Labour cutting farming budget in England by £100m a year, figures shows
Labour is cutting the farming budget in England by £100m a year, spending review figures show.
Despite the decrease, the budget has been cautiously welcomed by nature and farming groups, as there were fears the Treasury had wanted to reduce the funding further.
Farmers have felt squeezed by the Labour government's policies over recent months, with mass protests over the introduction of inheritance tax on farms worth more than £1m. Extreme weather and rising input prices have increased financial pressures on the sector, which has meant that a cut to the budget could have serious impacts.
Ministers have also indicated that larger farms could be ineligible for the nature-friendly farming fund in future. The Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs was recently forced to U-turn on a freeze to new applicants for the fund after the National Farmers' Union (NFU) threatened legal action.
Previous research by the RSPB has found that a £100m a year cut would lead to 239,000 fewer hectares (590,580 acres) of nature-friendly farmland.
Defra said the funding paid to farmers under of environment land management schemes (Elms) would 'skyrocket' from £800m in 2023-24 to £2bn in 2028-29. However, the NFU has called this 'misleading' because after Brexit, farmers were promised that their subsidies would be the same as they were under the EU and were promised a figure of £2.4bn a year.
The Elms programme was devised by the conservatives after Brexit: the goal was that rather than being paid per acre, farmers should be paid for improving nature. While the programme was being put in place,the acreage payments known as basic payments schemes (BPS) were kept, and cut each year as Elms increased. BPS is due to be phased out entirely by 2028. Farmers currently get the £2.4bn a year in the two streams as well as a smaller amount of money in grants for things such as robotics trials.
Going forward, the government has promised an average of £2.3bn a year up to 2028-29 for the farming budget. By the end of the spending period the budget will shrink to £2.25bn, with £2bn allocated for Elms and the rest paid in productivity grants.
Sanjay Dhanda, the NFU's senior economist, has said Defra has been 'misleading' in its claims.
He said: 'A key pillar of Defra's budget is the continued investment in Elms, with funding set to rise to £2bn by 2028-29, compared with the £1.8bn earmarked in the Autumn 2024 budget. While the government has framed this as a significant uplift from the £800m spent in 2023-24, this comparison is misleading as Elms was not fully operational at that point, and delinked payments [BPS] absorbed a large share of funding.'
However, Defra sources pointed out that although the previous government allocated £2.4bn a year for Elms, the Tories in fact underspent it by about £100m a year. That government had, however, promised that by the end of the spending period, which was cut short by the general election, the full fund was ringfenced and would be allocated to farmers.
Tom Bradshaw, the NFU president, said: 'While the Defra secretary of state has listened and managed to maintain the overall funding for farming and nature recovery, from what we can see so far, the £100 million cut to farming means farmers and growers will need to do more with less.'
Mark Spencer, a former farming minister who was in charge of issuing the farming budget, said the amount spent on Elms would have been higher than £2bn at the end of the spending period, under the Tories.
'The 2.4bn was meant for Elms. It was always our intention and emphasis to reduce BPS and pour the money into Elms and for the vast majority of it to go to Elms,' he said.
Reacting to the cut, Spencer added: 'A part of me is angry, a part of me is just so sad. We made such huge progress and now it is in jeopardy.'
Nature groups have credited Steve Reed, the environment secretary, for protecting the majority of the budget.
Hilary McGrady, the director general of the National Trust, said the chancellor Rachel Reeves had maintained the budget for nature-friendly farming, adding: 'Steve Reed deserves credit for securing this budget in challenging financial circumstances.'
A Defra spokesperson said: 'Contrary to media reports that the farming budget would be slashed by £1.2bn over the next three years, the government is investing a record £5.9bn into nature friendly farming schemes.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
29 minutes ago
- Times
The Casey report: the authorities had a culture of denial
Disproportionate numbers of Asian men have been responsible for child sex grooming gangs, but successive governments covered up the fact for fear of racism or raising tensions, a report has found. The national audit of grooming gangs, by Baroness Casey of Blackstock, found that flawed data had been used repeatedly to dismiss claims about Asian grooming gangs as sensationalised, biased or untrue, while an institutional view persisted that there was an overwhelming problem with white perpetrators when, in fact, that could not be proved. Casey pointed to a culture of denial that meant governments, police and local authorities had avoided the issue of ethnicity 'for fear of appearing racist, raising community tensions or causing community cohesion problems'.
