Somerset village remembers its evacuee teacher 80 years on
Village remember evacuee teacher 80 years on
Just now
Share
Save
Kelly Withers & Matt Faulkner
BBC News, Somerset
Charlie Taylor
BBC Radio Somerset
Share
Save
Family Handout
Alice Moody arrived in Hardington Mandeville after completing her teacher training
In 1943 a young teacher left her home in London to board a train to Somerset. As commemoration events take place to mark the 80th Anniversary of VE Day, the village she was sent to is remembering the children evacuated there for their own safety and the woman sent to help them.
Alice Moody (née Russell), then aged 22, was sent to teach children who had been evacuated to Hardington Mandeville around three years earlier.
From September 1939, Operation Pied Piper saw millions of people, many of them children, evacuated to the countryside from towns and cities at risk of being bombed.
When Mrs Moody arrived in Somerset, she taught both evacuee and local village children together.
"At the start I was a bit of an interloper but we seemed to get on well as time went on," she said.
"I showed the evacuees I was interested in whether they were happy or not. Had they heard from home, was it their mum's birthday?," she added.
The children evacuated to Hardington Mandeville were part of the biggest mass movement of people in Britain's history.
Evacuations, which were voluntary, took place in waves with another 1.25m leaving cities during the Blitz of 1940 and 1941.
Jean Laughlin
Jean Laughlin (l) and John White (middle, back) with local and evacuee children in 1941
Jean Laughlin was around 10 years old when evacuated children started to arrive in the village.
"They spoke rather differently, I don't think they could understand us either because we were Somerset children. We were eyeing one another with a degree of caution.
"They had new experiences they could share with us and their way of life was entirely different to anything we had experienced," she added.
Ms Laughlin also remembers the arrival of Mrs Moody.
She added: "She was very efficient, very neat and tidy. I envied her. She always seemed to know exactly where she was going and what she was doing."
Jean Laughlin remembers spending time with child evacuees in Hardington Mandeville
John White's father ran the Royal Oak pub and the farm attached to it in nearby Hardington Moor.
Mr White recalls his father helping bring evacuees to the village.
"Father was one of the few who had a car in the village at the time. He was shuttling the children from Pen Mill station to Hardington," she said.
"I think it must have been a good 20-odd who came to Hardington.
"I can remember Alice. Les Moody lived here in the pub as well and worked for dad on the farm, and he eventually married her [Alice]."
John White at the Royal Oak pub in Hardington Moor where Mrs Moody lived during the war
Mrs Moody lived in the village until 1945. She accompanied the children home to London a few weeks after VE Day.
She documented her experiences in a memoir, writing a book about her time during the war.
"I was not allowed to travel with the children on the train and had to travel in a separate carriage," she said.
"Once in London I stayed on the platform to wait, and then along came my little flock.
"All I was able to say to them was do be happy, lovely to know you."
Alice Moody, 103, now lives in a care home in Trowbridge in Wiltshire
She married Leslie Moody on 7 July 1945. After their wedding, the couple settled in Wiltshire and had a daughter called Pam.
Mrs Moody continued her teaching career before retiring in the 1980s.
She is now 103 and lives in a care home in Trowbridge.
Jean Laughlin, who is 95, said she had lost contact with Mrs Moody and had not realised she was still alive until 2024.
"The news came from the parish magazine last year. Someone asked if anyone remembered and I emailed back. I was so pleased."
She said Mrs Moody's book has triggered many memories from the time.
"The last time I had contact with her I was about 15 years old - so 80 years ago. I am hoping to see her again at some point very soon," said Ms Laughlin.
