
Buy This Tax-Free 8.4% Dividend As Trade Chaos Rages In The Markets
The powers that be are playing a high-stakes game of 'tariff roulette'—and I don't know about you, but I don't want to put my life savings on the table here!
But we're not among the crowd bailing on stocks, either.
No way. We're retirees (or aspiring retirees!) and we demand income. So instead, we're going to look to 'tariff-proof' (or 'recession-proof,' if you think this trade war is sending us there) our portfolio. And we're going to do it while cutting our tax bill, too.
Our timing is right here, because the jump in 10-year Treasury rates we've seen since the 'Liberation Day' tariff announcement has given us a window to secure one of my favorite tax-free 8.4% payers at a 'double discount.'
That's right: We're getting a deal on both the fund's portfolio, which has moved lower as rates jumped, and on the fund itself, which trades at a rare 10% discount to the net asset value (NAV or the value of its assets).
Translation: We can buy this stout fund's portfolio for 90 cents on the dollar!
As the tariff-driven volatility continues, we're looking at the ultimate domestic income play: municipal, or 'muni,' bonds, issued by local and state governments to fund infrastructure projects: think roads, bridges, schools and hospitals.
Many investors sidestep munis, partly because getting in on these bonds is tough for individual investors—especially if we want to get in on the best new issues. That's why we're going to buy through a muni-focused closed-end fund (CEF)—the Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAD), a holding of my Contrarian Income Report service. As I write, this one is paying a rich 8.4% dividend.
What's more, the income from muni bonds is tax-free for most Americans. Many munis are also tax-exempt at the state level.
It's hard to underestimate what that tax exemption does to a muni's 'headline' yield. Consider the 8.4% payout on NAD, for example: If you're in the top bracket, you'd need a 13.9% payout on a taxable asset, like a stock, to match it, according to Bankrate's taxable-equivalent yield calculator!
Tax Equivalent Yield
Bankrate.com
Safety? As I write this, the mean default rate on munis cumulatively over the last decade stands at just 0.1%, according to December numbers from JPMorgan Private Bank. And let's not forget that we've got the quiet backing of Jay Powell here.
As I've written before, Powell (very quietly) pumped liquidity into the banking system when a few shaky institutions crumbled in early 2023. So we can be certain he'd ride to the rescue if any cracks were to show up in the muni market, especially as these bonds are widely held by pension funds, insurers and retirees.
Here's where our opportunity comes in, because munis tend to move in opposition to the yield on the 10-year Treasury note—so they've pulled back as so-called 'long' rates jumped in the days following the 'Liberation Day' tariff announcement.
The muni-bond benchmark iShares National Muni Bond ETF (MUB), for example, is down about 1%—a big move for these normally placid income plays.
But we're not going with MUB here, The fund's 3.2% dividend just doesn't do it for us—tax-free or no.
Plus, when we buy munis (and any other asset, for that matter!), we demand a discount. And MUB, as an ETF, rarely offers one, since these funds issue shares to ensure their market price and net asset value (NAV, or the value of their underlying portfolios) align.
Instead, we look to CEFs, which have a fixed share count. That allows their market prices to deviate from NAV—and they often trade at a discount. What's more, we get the services of a pro fund manager, a necessity in the tight-knit muni world, where personal connections matter.
That's where the Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAD) re-enters the picture. NAD's issuer, Nuveen, manages $441 billion worth of bonds and is a big buyer. When municipalities issue bonds—or think about it—they call big whale Nuveen. The muni giant throws its purse around to secure the best deals for its investors.
NAD's portfolio reflects that: It includes 1,193 bonds with an average leverage adjusted duration of 13.5 years. Its average coupon is about 4.4%, and, as I just touched on, Nuveen deftly enhances returns with leverage, to the tune of 40.9% of the portfolio currently.
That's a more-than-acceptable level, given the stability of the fund's holdings. And I expect a recession later this year to pull down interest rates—and NAD's borrowing costs—while driving up investor demand for income plays like NAD.
Over the long haul—the best timeframe in which to hold munis—NAD has more than delivered, with a 231% total return since inception in 1999.
NAD Total Returns
Ycharts
As you can see on the right side of that chart, muni funds like NAD were on fire in 2024, but munis have since pulled back with the rise in long rates. Plus we've got that 10% discount to NAV I mentioned earlier, so we can pick up its portfolio of munis for less than it's worth. Let's take that opportunity.
