
Emilie Kiser asks to 'grieve in private.' Why public records could be released anyway.
As Emilie Kiser sues to prevent the release of records about her son's death, an Arizona judge will weigh whether the influencer's right to privacy outweighs the public's right to access.
Kiser's 3-year-old son Trigg died on May 18 after days earlier he was pulled from a backyard pool in Chandler, Arizona, police previously confirmed to USA TODAY.
In a lawsuit filed in Arizona Superior Court for Maricopa County on May 27, Kiser is pushing to keep records about what the lawsuit referred to as an accidental drowning, out of public view.
Kiser's attorneys said in the filing that she and her family "desperately want to grieve in private, but sadly, the public will not let them," adding that her son's death "has become a media frenzy."
However, the lawsuit is still slated to go through the court, and a judge could rule to release the records anyway.
"It's going to vary from case to case — a ruling like this, it's in the judge's discretion," Craig Weiner, a partner at Blank Rome law firm, told USA TODAY.
Emilie Kiser lawsuit Influencer sues to keep records about son Trigg's drowning death private
Across the country, documents such as police reports and 911 calls are public record, meaning they must be accessible to the public. The general reason for this is to keep citizens aware of their government, according to the Cornell Legal Information Institute.
At the federal level, the Freedom of Information Act requires government agencies to disclose information to the public. Each state, however, has its own laws in place around what kinds of records can be released.
In some cases, like Kiser's, individuals can ask a court to seal records that would ordinarily be public.
Kiser's lawsuit said more than 100 requests were filed with the City of Chandler and the Maricopa County Medical Examiner's Office for access to public records related to Trigg's death. USA TODAY filed a request on May 15 — three days after the initial drowning call — with the City of Chandler for access to the police report.
However, there are stipulations around the release of public records, and police often redact portions of these items. In Arizona, for example, officials can redact parts of video recordings to protect a victim's rights, according to Arizona's legislature.
In Arizona, a court can rule to keep public records private if the release could cause "substantial and irreparable private or public harm," according to the Arizona Legislature.
Kiser's lawsuit alleges that the records have been requested for "commercial purposes," rather than the purpose of monitoring the government.
Arizona law does not consider requesting records for the purposes of news gathering to be a commercial purpose, according to Arizona Ombudsman Citizens' Aide.
Influencer privacy Emilie Kiser's son Trigg's death shows how little privacy public figures get
The fact that Kiser is an individual with a public persona could likely play into a judge's decision in this case, Weiner told USA TODAY.
"The public has an interest in newsworthy events," Weiner said. "This is a high profile person. They are in the news. And what makes it even more, they put themselves out there."
Because influencers publicize their lives for the purpose of monetization, Weiner said Kiser's career could be a factor.
"I assume that this influencer monetizes their social media," Weiner said. "So to try to claim it that a news story is a commercial purpose, I don't see it."
While everyone has a right to privacy, a judge may be more inclined to ensure that right to a private citizen over a public figure like an influencer, Weiner said.
"The difference here is what they're sharing," Weiner said. "You can't turn around and say, 'this is affecting my privacy' when you posted a picture of your house and your kids."
Still, Weiner said Kiser did the "right thing by going to the judge."
"They're concerned that the publication of it will cause all types of stress, emotional distress to to the family, to the parents," Weiner said.
The lawsuit says the release of the records would be a "profound invasion of privacy" and cause "irreparable harm" to Kiser's family.
Kiser is "going through a parent's worst nightmare right now," the lawsuit said.
