What can we do about 'forever chemicals' in Oklahoma's drinking water?
Industry documents released through litigation show that manufacturers had sufficient information to know of dangers as early as 1961, but continued to make products containing them for decades.
Because the chemicals are essentially indestructible and do not fully degrade, they are referred to as toxic 'forever chemicals.'
A growing body of scientific research has found links between PFAS exposure and a wide range of health problems, including a weaker immune system, cancer, increased cholesterol levels, pregnancy-induced hypertension, liver damage, reduced fertility in men and women, and increased risk of thyroid disease.
Although the Environmental Protection Agency has taken some preliminary steps to limit PFAS in drinking water, the contamination crisis continues to grow partly due to the toxins' staying power in the environment and the inadequacy of U.S. chemical regulations.
When one PFAS came under scrutiny, companies created new ones that they claimed were safer, but were still chemically similar.
We now have thousands of PFAS that need investigation, but the American regulatory system treats chemicals as innocent until proven guilty. As a result, thousands of chemicals that haven't even been tested for toxicity have entered the market.
In 2024 at least 11 states enacted laws to restrict the use of PFAS in everyday consumer goods, professional firefighting foams, and biosolids utilized as fertilizer on farmland.
In the upcoming 2025 Oklahoma legislative session, two Senate bills — 268 and 271 — have been filed to address PFAS contamination.
Senate Bill 268 seeks to ban the application of biosolids as fertilizer on farmland.
For decades, farmers across America have been encouraged by the federal government and state officials to spread municipal sewage on millions of acres of farmland as fertilizer.
But sludge isn't a green plant food. It harbors a mishmash of all kinds of dangerous substances that leach into soil, plants, water, and even the food we eat. Most concerning, sludge is a huge conveyor of PFAS.
More: Other countries are ahead of us in restricting harmful food additives | Opinion
Oklahoma has one of the most extensive biosolid fertilizer programs in the nation, as more than 80% of the state's wastewater sludge ends up on crop fields.
SB 271 aims to shield 'passive recipients' of PFAS from any legal liability. This would include farmers who unwittingly used sewage sludge as a fertilizer.
Unfortunately, neither bill speaks to eliminating PFAS chemicals from their upstream sources.
The effluent from industrial facilities that use PFAS in their manufacturing processes is discharged to wastewater treatment plants and then those PFAS toxins are released into the environment. Removing PFAS from wastewater can be extremely expensive, with costs ranging from millions to billions of dollars depending on the volume of wastewater and the specific technology used.
Neither bill considers what might be exorbitant future costs for treatment and remediation.
After application of biosolids on agricultural land has been banned, PFAS will still have to be removed from wastewater and then be disposed of, destroyed or stored.
Beyond the cost of removal, Senate Bill 268 ignores other emerging costs, such as funding for state regulators to research and identify potentially impacted farms or food products and financial assistance and medical monitoring for impacted farm families.
Will there be money available for farmers to receive income replacement if their farm production is impacted, and if there are even land acquisitions in some cases?
The EPA estimates the compliance cost just for water system monitoring or capital improvements to reduce PFAS in drinking water to be approximately $1.5 billion annually.
Then you have the economic impact on local governments,'passive receivers' of substances containing PFAS that are ubiquitous in the water supply, wastewater treatment process, stormwater, biosolids management, and solid waste streams, if they become responsible for cleaning up the environmental contamination and for mitigation.
If local governments are forced to bear the brunt of the financial burden, an increase in water rates in communities across the nation is a near certainty. These will be most harshly felt by low-income households and disadvantaged communities who will not only be disproportionately impacted by increased costs for their water bills but risk exposure to emerging contaminants.
States and taxpayers didn't cause the contamination, but they will largely shoulder the burden of testing and monitoring, delivering clean water to communities, cleaning up contaminated sites, and covering health care costs.
PFAS may be an invisible part of your environment now, but soon its environmental and health effects will be apparent to all.
Mike Altshuler is a retired educator and environmental activist who lives in Edmond.