Follow BBC Somerset on Facebook and X. Send your story ideas to us on email or via WhatsApp on 0800 313 4630.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Number of Brits granted gender recognition certificates triples in just five years amid rise in Gen Z and millennial applications
Almost 10,000 gender recognition certificates (GRCs) have been granted in the UK since their introduction two decades ago, with an increasing proportion going to young adults, analysis shows. Some 1,169 GRCs were issued in the year to March 2025, more than three times the number in 2019/20, when it stood at just 364. It is also the highest annual total since 2005/06, which was the first full year that the scheme - which allows a person's acquired gender to be recognised legally in the country - was in operation. The surge is likely to reflect recent changes in the certification process, including a big cut in fees, combined with more applications from young people. Nearly a quarter (24%) of certificates granted in the latest year were for people born since 2000 - loosely known as Generation Z - and 68% were for those born since 1990, up from 4% and 41% respectively in 2019/20. The latest year also saw the highest annual total of GRCs since the first full year the scheme began - in 2005/06. A total of almost 10,000 GRCs have been handed out across the country since then. The surge in recent years is likely to reflect changes in the certification process, including a big cut in fees, combined with more young people applying. The age of those receiving GRCs has considerably changed in the past decade. People born before 1980 accounted for some 63 per cent of certificates ten years ago, in 2014/15. But this number has dropped sharply since then, to just 17 per cent in 2024/25. It is now people born after 1980 who account for the bulk (83 per cent) of certificates issued, as per the figures from the latest year. This is a massive change compared to how many people of this age were receiving certificates ten years ago (37 per cent). But the single age group currently responsible for the biggest proportion of certificates is those born in the 1990s. They accounted for 45 per cent of the total certificates issued in the year to March 2025. The findings come after the Supreme Court's ruling in April on the definition of sex within the 2010 Equality Act. Judges ruled the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the Act 'refer to a biological woman and biological sex'. This means transgender women with a GRC can be excluded from single-sex spaces if deemed 'proportionate'. The ruling was celebrated by women's rights activists including author JK Rowling. But its opponents have said they fear it could put trans and non-binary people at renewed risk of attacks and discrimination. After the ruling, the boss of Britain's equalities regulator suggested while it does not mean GRCs are 'worthless', their 'efficacy' could be re-examined. Baroness Kishwer Falkner, chairwoman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'I think the next stage of litigation may well be tests as to the efficacy of the GRC and/or other areas.' Asked if she thinks GRCs are now 'worthless', she replied: 'We don't believe they are. We think they're quite important.' Government advice on how to apply for a GRC states the Supreme Court ruling does not affect the application process. But it advises people to contact the EHRC if they have questions about the ruling. The Gender Recognition Act came into effect on April 4, 2005, giving adults the right legally to change the sex recorded on their birth certificate. This is done by applying for a GRC, a document legally recognising their acquired gender, if they have met the application criteria. This allows their sex to be changed 'for all purposes' to correspond with their acquired gender, with the sex on their birth certificate changed to reflect this. It would allows someone registered as male at birth to become a woman and vice versa, under the Act. Applications are made to the Gender Recognition Panel, a body of legal and medical experts, who issue a certificate only if the application meets the necessary criteria. A GRC is granted if the applicant has been diagnosed with gender dysphoria; has lived in the acquired gender for at least two years; and intends to live in that gender for the rest of their life. GRC applications hit a record 1,517 in the latest year - up from 1,397 in 2023/24 and more than three times the number recorded in 2019/20 (443). The application fee for a certificate was cut in May 2021 from £140 to £5 - and there was a switch to online applications in July 2022. The numbers of men and women applying for GRCs has changed since the scheme was introduced two decades ago. In its first full year (2005/06), more than three-quarters (77 per cent) of certificates were given to those whose sex at birth was male. Meanwhile, those whose sex at birth was female received just under a quarter (23 per cent) of all certificates handed out. The balance changed across the next ten years, with these figures respectively changing to 67 per cent and 33 per cent in 2015/16. By 2023/24, the split had actually become almost completely even. While 52 per cent of certificates were issued to those whose sex at birth was male, 48 per cent were given to those whose sex at birth was female. The split has become slightly more uneven in the most recent year, of 2024/25 - to 55 per cent for males at birth and 45 per cent to females at birth. Nearly one in ten receiving certificates in the year to March 2025 were part of a married couple. This proportion has been relatively stable since the law was changed in 2014 to allow some applicants to remain married while obtaining gender recognition. Of the 1,169 certificates granted in 2024/25, 109 (9 per cent) were for married applicants. But the vast majority - 1,033 (88 per cent) - were issued to people who were single, while 27 were recorded as 'other/unknown'. April's Supreme Court judgement marked the culmination of a long-running legal battle between the Scottish government and a women's group. It was over the definition of a 'woman' in Scottish legislation mandating 50 percent female representation on public boards. The case centred on whether somebody with a GRC recognising their gender as female should be treated as a woman under the 2010 Equality Act. The outcome will have implications in England, Scotland and Wales. Lord Hodge recognised 'the strength of feeling on both sides' and cautioned against seeing the judgement as 'a triumph for one side over another'. He stressed the law still gives trans people protection against discrimination. The judge said: 'The Equality Act gives transgender people protection not only against discrimination through the protected characteristics of gender reassignment, but also against direct discrimination, indirect discrimination, and harassment, in substance in their acquired gender.' He added: 'On the one hand women, who make up one half of the population, have campaigned for over 150 years to have equality with men and to combat discrimination based on their sex. That work still continues. 'On the other hand, a vulnerable and often harassed minority, the trans community, struggle against discrimination and prejudice as they seek to live their lives with dignity.' Human rights organisation Amnesty International has since also emphasised: 'The court has been clear that trans people are protected under the Equality Act against discrimination and harassment. 'The ruling does not change the protection trans people are afforded under the protected characteristic of 'gender reassignment', as well as other provisions under the Equality Act... 'The Supreme Court itself made clear that the vilification of a marginalised minority group is absolutely wrong.' 'All public authorities in the UK need to unequivocally enforce protections for trans people against discrimination and harassment.'
