Nationwide protests planned after pro-Palestine Harbour Bridge march
The pro-Palestine movement, boosted by a march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge which made news across the nation and around the world, hopes to build on its momentum.
The march across the bridge and back in pouring rain came after opposition from police, and a court's overruling approval that has politicians worrying about the rare occurrence becoming common.
Further protests are planned on August 24 in Sydney, Melbourne, Canberra, Adelaide and Perth with hopes more can be organised in other cities.
Ahead of the state's parliament resuming on Tuesday, NSW Premier Chris Minns says his Government is examining whether a legal precedent has been set by the Supreme Court judgment that allowed the protest to proceed.
'No one should believe it's open season on the bridge,' he told reporters on Monday.
But new laws might be needed to stop future bridge protests.
Mr Minns was 'not ruling anything out' but said any legislation could not be rushed.
Federal Opposition Leader Sussan Ley encouraged the premier to look at 'what might happen next'.
'Because we can't continue to have these protests that shut down such an important area of a major city,' she told reporters.
In her determination declining to prohibit the march, Justice Belinda Rigg said the bridge would have been closed to traffic regardless of whether the protest was authorised or not.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said demonstrations were an important part of democracy and highlighted the peaceful nature of the Sydney march.
'Australians want people to stop killing each other, they want peace and security ... they don't want conflict brought here,' he said.
Mr Minns has faced some internal dissent from other Labor MPs over protest legislation.
NSW Greens MP Sue Higginson has also flagged plans to seek the repeal of laws limiting protest, first introduced by the previous coalition government but expanded under Labor.
Palestine Action Group organiser Josh Lees, defendant of the court action NSW Police took in an unsuccessful attempt to have the demonstration ruled unlawful, says nationwide protests are being planned for August 24.
'We want to build on this massive momentum we have now,' he told reporters.
Despite concerns of regular marches across the bridge, Mr Lees said the group has no plans for a repeat crossing any time soon and accused the premier of having an anti-protest agenda.
'His stance is pretty clear and he's passed a raft of anti-protest legislation already,' Mr Lees said.
'We're going to have to keep fighting for our rights to demonstrate.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AU Financial Review
43 minutes ago
- AU Financial Review
Labor's bailouts for globally competitive smelters a contradiction
The economic reforms of the 1980s and 1990s liberalised and opened up Australia's highly protected economy, which had long sheltered behind high tariff walls. The result was three decades of prosperity broken only by the COVID-19 pandemic. Over the past three years, living standards have fallen amid the nation's steep productivity decline. Jim Chalmers' economic reform roundtable needs to focus on a meaningful tax, workplace, and regulatory agenda to fix Australia's economic malaise by boosting investment in productive and globally competitive businesses. However, what is now gathering pace is Labor's revival of industry policy. Counter-productively, this marks a return to old 'Fortress Australia' days of government intervention cossetting select industries at the expense of the nation's overall international competitiveness.
The Advertiser
43 minutes ago
- The Advertiser
Labor vows to fight on as premier makes power move
Tasmania's political limbo will come to a head as the premier seeks to have his government recommissioned within days, but the opposition leader isn't going down without a fight. Premier Jeremy Rockliff revealed on Tuesday he would approach the state's governor within 48 hours to be reappointed following a snap election in July that did not deliver any party a clear majority. Negotiations with the cross bench to form another minority government have intensified as Mr Rockliff and Tasmanian Labor Leader Dean Winter attempt to secure the 18 parliamentary votes needed to govern. The premier revealed he would attempt to stay in power even if he could not secure confidence and supply agreements from crossbenchers. "I would welcome more formal agreements with confidence and supply should individual members wish to do so," Mr Rockliff told reporters on Tuesday. "My understanding is that it is not necessary in terms of being recommissioned in a minority government." Mr Winter said while Mr Rockliff had the first opportunity to form government, it was not the only opportunity. He vowed to step up meetings with crossbenchers because a government without supply and confidence agreements would lead to instability, highlighting intentions for formal talks with independents in coming days. Mr Winter continued to rule out doing a deal with the Greens and said he wasn't seeking to meet with them. "We want to work with independents in particular who have said they want change," he said. "They want a new government, they want a government that can deliver stability and confidence to Tasmanians." The final makeup of Tasmania's parliament is 14 Liberals, 10 Labor, five Greens, one Shooters, Fishers and Farmers MP and five independents. Many crossbenchers are remaining tight-lipped on who they would support including Shooters, Fishers, Farmers MP Carlo Di Falco, who has placed gun law changes on the political agenda. He nominated "gun