This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: Chemical pollution a danger to Oklahomans' health | Opinion
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why racehorses might hold the key to saving human lives
After a routine gallop on the morning of October 31 2023, the American thoroughbred racehorse Practical Move collapsed and died. A necropsy – the animal equivalent of a human autopsy — suggested sudden cardiac death. More than a decade earlier, on March 17, 2012, Bolton footballer Fabrice Muamba collapsed during a televised FA Cup match, 41 minutes into play. His heart had stopped due to sudden cardiac arrest. For 78 minutes, Muamba was clinically dead. He was revived after 15 defibrillatory shocks and later fitted with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator – a device that monitors heart rhythms and delivers shocks when dangerous arrhythmias occur. Muamba's story captured global attention, as did Christian Eriksen's collapse during Euro 2020. But for every elite athlete whose sudden cardiac event makes headlines, there are countless others – both human and animal – who collapse without cameras, coverage, or answers. Horses suffer many of the same heart conditions as humans, including arrhythmias and sudden cardiac arrest. Like elite athletes, they push their cardiovascular systems to the limit. Their extraordinary physiology makes them a unique, underused model for studying how the heart performs – and sometimes fails – under extreme physical strain. If we're serious about improving health outcomes across species, we need to rethink the artificial divide between animal and human medicine. That's where the One Health, One Medicine agenda comes in. This approach recognises that human, animal and environmental health are deeply interconnected. It calls for collaboration between doctors, veterinarians, scientists, policymakers and environmental experts to tackle shared challenges — from zoonotic pandemics and antimicrobial resistance to chronic disease. While it's often associated with infectious threats such as avian flu or COVID-19, One Health is equally vital in addressing non-communicable diseases (ones that can't be passed from person to person), which are now the leading cause of death and disability worldwide. At its core, One Health starts with a simple idea: humans and animals share the same biological systems. Studying one helps us better understand the other. And, when it comes to cardiovascular health, racehorses offer a powerful example of why that matters. From stable to surgery As a cardiac electrophysiologist – a specialist in the heart's electrical activity in both humans and animals – I see cases every year of horses collapsing during or after races, potentially due to undiagnosed cardiac issues. Exercise-associated sudden death is notoriously hard to predict and devastating when it strikes – not only for the horses and their handlers, but for the racing world more broadly. Alongside my research team, I'm working to identify subtle electrical abnormalities in the equine heart that could act as early warning signs. Our goal is to understand what causes these sudden cardiac events — and ultimately, to predict which horses are most at risk. And this research could save lives. Not just equine ones. What we learn from equine hearts could help transform human cardiac medicine — particularly in athletes or others under intense cardiovascular stress. If we can recognise, manage and prevent rhythm disturbances in high-performing horses, we may find new ways to prevent sudden cardiac arrest in people. Unlike many lab animals, horses share heart anatomy and disease patterns that closely mirror our own. Their ability to shift from resting heart rates as low as 20 beats per minute to over 200 during exertion offers a natural model of extreme cardiac adaptability. And the benefits of equine research go far beyond the heart. Studies of horse physiology are also yielding insights into gut health, immune response and metabolism. As prey animals – species that have evolved to survive being hunted – horses are finely attuned to their environment. Their survival has long depended on their ability to detect and react quickly to potential threats, which has resulted in a highly sensitive nervous system. This heightened reactivity extends to their gastrointestinal tract, making them especially vulnerable to stress-related gut issues. Environmental changes, emotional distress and social disruption can all trigger digestive problems in horses, including colic and gastric ulcers. Because of this sensitivity, horses have emerged as a surprisingly valuable model for studying the gut-brain axis – the complex communication network between the digestive system and the brain. They also offer insight into how chronic stress and inflammation can affect long-term health, with potential applications not only in veterinary care but also in understanding human conditions such as irritable bowel syndrome, anxiety and depression. When we invest in equine health, we're not just helping animals. We're expanding what's possible in human medicine, too. Breaking down the silos Cardiovascular disease, diabetes, even some cancers — these aren't just human problems. They're shaped by shared genetic, environmental and behavioural forces that cut across species. By dismantling the silos between human and animal health, One Health allows us to share knowledge, pool data, and develop cross-species innovations that benefit us all. Too often, animal health is treated as separate — or even secondary — to human health. That's a mistake. Our wellbeing is tightly bound to the health of the animals we care for and the environments we share. A renewed focus on equine wellbeing doesn't just improve outcomes for horses. It sharpens our understanding of physiology, strengthens public health, and helps prevent avoidable deaths — on and off the track. If we want to reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death in athletes — or anyone pushing their body to its limits — we need to widen the lens. That means recognising the value of research in veterinary medicine. It means turning the stethoscope toward the stable. Because when a horse collapses on the track, it's more than a tragedy. It's a missed opportunity — to understand, to prevent and to save. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. Kamalan Jeevaratnam receives funding from British Heart Foundation, Horseracing Betting Levy Board, Hong Kong Jockey Club Equine Welfare Research Foundation, Petplan Charitable Trust, Grayson Jockey Club Research Foundation
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
French woman's homemade dinner sparks fury with boyfriend who just wanted a burger
A French woman's homemade dinner sparked fury from her American boyfriend who wanted a burger instead, according to a viral post. The woman said she moved from France to the U.S. two years ago and has dealt with digestive issues since, according to her Reddit posting. 'For some reason, the food here makes me sick,' she wrote. 'My body seems to struggle to digest it.' 'Whether it's takeout or fancy restaurant food … I can't go to the bathroom for days, or I'm violently vomiting,' the woman added. The expat consulted medical professionals and, after multiple tests, was told that her body was probably 'not used to the amount of salt and preservatives' in American food. After incorporating more whole foods into her diet, her health improved, she said. She wrote that she began meal-prepping and cooking meals from scratch. 'My dad is actually a chef back home, so he was more than happy to send me some recipes to keep my diet interesting,' she said. 4 After incorporating more whole foods into her diet, she began to feel better, she said in the post. Reddit/r/AmITheAngel But one of her recipes – a 'delicious' vegetarian lasagna made from scratch – caught the ire of her American partner. When he asked what was for dinner, the boyfriend 'rolled his eyes' when he found out it was lasagna, the woman wrote. '[H]e was sick of 'that organic crap' and wanted a cheeseburger,' she recounted. 'The comment hurt.' She said he told her that 'it was unfair to 'make' him eat my diet.' The woman also clarified that she intended no ill will toward Americans and said she enjoys living here – and those who shared comments mostly sided with her. 4 Her boyfriend 'rolled his eyes' when he found out it was a vegetarian lasagna and not a burger, the woman wrote. ViDi Studio – 'You are not responsible for feeding a grown man because he doesn't want to put in the effort,' one of the top comments read. While most commenters supported her, some questioned whether the post was even real. 'Because this totally happened, what in the world have you been eating since you've been in the U.S.?' one person questioned. 'In today's America, it is not compulsory for the woman to cook her boyfriend or husband a meal every night.' 4 'You are not responsible for feeding a grown man because he doesn't want to put in the effort,' a supportive commenter wrote. LIGHTFIELD STUDIOS – Carole Lieberman, M.D., a psychiatrist based in Beverly Hills, California, told Fox News Digital the Reddit poster appears to have 'excellent taste in food, but bad taste in boyfriends.' She added, 'In today's America, it is not compulsory for the woman to cook her boyfriend or husband a meal every night – and certainly not a meal that the woman can't eat herself. Many couples share meal preparation duties and even enjoy it.' Lieberman, who lived in France for years, also attested that the food is generally better than what most Americans eat. 'The problem is that your boyfriend has come to expect home-cooked meals every night because you have spoiled him,' she observed, speaking to the woman who shared her story. 4 According to Carole Lieberman, M.D., a psychiatrist, the woman has 'excellent taste in food, but bad taste in boyfriends.' Rafael Ben-Ari – 'He feels entitled to dictate the menu as well.' 'Perhaps you should remind him that there are many American men who would be delighted to have a French girlfriend cook for them.' Lieberman encouraged the Redditor to reevaluate her relationship. 'Perhaps you should remind him that there are many American men who would be delighted to have a French girlfriend cook for them, regardless of whether she's making vegetarian lasagna or veal escalope.'
CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
HPV vaccine could prevent thousands of cervical cancer cases each year. A doctor explains
Imagine if there were a vaccine for breast cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer, uterine cancer, ovarian cancer or any of the most well-known cancers that sicken and kill so many people. Every year, there are an estimated 48,000 new cases of cancers associated with the human papillomavirus, or HPV, in the United States, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. But in the case of HPV, there actually is a vaccine. Yet public awareness remains low. Over one-third of American adults are unaware of HPV or the HPV vaccine, according to a new research letter published Thursday in JAMA Oncology. In some states, the numbers are significantly higher. That's why people need to know about HPV, the cancers linked to the virus, and the effectiveness of the HPV vaccine. To help with these questions, I spoke with CNN wellness expert Dr. Leana Wen. Wen is an emergency physician and adjunct associate professor at George Washington University. She previously was Baltimore's health commissioner, and she is the mother of two young children. CNN: What is HPV, and what cancers is it linked to? Dr. Leana Wen: HPV is a virus that can infect humans. There are over 100 types of HPV. Most HPV infections aren't linked to cancer, but some are. The specific types of cancers associated with HPV infection are cervical cancer, cancers of the vagina, vulva, penis and anus. Some oral and throat cancers are also associated with HPV infection. Of the cancers linked to HPV, cervical cancer is the most common. Each year in the US, there are about 13,000 new cases of cervical cancer. About 4,000 American women die of this cancer annually. However, as referenced in the new report, it's not just cervical cancer — there are as many as 48,000 new cancer diagnoses linked annually to HPV. It's important for people to understand the association between HPV and cervical cancer as well as the link to other cancer types, including the link to oropharyngeal cancers. CNN: Do people know if they have HPV — do they have symptoms at the time? Wen: Some types of HPV cause warts. These tend to be what's called low-risk HPV, meaning HPV that is not linked with cancer. Infections with high-risk HPV do not cause symptoms at the time of infection; symptoms can develop later when precancerous and cancerous cells develop. According to the National Cancer Institute, HPV infection is very common — so common that nearly all sexually active people become infected with HPV within a few years of becoming sexually active. As much as half of HPV infections involve high-risk HPV. Most HPV infections are cleared by the body and do not result in cancer. However, some high-risk infections can persist. Over the course of many years, it can lead to the development of precancerous and then cancerous cells. CNN: How is HPV spread? Wen: The most common way for HPV to spread is through sexual intercourse. The virus can also spread during close skin-to-skin contact during intercourse. It's crucial to understand just how widespread HPV is and how high-risk HPV is spread by asymptomatic people. Condoms can lower the risk of spreading HPV, but because HPV can infect areas that condoms don't cover, they don't fully protect against HPV. This is why vaccination is so important, to protect against HPV-causing cancers down the line. CNN: How effective is the HPV vaccine? Wen: The HPV vaccines have very high efficacy — close to 100% — for the prevention of cervical cancer in women, according to the CDC. The vaccines have also been found to have very high efficacy in men who have sex with men in preventing anal cancer. The vaccines also reduce the likelihood of developing genital warts. CNN: When is the vaccine recommended to be given? Wen: The CDC recommends that preteens receive the first dose of the vaccine at age 11 or 12, though it can be given as early as age 9. For most people 9 through 14, a two-dose series is recommended, with the second shot given six to 12 months after the first. A three-dose series is recommended for people who begin vaccination at ages 15 through 45 and for immunocompromised individuals. The second shot is given one to two months after the first and the third about five months later. CNN: I have heard some parents say that they don't want their children to get the shot because it may encourage them to have sex earlier. How do doctors and public health experts respond to that concern? Wen: They would point to the data. A large study published in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine compared over 21,000 vaccinated girls with nearly 186,000 unvaccinated peers and found 'no evidence of increased unsafe sexual behavior.' Other studies have found no association between HPV vaccination status and age of first sexual encounter or number of sexual partners. Because high-risk HPV is so widespread, protecting against the cancers it can cause is essential. We are fortunate to have a vaccine that is so effective. Giving the vaccine is not about encouraging a particular behavior, but about giving protection in case someone becomes exposed to a virus someday. CNN: What is your takeaway from this latest report? Wen: Awareness of HPV and the HPV vaccine remains dangerously low among the general public. In seven states, more than 40% of adults were not aware of HPV; in 13 states, more than 40% were unaware of the vaccine. In 45 states and Washington, DC, more than 60% did not know that HPV could cause oral cancers. The authors concluded that 'there is a critical need to enhance HPV awareness among adolescents, young adults, parents or caregivers, and pediatric and adult health care professionals.' I agree. Get inspired by a weekly roundup on living well, made simple. Sign up for CNN's Life, But Better newsletter for information and tools designed to improve your well-being.
