Garda withdraws damages case after court told of climbs
A garda, who claimed his back and legs had been injured in a traffic accident, overlooked telling a judge today that he had afterwards climbed four of Ireland's highest peaks.
Immediately after Judge Sarah Berkeley heard in the Circuit Civil Court that Garda Sean Daly, of Curkish, Bailieborough, Co Cavan, had achieved the impressive climbs in a single weekend she rose to allow his legal team discuss the future of his €60,000 damages claim with defence barrister Shane English.
Garda Daly, aged 42, who claimed he had been injured while participating in a garda driving programme, sued his boss, Garda Commissioner Drew Harris, his colleague who had been driving an unmarked garda car, the Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan and Hyundai Cars Ireland, manufacturer of the vehicle that struck and skidded 100 metres along a ditch in Co Tipperary seven years ago.
When the court resumed after the very brief adjournment and talks between the parties, Garda Daly's barrister told Judge Berkeley he had received instructions from his client to withdraw his claim.
Garda Daly's claim collapsed during cross-examination by Mr English, who with Hayley Tarmey of Ennis Solicitors, was representing all four defendants. Garda Daly told Mr English he had been struggling to get back to soccer, running, walking and gym work for months after the accident.
He said he had not attended his doctor until 9 February 2018, a year and five months after the October 2016 accident and had difficulty remembering if he had attended his solicitor before and on the same day he had gone to his doctor.
Mr English reminded him he had signed an Injuries Board claim form and attended his doctor on the same day.
Approaching the closure of his cross-examination Mr English asked Garda Daly if he had engaged in any other physical activities shortly after his accident and when told several times he had not, counsel asked him to think carefully and reminded him he was giving his evidence on oath.
When Garda Daly finally stated he had not participated in any other activities, Mr English asked him again if there was anything else that might be escaping his memory as to what he may or may not have done and when Garda Daly said not that he could think of, Mr English asked him: "Have you heard of the Four Peaks? The four highest mountains in Ireland which he then named together with their heights in metres.
Garda Daly agreed he knew of them and also agreed the climbs lasted between four and seven hours. He had done the climbs but could not remember when.
He had climbed Carrauntoohill, Lugnaquilla, Slieve Donard, and Mweelrea.
"And you climbed all four of them in the one weekend did you not?" Mr English asked. Garda Daly agreed, but disagreed with counsel that one would have to be "pretty fit" to walk the four highest peaks in Ireland in one weekend.
"And you climbed them in May 2017, seven months after this accident and before you went to your doctor," Mr English said. "Why would you tell this court 'I can't do this and that and I'm trying to get back to doing this and that' without telling the court that you had climbed four of the highest peaks in Ireland?"
Judge Berkeley: "Or to the doctors?"
When Garda Daly told the court he had not remembered when he had climbed the four highest peaks, Mr English said: "It is not credible and I am surprised, to say the least, that you hold a very responsible role and I think you should have told us that."
