logo
Councils ‘covered up grooming gangs scandal'

Councils ‘covered up grooming gangs scandal'

Telegraph4 hours ago

A new grooming gangs public inquiry will target areas where councils have covered up scandals.
Baroness Casey, who led an audit into the scale of grooming, has recommended that a national inquiry should be set up to co-ordinate a series of targeted local investigations.
These will be overseen by a new independent commission with full statutory inquiry powers to compel witnesses to attend.
The proposed inquiry should be 'time-limited, targeted and proportionate to the number of victims', to avoid long delays.
The new commission will draw on criminal investigations, including a new nationwide probe by the National Crime Agency (NCA) and evidence from victims and witnesses.
It would have the authority to establish local investigations in areas where statutory services are found to have failed or obstructed justice..
Sir Keir Starmer announced at the weekend that he will accept the recommendations of Lady Casey's 200-page report after previously resisting calls for a national inquiry and accusing proponents of ' jumping on the bandwagon of the far Right '.
The Prime Minister said that he had changed his mind after reading Lady Casey's audit into the scale and nature of grooming gangs which will be published on Monday afternoon.
Her review is understood to have established an explicit link between grooming gangs and men of Pakistani origin. She will confirm concerns that the victims were let down by councils and police by being ' institutionally ignored for fear of racism '.
She will say that there will need to be a process to identify cases and allegations of statutory agencies' failures, with the Government developing criteria to determine the 'types and extent' of failures that could trigger a local hearing.
It is understood that the Government received the report 10 days ago and has already started work on setting up the framework for the inquiry. A chairman is expected to be appointed 'within weeks'.
Sarah Champion, the MP for Rotherham who has campaigned for justice for victims, welcomed an inquiry into the cover-up of grooming scandals.
She said: 'I would say that cover up is a strong word. I would use it to be honest. I have an intense frustration that, not the frontline staff, but further up the management chain, there were people who were actively blocking reports. There are people who, if not held to criminal standards, should be held to a professional standard for their negligence in protecting these children.
'What I saw was those people that would have faced the most criticism have left, taken early retirement, changed to a different job, and some of them are having very successful careers. That's an intense frustration when, because of their negligence, they have let children continue to be exposed, exploited and not secure justice.'
Nazir Afzal, the former chief prosecutor for north west England, said he was sceptical about whether a national inquiry could deliver justice but believed the national investigation by the NCA could do so.
He added: 'Only criminal investigations can bring real accountability. That's where you can use all the powers police have in terms of investigation and going through all the documents, and then interviewing people under caution.
'That's what needs to happen, and that's what I've always been for, is not just those who offended but also those who stood by and did not do what they were meant to do. That's how you deliver accountability. And unfortunately, my experience of national inquiries is that they take forever and don't deliver accountability.'
Sammy Woodhouse, a victim, said of a new national inquiry: 'It needs to investigate every single council and police force in this country. It needs to be independent, and it needs to have the statutory power.
'I want people named. We need to name, shame and bring these people to account, because not one person has been set to account yet. We hear that lessons have been learnt, well, no lessons have been learnt because we're still here. We're still decades on, trying to fight for this, and still, of course, happening today.'
Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, said: 'The vulnerable young girls who suffered unimaginable abuse at the hands of groups of adult men have now grown into brave women who are rightly demanding justice for what they went through when they were just children.
'Not enough people listened to them then. That was wrong and unforgivable. We are changing that now.'
Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said the inquiry must consider 'whether officials and public servants who covered up or turned a blind eye to the rapes should be investigated for the crime of misconduct in public office'.
He added: 'Keir Starmer's inquiry u-turn is too little, too late. He smeared those, including me, calling for a national inquiry into the rape gangs scandal as 'far-Right' and now he's been forced into a u-turn by the bite we planned next week and the imminent Casey report.
'The NCA announcement is a desperate smokescreen cooked up over the weekend to distract from Labour's failures.
'Labour spent six months blocking a statutory inquiry. That is six months of delayed justice. Yvette Cooper led the opposition to an inquiry, and now she pretends she thinks it's a great idea. Labour needs to get a grip and put the survivors of these appalling crimes first.
'We need a proper inquiry with full powers to uncover the truth.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labour cutting farming budget in England by £100m a year, figures shows
Labour cutting farming budget in England by £100m a year, figures shows

The Guardian

time26 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Labour cutting farming budget in England by £100m a year, figures shows

