logo
Jury in Harvey Weinstein sex assault retrial reach a partial verdict

Jury in Harvey Weinstein sex assault retrial reach a partial verdict

Yahoo11-06-2025
Jurors weighing the fate of disgraced movie mogul Harvey Weinstein said Wednesday that they had unanimously found him guilty of sexually assaulting one woman and not guilty of assaulting another more than a decade ago.
But the jurors at Weinstein's retrial told the judge they were unable to reach a verdict on allegations he assaulted a third woman, and Judge Curtis Farber sent them home for the day and asked them to resume deliberating on Thursday.
Weinstein, 73, had denied all the charges and his lawyers insisted the sexual encounters with his three accusers were 'transactional' and 'consensual.'
But the jury came to a different conclusion after five days of deliberations, during which the jury foreman told the judge several times they were having a hard time reaching a verdict and that several members of the panel had been clashing.
Before the partial verdict was announced, the jury foreman told the court he'd been threatened by another member of the panel who told him, 'You know me, you going to see me outside.'
'I feel afraid inside there,' the juror told the judge, according to a transcript of the conversation supplied by the New York State Court. 'I can't be inside there.'
Aidala immediately objected.
'You have a grown man who has now said that people have told him in the jury room they'll meet him outside,' Aidala said. 'He said it twice.'
Farber dismissed that as 'schoolyard nonsense.'
'He is a big guy,' the judge said. 'He's not particularly scared. He's basically saying, 'I am not changing my mind.' He is not being intimidated to change his mind. He is standing his ground, which could be in your favor of the prosecution's favor.'
Weinstein then asked to address the judge and made a last-minute plea, "this is not right for me, the person who is on trial here."
"Lawyers can fight all they want," Weinstein said, seated in his wheelchair. "This is my life on the line. It's not fair. It's that simple. It's just not fair."
Farber agreed this "was not a typical deliberation but it does happen" and the result of the deliberations in the third case could wind up being in favor of Weinstein.
"It could be in my favor, but it's not fair," Weinstein replied. "That's the problem with this. ... This is over. "
Minutes later, the jurors returned to the courtroom and rendered a partial verdict.
Weinstein put his hands to his head after he was found guilty of criminal sexual act for the 2006 attack on former 'Project Runway' production assistant Miriam Haley.
But Weinstein was found not guilty of a second charge of criminal sexual act stemming from allegations brought by former Polish runway model Kaja Sokola, who told the court she too was assaulted by the producer in 2006.
The jury deadlocked on a rape in the third-degree charge that Weinstein was hit with for allegedly sexually assaulting former actress Jessica Mann.
Haley's lawyer Gloria Allred spoke outside of the Manhattan courthouse following the partial verdict saying that the MeToo movement is not dead.
'The real hero of this case is Mimi Haley, because he was convicted not once, but twice, based on her testimony,' Allred said.
Haley said the verdict left her feeling hopeful and said she hopes others will continue to speak out against against their abusers.
'To those predators who still believe they can exploit abuse and walk away unscathed. Your time is running out. The world is changing, and you will not outrun the consequences of your actions forever,' Haley said.
Sokola said she was happy with the verdict, even though the jury did not convict Weinstein of assaulting her.
'It's a big win for everyone,' she said. 'For myself, it's closing of a chapter that caused me a lot of pain throughout my life.'
Both Haley and Mann testified at Weinstein's first trial in 2020. Sokola's charge was new to the retrial.
Weinstein found himself on trial again after the New York state Court of Appeals last year overturned his landmark 2020 conviction for sexually abusing young women, a trial that defined the #MeToo movement and helped turn the Oscar-winning producer into a pariah. The appeals court found that the judge in that trial had improperly allowed testimony against the former Miramax chief based on allegations that were not part of the case.
'If this person wasn't Harvey Weinstein, would we even be here?' Weinstein defense attorney Arthur Aidala asked during his closing argument in accusing the women of being grifters.
Prosecutors, however, said Weinstein preyed on young women trying to make it in Hollywood, sometimes repeatedly, and threatened to wreck their careers if they talked.
'He never had any interest in their careers,' Assistant District Attorney Nicole Blumberg told the jury. 'He had an interest in their bodies. And he was going to have their bodies and touch their bodies whether they had wanted him to or not."
Just as in 2020, Weinstein did not testify at his retrial. But he gave an interview to a FOX5 New York reporter after the jury began deliberations, saying that he acted "immorally" and regretted hurting his wife and family, but never did anything "illegal."