laws fit for purpose" among his priorities in parliament but insisted the issue hadn't come up in negotiations with Mr Rockliff or Mr Winter, suggesting his party's name made it obvious that was a core policy. Mr Di Falco believes the federal Howard government acted too quickly on gun control after the 1996 Port Arthur massacre. "There are anti-firearm zealots out there and I think it's morally reprehensible that 30 years after a tragedy that you know, that traumatised everybody, that they're still trying to milk that tragedy for all it's worth," he told AAP. "My view is just let ... the victims of Port Arthur rest in peace and it's not serving anybody's purposes to just keep regurgitating the same fearmongering that was happening in 1996." His comments drew criticism from Stephen Bendle from the Alannah & Madeline Foundation, an anti-violence charity set up by Walter Mikac after his two daughters were killed in the shooting. Mr Bendle, the charity's advocacy advisor, accused Mr Di Falco of being disrespectful and said the majority of Australians felt the nation's gun laws were "about right" or could be tighter. "It is hard to speak to anyone in Tasmania, let alone the rest of Australia that hasn't felt the impact of that tragedy," he said. "The fact that our strong gun laws have been largely responsible for the fact that it hasn't been repeated might be uncomfortable for Mr Di Falco and his supporters." Elected members have been confirmed after Labor's Jess Greene and independent George Razay claimed the final seats in the division of Bass on Saturday. The July 19 election was triggered after Mr Rockliff lost a no-confidence motion, prompting the state's second election in 16 months. A key sticking point in negotiations to form government is the major parties backing a new $1 billion stadium in Hobart, which the Greens and some independents oppose. Tasmania's political limbo will come to a head as the premier seeks to have his government recommissioned within days, but the opposition leader isn't going down without a fight. Premier Jeremy Rockliff revealed on Tuesday he would approach the state's governor within 48 hours to be reappointed following a snap election in July that did not deliver any party a clear majority. Negotiations with the cross bench to form another minority government have intensified as Mr Rockliff and Tasmanian Labor Leader Dean Winter attempt to secure the 18 parliamentary votes needed to govern. The premier revealed he would attempt to stay in power even if he could not secure confidence and supply agreements from crossbenchers. "I would welcome more formal agreements with confidence and supply should individual members wish to do so," Mr Rockliff told reporters on Tuesday. "My understanding is that it is not necessary in terms of being recommissioned in a minority government." Mr Winter said while Mr Rockliff had the first opportunity to form government, it was not the only opportunity. He vowed to step up meetings with crossbenchers because a government without supply and confidence agreements would lead to instability, highlighting intentions for formal talks with independents in coming days. Mr Winter continued to rule out doing a deal with the Greens and said he wasn't seeking to meet with them. "We want to work with independents in particular who have said they want change," he said. "They want a new government, they want a government that can deliver stability and confidence to Tasmanians." The final makeup of Tasmania's parliament is 14 Liberals, 10 Labor, five Greens, one Shooters, Fishers and Farmers MP and five independents. Many crossbenchers are remaining tight-lipped on who they would support including Shooters, Fishers, Farmers MP Carlo Di Falco, who has placed gun law changes on the political agenda. He nominated "gun laws fit for purpose" among his priorities in parliament but insisted the issue hadn't come up in negotiations with Mr Rockliff or Mr Winter, suggesting his party's name made it obvious that was a core policy. Mr Di Falco believes the federal Howard government acted too quickly on gun control after the 1996 Port Arthur massacre. "There are anti-firearm zealots out there and I think it's morally reprehensible that 30 years after a tragedy that you know, that traumatised everybody, that they're still trying to milk that tragedy for all it's worth," he told AAP. "My view is just let ... the victims of Port Arthur rest in peace and it's not serving anybody's purposes to just keep regurgitating the same fearmongering that was happening in 1996." His comments drew criticism from Stephen Bendle from the Alannah & Madeline Foundation, an anti-violence charity set up by Walter Mikac after his two daughters were killed in the shooting. Mr Bendle, the charity's advocacy advisor, accused Mr Di Falco of being disrespectful and said the majority of Australians felt the nation's gun laws were "about right" or could be tighter. "It is hard to speak to anyone in Tasmania, let alone the rest of Australia that hasn't felt the impact of that tragedy," he said. "The fact that our strong gun laws have been largely responsible for the fact that it hasn't been repeated might be uncomfortable for Mr Di Falco and his supporters." Elected members have been confirmed after Labor's Jess Greene and independent George Razay claimed the final seats in the division of Bass on Saturday. The July 19 election was triggered after Mr Rockliff lost a no-confidence motion, prompting the state's second election in 16 months. A key sticking point in negotiations to form government is the major parties backing a new $1 billion stadium in Hobart, which the Greens and some independents oppose. Tasmania's