"Emilie is trying her best to be there for her surviving son, two-month-old Theodore," it said. "But every day is a battle."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Will the 'No Kings' anti-Trump rally be in Savannah? Here are the 22 cities hosting protest
June 14 is set to be a busy day with Flag Day, President Donald Trump's birthday, and now 'No Kings' Day. This is a nationwide movement against Trump and his upcoming military parade, with events in Georgia and the rest of the U.S. Here's what we know: Trump is planning a lavish military parade on June 14 which marks the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary and is Trump's 79th birthday. It will include 7,500 troops, 120 vehicles, 50 aircraft on the streets and in the skies of Washington, D.C. According to a planning document seen by USA Today, the parade and a series of related events in D.C. beginning next week will cost up to $45 million. The public perception around this parade has been incredibly mixed. While some view this as a show of strength or national pride, Markus Schiller, the CEO of a German aerospace and security company, echoed what many of Trump's opponents feel: "There's definitely a correlation between putting on a military parade and authoritarian parades are about sending message to other countries and also to domestic political rivals." 'No Kings' describes itself as a nationwide day of defiance by multiple groups including Indivisible, 50501, and Stand Up America. "The flag doesn't belong to Donald Trump. It belongs to us. We're not watching history happen. We're making it," organizers said on the No Kings website. "On June 14th, we're showing up everywhere he isn't—to say no thrones, no crowns, no kings." Each event will look different depending on who is organizing it. Some may be simply flag-waving rallies, while others will be marches or full-on sign-waving protests. More than 20 are confirmed in Georgia: Albany: "No Kings Albany, GA" 10 a.m. to noon. Athens: "No Kings Athens" 5-7 p.m. at College Square. Atlanta: "No Kings in Atlanta" 10 a.m. to noon at Liberty Plaza; "No Cake for False Kings Atlanta" 1-4 p.m. at Atlanta Station Bridge/Overpass. Augusta: "No Kings Augusta" 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. Brunswick: "No Kings Brunswick, GA" 3-8 p.m. Columbus: "No Kings Columbus GA" 9-11 a.m. in front of the River Center in uptown Columbus. Douglas: "No Kings Douglas" noon-2 p.m. at Trojan Lane intersection. Fayetteville: "No Kings Fayetteville" 3-4:40 p.m. at Old Fayette County Courthouse. Forsyth County: "No Kings Forsyth County" 1-2 p.m. Gainesville: "No Kings in NE Georgia" 3-4 p.m. at Gainesville Square. Greene County: "No Kings Greensboro GA" 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. Griffin: "No Kings Nationwide Day of Defiance: Griffin" 10-11:30 a.m. at the Griffin Auditorium. Macon: "Kick Out the Clowns | No Kings Day of Action Macon" 10 a.m. to noon at Poplar Street median between 2nd and 3rd streets. McDonough: "No Kings Nationwide Day of Defiance; McDonough" 12:30-2 p.m. at MCDonough City Hall. Savannah: "No Kings Savannah" 11 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. at Thomas Square Park. Statesboro: "No Kings Statesboro" 10 a.m. to noon. St. Mary's: "No Kings St. Mary's" 3-6 p.m. at St. Mary's Waterfront Pavilion. Suwanee: "No Kings Gwinnett County" 2-4 p.m. Tucker: "No Kings March Tucker" 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. at Tucker Recreation Center. Valdosta: "Valdosta - No Kings Day of Defiance" 2-3 p.m. Waycross: "No Kings Waycross" 9-11 a.m. at the sidewalk area between Checkers and Hog and Bones facing Memorial Drive. Woodstock: "No Kings in Woodstock: We Took the Same Oath" 2-4 p.m. Kim Hjelmgaard of USA Today contributed to this article. Miguel Legoas is a Deep South Connect Team Reporter for Gannett/USA Today. Find him on X and Instagram @miguelegoas and email at mlegoas@ This article originally appeared on Savannah Morning News: When and where will the 'No Kings' anti-Trump protest be in Savannah?