Labour is cutting the farming budget in England by £100m a year, spending review figures show. Despite the decrease, the budget has been cautiously welcomed by nature and farming groups, as there were fears the Treasury had wanted to reduce the funding further. Farmers have felt squeezed by the Labour government's policies over recent months, with mass protests over the introduction of inheritance tax on farms worth more than £1m. Extreme weather and rising input prices have increased financial pressures on the sector, which has meant that a cut to the budget could have serious impacts. Ministers have also indicated that larger farms could be ineligible for the nature-friendly farming fund in future. The Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs was recently forced to U-turn on a freeze to new applicants for the fund after the National Farmers' Union (NFU) threatened legal action. Previous research by the RSPB has found that a £100m a year cut would lead to 239,000 fewer hectares (590,580 acres) of nature-friendly farmland. Defra said the funding paid to farmers under of environment land management schemes (Elms) would 'skyrocket' from £800m in 2023-24 to £2bn in 2028-29. However, the NFU has called this 'misleading' because after Brexit, farmers were promised that their subsidies would be the same as they were under the EU and were promised a figure of £2.4bn a year. The Elms programme was devised by the conservatives after Brexit: the goal was that rather than being paid per acre, farmers should be paid for improving nature. While the programme was being put in place,the acreage payments known as basic payments schemes (BPS) were kept, and cut each year as Elms increased. BPS is due to be phased out entirely by 2028. Farmers currently get the £2.4bn a year in the two streams as well as a smaller amount of money in grants for things such as robotics trials. Going forward, the government has promised an average of £2.3bn a year up to 2028-29 for the farming budget. By the end of the spending period the budget will shrink to £2.25bn, with £2bn allocated for Elms and the rest paid in productivity grants. Sanjay Dhanda, the NFU's senior economist, has said Defra has been 'misleading' in its claims. He said: 'A key pillar of Defra's budget is the continued investment in Elms, with funding set to rise to £2bn by 2028-29, compared with the £1.8bn earmarked in the Autumn 2024 budget. While the government has framed this as a significant uplift from the £800m spent in 2023-24, this comparison is misleading as Elms was not fully operational at that point, and delinked payments [BPS] absorbed a large share of funding.' However, Defra sources pointed out that although the previous government allocated £2.4bn a year for Elms, the Tories in fact underspent it by about £100m a year. That government had, however, promised that by the end of the spending period, which was cut short by the general election, the full fund was ringfenced and would be allocated to farmers. Tom Bradshaw, the NFU president, said: 'While the Defra secretary of state has listened and managed to maintain the overall funding for farming and nature recovery, from what we can see so far, the £100 million cut to farming means farmers and growers will need to do more with less.' Mark Spencer, a former farming minister who was in charge of issuing the farming budget, said the amount spent on Elms would have been higher than £2bn at the end of the spending period, under the Tories. 'The 2.4bn was meant for Elms. It was always our intention and emphasis to reduce BPS and pour the money into Elms and for the vast majority of it to go to Elms,' he said. Reacting to the cut, Spencer added: 'A part of me is angry, a part of me is just so sad. We made such huge progress and now it is in jeopardy.' Nature groups have credited Steve Reed, the environment secretary, for protecting the majority of the budget. Hilary McGrady, the director general of the National Trust, said the chancellor Rachel Reeves had maintained the budget for nature-friendly farming, adding: 'Steve Reed deserves credit for securing this budget in challenging financial circumstances.' A Defra spokesperson said: 'Contrary to media reports that the farming budget would be slashed by £1.2bn over the next three years, the government is investing a record £5.9bn into nature friendly farming schemes.'

Stormont MLA Remuneration Board Bill passes despite opposition
Stormont MLA Remuneration Board Bill passes despite opposition

The Independent

time29 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Stormont MLA Remuneration Board Bill passes despite opposition

