PBC commission averts questionable "fix" in replacing county administrator
What started off as a perceived "fix" morphed into a a credible procedure in replacing County Administrator Verdenia Baker, who is retiring. Following an eyebrow-raising 4-3 vote earlier this month to skirt a national search, Palm Beach County commissioners Thursday took the time to craft a national search, minimal and preferred qualifications and a timeline for applications, interviews and evaluations that ensures a more open, competitive and thorough hiring process.
It's closer to the kind of process that the residents and taxpayers of this county deserve.
And it's a notable improvement from an earlier meeting in which a majority of the board — Commissioners Sara Baxter, Joel Flores, Bobby Powell and Maria Sachs — voted to set aside hiring a firm to conduct a national search in favor of an expedited "stay home," approach of finding a new administrator. That move seemed to boost the chances of one applicant in particular — County Clerk & Comptroller Joe Abruzzo — and quite rightly drew the ire of county residents.
Still, the Post Editorial Board believes that a national search conducted by a headhunter would have ensured a better talent pool of candidates based on that firm's knowledge and contacts with qualified candidates. As it is, commissioners settled on having staff advertise the opening on various public administration association websites, a way to get the word out but not necessarily in front of those "elite" administrators who may not seek the job without the urging of a reputable headhunter.
To be sure, Abruzzo is no stranger to Palm Beach County and its government. He's a duly elected constitutional officer and has represented the county in the Florida Legislature. But had the commissioners not spelled out a more thorough hiring process, he would have been seen as the tainted beneficiary of a political appointment. And deservedly so. Besides the commission and the public, it's Abruzzo who'd benefit by going through a more open process to replace Baker, a 38-year administrator respected nationally for her bureaucratic acumen.
More: Why developers say they see better days ahead with Palm Beach County Administrator gone
Fortunately, the commission took a step toward bringing rationality back to the process while dispelling the notion that Baker's successor could be found so easily through a political appointment. Baker started working for the county 38 years ago as an analyst. She worked hard, climbing the ranks to become the first woman and the first Black person to run Palm Beach County government. In that position, she oversaw growth, often siding with taxpayers against the interests of developers, while achieving the county's current AAA bond rating. Her last day is May 31.
Baker's successor will have big shoes to fill. The good news is that county commissioners have moved closer to a transparent process that whoever gets the position, it now looks like that individual will be hired through an open procedure rather than a backroom deal that would have hobbled the next county administrator even before he or she showed up to work.
This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: Transparency to pick new PBC administrator is right move | Editorial
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
24 minutes ago
- Fox News
Biden book author reveals how White House staff truly felt about Karine Jean-Pierre as press secretary
CHICAGO - One of the authors of the new bombshell Joe Biden book pulled back the curtain Thursday on how White House staffers truly felt about former White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre. During their book tour in Chicago, "Original Sin" authors Alex Thompson and Jake Tapper were asked about the announcement of Jean-Pierre's new book promising to shed light on the "broken White House" she worked in and that she left the Democratic Party to become an independent. "Someone just texted me before I got on stage, a former Biden person, which is, 'It is quite the ballet move to say that you're leaving the Democratic Party because they were disloyal to Joe Biden.' But that is what she's saying," Thompson told the Windy City audience Thursday at The Vic Theatre. Thompson noted that despite "mass bad reviews" within the Biden administration of Jean-Pierre's job performance as White House press secretary, she was seen as "untouchable" due to her allyship with top Jill Biden aide Anthony Bernal. "I think what's really provoking anger from former Biden people… there was mass frustration on how she went about the job, felt that she was not good at it, was not aware she was not good at it, she did not try hard to get better at it. And there's more focus on elevating her own profile than not," Thompson said. "And now for her to then go out after the Democratic Party elevated her to the top spokesperson job in the country and then for her to then try to sell books by leaving the party, they say that simmering resentment just exploded instantly," the Axios reporter added. Tapper speculated that there would have been less "scorn" aimed at Jean-Pierre if she didn't announce she had become an independent, something the CNN anchor made little sense to him. The event moderator, NPR media correspondent David Folkenflik, asked Tapper and Thompson why former Biden staffers by and large "aren't using their names" as they criticize