political limbo will come to a head as the premier seeks to have his government recommissioned within days, but the opposition leader isn't going down without a fight. Premier Jeremy Rockliff revealed on Tuesday he would approach the state's governor within 48 hours to be reappointed following a snap election in July that did not deliver any party a clear majority. Negotiations with the cross bench to form another minority government have intensified as Mr Rockliff and Tasmanian Labor Leader Dean Winter attempt to secure the 18 parliamentary votes needed to govern. The premier revealed he would attempt to stay in power even if he could not secure confidence and supply agreements from crossbenchers. "I would welcome more formal agreements with confidence and supply should individual members wish to do so," Mr Rockliff told reporters on Tuesday. "My understanding is that it is not necessary in terms of being recommissioned in a minority government." Mr Winter said while Mr Rockliff had the first opportunity to form government, it was not the only opportunity. He vowed to step up meetings with crossbenchers because a government without supply and confidence agreements would lead to instability, highlighting intentions for formal talks with independents in coming days. Mr Winter continued to rule out doing a deal with the Greens and said he wasn't seeking to meet with them. "We want to work with independents in particular who have said they want change," he said. "They want a new government, they want a government that can deliver stability and confidence to Tasmanians." The final makeup of Tasmania's parliament is 14 Liberals, 10 Labor, five Greens, one Shooters, Fishers and Farmers MP and five independents. Many crossbenchers are remaining tight-lipped on who they would support including Shooters, Fishers, Farmers MP Carlo Di Falco, who has placed gun law changes on the political agenda. He nominated "gun laws fit for purpose" among his priorities in parliament but insisted the issue hadn't come up in negotiations with Mr Rockliff or Mr Winter, suggesting his party's name made it obvious that was a core policy. Mr Di Falco believes the federal Howard government acted too quickly on gun control after the 1996 Port Arthur massacre. "There are anti-firearm zealots out there and I think it's morally reprehensible that 30 years after a tragedy that you know, that traumatised everybody, that they're still trying to milk that tragedy for all it's worth," he told AAP. "My view is just let ... the victims of Port Arthur rest in peace and it's not serving anybody's purposes to just keep regurgitating the same fearmongering that was happening in 1996." His comments drew criticism from Stephen Bendle from the Alannah & Madeline Foundation, an anti-violence charity set up by Walter Mikac after his two daughters were killed in the shooting. Mr Bendle, the charity's advocacy advisor, accused Mr Di Falco of being disrespectful and said the majority of Australians felt the nation's gun laws were "about right" or could be tighter. "It is hard to speak to anyone in Tasmania, let alone the rest of Australia that hasn't felt the impact of that tragedy," he said. "The fact that our strong gun laws have been largely responsible for the fact that it hasn't been repeated might be uncomfortable for Mr Di Falco and his supporters." Elected members have been confirmed after Labor's Jess Greene and independent George Razay claimed the final seats in the division of Bass on Saturday. The July 19 election was triggered after Mr Rockliff lost a no-confidence motion, prompting the state's second election in 16 months. A key sticking point in negotiations to form government is the major parties backing a new $1 billion stadium in Hobart, which the Greens and some independents oppose. Tasmania's political limbo will come to a head as the premier seeks to have his government recommissioned within days, but the opposition leader isn't going down without a fight. Premier Jeremy Rockliff revealed on Tuesday he would approach the state's governor within 48 hours to be reappointed following a snap election in July that did not deliver any party a clear majority. Negotiations with the cross bench to form another minority government have intensified as Mr Rockliff and Tasmanian Labor Leader Dean Winter attempt to secure the 18 parliamentary votes needed to govern. The premier revealed he would attempt to stay in power even if he could not secure confidence and supply agreements from crossbenchers. "I would welcome more formal agreements with confidence and supply should individual members wish to do so," Mr Rockliff told reporters on Tuesday. "My understanding is that it is not necessary in terms of being recommissioned in a minority government." Mr Winter said while Mr Rockliff had the first opportunity to form government, it was not the only opportunity. He vowed to step up meetings with crossbenchers because a government without supply and confidence agreements would lead to instability, highlighting intentions for formal talks with independents in coming days. Mr Winter continued to rule out doing a deal with the Greens and said he wasn't seeking to meet with them. "We want to work with independents in particular who have said they want change," he said. "They want a new government, they want a government that can deliver stability and confidence to Tasmanians." The final makeup of Tasmania's parliament is 14 Liberals, 10 Labor, five Greens, one Shooters, Fishers and Farmers MP and five independents. Many crossbenchers are remaining tight-lipped on who they would support including Shooters, Fishers, Farmers MP Carlo Di Falco, who has placed gun law