logo
2 Sisters: Former workers sue chicken plant after contracting Covid

2 Sisters: Former workers sue chicken plant after contracting Covid

BBC News05-06-2025
Former workers at a poultry factory who claim they caught coronavirus in a mass outbreak at the plant can continue legal action against their former employers.Public Health Wales said there were over 200 confirmed Covid-19 cases linked to the 2 Sisters plant in Llangefni, on Anglesey, in June 2020.The group are suing 2 Sisters Food Group, alleging they contracted Covid-19 as a result of a breach of duty, breach of contract and negligence. Their case was thrown out last year but they have now won a High Court appeal, allowing the case to continue.Lawyers for 2 Sisters previously argued the claimants could not prove how they caught the virus and if it was connected to the factory.
The 2 Sisters factory closed down permanently in March 2023, with the loss of over 700 jobs, after the company said the site was old and needed too much investment to bring it up to standard.During the height of the pandemic in 2020, its site was one of several food processing factories in Wales that experienced outbreaks of Covid-19.At the time, Health Minister Vaughan Gething said officials were looking at the level of risk in the food industry.
Mark Edwards, Glynne Roberts, Nia Williams and Brian Perry worked on the chicken production line and claim they worked "shoulder to shoulder" and all fell ill with the virus that month.As part of their claim, they say Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) at work regulations had not been properly followed.The company accepts the staff worked in close proximity with each other, but denies they were "shoulder to shoulder".The firm said it implemented enhanced hygiene measures at the factory which was temporarily closed on 18 June 2020.
At the start of their legal action, the former employees had not obtained expert medical evidence to support the claim.Their lawyers said occupational health experts and virologists would be asked to give their opinion before the case went to trial.They also said the company should disclose evidence about the outbreak before they could ask for expert opinion to back up the claim.Lawyers for 2 Sisters argued the claimants could not prove when or how they had caught the virus and if it had any connection to the factory.In January 2024 they asked for the case to be struck out at the county court in Caernarfon on the basis that Mr Edwards and the others could not prove the cause of their illness and that their claim was doomed to fail.In July, Judge Wendy Owen ruled there was no real prospect of the claim succeeding without medical evidence and no other compelling reason why the case should go to trial.The judge said the issue of causation and medical opinion was a crucial element which should have already been investigated before proceedings were commenced, and gave a summary judgement against the former workers.
But permission to appeal the case was granted in December 2024 and a hearing before a High Court judge in Cardiff was held in April.In a judgement handed down at the end of May, High Court judge Sir Peter Lane said the summary judgment process was "somewhat draconian in nature" and courts should avoid conducting what has come to be described as a "mini trial" of a case.Sir Peter said Judge Owen "fell into error" in effectively conducting a "mini trial" without the benefit of the evidence that would have been available had the case been allowed to proceed to trial.He found that in a claim where the costs of an expert are likely to be significant, when set against the likely value of the claims, it is "plainly proportionate" for the former workers to have proceeded with the claim in this way.Allowing the appeal, he said the claimants may face "an uphill task" but Judge Owen could not be satisfied the claimants had no real prospect of succeeding.The date for the next hearing is yet to be decided.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Parents of woman who died in Texas flooding file lawsuit saying campground had ‘history of dangerous flooding'
Parents of woman who died in Texas flooding file lawsuit saying campground had ‘history of dangerous flooding'

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Parents of woman who died in Texas flooding file lawsuit saying campground had ‘history of dangerous flooding'

The family of a 22-year-old probation officer, who was killed in the deadly floods that ravaged Kerr County, Texas, filed what's believed to be the first lawsuit since the disaster. Flash floods slammed Kerr County and its surrounding areas last month, claiming at least 135 lives. The regions along the Guadalupe River were hit particularly hard as heavy rain caused the body of water to rise 36 feet. Jayda Floyd, a 22-year-old from Odessa, Texas, died after floodwaters deluged a luxury RV park and campground along the Guadalupe River on July 4, the lawsuit states. Her parents, Christie and David Floyd, are suing campground owners and its general manager, seeking more than $1 million in damages. Floyd, her fiancé Bailey Martin, and his family were staying at the HTR TX Hill Country Resort on the evening of July 3 into the following morning, when severe floods hit. The defendants were aware of the risk of "catastrophic flooding ' but didn't warn Floyd or Martin of this risk, the filing states. The lawsuit lays out the timeline of alerts sent by local and national officials, starting on July 2. The defendants were 'negligent' for failing to establish proper storm and flood monitoring procedures, to safely and timely evacuate the property, and to warn guests of the risk of flooding, the suit claims. The defendants placed 'guests in a known floodplain with a history of dangerous flooding' and installed structures on the campground that were not 'designed to withstand flooding conditions,' the lawsuit alleges. 'The flood waters scraped the structures from the HTR TX Hill Country Resort, leaving a barren wasteland,' the lawsuit states, alongside a photo of the aftermath of the damage. The Independent has reached out to HTR TX Hill Country Resort for a response to the family's claims. A message on the resort's website reads: "Due to severe weather and flooding in the area, our campground is currently closed for the safety of our guests and staff." On the morning of July 4, Floyd helped Martin's teenage step-siblings climb to the roof of the RV, saving their lives as floodwaters rose, lawyers for her family said in a press release. Floyd served as a juvenile probation officer in Ector County and was pursuing her master's degree in psychology at the University of Texas Permian Basin. The 22-year-old had dreamed of helping at-risk youth. 'She was someone who was going to make a difference in the lives of people, particularly kids,' her father, David Floyd, said in a statement. The family is hoping for some accountability, the family's lawyers said. 'Businesses operating campgrounds along the river have known about its flooding history for decades,' Jon Clark, an attorney for the family, said in a statement. 'We will investigate what steps — if any — were taken to monitor conditions and warn guests of the danger they were in.' Texas officials have faced scrutiny for their response to and warnings about the catastrophic floods. The National Weather Service sent out a string of flash flood warnings on the afternoon of July 3 before issuing flash flood emergencies in the wee hours of July 4, alerting locals that the weather posed a a severe threat. Last month, the acting administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency defended his agency's response. 'I can't see anything we did wrong,' David Richardson told a House panel. 'The forecasting was good. The warnings were good. It's always about getting people to receive the message,' Chris Vagasky, a meteorologist based in Wisconsin, told NBC News in the days after the floods.

