Do garages count as a 'story' when it comes to condo building inspections in Florida?
Live in a home governed by a condominium, co-op or homeowner's association? Have questions about what they can and cannot do? Ryan Poliakoff, an attorney and author based in Boca Raton, has answers.
Question: Does the three stories or higher new inspection rule count a parking level below the three living levels of a condo, thus actually making the building itself four stories? — Signed, T.A.
Dear T.A.,
Under the Florida Building Code stories are measured from the grade plane, upward — so underground garages would not count. But, if you are talking about an above-ground garage, with the living space beginning above that garage, it would count as a story.
Question: Can a person who is not on the deed of a condominium but holds a legal power of attorney for the property run for a position on the Board of Directors? — Signed, R.J.
Dear R.J.,
A power of attorney is a legal document that allows a person to step into the shoes of another for specific purposes. So, for example, a unit owner could grant someone a power of attorney to manage their condominium unit for them, communicating with management on their behalf, making decisions and even attending and participating in meetings.
However, whether a person is eligible to serve on a corporate board of directors depends on the language in the governing documents (usually the articles or bylaws).
The Condominium Act expressly states that owners may serve as directors — but not all governing documents limit board members to only owners. Some documents have no limitation at all, and technically any person could run for the board: tenants, family members, even people entirely unassociated with the condominium (I have rarely seen this occur, but it's a technical possibility).
However, a person with a power of attorney is not, by that document, an owner — so if the bylaws limit board membership to owners (persons listed on the deed as recorded in the public record) a power of attorney would not grant another person the right to serve on a board in their stead.
In case there was any question, Florida's Administrative Code also expressly states that where non-unit owners are prohibited from serving on the board, a person acting under a power of attorney is similarly disqualified.
Question: I live in a development governed by an HOA. We just voted out a board member/president of the HOA last year. He is not a resident of the community and doesn't even own a house outright. He is in partnership with another person (no stated formal partnership or corporation). He really wreaked havoc on our community, and we are close to bankrupt because of him and two of his buddies on the board.
The current board wanted to amend our bylaws to state that only 'homestead exemption' owners can be on the board. Our HOA lawyer says we can't do that but has provided no documentation. Can you lend some insight into this? Can we make the change to our bylaws, and have it upheld legally? — Signed. T.L.
Dear T.L.,
I agree with your association's lawyer. Your question is adjacent to the issue I addressed above. The HOA Act, at Section 720.306, Fla. Stat., expressly states that 'all members of the association are eligible to serve on the board of directors.' Your governing documents will define who your association's 'members' are, but most of the time it will be any person who is listed as an owner on the deed.
So, it doesn't ultimately matter if this person has a formal business relationship with the person with whom he co-owns his lot — if they are both on the deed, they are both owners, and so are likely both 'members' who are entitled to serve on the board. And if that's the case, you can't amend your bylaws to say otherwise.
You might be wondering whether you could amend your documents to change the definition of 'member' — but I don't think that would be possible for a number of reasons.
These include that it's tied into so many other aspects of how your HOA works, and also because the HOA Act expressly defines 'member' as any person or entity obligated by the governing documents to pay an assessment — and you certainly don't want to exempt this person from assessments just to avoid him serving on the board. In fact, you did exactly what you should have done — you voted him out.
Ryan Poliakoff, a partner at Poliakoff Backer, LLP, is a Board Certified specialist in condominium and planned development law. This column is dedicated to the memory of Gary Poliakoff. Ryan Poliakoff and Gary Poliakoff are co-authors of "New Neighborhoods — The Consumer's Guide to Condominium, Co-Op and HOA Living." Email your questions to condocolumn@gmail.com. Please be sure to include your location.
This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: Florida condo law 2025: Expert on building height on inspection
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
4 days ago
- Bloomberg
Warner Bros. Shareholders Reject Advisory Vote on Executive Pay
A majority of Warner Bros. Discovery Inc. shareholders voted against the 2024 compensation package given to Chief Executive Officer David Zaslav and other executives at the company's annual meeting Monday, according to a regulatory filing. 'The Warner Bros. Discovery Board of Directors appreciates the views of all its shareholders and takes the results of the annual advisory vote on executive compensation seriously,' the board of directors said in a statement. 'The Compensation Committee of the Board looks forward to continuing its regular practice of engaging in constructive dialog with our shareholders.'
