Record-breaking deep-sea snail species discovered 6km underwater
The species, found on hard volcanic rock some 500km southeast of Tokyo, grows to about 4cm long, remarkably large for a snail at such a depth. It has about 80 clearly defined white radial streaks on the shell.
Researchers have named the species Bathylepeta wadatsumi after the god of sea in Japanese mythology and the One Piece manga series character 'Large Monk' Wadatsumi.
'Here, we report a giant Bathylepeta up to a shell length of 40.5mm from 5,922m deep in the northwestern Pacific and name it Bathylepeta wadatsumi,' they wrote in a study detailing the discovery published in Zoosystematics and Evolution.
'We also take this opportunity to salute Eiichiro Oda for continuing to chart the epic voyage of One Piece, which reminds us that the greatest voyages are driven by freedom, camaraderie and an insatiable thirst for discovery.'
The snail grazes on sediment layers over rock, indicating it may be playing a specialised role in processing organic matter in deep-sea ecosystems.
'Members of this genus are notable not only for their very deep habitats but also for their large size considering the depth, with B laevis reaching 30 mm in shell length,' the study said. 'The body size of Bathylepeta is remarkable for the depth and this genus could play an important role in utilising sedimentary carbon deposited on abyssal hard substrata.'
The discovery underlines the usefulness of submersible vehicles in accessing deep habitats, allowing for direct observation and collection of previously overlooked organisms.
Researchers used crewed submersible DSV Shinkai 6500 to make the discovery, marking the first time a member of this genus had been observed and photographed live in its natural habitat rather than after being dredged up using a net.
'Even in an age of sophisticated remotely operated vehicles, there's often an edge to the human eye on the seafloor,' said Chong Chen, lead author of the study.
'Crewed submersibles like Shinkai 6500 let us explore with intention and nuance – spotting lifeforms like Bathylepeta wadatsumi that might otherwise be missed entirely.'
Scientists hope future studies using submersibles will reveal the true diversity and distribution of such snails and other animals living in deep-sea ecosystems.
'Our finding underscores the need for more comprehensive explorations of rocky abyssal habitats using submersibles to reveal the true diversity and distribution of Bathylepeta and other animals relying on such habitats,' they wrote.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
20 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Sea lions dive into sea for safety during Russia's massive earthquake
Climate Sea lions dive into sea during Russia's massive earthquake July 30, 2025 | 5:17 PM GMT Sea lions were spotted diving into water for safety off of Russia's Antsiferov Island after an 8.8-magnitude earthquake struck.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Why Did Such a Powerful Earthquake Produce Such a Weak Tsunami?
Early Wednesday morning, a powerful earthquake, one of the largest ever recorded, struck off the coast of the Kamchatka Peninsula in Russia. Tsunami warning centers along the Pacific coastline quickly sprung into action, issuing advisories for the potential of colossal ocean waves that are often generated by big earthquakes. But later in the morning, the centers began to cancel those warnings as the big waves failed to appear. What happened? According to Diego Melgar, a geophysicist at the University of Oregon, part of the reason the tsunamis were weaker than anticipated may have to do with the size of the earthquake. 'There's big,' he said. 'And then there's really, really, really big.' The most recent event had an estimated magnitude of 8.7 or 8.8 on the scale scientists use to measure the strength of earthquakes, Dr. Melgar said. By contrast, catastrophic tsunamis in the past, including a wave that struck Indonesia in 2004 and another that hit Japan in 2011, were about a magnitude 9. That may sound comparable to Wednesday's quake, Dr. Melgar said, but it is significantly bigger. That's because the earthquake scale is logarithmic: A magnitude 9 event possesses about 10 times as much energy as a magnitude 8.7 event, and about three times as much energy as a magnitude 8.8 event. The earthquake on Wednesday occurred along a subduction zone, where one of Earth's tectonic plates slides under another. This can cause the seafloor to move up and down, creating a wave that propagates across the ocean. According to Dr. Melgar, current models suggest that Wednesday's earthquake occurred across a stretch of seafloor that was hundreds of miles long. The longer the quake, the more energetic the tsunami can be, he said. A larger earthquake typically generates a larger wave. But the wave size depends on smaller details of the quake, like the depth of the motion at different parts along the line where the two tectonic plates meet. 'Not all earthquakes are created equal,' Dr. Melgar said. 'We're still untangling the details. It's going to take weeks to months of research to figure out exactly what happened.' More likely than not, this earthquake just wasn't big enough to create a catastrophic wave. 