Jean-Pierre. "I totally wonder that too," Tapper reacted. "Because, like, what are you afraid of?" Thompson responded by insisting many of them don't want to speak publicly because they have since landed new jobs and don't want their employers to be associated with the mudslinging. "I'd also say that the Biden culture was to punish and try to destroy people who spoke out," Thompson said. "And yes, they don't have power anymore, but they are watching very closely. I think some people still fear retaliation." Tapper added that since Jean-Pierre was a trailblazer" as the first Black woman and LGBTQ press secretary, that was another reason why her former colleagues aren't speaking out. Both authors took turns scrutinizing Jean-Pierre's credibility following her loyal defense of Biden before and after his disastrous debate performance. Tapper recalled a 2023 private fundraiser Biden attended in which he didn't have a teleprompter and how he told donors his canned remarks about how the events of Charlottesville inspired his presidential run in 2020 twice in the span of a few minutes, and how at the following press briefing, Jean-Pierre told reporters, "Well, that's how strongly he feels about that moment." "In her defense, she rarely saw him," Tapper quipped.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This Glitchy, Error-Prone Tool Could Get You Deported—Even If You're a U.S. Citizen
Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily. Juan Carlos Lopez-Gomez, despite his U.S. citizenship and Social Security card, was arrested on April 16 on an unfounded suspicion of him being an 'unauthorized alien.' Immigration and Customs Enforcement kept him in county jail for 30 hours 'based on biometric confirmation of his identity'—an obvious mistake of facial recognition technology. Another U.S. citizen, Jensy Machado, was held at gunpoint and handcuffed by ICE agents. He was another victim of mistaken identity after someone else gave his home address on a deportation order. This is the reality of immigration policing in 2025: Arrest first, verify later. That risk only grows as ICE shreds due process safeguards, citizens and noncitizens alike face growing threats from mistaken identity, and immigration policing agencies increasingly embrace error-prone technology, especially facial recognition. Last month, it was revealed that Customs and Border Protection requested pitches from tech firms to expand their use of an especially error-prone facial recognition technology—the same kind of technology used wrongly to arrest and jail Lopez-Gomez. ICE already has nearly $9 million in contracts with Clearview AI, a facial recognition company with white nationalist ties that was at one point the private facial recognition system most used by federal agencies. When reckless policing is combined with powerful and inaccurate dragnet tools, the result will inevitably be more stories like Lopez-Gomez's and Machado's. Studies have shown that facial recognition technology is disproportionately likely to misidentify people of color, especially Black women. And with the recent rapid increase of ICE activity, facial recognition risks more and more people arbitrarily being caught in ICE's dragnet without rights to due process to prove their legal standing. Even for American citizens who have 'nothing to hide,' simply looking like the wrong person can get you jailed or even deported. While facial recognition's mistakes are dangerous, its potential for abuse when working as intended is even scarier. For example, facial recognition lets Donald Trump use ICE as a more powerful weapon for retribution. The president himself admits he's using immigration enforcement to target people for their political opinions and that he seeks to deport people regardless of citizenship. In the context of a presidential administration that is uncommonly willing to ignore legal procedures and judicial orders, a perfectly accurate facial recognition system could be the most dangerous possibility of all: Federal agents could use facial recognition on photos and footage of protests to identify each of the president's perceived enemies, and they could be arrested and even deported without due process rights. And the more facial recognition technology expands across our daily lives, the more dangerous it becomes. By working with local law enforcement and private companies, including by sharing facial recognition technology, ICE is growing their ability to round people up—beyond what they already can do. This deputization of surveillance infrastructure comes in many forms: Local police departments integrate facial recognition into their body cameras, landlords use facial recognition instead of a key to admit or deny tenants, and stadiums use facial recognition for security. Even New York public schools used facial recognition on their security camera footage until a recent moratorium. Across the country, other states and municipalities have imposed regulations on facial recognition in general, including Boston, San Francisco, Portland, and Vermont. Bans on the technology in schools specifically have been passed in Florida and await the governor's signature in Colorado. Any facial recognition, no matter its intended use, is at inherent risk of being handed over to ICE for indiscriminate or politically retaliatory deportations. At state and local levels, however, there is a way to fight back. For example, there is a package of 'Ban the Scan' bills in the New York State Legislature and New York City Council to curb the use of facial recognition: by police (S5609/A1045), by landlords (A6363 and Intro. 