logo
Thousands of rent-stabilized NYC apartments face foreclosure

Thousands of rent-stabilized NYC apartments face foreclosure

New York Post24-05-2025

Thousands of rent-stabilized apartments in NYC are under threat of foreclosure as an increasing number of landlords stop paying their mortgages — making the coveted units even more scarce, insiders told The Post.
Buildings with a cumulative 176 rent-stabilized units have been foreclosed upon since 2022 – a figure that's been doubling every year on average — with another 2,093 stabilized units have been put on notice by banks in April that landlords are defaulting on their mortgages, according to an analysis by PropertyShark data.
'It's a bloodbath,' said Sarah Saltzberg, co-owner of Bohemia Realty Group, who rents pre-war units in upper Manhattan.
Advertisement
6 Sarah Salzberg says many rent-controlled property owners are losing money – not making it.
Bohemia Realty Group
Owners lose money on stabilized units, so they leave them empty and skip the listing – or walk away entirely, leading to foreclosures, Saltzberg said.
'The owners are under water – that's why in the past year it keeps happening over and over,' she said.
Advertisement
Many of the pre-1974 buildings — the year NYC established the rent stabilization system — desperately need repairs, but owners have stopped investing due to 2019 laws capping rent hikes after improvements at 2% and banning landlords from raising rents by up to 20% upon vacancy – changes that cut property values. Rising interest rates over the past three years also slowed renovations to a crawl.
Tenant advocacy groups and Democratic state legislators lobbied hard for these changes, considered the biggest overhaul of New York's rent laws in a generation – arguing they were necessary to protect tenants against rent hikes and evictions.
And they succeeded.
6 Coco Portofe's landlord has bailed on mortgage payments since January 2024, but she still has to pay rent every month.
Helayne Seidman
Advertisement
But NYC tenants could end up paying the price.
'A lot of us might end up displaced — a new owner can come in and kick us all out,' said Coco Portofe, 34, whose East Village rent-stabilized building is the subject of ongoing court proceedings.
If a landlord defaults, a new owner has to keep rent-stabilized units stabilized and keep rent the same.
But the issue is when no one wants to buy the foreclosed property because the rent-stabilized units make it so financially unattractive, insiders told The Post. In that case, the building's residents could face eviction.
Advertisement
'There are situations where given the rent-stabilized nature of the tenancy, any purchase price over $1 would be ludicrous,' said foreclosure attorney Alexander Paykin.
6 A foreclosure notice has been put on the door at 510 and 514 East 12th Street, which both have the same owner.
Helayne Seidman
Experts point to a recent case in March, when mortgage lender Santander Bank refused to even take the keys of a foreclosed rent-stabilized building in Harlem, as indicative of what could come. Some fear a repeat of the 1970s, when New York landlords simply walked away from decaying buildings that were no longer profitable to rent out.
Portofe's landlord – private equity firm Madison Capital Realty – is accused by its lender, the Community Preservation Corp., of not making mortgage payments on her building since January 2024, court records show.
'I have to pay rent on time, and they are not upholding their part of the bargain,' said Portofe, who pays $2,200 a month for a rent-stabilized one bedroom on East 12th Street. Market rate for one bedroom in her nabe rent for an average of $3,800, according to StreetEasy.
6 Adam Tantleff, Brian Shatz and Josh Zegen are the managing principals of Madison Realty — Portofe's landlord.
Madison Realty Capital
A total of 209 rent-stabilized apartments across 15 East Village buildings are part of the lawsuit. residential portfolio acquired by Madison acquired those units in 2021 as part of a residential portfolio for $153 million – a small part of the real estate investment firm's $22 billion assets under management.
Madison Capital is accused of 'intentional misconduct' and 'gross negligence for 'wrongfully' collecting rent and failing to turn over that money to its lender – to whom it's said to owe more than $76 million in mortgage payments, interest and late fees.
Advertisement
Madison Realty Capital didn't respond to The Post's request for comment.
6 Madison Realty bailed on mortgage payments on a set of 15 rent-stabilized buildings in the East Village, according to court documents.
Helayne Seidman
According to data from the Rent Guidelines Board – 10% of the 643,140 pre-1974 rent-stabilized apartments in New York City – an estimated 64,314 units – are losing money, a figured that's doubled since 2019 and is only expected to grow. Before the rental laws were overhauled, rent-stabilized buildings were a lot more profitable.
Advertisement
6 Willis is with NYU'S Furman Center, who works to advance knowledge and debate on housing in the city.
NYU Furman Center
'The extent of this rent shortfall will grow over time, risking the long-term sustainability of these key segments of the city's affordable housing stock,' said Mark A. Willis, a senior policy fellow at NYU's Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy.
And about to make matters even worse is a tax-lien sale the city Department of Finance is planning to hold on June 3 – the first since the pandemic – to sell the debt of landlords who've been delaying property tax, water or sewer payments to try to stay afloat. Whoever buys up that debt could foreclose on the properties to collect what's owed.
Additional reporting by Helayne Seidman

