Brazil's Lula pledges retaliation to Trump tariffs
"We'll first try to negotiate, but if there's no negotiation, the law of reciprocity will be put into practice," Lula said in an interview with Record TV, citing a law Congress recently passed giving the president powers to retaliate against trade barriers.
"If they're going to charge us 50, we'll charge them 50."
The president is unlikely to announce any retaliatory measures until the tariffs are implemented, said a Brazilian diplomat who requested anonymity to describe internal government debates.
"We have until August 1," the source said.
In a letter to Lula published on Wednesday, Trump linked the tariffs to Brazil's judiciary launching legal proceedings against former President Jair Bolsonaro, who is on trial on charges of plotting a coup to stop Lula from taking office in 2023 after hundreds of pro-Bolsonaro supporters stormed Congress. Trump said Bolsonaro was the victim of a "witch hunt."
Lula criticised Bolsonaro for perpetuating claims of legal persecution, stressing the former president's son, Eduardo Bolsonaro, took leave from his role in Congress at least in part to head a campaign in his father's favour in the United States.
"The former president of the Republic should take responsibility, because he is agreeing with Trump's taxation of Brazil. In fact, it was his son who went there to influence Trump's mind," Lula said.
In a social media post late on Thursday, Bolsonaro said Trump's letter announcing tariffs was received with "a sense of responsibility," adding he respects and admires the US government.
Bolsonaro argued the US measure was a reaction to Brazil's distancing from freedom. "This would never have happened under my government," he wrote.
The former president also urged the powers to act by presenting measures to restore what he called "institutional normality".
Lula said the government will set up a committee with Brazilian business leaders to "rethink" the country's commercial policy with the United States. He mentioned Brazil's new reciprocity law, passed just after Trump made his first tariff announcements in April, that allows the government to respond with reciprocal measures in case other countries impose unilateral barriers to Brazilian products.
Beyond imposing counter tariffs, the law would also allow Lula to restrict imports and investments and suspend intellectual property rights from US firms, among other measures.
The US is Brazil's second-largest trading partner after China and has a rare trade surplus with Latin America's largest economy.
Some market sectors, including aviation and banking, felt immediate pressure. Shares of some Brazilian firms declined on Thursday, with planemaker Embraer and major banks such as Itau Unibanco and Banco Santander posting losses.
But the tariffs could inflict pain in the US too, disrupting food prices, given Brazil's role as a major agricultural exporter of coffee, orange juice, sugar, beef, and ethanol. The proposed 50 per cent tariff would effectively halt the flow of Brazilian coffee to the US, its largest buyer, four trade sources told Reuters on Thursday.
Brazilian industry lobby groups representing sectors such as coffee and oil issued statements on Thursday, urging a diplomatic solution.
"We hope that diplomacy and balanced negotiations will prevail, despite ideologies and personal preferences, and that common sense will once again guide the relationship between these two great sovereign nations," Josue Gomes da Silva, the president of Sao Paulo industry group Fiesp, said in a statement.
Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva says he wants to find a diplomatic solution to US President Donald Trump's threat of 50 per cent tariffs on Brazilian exports, but vowed to reciprocate like-for-like if they take effect on August 1.
"We'll first try to negotiate, but if there's no negotiation, the law of reciprocity will be put into practice," Lula said in an interview with Record TV, citing a law Congress recently passed giving the president powers to retaliate against trade barriers.
"If they're going to charge us 50, we'll charge them 50."
The president is unlikely to announce any retaliatory measures until the tariffs are implemented, said a Brazilian diplomat who requested anonymity to describe internal government debates.
"We have until August 1," the source said.
In a letter to Lula published on Wednesday, Trump linked the tariffs to Brazil's judiciary launching legal proceedings against former President Jair Bolsonaro, who is on trial on charges of plotting a coup to stop Lula from taking office in 2023 after hundreds of pro-Bolsonaro supporters stormed Congress. Trump said Bolsonaro was the victim of a "witch hunt."
Lula criticised Bolsonaro for perpetuating claims of legal persecution, stressing the former president's son, Eduardo Bolsonaro, took leave from his role in Congress at least in part to head a campaign in his father's favour in the United States.
"The former president of the Republic should take responsibility, because he is agreeing with Trump's taxation of Brazil. In fact, it was his son who went there to influence Trump's mind," Lula said.
In a social media post late on Thursday, Bolsonaro said Trump's letter announcing tariffs was received with "a sense of responsibility," adding he respects and admires the US government.