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘We needed somewhere to mourn': Indian community in London keep vigil for victims
As the late afternoon sun streamed into a small square behind the Indian High Commission on Sunday, a crowd of 200 people gathered for a vigil – one of several held around the UK this weekend to remember those who died in the Air India disaster. Candles were placed beneath a bust of Jawaharlal Nehru and attenders listened to inter-faith leaders and members from the Gujarati community who had come to reflect on a shocking week of loss. Ridhi Sarmah-Kapoor and Olivia Gearson, two students whose fathers had travelled from Gujarat to London recently, laid flowers outside India House in Holborn. 'My dad frequently goes back and forth to India and he uses Air India,' said Sarmah-Kapoor. 'It gives it a personal connection – it's like these people are my family.' Gearson added: 'It needs to be honoured. There were parents coming back for their children's graduation – we're both students, it really hit hard.' Gujarati communities in the capital and other cities including Leicester have been gathering since the crash to commemorate the more than 270 people who died in one of the worst air accidents in Indian history. There have been remarkable stories, such as the Bristol student who missed the flight because she was held up in traffic and the miraculous tale of the sole survivor, Vishwash Kumar Ramesh. But the details of the lives lost – ambitions and hopes extinguished in an instant – all add to the sense of shock among British-Indians. 'We needed somewhere to mourn,' says Mayur Shikotra, who organised the vigil alongside Pranav Bhanot. Bhanot said: 'We're only a small community, many people are only one or two degrees away from the tragedy,. There aren't that many flights that come out of Gujarat directly, so it really could have been anyone. That makes it hit home.' Much has been made of the close-knit nature of the Gujarati community in the UK, a fact that has made the trauma personal for many. Narendra Thakerar was among a group of old school friends with Gujarati backgrounds who decided to come and remember those who lost their lives. 'I've flown three times in the last six months with Air India,' he said. 'It's a tragedy that no one prepares for, it's humbling and just a reminder about how fragile we are.' Bhanot said: 'It's really important that we find out what happened, we need the bodies repatriated and hopefully some compensation for loved ones – it's never going to bring anyone back but it'd be a recognition of what happened and the loss of life.' As well as grief, there was a desire for Boeing, the manufacturer of the aircraft, to be held accountable if it was at fault. 'My first thought is the Boeing 787,' says Thakerar, who is glad the fleet is being inspected by the Indian government after the disaster. Another member of the group, Mahesh Patel, said: 'The problem is when you're dealing with old planes that have been sold and resold and used and used.' There are more than 1,100 787s in service, with most major international airlines using them and its safety record in service has been good. Tata Group bought Air India from the Indian government in 2022 and announced plans last year to revamp and upgrade its fleet. 'None of us want this to happen again so there needs to be a thorough investigation,' Thakerar said.
The Sun
5 hours ago
- The Sun
I can't stop thinking about fling with colleague – but will it ever be more than just sex?
