Attorney for defendant in fatal OVI crash files motion to suppress blood evidence
YOUNGSTOWN, Ohio (WKBN) — The attorney for a man accused of driving drunk and causing a crash that killed a mother and her son has asked that blood evidence in the case be suppressed.
In a motion filed Tuesday in Mahoning County Common Pleas Court on behalf of Walter Bolt, 65, of Struthers, attorney Rhys Cartwright-Jones said blood drawn from Bolt after the March 3 crash should be excluded from trial because it was not collected according to state law.
Cartwright-Jones also said the affidavit to get a warrant for the blood draw was not sufficient.
Bolt has been in the Mahoning County jail on $250,000 bond since his arrest after a grand jury indicted him on two counts of aggravated vehicular homicide, a second-degree felony; aggravated vehicular assault, a third-degree felony; and operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, a first-degree misdemeanor.
He is accused of driving drunk on March 3 and causing a head-on crash that killed Angela Brown, 44, and her son, Jason Daff, 15, at state Route 170 and Unity Road in Springfield Township.
Another son of Brown's was injured in the crash and is presently recovering.
Bolt pleaded not guilty to the charges at his arraignment May 19. Court records list a July 9 pretrial hearing and July 14 trial before Judge R. Scott Krichbaum.
Troopers say his blood-alcohol content was .215, over the legal limit of 0.08. At a bond hearing last week before Judge R. Scott Krichbaum, Assistant Prosecutor Steve Maszczak said troopers and police also found several beer cans scattered throughout Bolt's car in the wake of the crash.
In his motion Tuesday, however, Cartwright-Jones said the affidavit written by state troopers from the Canfield Barracks of the Ohio State Highway Patrol requesting a blood draw did not say if those beer cans were open and did not provide a link between the cans and their suspicions that Bolt was drunk.
Although accident reports said Bolt appeared confused after the crash, Cartwright-Jones wrote in his motion that it would be reasonable for someone to appear confused following a head-on collision.
'The warrant application relied heavily on the presence of beer cans and a generalized claim of impairment without confirming the condition of the containers or establishing a clear nexus between any alleged alcohol abuse and the crash,' Cartwright-Jones wrote.
Cartwright-Jones also wrote that the way Bolt's blood was drawn goes against state law because medical records fail to identify who took the blood when Bolt was being treated at St. Elizabeth Health Center or the qualifications of the person who drew the blood.
Also, the state has failed to provide a 'chain of custody' for how the blood got to the state crime lab, or a documented chain of people who had the blood from the time it was taken until the time it got to the lab.
'Really, no one can say how the blood got to the state lab, let alone who took it, let alone whether anyone took the sample in an Administrative Code-compliant way,' Cartwright-Jones wrote.
Prosecutors have yet to file a response.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Local reps criticize proposed dairy legislation
Upstate Democratic and Republican lawmakers are coalescing in their efforts to block proposed legislation that would limit the size of dairy herds in New York. 'Although I don't believe this ill-conceived legislation will reach the floor for a vote this session, I will continue to vehemently oppose it,' said state Assemblyman Billy Jones (D-Chateaugay Lake). Jones is one of four upstate Democratic lawmakers which jointly issued a news release Monday opposing the legislation which Assemblywoman Linda Rosenthal (D-Manhattan) and Sen. Jabari Brisport (D-Brooklyn) introduced to prohibit the state Department of Environmental Conservation from issuing permits for new or expanding farms which seek to have herds of 700 or more dairy cows. State Assemblyman Matt Simpson (R-Lake George) and state Sen. Dan Stec (R-Queensbury) also oppose the legislation. 'This bill is yet one more unnecessary and misplaced piece of agenda-driven legislation that will add to Albany's constant top-down pressure to make it impossible for our state's hardworking farms to compete,' Simpson said, in an e-mail Tuesday. Simpson said the proposed legislation could force more North Country farmers out of business. 'Obviously, I oppose this asinine legislation. A new regulation limiting the number of livestock is the last thing New York's farmers need,' Stec said, the ranking Republican on the Senate Environmental Conservation Committee, in an email on Tuesday. Stec agrees with Jones that the legislation, introduced in March and currently under consideration in the Environmental Conservation committees of both houses, likely will not reach a vote of the full Senate or Assembly this session. At the heart of the debate is what defines a 'factory farm' versus a 'family farm.' Rosenthal and Brisport said that large herds increase agriculture runoff which pollutes streams and lakes, causing toxic algai blooms which can make people or animals sick. Rosenthal and Brisport also said that methane emitted from large herds increases greenhouse gasses which contribute to climate change. Jones, however, said that many New York dairy farmers have had to increase the size of herds in order to be financially solvent. 