Bolsonaro argued the US measure was a reaction to Brazil's distancing from freedom. "This would never have happened under my government," he wrote.
The former president also urged the powers to act by presenting measures to restore what he called "institutional normality".
Lula said the government will set up a committee with Brazilian business leaders to "rethink" the country's commercial policy with the United States. He mentioned Brazil's new reciprocity law, passed just after Trump made his first tariff announcements in April, that allows the government to respond with reciprocal measures in case other countries impose unilateral barriers to Brazilian products.
Beyond imposing counter tariffs, the law would also allow Lula to restrict imports and investments and suspend intellectual property rights from US firms, among other measures.
The US is Brazil's second-largest trading partner after China and has a rare trade surplus with Latin America's largest economy.
Some market sectors, including aviation and banking, felt immediate pressure. Shares of some Brazilian firms declined on Thursday, with planemaker Embraer and major banks such as Itau Unibanco and Banco Santander posting losses.
But the tariffs could inflict pain in the US too, disrupting food prices, given Brazil's role as a major agricultural exporter of coffee, orange juice, sugar, beef, and ethanol. The proposed 50 per cent tariff would effectively halt the flow of Brazilian coffee to the US, its largest buyer, four trade sources told Reuters on Thursday.
Brazilian industry lobby groups representing sectors such as coffee and oil issued statements on Thursday, urging a diplomatic solution.
"We hope that diplomacy and balanced negotiations will prevail, despite ideologies and personal preferences, and that common sense will once again guide the relationship between these two great sovereign nations," Josue Gomes da Silva, the president of Sao Paulo industry group Fiesp, said in a statement.
Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva says he wants to find a diplomatic solution to US President Donald Trump's threat of 50 per cent tariffs on Brazilian exports, but vowed to reciprocate like-for-like if they take effect on August 1.
"We'll first try to negotiate, but if there's no negotiation, the law of reciprocity will be put into practice," Lula said in an interview with Record TV, citing a law Congress recently passed giving the president powers to retaliate against trade barriers.
"If they're going to charge us 50, we'll charge them 50."
The president is unlikely to announce any retaliatory measures until the tariffs are implemented, said a Brazilian diplomat who requested anonymity to describe internal government debates.
"We have until August 1," the source said.
In a letter to Lula published on Wednesday, Trump linked the tariffs to Brazil's judiciary launching legal proceedings against former President Jair Bolsonaro, who is on trial on charges of plotting a coup to stop Lula from taking office in 2023 after hundreds of pro-Bolsonaro supporters stormed Congress. Trump said Bolsonaro was the victim of a "witch hunt."
Lula criticised Bolsonaro for perpetuating claims of legal persecution, stressing the former president's son, Eduardo Bolsonaro, took leave from his role in Congress at least in part to head a campaign in his father's favour in the United States.
"The former president of the Republic should take responsibility, because he is agreeing with Trump's taxation of Brazil. In fact, it was his son who went there to influence Trump's mind," Lula said.
In a social media post late on Thursday, Bolsonaro said Trump's letter announcing tariffs was received with "a sense of responsibility," adding he respects and admires the US government.
Bolsonaro argued the US measure was a reaction to Brazil's distancing from freedom. "This would never have happened under my government," he wrote.
The former president also urged the powers to act by presenting measures to restore what he called "institutional normality".
Lula said the government will set up a committee with Brazilian business leaders to "rethink" the country's commercial policy with the United States. He mentioned Brazil's new reciprocity law, passed just after Trump made his first tariff announcements in April, that allows the government to respond with reciprocal measures in case other countries impose unilateral barriers to Brazilian products.
Beyond imposing counter tariffs, the law would also allow Lula to restrict imports and investments and suspend intellectual property rights from US firms, among other measures.
The US is Brazil's second-largest trading partner after China and has a rare trade surplus with Latin America's largest economy.
Some market sectors, including aviation and banking, felt immediate pressure. Shares of some Brazilian firms declined on Thursday, with planemaker Embraer and major banks such as Itau Unibanco and Banco Santander posting losses.
But the tariffs could inflict pain in the US too, disrupting food prices, given Brazil's role as a major agricultural exporter of coffee, orange juice, sugar, beef, and ethanol. The proposed 50 per cent tariff would effectively halt the flow of Brazilian coffee to the US, its largest buyer, four trade sources told Reuters on Thursday.
Brazilian industry lobby groups representing sectors such as coffee and oil issued statements on Thursday, urging a diplomatic solution.