Judge Berkeley rose and went to her chambers while the two parties talked outside court. Garda Daly pulled his case within minutes.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
39 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
How misinformation took hold in the aftermath of Carlow shooting
Just after 6pm on Sunday 1 June in the centre of Carlow Town a 22-year-old man discharged a firearm inside a supermarket at the Fairgreen Shopping Centre. The man later died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound. He was the sole fatality. While there was understandable panic in the shopping centre, it was amplified online by false claims, misinformation, and disinformation about the number of victims and nature of the incident. The only other person physically hurt was a young girl who sustained a minor leg injury while fleeing the scene. She was treated by ambulance personnel and later brought home by family members. In the hour after the incident prominent individuals online claimed falsely that a child had been shot, that the gunman was a foreign national, and that the incident was a terror attack with multiple casualties. Some of these claims first appeared on online accounts with small followings. Others were amplified by prominent anti-immigration campaigners, at least one of whom travelled to Carlow to film the scene. What followed was a fast-moving and often chaotic swirl of information, in which rumour outpaced fact, and where the Gardaí ultimately felt compelled to issue unusually detailed public statements to try to calm public concern and set the record straight. Here's how that narrative took hold, step by step. The first claims appear Gardaí received multiple reports of shots being fired in the Fairgreen Shopping Centre shortly after 6:15pm on Sunday evening. Armed Garda units responded to the scene, and members of the public were quickly assisted to leave the area. While some local media, including radio station KCLR 96FM, had begun reporting on the incident as early as 7:05pm — noting that Gardaí were dealing with an incident and that shots were believed to have been fired — the first official Garda statement didn't come until 7:27pm. In it, Gardaí said the area had been evacuated and specified that there was no "further concern for public safety." The statement also urged anyone who had recorded footage of the incident "not to share it on social media platforms or messaging apps, but instead to provide it to Gardaí at Carlow Garda Station." It was an early indication of concern about a narrative that was already beginning to spiral online. In the period between the initial incident and the first Garda statement, a trickle of posts on X began to appear — mostly expressing confusion and concern about what had happened. Before long, speculation was spreading rapidly across social media. By around 6:51pm, some users were falsely claiming there were multiple shooters. At 7:05pm, a commenter on a fringe online forum claimed the incident was a "terror attack" and that the gunman had been "shot dead." Gardai would later specify that the gunman was a white Irish male, however the commenter inferred the person was non-white, saying "gunman shot dead. Have we been given his colour chart number yet?" By 7:13pm, others on X were alleging that a nine-year-old had been shot in the leg and that Gardaí had returned fire on an attacker, neither of which was true. One user posted around the same time claiming they'd heard "reports" of up to five injuries resulting from the shooting. Videos were soon circulating, in one filmed outside the shopping centre a voice could be heard saying "they f**king shot him down," adding to the confusion. At 7:20pm, Cork-based Derek Blighe the founder of the nationalist and immigration-focused 'Ireland First' party, weighed in on X. "Unconfirmed Reports of a mass shooting in Carlow," he wrote, "apparently 7 people including a child have been shot." In a video posted alongside the caption, Mr Blighe — who has been unsuccessful in several recent elections — speculated that the individual responsible had "been shot dead." His video also included a screengrab of a Facebook comment thread showing incorrect information about the incident, including that a nine-year-old had been shot. Mr Blighe commands a sizeable online following and regularly posts during high-profile incidents. Minute-by-minute analysis of posts on X containing the word 'Carlow' at the time shows a marked increase in activity following his comment. Gardaí issued the aforementioned first public statement providing the initial account of the incident shortly after. But the statement, that said there was "no further concern for public safety," did little to stem the spread of rumour. At 7:31pm, a user on X posted that: "rumours are a migrant went into the shopping center and started shooting." At 7:35pm, online outlet known for publishing hardline and often sensationalist content, posted to its near 70,000 followers that "Gardai appear to have shot an active shooter at a Carlow Shopping Centre." It followed up with a series of posts including one saying: "A 9-yr-old child has been shot during the crossfire." Traditional media sources began reporting on the incident soon after. Some local media had shared brief updates on social media earlier in the evening, but most outlets held off until Gardaí released their first official statement at 7:27pm. RTÉ News published its first online story at 7.40pm, reporting that a man had died and that a child had been injured. The report added that details of the incident remained "unclear" but that it appeared "a man fired a number of shots," and that it appeared the man had died as a result of "self-inflicted" gunshot wounds. Despite these emerging reports, false information continued to be shared elsewhere for hours. Shortly after at 8pm, Tommy Robinson, founder of the English Defence League, began