Brett Owens is Chief Investment Strategist for Contrarian Outlook. For more great income ideas, get your free copy his latest special report: How to Live off Huge Monthly Dividends (up to 8.7%) — Practically Forever.
Disclosure: none
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democrat Congresswoman draws boos over 'shameful' sexism remark in committee hearing with Treasury Secretary
A House Ways and Means Committee hearing took an unexpected turn Wednesday when Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-CA) accused Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent of interrupting her because of her gender—prompting audible groans from the room. The exchange occurred during a tense five-minute questioning session, where Sanchez challenged Bessent on the impact of tariffs enacted under President Trump's administration. "Prices are rising on many everyday goods," Sanchez said, citing increases in clothing, shoes, canned food, toys, and household tools. She added, "On average, Trump's tariffs are estimated to cost households $3,000 more for the same goods than they would have last year," though she did not cite the source of the figure when pressed. Trump Says 'Total Reset Negotiated' With China During Tariff Talks In Geneva When Bessent attempted to interject, Sanchez quickly cut him off: "Please don't interrupt me… I know I'm a woman, but please try to limit yourself to answering my questions." That remark prompted groans from the hearing room, with one attendee audibly reacting, "Oh, come on." Sanchez responded: "No, I'm sorry, but we get talked over all the time, and I don't want that to happen at this hearing." Read On The Fox News App Bessent, who is openly gay, did not address the accusation and instead focused on defending the administration's trade policies. When Sanchez challenged him on pricing impacts and China's trade behavior, Bessent responded, "That's incorrect," and said, "They met their agreements under President Trump in 2020, and President Biden did not enforce them." Wh Slams Dems' 'Partisan Games' After Trump-foe Schiff Calls For Insider Trading Investigation Over Tariffs Sanchez repeatedly claimed that American consumers are paying more due to tariffs and described recent negotiations with China as rushed and lacking transparency. "A poorly negotiated trade deal with China is probably not worth the paper that it is written on," she said. "I was alarmed to hear this morning that Trump said the U.S.–China deal was done after just two days of talks in London." Bessent defended the agreement as an initial step. "The deal struck was for a specific goal, and it will be a much longer process," he said, adding, "China has proven an unreliable partner." The clash between Sanchez and Bessent was repeatedly moderated by Chairman Adrian Smith (R-NE), who reminded members of time limits and decorum throughout the article source: Democrat Congresswoman draws boos over 'shameful' sexism remark in committee hearing with Treasury Secretary
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
American Petroleum Institute says Oil & Gas Industry prepared for hurricane season
LAFAYETTE, La. () – was founded in 1919 and represents all segments of America's natural gas and oil industry, supporting nearly 11 million U.S. jobs and backed by millions of Americans. It's approximately 600 members produce, process, and distribute the majority of the nation's energy. The Gulf Coast Region Director of API, Gifford Briggs, tells me their members, including many in the Gulf of America are prepared for this hurricane season and what mother nature could bring. He's a native of south Louisiana and tells me Louisiana is vital to the country's energy dominance. 'The energy that's provided for this great country comes through the Gulf of America and Lafayette, Louisiana and through the arteries of Louisiana and through the many refineries as they pump the fuel across the nation,' said Briggs. With hurricanes affecting the Gulf each year, it's important for all of these companies stationed in the Gulf, or along the Gulf coast, to have a game plan, especially in terms of evacuating workers. These plans usually occur in steps. Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now 'Non-essential personnel may be moved out a little bit earlier the essential personnel may stay a little bit later,' said Briggs. Briggs stresses the importance of safety, saying it's API's top priority. 'Many of our employees are people that work right here in Acadiana, so getting them to safety and off the platform is one thing, but they have families they need to take care of as well and we want to make sure our employees have every opportunity to do that as well,' added Briggs. These evacuations have an economic impact as production slows. The Gulf supplies nearly 17% of the nation's crude oil and 5% of the natural gas production. This means the next step is to get production moving as quickly as possible. 'We go through the steps we need to take to ensure the safety of the environment and safety of our employees and as soon as we can get back out to our facilities, we will do that in a safe manner,' explained Briggs. This is especially true if the Gulf is not the hardest hit area, as the Oil & Gas industry is crucial to helping our affected neighbors. 'We need to make sure we're making the fuel that's going to be needed as people prepare for the storm, but also helps people recover from the storm and our industry plays a critical role in ensuring a strong recovery for any storm affected area,' says Briggs. 48% of total U.S. Petroleum refining and 51% of U.S. natural gas processing is located along the Gulf coast. Attorneys for Kilmar Abrego Garcia argue for 'due process' in new court filing American Petroleum Institute says Oil & Gas Industry prepared for hurricane season Mother seeks justice after daughter fatally shot by close friend in Iberia Parish Saints conclude mandatory minicamp 'Immaturity': Rand Paul rips White House after being 'uninvited' from picnic Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Extending the Trump Tax Cuts Is a Good Idea. But It Won't Deliver 'Big, Beautiful' Economic Growth.