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Retired architect, 80, forced to bag groceries as med bills, promise to dying wife leave him broke
Retired architect, 80, forced to bag groceries as med bills, promise to dying wife leave him broke

New York Post

time39 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Retired architect, 80, forced to bag groceries as med bills, promise to dying wife leave him broke

A former big shot architect was forced to bag groceries after mounting medical bills and a promise he made to his dying wife left him broke. Utah resident Gary Saling, 80, has spent years working four days a week at Smith's Market in St. George – though a well-deserved retirement might be on the horizon thanks to the generosity of others. The senior citizen started the job in December 2020 about six months after the death of his wife, Carol, from two forms of dementia – including the rare, aggressive Progressive Supranuclear Palsy. Advertisement 3 Saling has been working as a bagger for years. FOX His spouse, who was an artist, suffered for about three and a half years, but he was always by her side. 'I promised myself, God, her, her brother, her son and daughter, (her stepsons), I promised them I would not put her in a nursing home,' Saling told The Post on Sunday. 'I'd keep her at home and I kept it.' Advertisement The devotion led to skyrocketing at-home care costs, which totaled $80,000 including other medical bills that two faced over the years. 'I paid it all, that's why I'm broke,' he said, noting about $40,000 was from the at-home care. The California native, who was a grocery bagger as a teenager growing up, was a talented architect for decades, working on multi-millionaire mansions for big-name clients including Jeffries Investment Group founder Boyd Jefferies in Laguna Beach. The company Saling worked for was even published on the Architectural Digest top 100 list four times. Advertisement 3 He started the job because he lost his savings to his wife's medical bills. FOX Gary and Carol, single parents who both had first marriages that ended, first met in 1990 while she was driving and he was walking along a sidewalk after leaving a park. The two caught a glimpse of each other and began talking on a park bench for more than three hours. By the next year, they were engaged and soon after they tied the knot. They later moved from the Golden State to Montana when the pair's children from the previous marriages grew up. 'We fell in love the day that we met at the park,' he said. 'We admitted that to each other later when we were dating.' Advertisement He chose the job at Smith's because he wanted a job that required little thinking after years of using his mind to build homes. The position has also given him the chance to meet people in the area and make new friends, including Duana Johnson, who wanted to know why he was still working hard at 80. When he told her his story and that he'd likely need to work until he dies, she quickly started a fundraiser that picked up steam last week when Fox 13 did a report on Saling. Nearly $40,000 had been raised as of Sunday afternoon – enough money that Saling believes he'll be able to retire by the end of June. Donors can relate to the loving husband's commitment to his wife, Johnson said. 3 The two loved each other and were married for almost 30 years. FOX 'It's awesome to see that because it shows there's a lot of compassion and love in our country that a lot of people are speaking against,' Johnson said. 'A lot of people are saying it's not that way, but I'm seeing the opposite.' 'Gary told me that Carol was very faithful, she loved the Lord,' Johnson added. 'I just feel like her prayers for him as she was leaving this earth are being answered. She loved him so much.' Advertisement The progress of the fundraiser has been documented on a local Facebook page. Saling said he was 'overloaded with gratitude' and 'speechless' at the generosity. 'People have said 'oh what a hero, or an angel or some people have even said saint.' Well my response to them … I'm certainly not a hero, certainly not an angel and far from a saint,' Saling said. 'I took care of her at home from the day she was diagnosed till I held her in my arms when she took her last breath and it was because I took vows, it's as simple as that. I took vows in sickness and in health.'

The Spectrum: Lt. Gov. Tressel; Ohio budget; defense contractor setting up in central Ohio
The Spectrum: Lt. Gov. Tressel; Ohio budget; defense contractor setting up in central Ohio

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The Spectrum: Lt. Gov. Tressel; Ohio budget; defense contractor setting up in central Ohio

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) – This week on The Spectrum: Former Ohio State football coach Jim Tressel is settling in as Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine's right-hand man, but will he try to run to replace him? Colleen Marshall sits with the lieutenant governor for an exclusive interview as he weighs a potential run for the governor's mansion. Both property tax relief and a flat state income tax could become a reality if the latest draft of the state budget passes. 'I think it's a very exciting and very bold budget,' State Sen. Jerry Cirino (R-Kirtland) said. Hear how the budget could affect funding for the state's school districts. Anduril, a cutting-edge defense contractor, is setting up shop in America's heartland. 'Central Ohio is going to be vital to the future of what we do,' Anduril Senior Vice President of Strategy Zachary Mears said. Hear how the business is already making an impact on the war in Ukraine as it prepares to employ thousands of central Ohioans. Democratic strategist Spencer Dirrig and Republican strategist Terry Casey join the roundtable to discuss Tressel's political future in red-state Ohio and the disagreements between the Ohio House and Senate over the budget. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

GOP braces for first ‘test run' on codifying DOGE cuts
GOP braces for first ‘test run' on codifying DOGE cuts