Reuters
30 minutes ago
- Reuters
Ireland to sell final AIB shares 15 years after banking crisis
DUBLIN, June 16 (Reuters) - The Irish government on Monday launched the sale of its remaining shares in AIB Group (AIBG.I), opens new tab, one of the country's two dominant lenders it effectively nationalised 15 years ago, Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe said. Ireland pumped 64 billion euros ($74.10 billion) or almost 40% of its then annual economic output, into the country's banks after a huge property crash in the late 2000s stemming from the global financial crisis. Two banks that swallowed up more than half of the capital still failed. Most of the remaining funds - 21 billion euros - went into AIB and the state's return from the bank stood at 19.2 billion euros last month when its shareholding dropped to 3.3%. AIB is also it talks to buy back stock warrants the government holds in the bank. The transaction will leave Ireland with a 57% stake in the smaller Permanent TSB (PTSB.I), opens new tab to sell to complete its long withdrawal from the sector. It sold the last of its shares in AIB's chief rival Bank of Ireland (BIRG.I), opens new tab in 2022. "This is an important milestone in delivering on the policy of returning the banking sector to private ownership," Donohoe said, announcing the sale of the state's final 2% holding by way of an accelerated bookbuild transaction. The government has sold small amounts of shares between its bigger transactions, resulting in the now 2% holding. Books on the transaction are covered, a bookrunner on the deal said shortly after it was announced. While Dublin is unlikely to fully recoup the cost of bailing out AIB, Donohoe said last month the state was at that point 300 million euros above break-even on its 29.4 billion investment in the three banks, mainly thanks to recovering 6.7 billion euros from the 4.7 billion it pumped into Bank of Ireland. The government removed a 500,000 euro pay cap from Bank of Ireland after completing a review of the sector's pay restrictions shortly after the bank returned to full private ownership. The cap remained in place for AIB and Permanent TSB. ($1 = 0.8637 euros)
BBC News
30 minutes ago
- BBC News
Mixed views on Wethersfield expansion plans
The Wethersfield asylum base could be expanded under new government plans. The BBC asked residents near Braintree, in Essex, what they thought about the news. 'I feel for them' Susan Duffin, 69, said there is not enough to do in the village, and while they were "no trouble", asylum seekers needed to be in bigger towns with more amenities."It's a totally unsuitable place for people to live who have come from another country, another culture; they need to be where there is some access to life in general, so I just feel for them," she said. "They're no trouble to us, but they're just wandering around, really not knowing what to do with themselves, and that's not right." 'Sheer madness' Alan McKenzie, chair of campaign group Stop Wethersfield Airbase Prison (SWAP), was exasperated by the news."If they are intending to increase the capacity in Wethersfield, it would be another folly on the part of the government - It's already been shown not to be value for money," he said."If they're talking about increasing the accommodation further, then it's sheer people get unhappy up there, it's a very enclosed environment, it's a long way to the centre of Wethersfield village where there are no facilities."He added: "I think locally everybody would want the government to adhere to what they've promised in the past, that the air base will be shut as soon as practically possible." 'Human beings, not aliens' Sheila Collar, 88, was enjoying the sun with Barbara Boxall, Collar said: "They've got to live somewhere, we've got to put them somewhere and they are human beings, not aliens.""They haven't worried us at all. We were very concerned when we knew it was coming, but they haven't bothered Wethersfield in the village."Ms Boxall added: "The asylum seekers have not been any problem to us at the moment… we don't see them at all really," 'Send them to Rwanda' Retiree Ian Dalziel, 69, was disgusted at the prospect of the site backed the Rwanda scheme, which was brought in by the previous Conservative government and aimed to send people who arrived illegally in the UK to the East African country. It was scrapped when Labour came into power after winning the 2024 general election."They shouldn't even be in this country, let alone being out in the countryside here, where there is nothing for them," he said. "It's just free handouts."Rwanda, that's where they should be. Put them up in that nice big hotel we paid for, which is empty. Stick them there, that's all there is to it." 'Prefer families over young men' Pruning her front garden in Finchingfield, Christine Ashford-Hodges, 78, said she would have been happy to help refugee families settle in, but is less comfortable with the high proportion of "young men" at the site."Not that I've seen them doing anything they shouldn't do, but it's intimidating sometimes, and it worries me there's going to be even more," she said."The traffic flow has certainly increased because obviously... staff, food, maintenance." 'Threatened and concerned' Personal assistant Christine Blake, 72, was watering her plants outside her home in Wethersfield."I'm a single female, there are many single females in this village, and we all feel threatened and concerned," she said."I have dogs which I walk and have walked for many years around the fields here, feeling completely safe and at home, but now it is a concern for all of us."It's not the right place, it's too remote and we really can't deal with it."She added: "I really and truly feel that the government needs to take control of the whole situation, never mind placing asylum seekers somewhere else, the whole situation needs to be dealt with." What does the government say? This week, the BBC revealed that Wethersfield was one of the sites that was being considered for an extension.A Home Office spokesperson said it was looking to deliver a "more sustainable and cost-effective asylum accommodation system", after Chancellor Rachel Reeves said that stopping the use of hotels would save £1bn. Follow Essex news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
