logo
Race, national identity, Dr Mahathir Mohamad, Malays

Race, national identity, Dr Mahathir Mohamad, Malays

From Moaz Nair
Malays do not need to be under a 'big umbrella' to achieve economic progress in the country. Only hard work, honesty and a positive mindset pay.
Times have changed and former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad's big umbrella non-political concept, as he defined it, to unite the Malays is nothing more than a hidden political agenda criticised by the Malay political leaders themselves.
Malays are already well represented at all levels of the country's administration since the country's independence.
There are also numerous Malay-based political parties in the country, each claiming to champion the rights of the Malays. Can these parties be dissolved and melded into one single party for all the Malays?
This is politically impossible, as each of these parties has its own agenda – that is to seek power for themselves.
And to achieve this, they cannot work in isolation but associate themselves with Malaysian-centric political parties.
Just accept the fact that the demographics of Malaysia are represented by its multiple ethno-linguistic groups that exist in the country.
There are more than 30 major ethno-linguistic groups in the country and despite the diversity of its people there are earnest politicians working towards unifying and not dividing them.
The population is already divided by race, language and religion and they should not be further divided with divisive policies for political gains. The country hence does not need a big umbrella of any sort for any single race.
A Malaysian nation
Ironically, it was Mahathir during his first stint as prime minister who came up with an ideal concept of 'Bangsa Malaysia', which translates to Malaysian nation. It was an inclusive policy for all races.
This has to be nurtured in the country today.
It is a concept and policy to create a unified national identity for all citizens of Malaysia, regardless of ethnicity or background. It aims to foster a sense of belonging and unity across the diverse populations of the country.
The policy seeks to replace the focus on a Malay-centric national identity and embrace a more inclusive approach that encompasses all Malaysian citizens, sharing a sense of national identity and belonging, encouraging cooperation and understanding among different ethnic groups.
The policy emphasises values like cooperation, moderation, and the spirit of give-and-take, aiming to build a nation based on these principles and accepting the Malaysian Constitution as its key component.
The aim here is to create a national identity for everyone in Malaysia replacing the old focus on Malay identity.
Bangsa Malaysia in this context refers to the idea of togetherness and comradeship among the various races. It is not the creation of a Malaysian race as it is impossible unless, of course, all the races assimilate biologically and grow into a race with a single cultural identity.
The problem lies with the system
Imagine studying or working in a foreign country and you meet a person from your homeland: be it a Malay, Chinese, Indian, Kadazan or Dusun, you would feel elated with an urge to become acquainted with the person despite our differences.
When we are away, we feel that we belong to the same nation and we share our experience coming from a country we call ours. This is one measure of Bangsa Malaysia and we have nearly achieved this.
The experience of Malaysians studying or working overseas testifies to this comradeship.
Why then the prejudice at home? The problem lies with the system. We cannot deny that politics, economic disparity and social and cultural preferences have made us perceive ourselves as divergent groups of people living together.
We label every person by his race and religion and, in the process, polarise people further.
From kindergarten to the workplace and until death, we come across countless forms and processes requiring us to identify our race and religion but not nationality first. A child can't help but grow up with prejudice as he is always made to feel different.
We are culturally different but can still share our experiences to create a nationality. The whole notion of creating a Bangsa Malaysia is to foster a deep love for the country, that is, patriotism.
To achieve this, all races should be represented at all levels to create a sense of belonging to this nation.
A state need not belong to one race, one religion or one way of life to be called a nation.
Differences may lead to conflicts, but we should not let them deny us the aspiration of creating a Bangsa Malaysia.
We need more tolerance, mutual support and respect for each other to achieve unity, even with all the diversity around us. Let us then achieve unity despite our diversity.
It is the Malaysian-first mindset that would nurture Bangsa Malaysia. Mahathir's latest Malay centric focus after no more in power is nothing more than another desperate political agenda to further divide the people.
Moaz Nair is an FMT reader.
The views expressed here are those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of FMT.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Court throws out Halim Saad's attempt to reinstate Renong takeover suit
Court throws out Halim Saad's attempt to reinstate Renong takeover suit