changes on the political agenda. He nominated "gun laws fit for purpose" among his priorities in parliament but insisted the issue hadn't come up in negotiations with Mr Rockliff or Mr Winter, suggesting his party's name made it obvious that was a core policy. Mr Di Falco believes the federal Howard government acted too quickly on gun control after the 1996 Port Arthur massacre. "There are anti-firearm zealots out there and I think it's morally reprehensible that 30 years after a tragedy that you know, that traumatised everybody, that they're still trying to milk that tragedy for all it's worth," he told AAP. "My view is just let ... the victims of Port Arthur rest in peace and it's not serving anybody's purposes to just keep regurgitating the same fearmongering that was happening in 1996." His comments drew criticism from Stephen Bendle from the Alannah & Madeline Foundation, an anti-violence charity set up by Walter Mikac after his two daughters were killed in the shooting. Mr Bendle, the charity's advocacy advisor, accused Mr Di Falco of being disrespectful and said the majority of Australians felt the nation's gun laws were "about right" or could be tighter. "It is hard to speak to anyone in Tasmania, let alone the rest of Australia that hasn't felt the impact of that tragedy," he said. "The fact that our strong gun laws have been largely responsible for the fact that it hasn't been repeated might be uncomfortable for Mr Di Falco and his supporters." Elected members have been confirmed after Labor's Jess Greene and independent George Razay claimed the final seats in the division of Bass on Saturday. The July 19 election was triggered after Mr Rockliff lost a no-confidence motion, prompting the state's second election in 16 months. A key sticking point in negotiations to form government is the major parties backing a new $1 billion stadium in Hobart, which the Greens and some independents oppose.
The Advertiser
an hour ago
- The Advertiser
'No shame': Minns slams convicted rapist's bid to serve as MP from jail
Lawyers for convicted rapist Gareth Ward have filed an injunction to stop his expulsion from parliament, which means he will remain MP for Kiama in the NSW Illawarra region while he awaits his sentencing behind bars. But Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig said the Supreme Court orders issued by Justice Sweeney were "non-binding upon the House" and the government would give the court the opportunity to rectify what he called "a significant constitutional error". Parliament returned on Tuesday and it was expected a notice of motion to expel the disgraced politician would be put forward. However, NSW Premier Chris Minns confirmed Ward's lawyers sought the injunction against Leader of the Lower House Ron Hoenig, with an urgent hearing to occur in the Supreme Court later this week. He warned there was a critical time factor at play, with parliament sitting from Tuesday for just one week before breaking again for five weeks. Mr Minns told 2GB radio on Tuesday morning that "most people would appreciate, it's an unconscionable situation to have someone who's currently sitting in Silverwater ... who is demanding to remain a member of parliament and continue to be paid". "Clearly he's got no shame," Mr Minns said. Mr Hoenig said he had received the orders from the Supreme Court but believed they did not stop the House from moving forward with the expulsion motion. "The orders made by the court yesterday afternoon, we say, have no effect and are not binding upon the House," Mr Hoenig said. "The House has an inherent power to conduct its own business, in accordance with the Constitution, unconstrained by any interference." He said the Crown Solicitors had been instructed to approach Justice Sweeney to "reconsider the orders that she had made to enable the House to conduct its affairs on behalf of the people unconstrained". He noted the case was listed for hearing on Friday, which is the last sitting day of the parliament until September 9. The Crown Solicitors had been instructed to try and get the case heard today rather than waiting until Friday, which may result in the parliament having to be recalled to deal with the expulsion motion. In a press conference, Mr Hoenig was asked whether the government planned to go ahead with the expulsion motion regardless of the court orders. "It is open to the House to conduct its affairs," he said. "We say that the court has no jurisdiction to prevent any member of parliament from moving a motion or any power to have the House conduct its affairs as it is entitled to under the Constitution. "However, we are talking about a separation of powers, we are talking about the Supreme Court of NSW, also a constitutional court, so we will give the court the opportunity to correct what we say is a significant constitutional error." The Minister said the affidavit from Ward's lawyers "asserted that the parliament had no jurisdiction to expel him", which Mr Hoenig said was constitutionally incorrect. Mr Hoenig said, in any debate on the expulsion motion, the parliament was free to consider waiting until Ward had exhausted the appeals process. "It's a matter for Parliament to consider, so it's my role to place the matter before the House for its consideration and for the House to consider it," Mr Hoenig said. "But as you would appreciate, the appeals process will take quite some time. "So if you run the appeals process through the Court of Criminal Appeal and then reserves its judgment, and then there's a special leave for the high court, the people of Kiama, for example, could be represented by somebody in custody right up until the next election." Ward, 44, has been in