
Amin Maalouf's ‘Labyrinth of the Lost'
I thoroughly enjoyed reading 'The Labyrinth of the Lost' by the creative and insightful French-Lebanese author Amin Maalouf. Having immigrated to France in the 1970s, Maalouf earned his place among the esteemed 40 members of the Académie Française, famously known as 'The Immortals.' Members of this prestigious academy are elected and hold lifetime membership, although they may choose to resign or be dismissed in cases of misconduct.
In addition to his literary achievements, Maalouf also serves as the Secretary General of the Académie Française. Amin Maalouf's book delves into the complex and evolving relationship and often conflict between the West and its historical adversaries, particularly in Southeast Asia, including China and Japan, as well as Soviet Russia and the West's dynamic with the New World, specifically the United States. The book traces the trajectory of these global powers, beginning with Japan's Meiji era, which astonished the world with its rapid industrial development, Soviet Russia, which posed a serious threat to the West for nearly three-quarters of a century before its eventual collapse, and China, which has emerged in the 21st century as the West's primary competitor in global influence, due to its vast population and unique philosophical foundations.
Maalouf also highlights the rise of the United States, especially after World War I, and its dominant global role following its decisive victory in World War II, emerging as the most advanced and powerful nation, and arguably the only one capable of defending global stability against external threats. When Maalouf completed his book two years ago, before the outbreak of the Gaza conflict and its repercussions, he predicted a significant decline of the West, particularly embodied by America. What we are witnessing today confirms this prediction, manifesting as political and moral bankruptcy. However, this does not imply that the West's adversaries or challengers are in a better position.
Neither side currently holds the capacity to lead humanity out of the complex maze it faces. Even the United States, once a symbol of moral and material hope for many nations globally, is now experiencing setback after setback. America spent billions of dollars on its war in Afghanistan but did not build a single school or clinic there, a stark contrast to its honorable record with Japan and Germany after World War II. Its direct and indirect interventions in dozens of countries worldwide have tarnished both its credibility and the legacy of its founding fathers. The scandals and defeats in Vietnam and Afghanistan, along with the consequences of the Iraq invasion, which many viewed as a defeat, have deeply affected the prudence and humanity of the American administrations. Maalouf concluded that it is not in humanity's best interest to be led by a hegemonic power, whether from America, China, or any other nation, because such dominance inevitably turns that country into an arrogant tyrant, ultimately leading to its downfall, as has occurred with empires throughout history.
The solution lies in genuine cooperation within respected international organizations where all voices are heard. It is absurd, for example, to witness America's relentless push to establish an 'International Court of Justice,' only to demand, insist upon, and secure exemptions for its citizens from being held accountable before it. What we are witnessing from the current U.S. administration was foreseen by Maalouf in his insightful book. Maalouf concludes by stating that the huge problems facing our planet require collective action through a system of global solidarity. This is the only way to avoid future dangers, especially now that the world's sole superpower has lost its 'moral legitimacy.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Arab Times
11 hours ago
- Arab Times
Amin Maalouf's ‘Labyrinth of the Lost'
I thoroughly enjoyed reading 'The Labyrinth of the Lost' by the creative and insightful French-Lebanese author Amin Maalouf. Having immigrated to France in the 1970s, Maalouf earned his place among the esteemed 40 members of the Académie Française, famously known as 'The Immortals.' Members of this prestigious academy are elected and hold lifetime membership, although they may choose to resign or be dismissed in cases of misconduct. In addition to his literary achievements, Maalouf also serves as the Secretary General of the Académie Française. Amin Maalouf's book delves into the complex and evolving relationship and often conflict between the West and its historical adversaries, particularly in Southeast Asia, including China and Japan, as well as Soviet Russia and the West's dynamic with the New World, specifically the United States. The book traces the trajectory of these global powers, beginning with Japan's Meiji era, which astonished the world with its rapid industrial development, Soviet Russia, which posed a serious threat to the West for nearly three-quarters of a century before its eventual collapse, and China, which has emerged in the 21st century as the West's primary competitor in global influence, due to its vast population and unique philosophical foundations. Maalouf also highlights the rise of the United States, especially after World War I, and its dominant global role following its decisive victory in World War II, emerging as the most advanced and powerful nation, and arguably the only one capable of defending global stability against external threats. When Maalouf completed his book two years ago, before the outbreak of the Gaza conflict and its repercussions, he predicted a significant decline of the West, particularly embodied by America. What we are witnessing today confirms this prediction, manifesting as political and moral bankruptcy. However, this does not imply that the West's adversaries or challengers are in a better position. Neither side currently holds the capacity to lead humanity out of the complex maze it faces. Even the United States, once a symbol of moral and material hope for many nations globally, is now experiencing setback after setback. America spent billions of dollars on its war in Afghanistan but did not build a single school or clinic there, a stark contrast to its honorable record with Japan and Germany after World War II. Its direct and indirect interventions in dozens of countries worldwide have tarnished both its credibility and the legacy of its founding fathers. The scandals and defeats in Vietnam and Afghanistan, along with the consequences of the Iraq invasion, which many viewed as a defeat, have deeply affected the prudence and humanity of the American administrations. Maalouf concluded that it is not in humanity's best interest to be led by a hegemonic power, whether from America, China, or any other nation, because such dominance inevitably turns that country into an arrogant tyrant, ultimately leading to its downfall, as has occurred with empires throughout history. The solution lies in genuine cooperation within respected international organizations where all voices are heard. It is absurd, for example, to witness America's relentless push to establish an 'International Court of Justice,' only to demand, insist upon, and secure exemptions for its citizens from being held accountable before it. What we are witnessing from the current U.S. administration was foreseen by Maalouf in his insightful book. Maalouf concludes by stating that the huge problems facing our planet require collective action through a system of global solidarity. This is the only way to avoid future dangers, especially now that the world's sole superpower has lost its 'moral legitimacy.'