'Being raised on a family dairy farm myself and representing many hard-working dairy farmers in the North Country, I know firsthand how misguided this proposed legislation is,' Jones said. Rosenthal and Brisport said the legislation is intended to crack down on the proliferation of 'large-scale factory farms' in New York, a challenge some say does not exist in the state. A 'factory farm,' also known as a concentrated animal feeding operation, is an industrialized farm in which large numbers of animals are kept primarily indoors in order to minimize operating costs. Rosenthal and Brisport said that a study by Food and Water Watch, a national organization which advocates on food security and climate change issues, found a 21% increase in farms in New York between 2017 and 2021. 'These large-scale factory farms are often run by large corporations that squeeze out local competition to maximize profits,' the sponsors wrote in the justification section of the proposed legislation. Opponents of the legislation said herd size is not the only consideration in categorizing a factory farm. 'I represent over 1,400 family farms. … Some of these family farms have more than 2,000 head in their herd,' said Assemblywoman Carrie Woerner (D-Round Lake), one of the three other Assembly Democrats who joined with Jones in the joint news release. Farms which currently have more than 700 cows would not have to reduce their herd sizes, but would not be able to increase their herd sizes further, under the proposed legislation. The other two upstate Democratic Assembly members which joined in the news release are Agriculture Committee Chairwoman Donna Lupardo (D-Endicott) and Assemblywoman Marie Butteschon (D-Marcy). At the federal level, U. S. Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-Schuylerville) and Democratic congressional candidate Blake Gendebien both criticized the proposed state legislation to limit the size of dairy herds. 'New York Democrats must stop their attack on multi-generational, locally-rooted dairy farms that feed families all across our state,' Stefanik said, in a news release. Stefanik has said she is considering seeking the Republican nomination for governor in 2026. 'New York City Dems don't get agriculture,' Gendebien posted on his campaign Facebook page on May 30, inviting the sponsors of the proposed legislation to visit his dairy farm at Lisbon, in St. Lawrence County, to gain a better understanding of agriculture issues. Gendebien said in a telephone interview on Tuesday he is not surprised that upstate Democrats and Republican are united in their opposition to this particular legislation. 'We need farms of all sizes. They are all important,' he said. Gendebien, a Democratic in the 21st Congressional District in 2026, said the trend toward larger herds is due to multiple siblings or other relatives partnering to achieve economy of scale in their operations. Larger herds are necessary because the price-per-pound of milk has not kept up with inflation, he explained. Gendebien said his herd is currently 500 cows, but he will need to expand the herd in the future in order for his three sons to come into the business when they are adults. As well, farms will need to increase production to provide milk for a new Chobani yogurt plant being developed at Rome and two other dairy product plants planned for western New York, he said. Gendebien said there are virtually none, if any, corporate farms in New York. Of some-450 New York and New England farms he communicated with when he was a board member of Agrimark, the cooperative that makes Cabot and McAdam cheese, not one was owned by a corporation, he said. Gendebien said that dairy cows are treated humanely in New York, whether free to roam in pastures or confined in barns with ample room to move around and adequate cooling and heating systems. The Adirondack Council has not taken a position on the proposed legislation, said John Sheehan, a spokesman for the regional environmental group.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ohio House passes human trafficking bill
(WKBN)- The Ohio House has passed a bill to toughen penalties for human trafficking. The Human Trafficking Prevention Act raises the minimum prison sentence from 10 to 15 years. For cases involving minors or people with developmental disabilities, it increases to up to 25 years to life. Local representative Nick Santucci co-sponsored the bill. It now moves to the Senate. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ohio Senate budget alters the Governor's Merit Scholarship, ties funds to Senate Bill 1 compliance