"We hope that diplomacy and balanced negotiations will prevail, despite ideologies and personal preferences, and that common sense will once again guide the relationship between these two great sovereign nations," Josue Gomes da Silva, the president of Sao Paulo industry group Fiesp, said in a statement.
Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva says he wants to find a diplomatic solution to US President Donald Trump's threat of 50 per cent tariffs on Brazilian exports, but vowed to reciprocate like-for-like if they take effect on August 1.
"We'll first try to negotiate, but if there's no negotiation, the law of reciprocity will be put into practice," Lula said in an interview with Record TV, citing a law Congress recently passed giving the president powers to retaliate against trade barriers.
"If they're going to charge us 50, we'll charge them 50."
The president is unlikely to announce any retaliatory measures until the tariffs are implemented, said a Brazilian diplomat who requested anonymity to describe internal government debates.
"We have until August 1," the source said.
In a letter to Lula published on Wednesday, Trump linked the tariffs to Brazil's judiciary launching legal proceedings against former President Jair Bolsonaro, who is on trial on charges of plotting a coup to stop Lula from taking office in 2023 after hundreds of pro-Bolsonaro supporters stormed Congress. Trump said Bolsonaro was the victim of a "witch hunt."
Lula criticised Bolsonaro for perpetuating claims of legal persecution, stressing the former president's son, Eduardo Bolsonaro, took leave from his role in Congress at least in part to head a campaign in his father's favour in the United States.
"The former president of the Republic should take responsibility, because he is agreeing with Trump's taxation of Brazil. In fact, it was his son who went there to influence Trump's mind," Lula said.
In a social media post late on Thursday, Bolsonaro said Trump's letter announcing tariffs was received with "a sense of responsibility," adding he respects and admires the US government.
Bolsonaro argued the US measure was a reaction to Brazil's distancing from freedom. "This would never have happened under my government," he wrote.
The former president also urged the powers to act by presenting measures to restore what he called "institutional normality".
Lula said the government will set up a committee with Brazilian business leaders to "rethink" the country's commercial policy with the United States. He mentioned Brazil's new reciprocity law, passed just after Trump made his first tariff announcements in April, that allows the government to respond with reciprocal measures in case other countries impose unilateral barriers to Brazilian products.
Beyond imposing counter tariffs, the law would also allow Lula to restrict imports and investments and suspend intellectual property rights from US firms, among other measures.
The US is Brazil's second-largest trading partner after China and has a rare trade surplus with Latin America's largest economy.
Some market sectors, including aviation and banking, felt immediate pressure. Shares of some Brazilian firms declined on Thursday, with planemaker Embraer and major banks such as Itau Unibanco and Banco Santander posting losses.
But the tariffs could inflict pain in the US too, disrupting food prices, given Brazil's role as a major agricultural exporter of coffee, orange juice, sugar, beef, and ethanol. The proposed 50 per cent tariff would effectively halt the flow of Brazilian coffee to the US, its largest buyer, four trade sources told Reuters on Thursday.
Brazilian industry lobby groups representing sectors such as coffee and oil issued statements on Thursday, urging a diplomatic solution.
"We hope that diplomacy and balanced negotiations will prevail, despite ideologies and personal preferences, and that common sense will once again guide the relationship between these two great sovereign nations," Josue Gomes da Silva, the president of Sao Paulo industry group Fiesp, said in a statement.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
Donald Trump's puppet has a crazy plan to weaken the US dollar
He wants both a weaker dollar so as to make American goods more competitive and thereby reduce the trade deficit. But at the same time, he wants to preserve and enhance the dollar's global reserve currency status, and its parallel position as the predominant international means of exchange. To list but the most important of them, the benefits of dollar hegemony include enabling the US to borrow more cheaply in world markets, the exercise of geopolitical influence through the imposition of sanctions, and encouraging foreign investment in the US. A weaker dollar furthers Trump's protectionist goals by making imports more expensive and exports cheaper. Credit: AP It is not at all clear that Trump can maintain what France's one-time president, Valery Giscard d'Estaing, called America's 'exorbitant privilege' while at the same time pursuing strategies, such as inflationary monetary policy, that might weaken its currency. We know what Miran's thoughts on the matter are, since he wrote about them in a paper published shortly before Trump's re-election as president. His musings might be seen as an extended job application. Loading The dollar has long been persistently overvalued from a trade perspective, he argued, and that's in large part because dollar assets 'function as the world's reserve currency'. Can you have one without the other, both reserve currency supremacy and a much weaker dollar? Not according to Miran, who suggests that foreigners could be taxed