amplifying false claims about the incident, saying "Multiple reports of a suspected terror attack in Carlow, Ireland. Gunman shot dead by Gardaí." Robinson, who was jailed in the UK for contempt of court in October after repeating false claims about a Syrian refugee, was released from prison last month. He has previously posted inflammatory claims related to events in Ireland, often amplifying false or unverified information. Despite the posts from Mr Blighe, and Robinson being inaccurate, they remain online more than a week after the incident. Influencers on the scene As speculation intensified online, Philip Dwyer, an unsuccessful candidate in the most recent general election and self-styled 'citizen journalist', travelled to Carlow to film outside the Fairgreen Shopping Centre. In a live video stream, which started at 8:27pm, Mr Dwyer approached frontline emergency service personnel and asked them how many casualties there have been. When they declined to answer, he told viewers that "the next thing they'll be going around in their LGBT fire engines." He later accused them of "belligerence." Earlier that day, he had been livestreaming from an anti-immigration protest in Clonmel. That stream drew just 6,000 views. His Carlow stream, filmed hours later amid public fear and confusion, has since been viewed more than 80,000 times. On his social channels, Mr Dwyer includes links inviting followers to donate to his mission to "expose Ireland." He also offers a subscription service, with an 'Ultra Tier' option of up to $100 a month to help him "expose the madness." The official response A second Garda statement was issued at 9pm on Sunday, confirming that the gunman was a white Irish male who was known to Gardaí and had died at the scene. It was notably specific, appearing to be partly an attempt to address misinformation by countering circulating claims. The statement also gave media outlets more verified details to report. RTÉ News followed up its earlier online coverage in the Nine O'Clock News bulletin after the second Garda statement was issued. Again, even with verifiable information now widely available about the incident, rumours continued to spread. Users like Mr Blighe repeated unverified claims about explosives and tactical gear in a post on X at 9:07pm. International escalation While the volume of posts about Carlow peaked around 8pm, the reach — the number of people viewing and engaging with those posts — continued to climb, peaking at 10pm. As with previous incidents, the Carlow shooting revealed a pattern in how information and misinformation now spreads. In the crucial early hours, the facts often become secondary, with online figures racing to insert themselves into the narrative before the full picture emerges. And as the night wore on, accounts with international followings began wading in to the discourse. One of the most widely shared falsehoods came from the account @CilComLFC, which regularly posts Ireland-related anti-migrant content, and has recently been amplified by X owner Elon Musk. At around 10:50pm, it shared a video of Gardaí responding to an unrelated incident weeks previously in Dublin city centre, alongside a caption containing terminology which would be familiar to a US audience. "Today's Shopping Mall Massacre, which saw a 9-year-old girl shot by a man who had explosives strapped to his body, has enraged the General Public," the post said. The post, though entirely false, was viewed more than 5.7 million times. The aftermath By Monday afternoon, the facts had settled. At 12:30pm, Gardaí issued their fourth statement, setting out in detail what had occurred. It confirmed that the gunman was a 22-year-old Irish man who died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound. No Garda had discharged a weapon. Additionally, it said that a bottle containing an unknown substance was found on the deceased, prompting the involvement of the Defence Forces' Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) team. The gunman It later emerged that the man with the weapon, named Evan Fitzgerald, was on bail having been arrested last year as part of a Garda investigation into the sale of firearms on the dark web. He had been facing 13 charges related to firearms, ammunition, and explosives, and was granted bail with Garda consent under strict conditions. The Director of Public Prosecutions has since directed that the charges be withdrawn. On Tuesday morning, during a sitting of Naas District Court, Judge Desmond Zaidan addressed what he described as "sensational headlines" about Fitzgerald having been out on bail at the time of the shooting. While that was true, he said, crucial context about the court's limited power to deny bail in such cases was omitted from much of the reporting. His comments came after several outlets highlighted the bail decision in their headlines, but did not always explain that consent from Gardaí meant a judge had no discretion to refuse it. "Once gardaí consent to bail, the court cannot go beyond that — remember that," he said. Bail had been granted to Fitzgerald on consent in March 2024. "This judge or no judge in Ireland has the power to go behind that… They'd be running to the High Court if I did," he added. "Please report sensibly. Please tread carefully." The judge's comments were themselves widely reported on by media outlets. Judge Zaidan said he felt compelled to set the record straight after reviewing court recordings with his staff. Swirl of confusion In a matter of hours, a shooting incident involving a single gunman and no victims of gunfire became the subject of widespread misinformation, with false claims spreading faster and further than verified facts. Despite multiple Garda statements, speculation continued to dominate online. The Carlow shooting was a moment of real panic. But it also showed how quickly events can be reshaped online, often before the full picture is known.