jail since last week after Judge Kara Shead SC granted a detention application to revoke his bail, after a jury found him guilty of sexual intercourse without consent and three counts of indecent assault. The Kiama MP since 2011 had faced a nine-week trial, which heard he sexually assaulted a 24-year-old man in Potts Point in 2015, and touched and massaged an 18-year-old man in Meroo Meadow in 2013. He met both men through political circles. On the morning parliament returned NSW Opposition Leader Mark Speakman recommitted to supporting Ward's expulsion and working with the government "to get this done as quickly as possible" "However, Mr Ward's legal team should do whatever it takes to get a clear message to him - immediately resign," Mr Speakman said. "Every day he clings to his seat from a jail cell, taxpayers are footing the bill and the people of Kiama are left voiceless. It's not just wrong, it's offensive. "This is about decency, accountability, and basic respect for the community. Mr Ward should spare the Parliament, spare the courts, and above all, spare the people of NSW any further disgrace. "Step aside." Last week, Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig sent a letter to Ward via his legal team notifying him of the parliament's plans to consider his expulsion. "I am sure you would appreciate that in view of the verdict of the jury convicting you of serious criminal offences that the House needs to consider whether your continued membership of the House requires it to act to protect the high standing of the Parliament so that it may discharge with the confidence of the community the great responsibility that it bears," the letter stated. The letter, seen by the Mercury, noted that Ward was in custody and would be unable to attend parliament when the expulsion motion is being debated. "Accordingly, I invite you to submit to me yourself or anyone on your behalf any statement or material you would want the House to consider prior to making any determination," the letter stated. It gave a deadline for submissions of 9am on August 5. Under the NSW Constitution Act, an MPs seat is declared vacant if they are convicted of a crime punishable by five years or more imprisonment. Ward is facing a maximum penalty of 14 years' jail. However, changes to the law in 2000 state that a conviction is considered to mean "once you have reached the end of the appeals process ... and not had the conviction overturned". Ward confirmed his intention to appeal in a press release issued last Friday. "I am taking advice about next steps, but I can confirm that I have provided instructions to my legal team to prepare an appeal at the earliest opportunity," he said. Parliament also has the power to expel an MP for "unworthy conduct". If the expulsion is passed a byelection will be called for the seat of Kiama. Despite being charged with the offences in 2022, Ward was re-elected to the seat as an independent in 2023. Lawyers for convicted rapist Gareth Ward have filed an injunction to stop his expulsion from parliament, which means he will remain MP for Kiama in the NSW Illawarra region while he awaits his sentencing behind bars. But Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig said the Supreme Court orders issued by Justice Sweeney were "non-binding upon the House" and the government would give the court the opportunity to rectify what he called "a significant constitutional error". Parliament returned on Tuesday and it was expected a notice of motion to expel the disgraced politician would be put forward. However, NSW Premier Chris Minns confirmed Ward's lawyers sought the injunction against Leader of the Lower House Ron Hoenig, with an urgent hearing to occur in the Supreme Court later this week. He warned there was a critical time factor at play, with parliament sitting from Tuesday for just one week before breaking again for five weeks. Mr Minns told 2GB radio on Tuesday morning that "most people would appreciate, it's an unconscionable situation to have someone who's currently sitting in Silverwater ... who is demanding to remain a member of parliament and continue to be paid". "Clearly he's got no shame," Mr Minns said. Mr Hoenig said he had received the orders from the Supreme Court but believed they did not stop the House from moving forward with the expulsion motion. "The orders made by the court yesterday afternoon, we say, have no effect and are not binding upon the House," Mr Hoenig said. "The House has an inherent power to conduct its own business, in accordance with the Constitution, unconstrained by any interference." He said the Crown Solicitors had been instructed to approach Justice Sweeney to "reconsider the orders that she had made to enable the House to conduct its affairs on behalf of the people unconstrained". He noted the case was listed for hearing on Friday, which is the last sitting day of the parliament until September 9. The Crown Solicitors had been instructed to try and get the case heard today rather than waiting until Friday, which may result in the parliament having to be recalled to deal with the expulsion motion. In a press conference, Mr Hoenig was asked whether the government planned to go ahead with the expulsion motion regardless of the court orders. "It is open to the House to conduct its affairs," he said. "We say that the court has no jurisdiction to prevent any member of parliament from moving a motion or any power to have the House conduct its affairs as it is entitled to under the Constitution. "However, we are talking about a separation of powers, we are talking about the Supreme Court of NSW, also a constitutional court, so we will give the court the opportunity