - more than 10 - to be allowed in a prison camp. Maxwell's attorney Markus declined to provide any additional information to CNN. Spokespeople from the Justice Department and the Bureau of Prisons haven't responded to multiple requests for comment this week. The unusual nature of Maxwell's transfer, coming after she spoke to Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche for two days following a proffer agreement, has also caught the attention of Capitol Hill. Democratic Senator Sheldon Whitehouse has requested more information from the Bureau of Prisons about her transfer and internal BOP designations. A spokesperson for Whitehouse said he hasn't received any new information as of Thursday (local time). Acting US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Audrey Strauss, announces charges against Ghislaine Maxwell at a media conference in July 2020. Photo: AFP But just because Maxwell now has some of these lower designations doesn't mean she'll get full access to what the camp at Bryan has to offer. Some of the programmes inmates want to participate in may not take her. For instance, the work release programme at the Bryan prison camp trains certified nursing assistants, according to several people familiar with the prison camp. The program is run by the Southern Careers Institute, an education company that screens applicants from the prison and won't allow inmates with certain charges to take part in the programme if they apply, a person familiar with the program told CNN. Canine Companions, which places puppies in federal prisons for inmates to train as service dogs, explicitly said it wouldn't allow Maxwell into the puppy programme at the prison camp. Currently, there are seven puppies (Names: Kianda, Lisa VII, Louise V, Mavis IV, Hector VII, Gator V) paired with a total of 15 inmate handlers at FPC Bryan. The inmates keep the dogs with them from eight weeks to 17 months, teaching the puppies their first 20 or so tasks to use in service of people with disabilities, and the inmates groom, exercise and socialise the puppies inside the prison. Maxwell hasn't applied to the programme. But if she were to, the puppy programme wouldn't accept her. "We do not allow anyone who has committed crimes against animals or minors. That's because they're vulnerable populations," Paige Mazzoni, Canine Companions' CEO, told CNN. "The goal is to give the puppies love and enough confidence to continue to learn tasks." Two other high-profile inmates at FPC Bryan, Elizabeth Holmes the former CEO of Theranos and Jennifer Shah of the Real Housewives of Salt Lake City, aren't part of the puppy programme, either, Mazzoni said. - CNN

Philip Polkinghorne may give evidence at inquest into wife's death
Philip Polkinghorne may give evidence at inquest into wife's death

1News

time2 days ago

  • 1News

Philip Polkinghorne may give evidence at inquest into wife's death

The Auckland eye surgeon found not guilty of killing his wife after a lengthy murder trial last year may give evidence at her coronial inquest next year. Pauline Hanna, who managed the rollout of the Covid-19 vaccine as an executive director at Counties Manukau Health, died in her Remuera home on April 5, 2021. Her husband, former Auckland eye surgeon Philip Polkinghorne, was found not guilty of her murder after an eight-week trial. A pre-hearing conference has taken place in the North Shore District Court this morning with a number of key figures from the trial appearing in court once again. Polkinghorne and his lawyer Ron Mansfield were present, alongside Pauline's brother Bruce Hanna, and niece Rose, and lawyer Alysha McClintock representing the police. ADVERTISEMENT There was also a large media presence, including author Steve Braunias who has written a book about the trial, Polkinghorne, and documentary maker Mark McNeill. Coroner Tania Tetitaha laid out a timeline for lawyers to produce evidence for the inquest. She gave them 28 days to come up with agreed facts and contested evidence. The coroner asked if Polkinghorne would be available to appear before the inquest in August next year. Philip Polkinghorne leaves the North Shore District Court. (Source: 1News) Mansfield said Polkinghorne could make himself available. She deemed it relevant, saying he would know best the stressors in her life leading up to Hanna's death, as her husband. ADVERTISEMENT Mansfield raised concerns around how far back evidence would be collected for the inquest, calling a submission filed by the police a "pseudo-prosecution" of Polkinghorne. "The main issue is going to be what happened on that evening, I have no doubt about that," Tetitaha said. It was revealed in July Australian sex worker Madison Ashton, Polkinghorne's former lover, had asked to give evidence at the inquest. Tetitaha brought up Asthon's potential evidence, saying it would be useful to hear from Polkinghorne on what was presented. The Crown argued during his criminal trial held in the High Court at Auckland Polkinghorne killed his wife after a possible violent struggle, while he may have been under the influence of methamphetamine. His defence maintained Hanna died by suicide after many years of struggling with depression, compounded by work-related stress. The inquest is expected to get underway in August 2026. ADVERTISEMENT

Polkinghorne may give evidence at inquest into wife's death
Polkinghorne may give evidence at inquest into wife's death

Otago Daily Times

time2 days ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Polkinghorne may give evidence at inquest into wife's death

Philip Polkinghorne. Photo: RNZ The Auckland eye surgeon found not guilty of killing his wife after a lengthy murder trial last year may give evidence at her coronial inquest next year. Pauline Hanna, who managed the rollout of the Covid-19 vaccine as an executive director at Counties Manukau Health, died in her Remuera home on April 5, 2021. Her husband, former Auckland eye surgeon Philip Polkinghorne, was found not guilty of her murder after an eight-week trial. A pre-hearing conference took place in the North Shore District Court this morning with a number of key figures from the trial appearing in court once again. Polkinghorne and his lawyer Ron Mansfield were present, alongside Pauline's brother Bruce Hanna, and niece Rose, and lawyer Alysha McClintock representing the police. There was also a large media presence, including author Steve Braunias who has written a book about the trial, Polkinghorne, and documentary maker Mark McNeill. Coroner Tania Tetitaha laid out a timeline for lawyers to produce evidence for the inquest. She gave them 28 days to come up with agreed facts and contested evidence. The Coroner asked if Polkinghorne would be available to appear before the inquest in August next year. His lawyer Ron Mansfield said Polkinghorne could make himself available. She deemed it relevant, saying he would know best the stressors in her life leading up to Hanna's death, as her husband. Mansfield raised concerns around how far back evidence would be collected for the inquest, calling a submission filed by the police a "pseudo-prosecution" of Polkinghorne. "The main issue is going to be what happened on that evening, I have no doubt about that," Tetitaha said. It was revealed in July that Australian sex worker Madison Ashton, Polkinghorne's former lover, had asked to give evidence at the inquest. Coroner Tetitaha brought up Ashton's potential evidence, saying it would be useful to hear from Polkinghorne on what was presented. The Crown argued during his criminal trial held in the High Court at Auckland that Polkinghorne killed his wife after a possible violent struggle, while he may have been under the influence of methamphetamine. His defence maintained Hanna died by suicide after many years of struggling with depression, compounded by work-related stress. The inquest is expected to get under way in August 2026.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store