on their holdings of US Treasuries to lessen their attractions to overseas investors, never mind that this would be both a technical and legal default. If that happened, then the dollar would indeed lose the commanding position it now holds; it's hard to imagine a policy less likely to make America great again, and essentially amounts to quack economics. As it happens, Trump already seems to be getting his way on a weaker dollar, and that's without even trying. Conventional economics would suggest that if you raise tariffs significantly, the dollar would appreciate to compensate, negating at least part of the impact of tariffs on prices. In the event, it's actually gone the other way, depreciating by nearly 10 per cent on a trade-weighted basis since it first became apparent that Trump was deadly serious about tariffs. A weaker dollar furthers Trump's protectionist goals by making imports more expensive and exports cheaper. Credit: Bloomberg Growing policy uncertainty, including precisely where the president stands on the strong dollar policy, is a large part of the explanation. There has been a significant rotation out of dollar assets among international investors, which no doubt has further to run if inflationary monetary policy is pursued. White House attacks on the integrity of the Fed – and the data, whenever they show the economy in a poor light – have further fuelled the loss of confidence. A withholding tax on US Treasuries might well turn this into a rout. US policymakers are nonetheless confident that they can preserve and even enhance the dollar's core position in the world's financial system while at the same time inducing a more competitive exchange rate. As on most other aspects of Trump's economic agenda, the president's 'vision' for the dollar is a mass of contradictions and apparently incompatible goals. Their big hope rests on stablecoins, privately issued digital tokens which are already beginning to make inroads into global payments. These use distributed ledger and blockchain technologies to make payments faster and cheaper than current systems. Backed dollar-for-dollar by US Treasuries, central bank reserves and other supposedly risk-free assets, stablecoins are promoted by the Trump administration as a market-led way of defending and further promoting the internationalisation of the dollar. They also potentially provide a major alternative source of demand for US Treasuries. I've written before about the long-term threat that poorly regulated stablecoins might pose to financial stability. It's not just about ensuring that the assets that secure the stablecoins' value are reliable. It's also about making such tokens immune to cyber attack, theft and digital terrorism. Advances in supercomputing make the public keys and digital certificates on which ownership rights rest look much more vulnerable than they used to be. Privately promoted stablecoins could easily become subject to self-reinforcing runs if their integrity is in any way challenged or ownership rights are called into question. Some readers may be familiar with Robert Harris's novel The Second Sleep , in which the author imagines a world far into the future where humanity has returned to almost medieval levels of advancement. The calamity that has befallen society is never explicitly spelt out, but the most likely explanation is eventually traced to a complete collapse of the digital economy. Something I didn't know until I read the book is that London is just three meals away from anarchy. Such a collapse could, of course, occur without the addition of stablecoins; the vast majority of commerce these days is just zeros and ones on a computer. But at least with fiat money, you know that the full force of the sovereign state and its central bank stand behind it. There may be no such guarantor with stablecoins. Any strategy for sustaining the power and reach of the mighty dollar that depends solely on the advance of stablecoins would seem peculiarly high risk. Loading There's no telling how Miran might behave if granted the privilege of running the US Federal Reserve. Most go native, and quickly forget any iconoclastic leanings they might have had, once the responsibilities of high office start to weigh. Witness Powell, who – though it now seems incredible – was Trump's pick for the position. In any case, Trump jeopardises the strong dollar policy at his peril. Down the decades, it's generally served the US well, and is a vital part of America's wider geopolitical power. If it ain't broke, why break it? Telegraph, London
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
The real meaning of the Zelensky summit was not as it appeared
As anyone who caught even a bit of the day's news knows, US President Donald Trump, President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine and the leaders of NATO, the European Union, Britain and several European countries spent Monday at the White House negotiating a possible land swap and security guarantees that could end the Russian-Ukrainian war. But did they really? Let's think about the word 'negotiating'. All wars end with it, according to the popular saying, but rarely does the aggressor come to the table demanding territory that it doesn't actually control. Usually, the belligerents discuss which military gains should be formalised and which should be reversed. Vladimir Putin, however, has consistently demanded more land than his military has been able to bring under its control in the three and a half years since Russia's full-scale invasion began. During his summit with Trump in Alaska on Friday, Putin appears to have made a small concession: He is