to correct what we say is a significant constitutional error." The Minister said the affidavit from Ward's lawyers "asserted that the parliament had no jurisdiction to expel him", which Mr Hoenig said was constitutionally incorrect. Mr Hoenig said, in any debate on the expulsion motion, the parliament was free to consider waiting until Ward had exhausted the appeals process. "It's a matter for Parliament to consider, so it's my role to place the matter before the House for its consideration and for the House to consider it," Mr Hoenig said. "But as you would appreciate, the appeals process will take quite some time. "So if you run the appeals process through the Court of Criminal Appeal and then reserves its judgment, and then there's a special leave for the high court, the people of Kiama, for example, could be represented by somebody in custody right up until the next election." Ward, 44, has been in jail since last week after Judge Kara Shead SC granted a detention application to revoke his bail, after a jury found him guilty of sexual intercourse without consent and three counts of indecent assault. The Kiama MP since 2011 had faced a nine-week trial, which heard he sexually assaulted a 24-year-old man in Potts Point in 2015, and touched and massaged an 18-year-old man in Meroo Meadow in 2013. He met both men through political circles. On the morning parliament returned NSW Opposition Leader Mark Speakman recommitted to supporting Ward's expulsion and working with the government "to get this done as quickly as possible" "However, Mr Ward's legal team should do whatever it takes to get a clear message to him - immediately resign," Mr Speakman said. "Every day he clings to his seat from a jail cell, taxpayers are footing the bill and the people of Kiama are left voiceless. It's not just wrong, it's offensive. "This is about decency, accountability, and basic respect for the community. Mr Ward should spare the Parliament, spare the courts, and above all, spare the people of NSW any further disgrace. "Step aside." Last week, Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig sent a letter to Ward via his legal team notifying him of the parliament's plans to consider his expulsion. "I am sure you would appreciate that in view of the verdict of the jury convicting you of serious criminal offences that the House needs to consider whether your continued membership of the House requires it to act to protect the high standing of the Parliament so that it may discharge with the confidence of the community the great responsibility that it bears," the letter stated. The letter, seen by the Mercury, noted that Ward was in custody and would be unable to attend parliament when the expulsion motion is being debated. "Accordingly, I invite you to submit to me yourself or anyone on your behalf any statement or material you would want the House to consider prior to making any determination," the letter stated. It gave a deadline for submissions of 9am on August 5. Under the NSW Constitution Act, an MPs seat is declared vacant if they are convicted of a crime punishable by five years or more imprisonment. Ward is facing a maximum penalty of 14 years' jail. However, changes to the law in 2000 state that a conviction is considered to mean "once you have reached the end of the appeals process ... and not had the conviction overturned". Ward confirmed his intention to appeal in a press release issued last Friday. "I am taking advice about next steps, but I can confirm that I have provided instructions to my legal team to prepare an appeal at the earliest opportunity," he said. Parliament also has the power to expel an MP for "unworthy conduct". If the expulsion is passed a byelection will be called for the seat of Kiama. Despite being charged with the offences in 2022, Ward was re-elected to the seat as an independent in 2023. Lawyers for convicted rapist Gareth Ward have filed an injunction to stop his expulsion from parliament, which means he will remain MP for Kiama in the NSW Illawarra region while he awaits his sentencing behind bars. But Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig said the Supreme Court orders issued by Justice Sweeney were "non-binding upon the House" and the government would give the court the opportunity to rectify what he called "a significant constitutional error". Parliament returned on Tuesday and it was expected a notice of motion to expel the disgraced politician would be put forward. However, NSW Premier Chris Minns confirmed Ward's lawyers sought the injunction against Leader of the Lower House Ron Hoenig, with an urgent hearing to occur in the Supreme Court later this week. He warned there was a critical time factor at play, with parliament sitting from Tuesday for just one week before breaking again for five weeks. Mr Minns told 2GB radio on Tuesday morning that "most people would appreciate, it's an unconscionable situation to have someone who's currently sitting in Silverwater ... who is demanding to remain a member of parliament and continue to be paid". "Clearly he's got no shame," Mr Minns said. Mr Hoenig said he had received the orders from the Supreme Court but believed they did not stop the House from moving forward with the expulsion motion. "The orders made by the court yesterday afternoon, we say, have no effect and are not binding upon the House," Mr Hoenig said. "The House has an inherent power to conduct its own business, in accordance with the Constitution, unconstrained by any interference." He said the Crown Solicitors had been instructed to approach Justice Sweeney to "reconsider the orders that she had made to enable the House to conduct its affairs on behalf of