425), by public accommodations (A6211 and Intro. 217), and to make permanent the ban on its use in schools (S3827/A6720). And while New York, the most surveilled city in the country, has the opportunity to lead the way, legislative protections against the risks of facial recognition must proliferate nationwide to fully protect our communities. The only way to completely prevent Trump—or any future authoritarian—from allowing this tech to do his and ICE's bidding is to prevent the use of facial recognition in the first place. Because of the immense power of facial recognition to target political enemies and indiscriminately deport any of us, and because the system's racially biased inaccuracy is already causing wrongful arrests, banning facial recognition is an essential step toward preventing authoritarian overreach. The New York State Legislature can and should pass the Ban the Scan package of facial recognition bills, and the rest of the country should follow suit in protecting communities from this force multiplier for tyranny.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Quest to Bring Young Men Back to the Democrats
In the months leading up to the 2024 election, and particularly after the ascension of Vice President Kamala Harris to the top of the presidential ticket, Democrats found themselves particularly vexed about the best way to reach young men and bring them into their coalition. Their fears that they were falling short in this regard were borne out in November, when the majority of young men between ages 18 and 29 voted Republican. That trend cut across racial lines: Young white men supported President Donald Trump overwhelmingly, but young Black and Latino men swung toward Trump by an even larger margin than their white counterparts from 2020 to 2024—even as majorities supported Harris. Those losses have precipitated soul-searching on the left, as Democrats wonder how to revive their appeal to young men who are struggling financially but intrigued by the machismo promoted by Trump and media figures popular on the right. Republicans are 'exploiting grievances' by connecting economic pressures to shifts in gender norms, said Shaunna Thomas, the co-founder and former executive director of the gender justice organization UltraViolet. Democrats know they need to bring young men back into the fold. But it's a delicate dance: On the one hand, the wrong kind of outreach risks coming across as condescending, but on the other hand, too much focus on the needs of young men might end up alienating the women who have traditionally formed the core of the Democratic base. 'I think Democrats really tend to focus on deficits more than their strengths. They look for the shortest line from point A to point B for success, and they look at what's working on the other side. If they were to mimic that in any way, I think that would be a really great way to weaken the loyalty women have shown to the party,' said Thomas. The right has cultivated the anger of young men using online platforms for years. The vitriolic 2014 Gamergate movement was cultivated and harnessed by then-Breitbart editor and current Trump adviser Steve Bannon. Right-wing impresarios like Andrew Tate, an online influencer accused of sexual assault and trafficking whose winter arrival in the United States appeared to be orchestrated by Trump allies, have envisioned a world of violently enforced traditional gender roles. The endorsement of Trump ahead of 2024 by nominally political figures, such as popular podcaster Joe Rogan, also served to give the impression that Republicans understood young men better than Democrats did. But Thomas worries that trying to replicate a media ecosystem that has been effective for the right could be disastrous for the left. 'Some people employ a methodology where you take very seriously what you see young men responding to on the internet, and your instinct or your strategy is to replicate that. I think that's a mistake,' said Thomas. 'If you try to appeal to young men at the expense of women and gender nonconforming people, not only are you doing the opposition's work for them, you're definitely going to lose your base.' It's a tension that Ilyse Hogue, the former president of the abortion rights group NARAL Pro-Choice America, is trying to reconcile. Along with John Della Volpe, the director of polling at the Harvard Kennedy School's Institute of Politics, Hogue is leading an initiative called 'Speaking With American Men.' The program—which has been met with online skepticism by liberals and conservatives alike—will invest $20 million over two years in research, organizing, and communications focused on young men of different racial and economic backgrounds. The initiative's prospectus promises that the program will serve as a 'research hub' that also works to 'identify and build trust with organic leaders in the largest, relevant online communities in Discord/Reddit and other online platforms.' It also seeks to 'provide a media roadmap' for Democrats to use nontraditional methods of reaching young men, including by investing in YouTube commentary shows and video game digital ads. The initiative's early focus groups found that young men are confused about how they should express masculinity, frustrated by social isolation, and feel unable to reach economic milestones, according to reporting by Politico. Hogue also said that she has seen that young men may share policy preferences with Democrats, but nonetheless do not feel as if the party has their best interests at heart. 