"I put so many friends through this and hurt people … that were close to me, by the way, by actions that were stupid," he said. "But never illegal, never criminal, never anything."
Much of the evidence that resulted in Weinstein being convicted five years ago of the third-degree rape of one woman and a first-degree criminal sex act against another woman was reintroduced at his retrial.
Just as before, Weinstein pleaded not guilty to charges of first-degree criminal sexual act and third-degree rape based on complaints by Haley and Mann. But this time, Weinstein also pleaded not guilty to an additional charge of first-degree criminal sexual act in the alleged sexual assault of Sokola.
Sokola told the court that Weinstein forcibly performed oral sex on her in 2006 at a Manhattan hotel when she was 19 years old. But the alleged abuse began in 2002, when she was 16 and Weinstein forced her to masturbate him, she said.
'Her first sexual experience was the defendant forcing himself on her,' Blumberg said.
During his three-hour closing, Aidala tried to poke holes in the testimony of the three accusers. He suggested they were coached by prosecutors to describe the sexual encounters, which he likened at one point to 'naked twister,' in a sinister light.
'They did it all to get the original sinner, the poster boy of the MeToo movement,' Aidala said.
The #MeToo hashtag took off in 2017 following reports in The New York Times and The New Yorker that detailed allegations of sexual misconduct against Weinstein that went back decades. It helped inspire a reckoning in Hollywood and beyond around sexual harassment.
Weinstein, Aidala added, made for an easy target. 'He's a fat dude — sorry, Harvey,' he said while the former producer looked on.
'It's not really a casting couch I thought it was,' Aidala added. 'It's different now. I know it sounds crazy, but he's the one being used.'
Blumberg painted a far different picture during the prosecution's closing remarks.
'I want to remind you why we are here,' she said. 'Because he raped three people.'
Sokola and Haley both claimed that Weinstein forcibly performed oral sex on them in separate incidents in 2006. Mann told the court the producer raped her in 2013.
Weinstein, Blumberg said, 'had tremendous control over Hollywood. He spoke, people listened. He decided who was in and who was out.'
'Remember, it's not the person sitting here today in a wheelchair but this man, in Hollywood, who had the power and was in control,' Blumberg said.
Regardless of the verdict, Weinstein will most likely be returned to California where he has to serve a 16-year sentence for a 2022 rape conviction. His lawyers filed an appeal for that conviction in 2024 that is still in process.
During his latest trial, Weinstein has been allowed to stay at Bellevue Hospital where he was being treated for a host of serious health issues.
Back in October, two sources told NBC News that Weinstein had been diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia, an uncommon form of bone marrow cancer.
Weinstein was a Hollywood titan in the 1990s and 2000s when he and his brother Bob ran Miramax, the distributor of critically acclaimed independent movies like 'Sex, Lies, and Videotape,' 'The Crying Game,' 'Pulp Fiction' and 'Clerks,' and box office successes like 'Chicago' and 'Bridget Jones's Diary.'
In 1999, Weinstein won a best picture Oscar as one of the producers of 'Shakespeare in Love.' And in the early 2010s, his second distribution label, The Weinstein Company, won back-to-back best picture Oscars for 'The King's Speech' and 'The Artist.'
But as Weinstein collected accolades, he was dogged by rumors that he preyed on his leading ladies and other women in the industry. By the time he was arrested, more than 80 women had accused him of sexual assault or harassment going back decades.