'Don't get me wrong, it's still huge,' he said. 'But those in 2004 and 2011 were behemoths.' Tsunamis are different than typical ocean waves, which are shallower ripples created by the wind. Tsunamis, by contrast, are generated deeper down and are more like the waves produced if you submerge your hand in water and move it up and down. Wednesday's event was a bit poetic, Dr. Melgar said: An earthquake struck in the same place in 1952. That triggered a 12-foot-high wave that reached the coast of Hawaii with little warning. This time, the network of warning centers in the Pacific Ocean meant the world was more prepared. 'It's kind of a better-safe-than-sorry situation,' Dr. Melgar said. 'Warnings went out. This is a big success.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Why the Pacific tsunami was smaller than expected
The earthquake near the east coast of the Kamchatka peninsula in Russia on July 30 2025 generated tsunami waves that have reached Hawaii and coastal areas of the US mainland. The earthquake's magnitude of 8.8 is significant, potentially making it one of the largest quakes ever recorded. Countries around much of the Pacific, including in east Asia, North and South America, issued alerts and in some cases evacuation orders in anticipation of potentially devastating waves. Waves of up to four metres hit coastal towns in Kamchatka near where the earthquake struck, apparently causing severe damage in some areas. But in other places waves have been smaller than expected, including in Japan, which is much closer to Kamchatka than most of the Pacific rim. Many warnings have now been downgraded or lifted with relatively little damage. It seems that for the size of the earthquake, the tsunami has been rather smaller than might have been the case. To understand why, we can look to geology. The earthquake was associated with the Pacific tectonic plate, one of several major pieces of the Earth's crust. This pushes north-west against the part of the North American plate that extends west into Russia, and is forced downwards beneath the Kamchatka peninsula in a process called subduction. The United States Geological Survey (USGS) says the average rate of convergence – a measure of plate movement – is around 80mm per year. This is one of the highest rates of relative movement at a plate boundary. But this movement tends to take place as an occasional sudden movement of several metres. In any earthquake of this type and size, the displacement may occur over a contact area between the two tectonic plates of slightly less than 400km by 150km, according to the USGS. The Earth's crust is made of rock that is very hard and brittle at the small scale and near the surface. But over very large areas and depths, it can deform with slightly elastic behaviour. As the subducting slab – the Pacific plate – pushes forward and descends, the depth of the ocean floor may suddenly change. Nearer to the coastline, the crust of the overlying plate may be pushed upward as the other pushed underneath, or – as was the case off Sumatra in 2004 – the outer edge of the overlying plate may be dragged down somewhat before springing back a few metres. It is these near-instantaneous movements of the seabed that generate tsunami waves by displacing huge volumes of ocean water. For example, if the seabed rose just one metre across an area of 200 by 100km where the water is 1km deep, then the volume of water displaced would fill Wembley stadium to the roof 17.5 million times. A one-metre rise like this will then propagate away from the area of the uplift in all directions, interacting with normal wind-generated ocean waves, tides and the shape of the sea floor to produce a series of tsunami waves. In the open ocean, the tsunami wave would not be noticed by boats and ships, which is why a cruise ship in Hawaii was quickly moved out to sea. Waves sculpted by the seabed The tsunami waves travel across the deep ocean at up to 440 miles per hour, so they may be expected to reach any Pacific Ocean coastline within 24 hours. However, some of their energy will dissipate as they cross the ocean, so they will usually be less hazardous at the furthest coastlines away from the earthquake. The hazard arises from how the waves are modified as the seabed rises towards a shoreline. They will slow and, as a result, grow in height, creating a surge of water towards and then beyond the normal coastline. The Kamchatka earthquake was slightly deeper in the Earth's crust (20.7km) than the Sumatran earthquake of 2004 and the Japanese earthquake of 2011. This will have resulted in somewhat less vertical displacement of the seabed, with the movement of that seabed being slightly less instantaneous. This is why we've seen tsunami warnings lifted some time before any tsunami waves would have arrived there. Get your news from actual experts, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter to receive all The Conversation UK's latest coverage of news and research, from politics and business to the arts and sciences. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. Alan Dykes does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