DEAR DEIDRE: I AM having steamy sex with a colleague. I think about him from the moment I wake up to the minute I go to sleep, but will it ever develop into something more? We sit opposite one another at work. I'm a woman of 24, he is a couple of years older than me, and very handsome. We're both very professional when we're in the office, but as soon as I saw he'd slid into my DMs, I knew what was coming. We arranged a drink at a nearby bar and he walked me home. It was obvious how we both wanted the evening to end and I took him straight up to my room. Now we meet every week for hot times in bed. It was just sex with no feelings until a couple of weeks ago when I was at a mate's barbecue. A male friend of my colleague was there and he kissed me. News of the kiss got back to my lover and from that moment our situation feels like it has stopped being just casual sex. We talk more, he is much more attentive and wants to know how I am. I know he has a reputation for being a bit of a player and loves his happy-go-lucky lifestyle. Does he want me to think he likes me so he can get what he wants? Or does he want there to be more to us now? I don't want to tackle him as I am worried my intuition might be wrong. He might think I am mad, or too needy for even imagining that he has feelings for me. DEIDRE SAYS: That kiss at the party may have made your colleague realise he cares for you more than he thought. It's impossible to know if your relationship is developing unless you have 'the conversation'. Try not to build it up into a big moment – you can discuss how you both see your arrangement in a relaxed way. A simple 'how do you see us?' would add clarity. You are not being needy by seeking some clarification. If he communicates he doesn't want commitment at all, that is the time to consider what you want. If you're happy keeping it casual that's absolutely fine but if you are falling for him it would be wise to explain that your current arrangement doesn't work for you. Take the sex off the table to limit any more hurt. You'll find out soon enough whether he is willing to lose you to somebody else. DAD-TO-BE WON'T QUIT WEED HABIT DEAR DEIDRE: MY boyfriend has been smoking weed behind my back even though he said he would give up drugs when I became pregnant. I am 25 and he is 26. We have been together for three years. I knew he smoked dope when we first got together and it has always been an issue between us, but he reassured me that if I ever got pregnant he would give it up immediately. We are both excited about the pregnancy. I took him at his word and now feel let down. I can smell it on him, and I know the signs. I know he is lying even though he insists he has stopped. I even asked my parents to talk to him but nothing they say has made any difference. This baby means everything to me and so does he. It feels like we mean so little to him. Why hasn't he changed? Should I tell his parents? DEIDRE SAYS: I'd resist the temptation to tell his parents. Perhaps he is finding stopping harder than he expected. If he really wants to stop using weed, he needs help. It sounds like he has become dependent. He can get support from (0300 123 6600) and my support pack on Drug Worries should also help. Encourage him to go with you to midwife appointments so he understands how health issues affect your unborn baby. LIBIDO IS TOO HIGH FOR WIFE DEAR DEIDRE: WOULD a course of hypnotherapy help me to lower my sex drive? I am 44 and my wife is 41. We have been married for 12 years and have three children. We have a great relationship, but I have a high sex drive whereas my wife never seems to be in the mood. I always get up with the kids, and do plenty around the house to help out. I tell her how great she looks and how much I love her but none of this seems to help. The less sex I get the more I think about it. I am constantly frustrated and usually end up pleasuring myself to relieve the tension but that isn't what I want. I'd love to feel closer to my wife, and not have to rely on sorting myself out. I miss the intimacy sex provides. I was wondering whether hypnotherapy could help. Perhaps if I can lower my sex drive it would be better all round? DEIDRE SAYS: Hypno-therapy is not the answer – better communication around the benefits of a good sex life is. Pick a quiet moment when you are both relaxed and tell your wife how much you miss being intimate with her. You should be able to talk to her about anything. Explain you are worried about her lack of sex drive and you want to support her. A healthy sex life has huge mental health benefits so it's understandable that this has been frustrating you. My support pack Different Sex Drives? explains more. I KEEP HAVING FAMILY FANTASY DEAR DEIDRE: EVEN though I have a lovely girlfriend, my ex is always on my mind and it is killing me. I am 34 and my girlfriend is 31. I was with my partner for seven years and we have two daughters. We split up almost three years ago. She moved to be nearer her parents, but I have kept up contact with our children and see them as much as I can. Picking up my kids is always tough as it reminds me of happier times. Seeing her regularly unsettles me and although my ex knows I've met someone new, she never seems very happy about it. We have never attempted to get back together but more recently I have been thinking about her more. Sometimes I dream about her and wonder if I'm still in love with her. I even fantasize about what I would do to get back with her. When I am drunk, I really want to get in touch and tell her how I feel but so far I have been able to resist. I miss the daily contact with my daughters. Do I really want to get back with her and love her or is it just because I want to be with my daughters more and want to be a family again? I'm so confused about what I really want. DEIDRE SAYS: Of course it's understandable that seeing your ex when picking up the kids makes you miss her. It can be a reminder of what you have lost – but it doesn't necessarily mean that it would be right to go back to her. You don't know how she feels. Perhaps it's time to discuss whether she would ever try again but don't get your hopes up. If you are to rekindle your relationship, for your girls' sake, you must work out what went wrong to cause you to split up. Consider couple's counselling, you can arrange that via (020 7380 1960). And do the right thing by your current girlfriend, be honest if you do decide to go back to your ex.