Kuwait Times
11 hours ago
- Kuwait Times
Arab envoys bid farewell to Lebanese Chargé d'Affaires
KUWAIT: Arab ambassadors accredited in Kuwait gather for a photo during a farewell ceremony held in honor of Lebanese Chargé d'Affaires Ahmed Arafa. KUWAIT: The Arab Diplomatic Corps in Kuwait held a farewell ceremony on Monday afternoon in honor of Ahmed Arafa, Chargé d'Affaires of the Lebanese Embassy in Kuwait, marking the end of his mission as he prepares to take up a new post as Lebanon's Permanent Representative to the United Nations. The event, hosted by Palestinian Ambassador and Dean of the Arab Diplomatic Corps Rami Tahboub, brought together ambassadors and Arab diplomats to pay tribute to Arafa's role in nurturing strong ties between Lebanon and Kuwait during his time in office. In his speech, Ambassador Tahboub commended Arafa for his dedication and effective efforts in promoting bilateral relations, thanking him for 'the great energy he invested in strengthening the bonds between Lebanon and Kuwait.' He also conveyed the collective wishes of the Arab diplomatic community for success in his new role, saying Arafa will now serve Lebanon and Arab causes 'in the most prominent international forum.' Arafa expressed deep gratitude for the gesture, thanking Ambassador Tahboub and all his Arab colleagues for their support. He praised the fraternal spirit that defined his work in Kuwait, and extended special thanks to the Kuwaiti leadership and people for their longstanding support to Lebanon and the broader Arab region. 'I leave Kuwait with great respect and appreciation for this country — its Amir, government, and people — who have stood by Lebanon in both calm and crisis,' Arafa said. The ceremony concluded with a symbolic gesture of appreciation, as Ambassador Tahboub presented a commemorative gift to Arafa on behalf of the Arab ambassadors accredited in Kuwait.


Arab Times
13 hours ago
- Arab Times
Iran must face reality
AFTER 13 days of direct Iranian-Israeli conflict, a ceasefire was finally reached through Qatari mediation and American sponsorship. With the negotiating table set and all parties weighing their gains and losses, several important points must be emphasized. The disruption of the Iranian nuclear project, achieved through this confrontation, is credited to the United States, which accomplished this goal through a highly precise surgical operation. This proves the fact that when a superpower intervenes, supported by the European Union and regional states, it aims for a decisive outcome rather than merely managing the crisis. Secondly, Iran's violation of the sovereignty of the sisterly state of Qatar revealed the true nature of the destructive mullahs' regime in Tehran. This regime shows no respect for good neighborliness or the excellent relations between Tehran and Doha. Through this reckless act, the Iranian leadership exposed their disregard for approaches that benefit their people, prioritizing instead their terrorist agenda in the region. There was indeed a prior agreement for a limited and 'controlled' Iranian response to the US attack, similar to the reaction following the assassination of former Quds Force commander Qassem Soleimani near Baghdad airport. At that time, US President Donald Trump stated that Iran had informed the Americans it would strike the Ain al-Assad base, mainly to create an excuse for its people, a gesture seen as a merciful or 'brotherly' bombing. What does this mean? It means that no power can truly challenge the United States. Iran, for its part, cannot confront this superpower directly. Moreover, the United States and Europe consider Israel's security a red line that must not be crossed. In contrast, Iran has demonstrated its weakness in direct confrontation. While Iran once waged wars against Israel through proxies and supplied arms, allowing Tel Aviv to score several points in its favor, the situation today is very different. Iran no longer controls four Arab capitals, nor does it possess the capability to threaten Israel's annihilation. Neither Lebanese Hezbollah, the Iraqi sectarian militias, nor the destructive Houthis can seriously threaten any country, especially Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states. Overall, Iran's network of proxies is weaker than ever. Based on this, experience has shown that Tehran must adopt a more realistic vision that aligns with its distinguished position, its large population of 94 million, and its considerable capabilities. We have stated before, and reiterate now, that neither anyone in the region nor the international community wants a country governed by such a regime to possess nuclear weapons. No rational Islamic state supports the proliferation of nuclear arms, especially in an extraordinarily sensitive region like the Middle East. Now that the war has ended, a realistic Iranian assessment of the confrontation's outcome is a must. Iran must seriously consider changing its political and economic course and seeking common ground with its neighbors, who unanimously condemned Iran's aggression against Qatar. This united stance confirms that the Gulf Cooperation Council countries share an unshakable destiny and makes clear that any attempt to undermine regional security will be met with severe consequences. The day after the ceasefire, any rational observer can see who the biggest losers and winners are. Iran faces the daunting task of rebuilding, requiring a lot of time, money, and resources, none of which are easily available due to the sanctions imposed on it. Meanwhile, Israel continues to benefit from unlimited logistical and financial support from the United States and Europe, along with a workforce of 400,000 Palestinian laborers in Israel. Is this truly the outcome Iran sought from the war? To strengthen Israel's position? Regardless of the outcome, Iran must adopt a wise and pragmatic approach to the future. It is time for Tehran to understand that stubbornness only leads to the harshest consequences.