still demanding more land than he has occupied, but not as much as he used to demand. But less is still more. So let's talk about 'land swap'. This phrase seems to refer to Putin's offer to take a piece of Ukraine in exchange for not threatening an even bigger piece of Ukraine. This is not what we normally think of as a swap. It's what we think of as extortion. Let's also talk about the word 'land', or 'territory', which the leaders gathered at the White House on Monday used a lot. Zelensky referred to a map Trump apparently provided to facilitate discussion of 'territory'. Trump promised to get him a copy. But 'territory' is not an outline on a map. It's cities and towns and villages where people still live – even near the front line, even now. Before the full-scale invasion, the populations of Kramatorsk and Sloviansk, the two Ukrainian cities on land Putin is demanding, were 200,000 and 100,000, respectively. We don't know how many people live there now – some people surely fled, some came from occupied territories, some died – but the number is almost certainly tens and possibly hundreds of thousands of people. Loading To propose to cede the land to Russia is to propose either subjecting those residents to Russian occupation – which in other cities has involved summary executions, detentions and torture – or displacing them forcibly. Either would be a crime – a crime in which Trump is asking Zelensky to become an accomplice. This kind of negotiation-through-extortion is not unprecedented. In February 1945, the leaders of the Soviet Union, the United States and Britain met in Yalta – then a city in Soviet Russia, later a city in Ukraine, now a city in Russian-occupied Crimea – to negotiate the end of World War II. Among other things, Josef Stalin wanted the Kuril Islands, which stretched from Soviet Kamchatka to the coast of Japan. Franklin D. Roosevelt and Winston Churchill agreed to let the Soviets have the Kurils. The islands weren't theirs to give – the Kurils belonged to Japan – but they were theirs to take. Six months later, Soviet troops, with significant support from the US military, took control of the islands and deported the Japanese residents.
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Five takeaways from Trump's Ukraine summit (and his post-mortem on Fox News)
On Fox, he said it was 'insulting' for Ukraine to have sought to join NATO. As for wanting to regain Crimea, a large territory Putin annexed in 2014, Trump said this was impossible because Putin got it in a 'good deal'. 'That was given [to Russia] all because Barack Hussein Obama gave it away in one of the dumbest real estate deals I've ever seen,' Trump said, even though the international community still recognises Crimea as part of Ukraine. Zelensky will have to meet Putin with bombs falling Despite the concerns of European leaders, particularly German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and French President Emmanuel Macron, Trump has made clear he won't push Putin for a ceasefire. That means that if Zelensky and Putin do have this purported meeting, it will be with bombs still falling. That makes for trying circumstances. Remember, on the flight to Anchorage on Friday, Trump said he would be unhappy if he didn't walk away from the Putin meeting with some form a ceasefire. Now he says it's not necessary at all. Oleh Shamshur, a former Ukrainian ambassador to the US and a senior fellow at the Atlantic Institute, said the talks had largely failed as Trump still believed 'peace talks can advance while hostilities continue'. But Michael O'Hanlon, foreign policy director at the Brookings Institution, said a ceasefire would soon become less important. 'If there is no reasonable effort by Putin to end this war fairly soon – and I doubt there will be – then this whole notion that we should try to negotiate peace will just seem to everyone like a play for time,' he told CNBC. 'Trump's pretty good at sniffing out that kind of tactical ploy.' Europe will have to do the work but cede the credit Trump clearly revelled in the role of ringmaster, and the White House duly pumped out photographs showing European leaders thanking the president, listening to him or inspecting his 'shop' of caps, books and merch. One thing they heard over and over again was that Trump had already ended six wars – a dubious claim at best – and while this one was proving to be the hardest, he was sure he would get it done. After leaving the door ever-so-slightly ajar to putting US boots on the ground as part of a peacekeeping force, Trump scotched that definitively the next morning on Fox News. But he did signal the US could support the Europeans with air power, as well as 'co-ordinating' the security guarantee. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the details of this arrangement were now being worked out. It was one of many components that remained vague after the meeting in Washington, but overall the picture was clear: US involvement will be minimal but just large enough for Trump to take credit. The one thing Trump is wedded to is staying involved Gone are the threats that the US may walk away from the Ukraine-Russia conflict altogether. Trump is now in this for the long-haul. Loading Not only is the US president desperate for the Nobel Peace Prize – he even cold-called a Norwegian minister about it last week, according to a German media report – but he feels ending the war is his ticket to salvation. 'I want to try and get to heaven, if possible,' Trump told Fox. 'I'm hearing I'm not doing well. I am really at the bottom of the totem pole. But if I can get to heaven, this will be one of the reasons.'