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
SCOOP: Liberal city mayor hit with ethics complaint over alleged lavish gifts
FIRST ON FOX: A nonpartisan government watchdog filed an ethics complaint against Washington, D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser on Tuesday morning. The complaint by the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust (FACT) requests the Board of Ethics and Government Accountability investigate Bowser for allegedly accepting illegal travel and hospitality gifts on high-profile trips to Doha, Qatar, for the 2023 United Nations Climate Change Conference, the Masters Golf Tournament in Augusta, Georgia, and trips to Dubai, Las Vegas, Miami and Mar-a-Lago. "The basic standard for elected officials is honest transparency, which means following all disclosure laws and willingly answering the public's questions. The mayor's unwillingness to provide basic information about numerous high-profile trips is unacceptable," Kendra Arnold, executive director of FACT, shared first with Fox News Digital. FACT cited WJLA's investigation into missing records from Bowser's prominent trips, in which they discovered Qatar paid Bowser and four staff members $61,930 to fly to the Middle East in 2023. Schumer Moves To Block Trump Doj Nominees As He Seeks Answers On Qatari Jet To Defense Department "It is not simply the Qatar trip, but a troubling pattern from Mar-A-Lago to Doha to Augusta National – the District has no record of who paid for these trips or what public purpose they served, if there was one at all," Arnold said. "The ethics rules exist to protect against corruption, and when they are ignored, the public's trust erodes. I urge the Board to investigate and enforce the law without delay." Read On The Fox News App Sanctuary City Mayors To Testify At House Oversight After Ag Bondi Cuts Them Off From Federal Funds While the Middle East trip should have been disclosed in order to be accepted as a legal donation to the District of Columbia, FACT said in the complaint that there is no record of who paid for the trip. "When questioned by the press, initially the mayor's office said the trip was paid for by the D.C. Chamber of Commerce. The Chamber said that was not true. Then, the mayor's office said the trip was paid for by the U.S. Conference of Mayors. That was also false," FACT claimed. Then, in February 2025, the mayor's office requested the trip's expense breakdown, labeled it an "in-kind donation" and sought a "retroactive donation agreement," despite the two years that passed, according to FACT. "Yet, unbelievably, it wasn't until a reporter's Freedom of Information Act request in March 2025 that this information was publicly revealed—more specifically that Qatar paid more than $61,930 for the trip the mayor's office was now attempting to retroactively describe as an 'in-kind donation.' As of May 2025, the District still does not have a record of Qatar paying for Bowser's 2023 trip," according to the complaint. Again, citing WJLA's investigative reporting, FACT said the District of Columbia has no expense records for several more trips, including to the Masters Golf Tournament in Augusta, Georgia, and trips to Las Vegas, Miami and Mar-a-Lago. FACT accused Bowser of violating a "fundamental ethics principle" that prevents corruption and discourages elected officials from accepting bribes and donations. Under Washington, D.C., law, government officials cannot accept certain gifts, including trips, lodging and transportation. The law allows donations to the district itself if the government entity "uses the gift or donation to carry out its authorized functions or duties." In that case, detailed and accurate records must be available for "audit and public inspection." Those donations to the district must be "recorded and approved before the donation is used." "Clearly Mayor Bowser's trip to Qatar qualifies as a gift, and one that elected officials are personally prohibited from accepting. Additionally, this gift would not qualify as a donation made to the District because the donation was not recorded and approved before the donation was used. The District still does not even have a record of it," FACT concluded in the article source: SCOOP: Liberal city mayor hit with ethics complaint over alleged lavish gifts


USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Huge 400-pound alligator captured in North Carolina on 'suspicion of being a dinosaur'
Huge 400-pound alligator captured in North Carolina on 'suspicion of being a dinosaur' A massive offender with "scaly intentions" was nabbed by authorities after he was spotted loitering "near the double yellow line" on a roadway in North Carolina. "Pepe the Gator," weighing almost 400 pounds and measuring 10 feet in length was caught loitering off the pavement in Jacksonville, around 120 south of Raleigh, with witnesses saying, "he was just chilling and snapping (and) clearly ignoring the 'no loitering or lounging on roadways' sign," Onslow County Sheriff's Office said in a post on Facebook. A dinosaur? The prehistoric perp "has been cited for Suspicion of Being a Dinosaur without Proper Papers, Public Loitering with Intent to Sunbathe, and Obstructing Traffic," the sheriff's office said. Pepe was eventually captured and taken to a boat ramp on Camp Geiger, a few miles away, and released back into the wild the same day, sheriff's office spokesperson Trevor Dunnell told USA TODAY. No injuries were reported, except for Pepe's pride when he "refused to be cuffed," authorities said. Alligators are common in North Carolina American alligators occur naturally in North Carolina, according to North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, and can be found inhabiting bay lakes, rivers, creeks, marshes, swamps and ponds. The state is the "northern extent of the alligator's range and they generally become less common as you move from south to north along the NC coast," says the wildlife commission. Adult male alligators can weigh up to 500 pounds and can reach 13 feet in length, the wildlife commission said, while females generally grow to less than 9 feet and weigh up to 200 pounds. These wild animals are shy and secretive in nature, according to the commission. Feeding, touching, harming, harassing or poaching an alligator is illegal in North Carolina, according to the North Carolina Wildlife Federation. The department recommends being vigilant in areas where alligators have been spotted and maintaining a safe distance of at least 50 feet in case of an encounter. Saman Shafiq is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Reach her at sshafiq@ and follow her on X and Instagram @saman_shafiq7.