the people unconstrained". He noted the case was listed for hearing on Friday, which is the last sitting day of the parliament until September 9. The Crown Solicitors had been instructed to try and get the case heard today rather than waiting until Friday, which may result in the parliament having to be recalled to deal with the expulsion motion. In a press conference, Mr Hoenig was asked whether the government planned to go ahead with the expulsion motion regardless of the court orders. "It is open to the House to conduct its affairs," he said. "We say that the court has no jurisdiction to prevent any member of parliament from moving a motion or any power to have the House conduct its affairs as it is entitled to under the Constitution. "However, we are talking about a separation of powers, we are talking about the Supreme Court of NSW, also a constitutional court, so we will give the court the opportunity to correct what we say is a significant constitutional error." The Minister said the affidavit from Ward's lawyers "asserted that the parliament had no jurisdiction to expel him", which Mr Hoenig said was constitutionally incorrect. Mr Hoenig said, in any debate on the expulsion motion, the parliament was free to consider waiting until Ward had exhausted the appeals process. "It's a matter for Parliament to consider, so it's my role to place the matter before the House for its consideration and for the House to consider it," Mr Hoenig said. "But as you would appreciate, the appeals process will take quite some time. "So if you run the appeals process through the Court of Criminal Appeal and then reserves its judgment, and then there's a special leave for the high court, the people of Kiama, for example, could be represented by somebody in custody right up until the next election." Ward, 44, has been in jail since last week after Judge Kara Shead SC granted a detention application to revoke his bail, after a jury found him guilty of sexual intercourse without consent and three counts of indecent assault. The Kiama MP since 2011 had faced a nine-week trial, which heard he sexually assaulted a 24-year-old man in Potts Point in 2015, and touched and massaged an 18-year-old man in Meroo Meadow in 2013. He met both men through political circles. On the morning parliament returned NSW Opposition Leader Mark Speakman recommitted to supporting Ward's expulsion and working with the government "to get this done as quickly as possible" "However, Mr Ward's legal team should do whatever it takes to get a clear message to him - immediately resign," Mr Speakman said. "Every day he clings to his seat from a jail cell, taxpayers are footing the bill and the people of Kiama are left voiceless. It's not just wrong, it's offensive. "This is about decency, accountability, and basic respect for the community. Mr Ward should spare the Parliament, spare the courts, and above all, spare the people of NSW any further disgrace. "Step aside." Last week, Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig sent a letter to Ward via his legal team notifying him of the parliament's plans to consider his expulsion. "I am sure you would appreciate that in view of the verdict of the jury convicting you of serious criminal offences that the House needs to consider whether your continued membership of the House requires it to act to protect the high standing of the Parliament so that it may discharge with the confidence of the community the great responsibility that it bears," the letter stated. The letter, seen by the Mercury, noted that Ward was in custody and would be unable to attend parliament when the expulsion motion is being debated. "Accordingly, I invite you to submit to me yourself or anyone on your behalf any statement or material you would want the House to consider prior to making any determination," the letter stated. It gave a deadline for submissions of 9am on August 5. Under the NSW Constitution Act, an MPs seat is declared vacant if they are convicted of a crime punishable by five years or more imprisonment. Ward is facing a maximum penalty of 14 years' jail. However, changes to the law in 2000 state that a conviction is considered to mean "once you have reached the end of the appeals process ... and not had the conviction overturned". Ward confirmed his intention to appeal in a press release issued last Friday. "I am taking advice about next steps, but I can confirm that I have provided instructions to my legal team to prepare an appeal at the earliest opportunity," he said. Parliament also has the power to expel an MP for "unworthy conduct". If the expulsion is passed a byelection will be called for the seat of Kiama. Despite being charged with the offences in 2022, Ward was re-elected to the seat as an independent in 2023. Lawyers for convicted rapist Gareth Ward have filed an injunction to stop his expulsion from parliament, which means he will remain MP for Kiama in the NSW Illawarra region while he awaits his sentencing behind bars. But Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig said the Supreme Court orders issued by Justice Sweeney were "non-binding upon the House" and the government would give the court the opportunity to rectify what he called "a significant constitutional error". Parliament returned on Tuesday and it was expected a notice of motion to expel the disgraced politician would be put forward. However, NSW Premier Chris Minns confirmed Ward's lawyers sought the injunction against Leader of the Lower House Ron Hoenig, with an urgent hearing to occur in the Supreme Court later this week. He warned there was a critical time factor at play, with parliament sitting from Tuesday for just one week