Melania Trump threatens to sue Hunter Biden over Epstein claim
Melania Trump threatens to sue Hunter Biden over Epstein claim

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Melania Trump threatens to sue Hunter Biden over Epstein claim

First Lady Melania Trump has threatened to sue Hunter Biden for more than $1bn after he claimed she was introduced to her husband by sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Lawyers acting on behalf of the first lady, who married US President Donald Trump in 2005, described the claim as "false, disparaging, defamatory and inflammatory". Biden, son of former US President Joe Biden, made the comments during an interview earlier this month, in which he strongly criticised the president's former ties to Trump was a friend of Epstein, but has said the pair fell out in the early 2000s because the financier had poached employees who worked at the spa in Trump's Florida golf club. A letter from the first lady's lawyers and addressed to an attorney for Hunter Biden demands he retract the claim and apologise, or face legal action for "over $1bn in damages". It says the first lady has suffered "overwhelming financial and reputational harm" because of the claim he also accuses the youngest Biden son of having a "vast history of trading on the names of others", and repeating the claim "to draw attention to yourself". During a wide-ranging interview with filmmaker Andrew Callaghan published earlier this month, Hunter Biden claimed unreleased documents relating to Epstein would "implicate" President said: "Epstein introduced Melania to Trump - the connections are so wide and deep." The first lady's legal letter notes the claim was partially attributed to Michael Wolff, a journalist who authored a critical biography of the president. In a recent interview with US outlet the Daily Beast, Wolff reportedly claimed that the first lady met Trump through the founder of modelling company, who Wolff said was connected to Epstein. The outlet later retracted the story after receiving a letter from the first lady's attorney that challenged the contents and framing of the story. There is no evidence the pair were introduced to each other by Epstein, who took his own life in prison while awaiting trial in the first lady's legal letter, Hunter Biden is accused of relying on a since-removed article as the basis of his claims, which it describes as "false and defamatory". A message on the archived version of the Daily Beast online story reads: "After this story was published, The Beast received a letter from First Lady Melania Trump's attorney challenging the headline and framing of the article. "After reviewing the matter, the Beast has taken down the article and apologizes for any confusion or misunderstanding."Asked about the legal threat, the first lady's lawyer, Alejandro Brito, referred BBC News to a statement issued by her aide, Nick Clemens. It read: "First Lady Melania Trump's attorneys are actively ensuring immediate retractions and apologies by those who spread malicious, defamatory falsehoods."A January 2016 profile by Harper's Bazaar reported the first lady met her husband in November 1998, at a party hosted by the founder of a modelling Trump, 55, told the publication she declined to give him her phone number because he was "with a date". The profile said Trump had recently separated from his second wife, Marla Maples, whom he divorced in 1999. He was previously married to Ivana Trump between 1977 and BBC has contacted Hunter Biden's legal letter comes after weeks of pressure on the White House to release the so-called Epstein files, previously undisclosed documents relating to the criminal investigation against the convicted being re-elected, Trump said he would release the records if he returned to office, but the FBI and justice department said in July that no "incriminating" client list of Epstein associates existed.

Dragons' Den star Sara Davies increases stake in business she founded
Dragons' Den star Sara Davies increases stake in business she founded

Times

time2 hours ago

  • Times

Dragons' Den star Sara Davies increases stake in business she founded

A star of Dragons' Den is increasing her stake in the crafting company she founded as the owner of WH Smith sells its holding in the business. Sara Davies, a panellist on the popular BBC show, has increased her holding in Crafter's Companion after joining efforts to turn around the company when it filed for administration earlier this year. Davies, 41, founded the business from her bedroom at York University and built it into an international seller of paper craft, art and sewing products, with a reported valuation of more than £25 million in 2019. She returned as chief executive of Crafter's Companion earlier this year when it was sold through a fast-track pre-pack administration to Modella Capital, the investment firm that has since purchased the WH Smith store portfolio. Modella has now sold its interest to Maven Capital Partners, an investment firm headquartered in Glasgow, and Davies, who founded the company 20 years ago. Crafter's Companion swung back to profitability in May following Davies's return. She is now standing down as chief executive and will hand over day-to-day running of the business to Diane Sharp, who was initially brought in as a financial controller and was subsequently promoted to managing director. The company is opening a warehouse in the US in the coming weeks as its products were caught by the Trump administration's decision to end a tariff exemption on imports of goods valued at $800 or less. Davies had stayed as a non-executive with Crafter's Companion when it was sold to Growth Partner, a long-term backer, in 2024. She said the business lost its way when the new management team brought in to run the company shifted its focus from die-hard crafters towards a more general audience. She told The Times: 'We are excellent in our product development and our biggest investment in our company is in product development. They radically cut our product development teams down and wanted to source off-the-shelf product from China. 'Our customers are generally older, retired ladies who have time on their hands and plenty of money. The strategy pivot went after a much broader audience. And in my eyes, we have no right to win there. We don't compete on price; we deliver exceptional products which are at the higher end of the market.' The financial details of the transaction were not disclosed but it is understood that Davies will significantly increase her minority shareholding in the business, with Maven owning a majority stake.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store