President Donald Trump and many of his allies in Congress are making grand claims about the economic growth they say will result from the recently proposed "One Big Beautiful Bill." Trump has accused critics of not understanding the budget proposal, "especially the tremendous GROWTH that is coming." A closer examination of the economic realities involved reveals that these claims are dramatically overstated. I have no objections on principles to extending the expiring provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Allowing these cuts to expire would deliver some measure of pain to the economy and add to our troubles. Tax hikes at a time when individuals and businesses are expecting tax stability would undoubtedly depress investment, employment, and overall economic confidence. Americans are already getting a huge tax hike because of Trump's tariffs. However, making a sound case for maintaining the current tax structure is fundamentally different from making the case that it will bring about substantial new growth. It's largely a defensive move. Realistically, the economic boost will be modest at best. In fact, the administration and congressional supporters of this bill admit that much without realizing it. On the Senate side, lawmakers argue that the fiscal cost of extending the 2017 tax cuts should be measured against today's tax code rather than against the code to which we would revert if the cuts automatically expire. They argue that assuming the cuts will be extended reflects the common expectation among taxpayers and markets. But if markets already expect extensions, then making the tax cuts permanent cannot generate significant additional economic growth. The growth that can be achieved by these tax cuts has largely been realized. Merely continuing with lower rates doesn't unleash many new incentives or productivity. In addition, the budget legislation does lots more than extend the 2017 tax cuts. In fact, about 25 percent of the bill consists of different tax breaks on tips or overtime, and spending hikes for the military and various special interests. These are not pro-growth policies—in addition to being expensive. The Tax Foundation estimates that the bill would raise economic output by approximately 0.8 percent in the long run. The Economic Policy Innovation Center analysis pegs the economic gain at around 0.5 percent of gross domestic product (GDP). Both are far from the revolutionary 3 percent figures that Trump's most ardent fanboys are claiming. Moreover, most economic models don't adequately consider the negative consequences of ballooning federal debt on long-term growth. And according to the Congressional Budget Office, this bill will add a further $2.4 trillion to the debt. High levels of debt put upward pressure on interest rates, crowding out private investment and dampening long-term growth prospects. Historically, too much debt correlates with diminished economic performance. Whatever blip in the growth rate we will see thanks to the tax bill, it won't compensate for the damage done by the Trump administration's ongoing trade wars. Tariffs disrupt supplies, increase costs for American businesses and consumers, and create considerable economic uncertainty. Even if we generously assume that tax cuts will deliver an additional 0.5 percent to 0.8 percent in annual GDP growth, the drag from tariffs easily surpasses this modest benefit. The contradiction couldn't be clearer. Proponents of the bill and the president himself trumpet its growth-enhancing powers while simultaneously piling up debt and enacting trade policies that are both guaranteed to undermine economic dynamism. And yes, in addition to the expected opposition from Democrats, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and a few other voices from the right side of the aisle have been highlighting the bill's inadequacies, to the great displeasure of the president. Among other things, they point to its subsidies and other distorting economic interventions and accurately observe that the economic benefits being touted are inflated and misleading. Paul understands that a true pro-growth agenda would extend the tax provisions while limiting the debt impact by cutting wasteful spending, closing tax loopholes, and not loading the bill with lots of special-interest giveaways. The legislation is now in the hands of the Senate. If senators are interested in genuine and productive tax reform, they will scrap the new provisions and do 10-year extensions of pro-growth policies that are currently temporary in the legislation as passed by the House (such as 100 percent bonus depreciation and research-and-development expensing)—and they'd still be left with room to lower the cost. If they keep the spending offset included in the House bill and Medicaid reform, this would become both pro-growth and fiscally responsible legislation. Instead of indulging in the dangerous fantasy that any tax cuts will produce enormous growth, Congress needs to do the work and revise the bill so that it does produce growth and offsets the debt accumulation. COPYRIGHT 2025 The post Extending the Trump Tax Cuts Is a Good Idea. But It Won't Deliver 'Big, Beautiful' Economic Growth. appeared first on