College students graduating. Getty Images. The Ohio Senate's version of the state's two-year budget would reduce the number of students who would be eligible to receive the Governor's Merit Scholarship and it would come with strings attached. The Governor's Merit Scholarship currently awards the top 5% of each high school graduating class a $5,000 scholarship each year to attend an Ohio college or university. The Senate's version of the budget would reduce it to the top 2% of each high school starting with the 2027 fiscal year. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX The Senate also added a provision requiring students who receive the scholarship to stay in Ohio for three years immediately after graduation. Students attending graduate school would be an exception, but the expectation would remain that they would come back to Ohio for three years after graduate school, said Ohio Senate President Rob McColley, R-Napoleon. 'Part of the reasoning for that is we want to keep our best and brightest in Ohio,' McColley said. 'It stands to reason that if we want to keep them in Ohio, we should actually require them to stay in Ohio post-graduation.' If a student who received the Governor's Merit Scholarship moved out of the state within those three years after graduating, they would have to pay back a portion of the aid they received, McColley said. 'We do want some teeth to that,' he said. Ohio House Speaker Matt Huffman, R-Lima, said the three-year requirement would be almost impossible to implement. 'I think it would be extraordinarily difficult to police saying you must stay in Ohio for three years,' Huffman said. 'I suppose we can try to penalize them and all that.' Todd Jones, president and general counsel of the Association of Independent Colleges and Universities of Ohio (AICUO), said he is open to the state's three year retention after graduation. 'We're very sympathetic to the need of the state to help retain people in Ohio who are getting financial assistance,' he said. 'We wouldn't oppose it not being there, but it's certainly a judgment call for the legislature to make on that, and we're sympathetic to their desire to keep folks in Ohio.' The Senate's version of the budget eliminated provisions the Ohio House added regarding additional requirements for private colleges to continue to participate in the Governor's Merit Scholarship. The House had added language to the budget that would have required private colleges to comply with parts of Senate Bill 1 — Ohio's new higher education law that bans diversity and inclusion efforts and regulates classroom discussion, among other things. Jones was happy that was nixed from the budget. 'It's important that we retain students in Ohio and keep our best and brightest here,' Jones said. The Senate decided to take that language out of the budget after hearing concerns from many private universities, McColley said. The Governor's Merit Scholarship was enacted through the last state budget two years ago and 76% of the state's 6,250 eligible students from the class of 2024 accepted the scholarship. Eighty-seven percent of Ohio students accepted the scholarship in its second year and 11 rural counties had a 100% acceptance rate. The Senate's version of the budget trims how much money is allocated to the scholarships. It keeps it at $47 million for fiscal year 2026, but reduces it to $56.4 million in fiscal year 2027. Gov. Mike DeWine's and the House's version of the budget allocated $70 million for fiscal year 2027. The Senate's version of the budget ties a portion of the State Share of Instruction to compliance with Senate Bill 1. 'We wanted to make sure that everybody at the university level was following through with the conditions and regulations in Senate Bill 1,' said Ohio Sen. Jerry Cirino, R-Kirtland. 'We have the ability to decide how we're going to fund things. … If they are viewed as in compliance, nothing will be withheld from their SSI share, which would be their normal proportion of the SSI dollars.' Huffman said he supports tying a portion of the State Share of Instruction to compliance with S.B. 1. 'If the universities aren't going to apply state law then there needs to be some incentive to make sure that they do,' he said. House Minority Leader Allison Russo, D-Upper Arlington, is against tying State Share of Instruction to compliance with S.B. 1. 'I firmly oppose S.B. 1, so tying more compliance to S.B. 1, which I think is an extremely flawed piece of legislation, obviously we oppose that portion,' she said. Senate Minority Leader Nickie J. Antonio, D-Lakewood, said she thinks the provision is outrageous. 'It's also following the pattern that we're seeing at the national level of intimidation and bullying, frankly, telling people that if you don't comply with what we say, then we'll just punish you and we'll withhold money,' she said. Follow Capital Journal Reporter Megan Henry on Bluesky. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