The Irish Sun
9 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Gardai carried out ‘controlled delivery' of guns to Carlow shooter before ‘extraordinary event', Dail committee told
AN Oireachtas committee has heard that the man who died in a shooting incident in an Irish shopping centre received guns in a controlled delivery by Gardai. Garda Commissioner Drew Harris was questioned about Evan Fitzgerald by Labour TD Alan Kelly and former Minister for Justice Michael McDowell before the 2 Garda Commissioner Harris was questioned when he appeared before the committee Evan Fitzgerald, 22, from Portrushen Upper near Kiltegan in He appeared in Labour TD Kelly queried if it had been a "controlled delivery" of guns and ammunition, saying he had "serious concerns" that undercover READ MORE IN IRISH NEWS A controlled delivery is a method used world-wide, and sees a suspect being given illicit items by an undercover Kelly asked: "Did undercover gardaí engage face-to-face with this young man prior to this delivery of Harris said he was unable to discuss the provenance of the firearms and where they came from, and could not confirm if Gardai engaged in a controlled delivery as two other people are before the courts. He said: "I would say that controlled delivery is very sensitive police methodology. Most read in Irish News "We use it for both organised After the two-hour hearing, he was quizzed by Michael McDowell and proceeded to expand on his response, saying: "You'll be aware that controlled delivery is a tactic that's often used around both firearms and COMPLIANT He also added that the case had been examined since Fitzgerald died on June 1, and it was found that he was compliant in his interactions with Gardai, along with his bail conditions. He explained: "Might I say then that obviously there has been an examination following the terrible incidents of the first of June. "We've looked to what we knew of this individual beforehand, and I just, I want to be very careful, because he's been described so many [ways] in the media, but in our interactions with him, he was compliant. "He complied with his bail conditions up until the first of June, and certainly by his behaviors, we didn't anticipate the events of the first of June. It was an extraordinary event". The committee heard that the office of the Police Ombudsman, Fiosru, examined an investigation file into the controlled delivery and concluded that there was no issue of concern. In response to a question from FAR RIGHT OF 'HUGE CONCERN' Kelly noted that counter terror detectives in the Special Detective Unit, the Gardai's anti- He added that cops on a national and local level monitor online activity surrounding protests and specialist training. Kelly then noted that equipment has been given to Gardai. He explained: "Absolutely, to your specific question the far right. "Of course, it's a huge concern to us, absolutely huge concern to us. "We have dedicated officers in the special detective unit, our counterterrorism operational unit, and that's all they do". 2 Evan Fitzgerald died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound Credit: Garda Press Office
Irish Daily Mirror
10 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Gardaí launch urgent search appeal for missing Dublin 13-year-old
Gardaí have launched an urgent search appeal for a missing teenager as concern grows for his welfare. Eoghan O'Reilly, 13, has been missing from the Springfield area of Tallaght, Dublin 24 since the evening of Sunday, June 8. He was last seen in the area at approximately 5pm. Eoghan is described as being approximately five feet in height with a slim build. He has brown hair and blue eyes. When last seen, Eoghan was wearing black and grey tracksuit bottoms, a black North Face jacket, and blue and black Nike Air Max shoes. It is believed that Eoghan may have travelled to the Coolock, Dublin 17 area. Gardaí and Eoghan's family are concerned for his wellbeing and have appealed for anyone with any information on his whereabouts to contact authorities. A Garda spokesperson said: 'Gardaí are seeking the public's assistance in tracing the whereabouts of 13-year-old Eoghan O'Reilly who is reported missing from the Springfield area of Tallaght, Dublin 24 since the evening of Sunday, 8 June'. They added: 'Anyone with any information on Eoghan's whereabouts are asked to contact Tallaght Garda Station on 01 666 6000 the Garda Confidential Line on 1800 666 111, or any Garda Station.'