'They're not seeing themselves reflected in those sorts of coalitions that progressives claim to care about. And so some of the solutions are really about 'a rising tide lifts all boats,' but we have to actually be able to communicate: 'You are on the boat too,'' Hogue said about how Democrats should think about reaching young men. But Amanda Litman, the co-founder and president of Run for Something, an organization focused on recruiting and supporting young progressive candidates, warned that Democrats may be in search of a political solution to something that may be more of a 'cultural problem.' To a hammer, everything is a nail. To a political strategist, believes Litman, 'everything looks like something you can poll-test your way into.' Litman believes that Democrats are at risk of 'misunderstanding' how to reach young men who have shifted toward the right in recent years, and 'trying solutions that ultimately will be a waste of resources.' 'I think Democrats, especially in the last 15 years, have started to micro-target our way into oblivion,' said Litman. 'We can't pretend we can 'focus group' our way into a solution here.' Litman argued that focusing on underlying policy goals was the better way to reach young men, without isolating them as a specific demographic that needs to be wooed. Ross Morales Rocketto, a Democratic strategist who served as lead organizer of White Dudes for Harris ahead of the 2024 election, believes that, after an electoral loss, Democrats tend to focus on 'shiny objects': the topics that they believe will appeal to voters—and donors—without necessarily giving thought to effective strategy. Morales Rocketto believes that the Democrats' desperate focus on clawing back support from young men is the latest shiny object upon which the party has fixed its gaze. But he worries that treating young men as a prize to be won assumes that they already might be lost. 'I get maybe a little bit frustrated when I see things that are like, 'Well, all we need to do is do some polling, and then we'll have the messages that work for them, and then like, everything will be OK,'' Morales Rocketto said. Much has been written about the social isolation that many men feel. But Democrats should not be surprised if young women are 'collectively eye-rolling' over the recent emphasis on young men voters, said Thomas. She argued that there is still a very clear power imbalance in American society, highlighted by such occurrences as the overturning of the federal right to an abortion and the election of Trump instead of two different female candidates in 2016 and 2024. Neither loneliness nor economic hardship are the exclusive domain of men. People are more likely to feel loneliness in early adulthood and old age, regardless of gender; some studies have shown that women and men also report equal rates of loneliness. Recent polling by the Pew Research Center found that men are not more likely than women to say that they feel lonely or have few close friends, although they are less likely to turn to their networks for connection and support. Then there are the universal worries about economic uncertainty. According to the most recent Harvard Youth Poll, young women are more likely than young men to say that they are struggling to make ends meet; by contrast, young men are more confident than young women that they will accumulate significant wealth. Litman argued that Democratic candidates needed to address the 'root causes' of inequality, such as addressing the cost of living or investing in health care, which would, in turn, assist citizens across the entire demographic spectrum. 'I think the right candidate or elected official who can … thread the needle of, 'We can lift up men without bringing down women,' the one who can talk about how we need to care for mental health without making it 'women need to solve their problems'—that's what we need,' Litman said. Hogue said that the purpose of the initiative was not to focus on men at the detriment of women, but to assert that Democrats are not 'ceding a generation' of young men to the right by reaching them where they are. She also argued that outreach to young men was not a 'zero-sum game' that would automatically alienate other demographics. 'Why do we feel like we can't actually reflect the needs of both men and women in our coalition and not pit them against each other?' asked Hogue. 'It's not about going after a new constituency. It's about reaffirming our commitment to young people to a better future regardless of their gender.' Still, speaking generally about the party's efforts to reach young men, Thomas warned that while the right may be better at 'exploiting' young men's worries about shifting gender norms, it would be a mistake for Democrats to assume these concerns are the 'main event.' 'It's strange, the extent to which we are focusing on this data about young men, as if it's limited to them, as if they're the only people experiencing this,' said Thomas. 'These issues are just not isolated to men, and it's silly to try to create a strategy as if it is.'