Free Malaysia Today

time33 minutes ago

  • Free Malaysia Today

Court throws out Halim Saad's attempt to reinstate Renong takeover suit

(From left) Halim Saad claimed that Dr Mahathir Mohamad and Nor Mohamed Yakcop 'forced' him to relinquish his stake in Renong-UEM, together with all rights vested in him, without adequate compensation more than 23 years ago. PUTRAJAYA : Tycoon Halim Saad has failed to reinstate his lawsuit against former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad and two others over the government's takeover of his holdings in the Renong-UEM Group. The Court of Appeal dismissed Halim's appeal today on grounds that this lawsuit, filed in 2023, was time-barred. Justice Supang Lian, who led a three-member bench, said Halim's lawsuit was a plain and obvious case for striking out. Justices Lim Chong Fong and Alwi Wahab also heard the appeal. The court ordered Halim to pay RM20,000 in costs to the defendants, who included former second finance minister Nor Mohamed Yakcop and the government. In the suit, Halim claimed that Mahathir and Mohamed 'forced' him to relinquish his stake in Renong-UEM, together with all rights vested in him, without adequate compensation more than 23 years ago. Mahathir was prime minister from July 1981 to October 2003, and again from May 2018 to February 2020. Halim alleged that Mahathir and Mohamed were 'the prime movers in respect of the said compulsory acquisition and deprivation'. The stake was said to comprise 372 million shares, and represented 16% of Renong Bhd's entire share capital. Halim claimed that the shares, acquired by government investment arm Khazanah Nasional Bhd through its subsidiary in 2001, belonged to him personally and not to Umno, a fact acknowledged by Anwar Ibrahim in Parliament on Nov 24, 1997. Anwar was Mahathir's deputy and also the finance minister and Umno deputy president at the time. Halim claimed that UEM then held a 32.6% stake in Renong, while Renong held a 37.92% share in UEM. The suit sought an unspecified amount in compensation or, alternatively, general, aggravated and exemplary damages to be assessed by the court, together with interest and costs. The High Court struck out the lawsuit in May last year. Lawyer Malik Imtiaz Sarwar appeared for Halim while senior federal counsel Ahmad Hanir Hambaly and Imtiyaz Wizni Aufa Othman appeared for Mahathir, Mohamed and the government.

16 MA63 Demands Still Under Review
16 MA63 Demands Still Under Review

Barnama

timean hour ago

  • Barnama

16 MA63 Demands Still Under Review

KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 18 (Bernama) -- Sixteen demands under the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63), out of 29, are still under review by the Technical Committee of the Malaysia Agreement 1963 Implementation Action Council (MTPMA63), said Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Fadillah Yusof. He said the demands involve issues related to education, healthcare, oil royalties, petroleum cash payments, oil minerals and fields, the Territorial Sea Act 2012 (Act 750), as well as state rights over the continental shelf. Fadillah said 13 claims have been resolved, nine under the MADANI Government and four during the previous administration. 'Among the claims resolved under the MADANI Government's administration are the recognition of the Public Works Department (JKR) and the Irrigation and Drainage Department (JPS) in Sabah and Sarawak as Technical Departments under Treasury Instruction 182 (AP182), as well as the transfer of the Electricity Regulatory Authority to the Sabah state government. "(The resolved demands) also include the amendment to the Inland Revenue Board (IRB) Act 1995 to appoint representatives from the Sabah and Sarawak state governments as permanent members of the IRB, as well as amendments to the Sabah Labour Ordinance and the Sarawak Labour Ordinance,' he said during the winding up debate on the 13th Malaysia Plan (13MP) in the Dewan Rakyat today. Fadillah said the MTPMA63, chaired by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, was established to review the demands submitted by the Sabah and Sarawak state governments, based on the legal framework and implementation of the agreed-upon claims. "The MADANI Government is fully committed to expediting the resolution of all MA63 demands. However, the timeframe for resolving each demand is subject to the relevant legal processes. '…the readiness of the Sabah and Sarawak state governments in terms of operations, human resources, and finances must also be considered before a claim under the MA63 can be resolved,' he added. On measures to reduce flood risks, Fadillah, who also serves as the Minister of Energy Transition and Water Transformation, stated that the ministry, through JPS, has implemented structural and non-structural strategies nationwide to improve drainage systems and infrastructure.

Legal Aid and Public Defence Bill to be tabled next week, says Azalina
Legal Aid and Public Defence Bill to be tabled next week, says Azalina

Malay Mail

timean hour ago

  • Malay Mail

Legal Aid and Public Defence Bill to be tabled next week, says Azalina

KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 18 — The Legal Aid and Public Defence Bill 2025, a key component of the legal reform agenda, is expected to be tabled for its first reading in the Dewan Rakyat next week. Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said said that the bill is part of the Madani government's efforts to enhance access to justice for all Malaysians. 'This will provide a focus on vulnerable groups and individuals who meet the criteria for legal assistance, ensuring broader access to quality legal and defence services, in line with the principle of justice for all,' she said. Azalina said this when winding up the debate on the 13th Malaysia Plan (13MP) at the Dewan Rakyat sitting today. She added that the implementation of the mobile court initiative in Peninsular Malaysia was agreed upon, following a meeting last week with Chief Justice Datuk Wan Ahmad Farid Wan Salleh and the Office of the Chief Registrar. The initiative, already implemented in Sabah and Sarawak, aims to establish at least one mobile court in each state in Peninsular Malaysia. 'We hope that, with the presence of these mobile courts, access to the legal system, whether for legal services, resolution of minor cases, or registration of important documents, will become more inclusive, ensuring justice not only in urban centres, but also in rural and remote areas. 'We hope that in the Budget 2026, which will be tabled by the Prime Minister, this initiative can become a reality, insya-Allah,' she added. — Bernama

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store