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

GOP braces for first ‘test run' on codifying DOGE cuts

Congressional Republicans are gearing up for a major test of how easily they can lock in cuts sought by President Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said he aims to have the House act swiftly on approving Trump's request for more than $9 billion in cuts to foreign aid and public broadcasting funding. That package is expected to hit the floor this week. 'We haven't done anything like this in a while, so this is probably, in some ways, a test run,' House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole (R-Okla.) told reporters. Trump last week sent Congress a request for $8.3 billion in cuts to the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and foreign aid, and more than $1 billion in cuts to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which provides some funding to NPR and PBS. The request kick-starts a process that would allow Republicans to claw back funds for a list of programs on the administration's chopping block with just a simple majority in both chambers. That means Republicans wouldn't require Democratic votes in the Senate if they can stay mostly unified in greenlighting what's known as a rescissions package. But it's been decades since Congress has approved such a request to yank back funds previously greenlighted by lawmakers. Trump tried to use the same process to rescind funds in his first term but was unsuccessful, despite Republicans controlling the House, Senate and White House at the time. Republicans are bullish that this time will be different, however. '[Trump's] done this before, and they've got a great team, I think, in place,' Cole said. 'They've thought about these things a lot in the time in between his first and his second term.' 'They just seem to me to be much more sure-footed, and there's no question, the president has much more influence inside the Republican Party than he had during his first term,' Cole added. Still, some Republicans have expressed concerns about parts of the request. Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine) voiced opposition last week to cutting the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), saying Wednesday that the idea makes 'no sense' to her 'whatsoever.' 'Given the extraordinary record of PEPFAR in saving lives, it has literally saved millions of lives, and so I do not see a basis for cutting it,' she said. And not all Republicans are thrilled by the proposed cuts to public broadcasting in the plan, which calls for rescinding $535 million in both fiscal 2026 and 2027. 'You go to rural America, public television is how you get emergency broadcasting and all that kind of stuff,' Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho), a spending cardinal, said Thursday. 'I look at Idaho Public Television, they're a great organization, and we don't see the politics that some states do in them, or at least they believe they see that and stuff.' However, Simpson said he still intends to support the overall package. 'I don't think in the long run, the rescissions are going to hurt them, because we're talking about the advanced appropriations and stuff like that.' 'What they're concerned about is, and should be, is the next year's appropriation process and stuff,' he continued. On its website, DOGE estimates that it's racked up $180 billion in savings as of June 3 through a combination of efforts like asset sales, contract cancellations and renegotiations, 'fraud and improper payment deletion, grant cancellations' and workforce reductions. And White House budget chief Russell Vought signaled further special requests to lock in more DOGE cuts could be on the way when pressed on the matter during a budget hearing last week, particularly as the administration's ongoing efforts to shrink the government have been tangled up in courts. But he also said it's 'very important' for this first package of cuts to pass, adding, 'If it does, it'll be worth the effort and we'll send up additional packages.' 'We are very anxious to see the reception from a vote standpoint in the House and the Senate,' Vought said, though he added, 'I'm less concerned about the House as I am in the Senate.' Some Republicans see the package introduced this week as potentially the easiest one to deal with, as many in the party have been critical of foreign aid and funds going to outlets like PBS and NPR, which they've accused of political bias. In a statement promoting the package on the social platform X, House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) on Friday touted the president's request as cutting '$9.4 BILLION in wasteful spending' while holding 'bureaucrats accountable to the American people.' The package would target dollars for items like migration and refugee assistance that the administration says support activities that 'could be more fairly shared with non-U.S. Government donors,' USAID efforts they say have been used to 'fund radical gender and climate projects,' and development assistance they argued 'conflict with American values' and 'interfere with the sovereignty of other countries,' among other rescissions. Funding would also be eliminated for the United Nations Children's Fund, U.N. Development Program and the U.N. Population Fund under the proposal, as well as the World Health Organization and 'portions of the U.N. Regular Budget for the U.N. Human Rights Council and the U.N. Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East.' Democrats, meanwhile, have come out in strong opposition to the plan, accusing Trump of seeking political retribution and undermining foreign assistance efforts. They've also signaled trouble down the line when it comes time for both sides to negotiate a funding deal for fiscal 2026 — when Democratic support will likely be necessary to keep the government open in early fall. 'It's going to make it very difficult for us to do bipartisan bills if we believe that he's just going to send rescissions over for whatever they want or don't want in a bipartisan agreement,' Sen. Patty Murray (Wash.), top Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee, told The Hill this week. 'They need Democratic votes.' There's been some GOP frustration over the administration's handling of the annual funding work as well, as lawmakers on both sides have pressed the White House for more information about its budget plans in recent weeks. 'If we're getting to the point where we are right now, where we have a [funding stopgap], where we don't really have spend plans that are meaningful, now we have the administration transferring to the Congress their desires with rescission,' Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), a senior appropriator, said. 'I don't want to be a committee that no longer has a purpose. The role that we play is significant.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store