before breaking again for five weeks. Mr Minns told 2GB radio on Tuesday morning that "most people would appreciate, it's an unconscionable situation to have someone who's currently sitting in Silverwater ... who is demanding to remain a member of parliament and continue to be paid". "Clearly he's got no shame," Mr Minns said. Mr Hoenig said he had received the orders from the Supreme Court but believed they did not stop the House from moving forward with the expulsion motion. "The orders made by the court yesterday afternoon, we say, have no effect and are not binding upon the House," Mr Hoenig said. "The House has an inherent power to conduct its own business, in accordance with the Constitution, unconstrained by any interference." He said the Crown Solicitors had been instructed to approach Justice Sweeney to "reconsider the orders that she had made to enable the House to conduct its affairs on behalf of the people unconstrained". He noted the case was listed for hearing on Friday, which is the last sitting day of the parliament until September 9. The Crown Solicitors had been instructed to try and get the case heard today rather than waiting until Friday, which may result in the parliament having to be recalled to deal with the expulsion motion. In a press conference, Mr Hoenig was asked whether the government planned to go ahead with the expulsion motion regardless of the court orders. "It is open to the House to conduct its affairs," he said. "We say that the court has no jurisdiction to prevent any member of parliament from moving a motion or any power to have the House conduct its affairs as it is entitled to under the Constitution. "However, we are talking about a separation of powers, we are talking about the Supreme Court of NSW, also a constitutional court, so we will give the court the opportunity to correct what we say is a significant constitutional error." The Minister said the affidavit from Ward's lawyers "asserted that the parliament had no jurisdiction to expel him", which Mr Hoenig said was constitutionally incorrect. Mr Hoenig said, in any debate on the expulsion motion, the parliament was free to consider waiting until Ward had exhausted the appeals process. "It's a matter for Parliament to consider, so it's my role to place the matter before the House for its consideration and for the House to consider it," Mr Hoenig said. "But as you would appreciate, the appeals process will take quite some time. "So if you run the appeals process through the Court of Criminal Appeal and then reserves its judgment, and then there's a special leave for the high court, the people of Kiama, for example, could be represented by somebody in custody right up until the next election." Ward, 44, has been in jail since last week after Judge Kara Shead SC granted a detention application to revoke his bail, after a jury found him guilty of sexual intercourse without consent and three counts of indecent assault. The Kiama MP since 2011 had faced a nine-week trial, which heard he sexually assaulted a 24-year-old man in Potts Point in 2015, and touched and massaged an 18-year-old man in Meroo Meadow in 2013. He met both men through political circles. On the morning parliament returned NSW Opposition Leader Mark Speakman recommitted to supporting Ward's expulsion and working with the government "to get this done as quickly as possible" "However, Mr Ward's legal team should do whatever it takes to get a clear message to him - immediately resign," Mr Speakman said. "Every day he clings to his seat from a jail cell, taxpayers are footing the bill and the people of Kiama are left voiceless. It's not just wrong, it's offensive. "This is about decency, accountability, and basic respect for the community. Mr Ward should spare the Parliament, spare the courts, and above all, spare the people of NSW any further disgrace. "Step aside." Last week, Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig sent a letter to Ward via his legal team notifying him of the parliament's plans to consider his expulsion. "I am sure you would appreciate that in view of the verdict of the jury convicting you of serious criminal offences that the House needs to consider whether your continued membership of the House requires it to act to protect the high standing of the Parliament so that it may discharge with the confidence of the community the great responsibility that it bears," the letter stated. The letter, seen by the Mercury, noted that Ward was in custody and would be unable to attend parliament when the expulsion motion is being debated. "Accordingly, I invite you to submit to me yourself or anyone on your behalf any statement or material you would want the House to consider prior to making any determination," the letter stated. It gave a deadline for submissions of 9am on August 5. Under the NSW Constitution Act, an MPs seat is declared vacant if they are convicted of a crime punishable by five years or more imprisonment. Ward is facing a maximum penalty of 14 years' jail. However, changes to the law in 2000 state that a conviction is considered to mean "once you have reached the end of the appeals process ... and not had the conviction overturned". Ward confirmed his intention to appeal in a press release issued last Friday. "I am taking advice about next steps, but I can confirm that I have provided instructions to my legal team to prepare an appeal at the earliest opportunity," he said. Parliament also has the power to expel an MP for "unworthy conduct". If the expulsion is passed a byelection will be called for the seat of Kiama. Despite being charged with the offences in 2022, Ward was re-elected to the seat as an independent in 2023.