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Attorney for defendant in fatal OVI crash files motion to suppress blood evidence
YOUNGSTOWN, Ohio (WKBN) — The attorney for a man accused of driving drunk and causing a crash that killed a mother and her son has asked that blood evidence in the case be suppressed. In a motion filed Tuesday in Mahoning County Common Pleas Court on behalf of Walter Bolt, 65, of Struthers, attorney Rhys Cartwright-Jones said blood drawn from Bolt after the March 3 crash should be excluded from trial because it was not collected according to state law. Cartwright-Jones also said the affidavit to get a warrant for the blood draw was not sufficient. Bolt has been in the Mahoning County jail on $250,000 bond since his arrest after a grand jury indicted him on two counts of aggravated vehicular homicide, a second-degree felony; aggravated vehicular assault, a third-degree felony; and operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, a first-degree misdemeanor. He is accused of driving drunk on March 3 and causing a head-on crash that killed Angela Brown, 44, and her son, Jason Daff, 15, at state Route 170 and Unity Road in Springfield Township. Another son of Brown's was injured in the crash and is presently recovering. Bolt pleaded not guilty to the charges at his arraignment May 19. Court records list a July 9 pretrial hearing and July 14 trial before Judge R. Scott Krichbaum. Troopers say his blood-alcohol content was .215, over the legal limit of 0.08. At a bond hearing last week before Judge R. Scott Krichbaum, Assistant Prosecutor Steve Maszczak said troopers and police also found several beer cans scattered throughout Bolt's car in the wake of the crash. In his motion Tuesday, however, Cartwright-Jones said the affidavit written by state troopers from the Canfield Barracks of the Ohio State Highway Patrol requesting a blood draw did not say if those beer cans were open and did not provide a link between the cans and their suspicions that Bolt was drunk. Although accident reports said Bolt appeared confused after the crash, Cartwright-Jones wrote in his motion that it would be reasonable for someone to appear confused following a head-on collision. 'The warrant application relied heavily on the presence of beer cans and a generalized claim of impairment without confirming the condition of the containers or establishing a clear nexus between any alleged alcohol abuse and the crash,' Cartwright-Jones wrote. Cartwright-Jones also wrote that the way Bolt's blood was drawn goes against state law because medical records fail to identify who took the blood when Bolt was being treated at St. Elizabeth Health Center or the qualifications of the person who drew the blood. Also, the state has failed to provide a 'chain of custody' for how the blood got to the state crime lab, or a documented chain of people who had the blood from the time it was taken until the time it got to the lab. 'Really, no one can say how the blood got to the state lab, let alone who took it, let alone whether anyone took the sample in an Administrative Code-compliant way,' Cartwright-Jones wrote. Prosecutors have yet to file a response. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Forbes
5 days ago
- Forbes
5 ChatGPT Prompts To Unlock ChatGPT's Genius Strategic Brain
5 ChatGPT prompts to unlock ChatGPT's genius strategic brain You don't need to pay $200 a month for ChatGPT Pro to unlock its genius brain. With the right prompts, you can make the $20 or even the free version do more for your business. But you have to know how to prompt like a pro. That changes everything. People typically use ChatGPT for writing blog posts and answering basic questions. They settle for basic results. But beneath the hood lives a strategic powerhouse waiting to challenge your thinking and spot your blind spots. What if you could flip a switch and transform ChatGPT from basic assistant to business strategist? Your business deserves better than surface-level answers. Stop wasting ChatGPT's potential. Copy, paste and edit the square brackets in ChatGPT, and keep the same chat window open so the context carries through. Too many entrepreneurs make decisions alone. They get stuck in their own perspective. Opportunities hide in situations they didn't unpack. But a fresh set of eyes can spot what you're too close to see. Give ChatGPT your business context once, then leverage that information repeatedly to get tailored strategic advice without repeating yourself. "You are my growth strategist. Here's my current plan: [describe your business goal, strategy, or challenge] and these are my goals [describe what you want out of your life and career]. Based on what you know about me and my business, act as my board of directors. Ask me probing questions that challenge my assumptions. Push back on weak points in my thinking. Then give three specific action steps I should take this week to improve my plan. Make these recommendations audacious." Your best ideas often hide behind your worst assumptions. The default mode is believing you're right. The smartest entrepreneurs constantly question their thinking. They don't get squished by their own ego. They know blind spots cost money. ChatGPT can play devil's advocate without the politics that comes with human advisors. "Based on what you know about me and my business, which assumptions in my approach are most likely to fail? Consider areas like [market timing, customer needs, resource allocation]. For each risky assumption, suggest a small, low-cost and low effort experiment I could run this week to test if I'm right or wrong. Be specific about what signals would confirm or disprove my assumption." The best business minds find creative paths through tight constraints. They turn limitations into advantages. When you have a tough choice ahead, don't default to the obvious solution. It's wrong. It's based on a smaller version of you. Push ChatGPT for unconventional thinking that creates new possibilities. "I'm facing some constraints in my business: [describe them here]. Based on what you know about me and my business, identify the cleverest way through these constraints. Don't suggest removing the constraints. Instead, show me how to use them as advantages or find the hidden opportunity they create. Give me 3 non-obvious approaches that most business owners would miss." Investors see your company in a different way to you. They spot weaknesses you've grown blind to and opportunities you've been sitting on for years. Getting this perspective before you need it transforms your decision-making and accelerates growth in ways nothing else can. Even if you're not looking for investment, try this to see your business through a different lens with ChatGPT. "Based on what you know about my business, what do you predict an investor or potential buyer would critique about it? Take a hard, objective look at my business model, growth strategy, team structure, and systems. Identify the 3 biggest red flags that would make them hesitate. Then suggest specific fixes that would not only address these concerns but turn them into strengths that could increase my company's valuation." Everyone experiences failure. Winners learn from it. Losers repeat it. The difference is identifying the system behind the mistake. Stop putting out the same fires in your business. Go deeper than surface level when something goes wrong and fix ten future problems with one solution. "I recently experienced this failure in my business: [describe the specific failure]. Based on what you know about me and my business, how would you solve it without only focusing on the symptom? Identify what systemic flaw in my business likely caused this. Then suggest 3 specific changes to my systems, processes, or thinking that would prevent similar failures across my entire business. Ask for more detail if required." Stop using ChatGPT like everyone else and start using it like a strategic advisor who knows your business inside out. Challenge your assumptions, navigate impossible constraints, and see through investor eyes. Fix the systems causing failures instead of just the symptoms. Watch your thinking sharpen and your decisions strengthen. Your best business moves start with better questions. Access all my best ChatGPT content prompts.