The Stormont Assembly have voted to pass a new independent board to determine their salaries despite opposition from the smallest parties. The Assembly Members (Independent Remuneration Board) Bill will establish a new independent board to determine salaries and pensions for MLAs. It will replace the previous Independent Financial Review Panel which has been defunct for a number of years. Currently, the basic salary for an MLA is £51,500, but this can rise with position including chairing some committees or serving as a minister, with the First and deputy First Ministers receiving a salary of £123,500. A report alongside the Bill showed MLA salaries are lower than those received by Members of the Scottish Parliament (£72,196), Assembly Members at the Welsh Assembly (£72,057) and Members of the Irish Parliament (113,679 euros/£94,537). The Bill, put forward by the Assembly Commission, was passed by an oral vote by MLAs on Monday, with the sole MLAs representing the TUV and People Before Profit both opposing the Bill. TUV MLA Timothy Gaston claimed it is 'nothing more than a vehicle to enable MLAs to award themselves a substantial pay rise', and objected to former MLAs being entitled to sit on the new board. People Before Profit MLA Gerry Carroll also criticised that former MLAs could sit on the board, and said that a pay rise for MLAs amid 'rising rates of poverty' would be 'completely tone deaf'. However UUP MLA Andy Allen, who sits on the Assembly Commission, described a 'technical Bill' to deal with the process of how salaries and pensions are set. Closing the debate Sinn Fein MLA Sinead Ennis slammed what she termed 'inaccuracies and misunderstandings' over the Bill. She also warned that if the Bill did not pass the Assembly 'will have failed' to ensure legal clarity and leave no structure in place to determine the salaries and pensions of MLAs. 'In passing this Bill today, future discussions and decisions around the salaries and pensions of members will shift to the independent remuneration board,' she told MLAs. 'That board has independence in deciding what factors it wants to consider before determining its view on the appropriate level of salaries and pensions for members. 'That is the appropriate way of dealing with these matters.'

Car rampage killer was on bail from immigration detention centre, court told
Car rampage killer was on bail from immigration detention centre, court told

The Independent

time29 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Car rampage killer was on bail from immigration detention centre, court told

An Albanian national killed two people during a car rampage while mentally ill after being bailed from an immigration detention centre, a court has heard. Warwick Crown Court was told 'nothing was done' by the Home Office as 34-year-old Emiljano Kasaj failed to attend appointments for almost a year before he used his Mercedes to deliberately kill pedestrian Leo Moran and cyclist Joel Carriedo. Kasaj, who was arrested on the morning of September 3 2023 after crashing into a house in Coventry, pleaded guilty in March this year to one count of attempted murder and two counts of manslaughter on the grounds of diminished responsibility. His sentencing hearing on Monday was shown graphic CCTV footage of 44-year-old Mr Moran, who died of a neck injury, being struck at 7.56am in Gosford Street, Coventry, while another passer-by was knocked into a building and suffered a head wound. Other footage, presented to the court by prosecutor Peter Grieves-Smith, showed the car driving off at speed with a smashed windscreen, and later travelling towards hospital worker Mr Carriedo, a father-of-two. The NHS worker, whose bike was split in two by the impact, died of chest injuries after being struck head-on and knocked over a wall around seven minutes later in Woodway Lane, Coventry. Opening the facts of the case against Kasaj, of no fixed address, Mr Grieves-Smith told High Court Judge Mr Justice Choudhury that the defendant then struck a house around 300 metres away and was arrested almost an hour later in a nearby garden. The court heard Kasaj had used a false name and address to register the vehicle. Mr Grieves-Smith told the court psychiatrists had diagnosed the defendant as suffering from a paranoid psychosis linked to schizophrenia – with him telling experts he believed he had to kill because he was being blackmailed. The Crown's barrister said of the defendant: 'Born in July 1990, he is an Albanian national with no previous convictions or cautions. 'He told the defence psychiatrist that having left school he worked at a car wash and then travelled to Athens to find work. He came to the UK about two years prior to the offences and settled in Coventry.' The court heard that Kasaj also said 'he came to England for a better life' and was in 'in the UK illegally' but did not claim benefits. Mr Grieves-Smith told the court: 'The police made inquiries about his status. Checks with Albanian authorities show he left Albania in January 2022. 'He was arrested for immigration offences in August 2022 as he had made no attempts to register and he was detained in order to be removed. 'He said he had been trafficked into the country in the back of a lorry.' The court heard Kasaj was held at Harmondsworth Detention Centre in west London and attended a hospital during that period, although the visit was not related to his mental health. On October 7 2022, the court heard, Kasaj was bailed to an address in Newfield Road, Coventry, with 'a condition to sign on' at the Solihull Immigration Centre on December 5. Mr Grieves-Smith continued: 'He failed to appear for this and all other appointments. 'So at the time he committed these offences he was subject to bail conditions imposed because of his immigration status. He was in breach of them but nothing was done about it by the Home Office.' Psychiatric evidence presented to the court showed that Kasaj suffers from 'a major mental illness, the most likely diagnosis being schizophrenia' which may have been aggravated by use of cannabis or cocaine in the weeks before the incident. Kasaj, who appeared in the dock alongside an interpreter and several mental health nurses, is due to be sentenced later on Monday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store