Just as he did at his trials, Weinstein doggedly denied the claims and insisted the encounters were consensual.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Harvey Weinstein's Sentencing for Sex Crime Pushed Back in New York Court
Harvey Weinstein's Sentencing for Sex Crime Pushed Back in New York Court

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Harvey Weinstein's Sentencing for Sex Crime Pushed Back in New York Court

Harvey Weinstein had his sentencing pushed back to the end of September and could be headed back to trial on an unresolved rape charge NEED TO KNOW Harvey Weinstein had his sentencing pushed back to the end of September after being convicted of a criminal sex act by a New York jury in his criminal retrial Weinstein, who appeared in court expecting to be sentenced on Wednesday, Aug. 13, had previously been sentenced to 23 years in prison after his first New York trial in 2020 Prosecutors want to try him for a third time on a rape charge after a mistrial was declared by the judge on that charge A judge in New York has pushed back the sentencing of Harvey Weinstein to the end of September. The disgraced mogul, 73, is facing a maximum of 25 years in prison after a jury convicted him on a single count of criminal sex act following his retrial on criminal charges. He had arrived at court on Wednesday, Aug. 13, expecting to be sentenced. Instead, the judge held a pre-sentencing hearing during which Weinstein was given the offer of taking a plea on the rape charge — which had resulted in a mistrial at his most recent trial. If he entered a plea, and agreed to waive his right to appeal, Weinstein would avoid having to stand trial for a third time on that charge. Prosecutors said in court that they would be ready to commence with that trial, if needed, in January. Judge Curtis Farber responded to that by saying in court that if there was to be another trial it would need to take place this year, and a date would be set at the September hearing should that be the case. After a seven-week trial that began in April, jurors for the second time found Weinstein guilty of criminal sexual act against Miriam "Mimi" Haley, 48, a former production assistant on Project Runway. She testified that Weinstein — who served as an executive producer on Project Runway at the time — invited her to his multimillion-dollar Soho apartment in New York City to "say hi" in 2006, and then proceeded to pin her down in a bedroom and perform a sex act on her without her consent. Jurors then acquitted Weinstein of the same charge for an incident involving Kaja Sokola, a 39-year-old model who alleged that Weinstein forced her to perform oral sex on him after the two met for lunch in 2006. Sokola, who did not testify in Weinstein's first New York trial, said outside the courthouse that she was happy the mogul had been convicted on at least one charge when jurors returned their verdict on two of the three charges back in in a bizarre twist, a mistrial was declared on a rape count Weinstein was facing involving actress Jessica Mann, who was also testifying for the second time. Mann, 40, alleged that Weinstein invited her to what he claimed was a breakfast meeting in 2013 and then took her to a hotel room where he proceeded to rape her. Jurors returned with a guilty verdict on that charge in the first criminal trial, but after the jury foreman claimed deliberations had devolved into threats of violence, the judge dismissed the seven women and five men who, by that point, had spent six days trying to reach a unanimous decision. Weinstein had previously been convicted of both criminal sex act and rape at his 2020 trial and sentenced to 23 years in prison. A verdict from that trial was overturned in 2024 by The New York Court of Appeals in a 4-to-3 decision. The majority in that case sided with Weinstein's defense team, who argued that their client did not receive a fair trial as a result of the judge's decision to allow prosecutors to call several women to testify about allegedly being assaulted by Weinstein in incidents that were not criminally charged by the Manhattan District Attorney's Office. That decision was viewed by some — including the three dissenting judges — as a giant setback for the #MeToo movement, victims of sexual assault and marginalized groups. Judge Madeline Signas wrote at the time: "Men who serially sexually exploit their power over women — especially the most vulnerable groups in society — will reap the benefit of today's decision." Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg responded to the news by announcing his office would once again be filing charges against Weinstein, and his second trial got underway in less than a year. And while that ruling meant Weinstein no longer had to serve out his sentence in New York, he was not able to walk free. Weinstein was instead transferred from New York to California upon his release, where he started serving out his 16-year prison sentence following a 2022 criminal trial that ended with a jury returning guilty verdicts on one count of rape and two counts of sexual assault. He was back in New York just a few months later, though, after a governor's warrant ordered that he be returned from California and remain in the state until the completion of his trial. That warrant was issued by Gov. Kathy Hochul. The warrant filed by Gov. Hochul means that Weinstein will remain in custody until all criminal charges against him have been resolved, including the lingering rape charge for which he might face a third trial. This all comes at a time when Weinstein has been dealing with a growing number of health crises, including heart issues, a cancer diagnosis and diabetes. He is currently being housed in the Rikers' facility reserved for individuals with contagious diseases and medical conditions requiring constant care. He arrived at court on Wednesday in a wheelchair. "Harvey's health is in steep decline, and this long, punishing ordeal has only worsened the toll. For years, he has been tried in the court of public opinion—by those nursing old grudges and by others seeking personal gain in keeping his name alive in headlines," Weinstein's rep Juda Englemeyer tells PEOPLE. "It's time for the barrage to end, and for the focus to return to fairness, truth, and the basic dignity every person deserves." In the wake of the allegations against him, which were first detailed in The New York Times followed soon after by the New Yorker, Weinstein saw himself banished from Hollywood and became one of just two Oscar winners to ever be expelled from the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences. His second wife, former Marchesa designer Georgina Chapman, divorced him soon after and has since entered into a relationship with actor Adrien Brody. Well over 100 women came forward and said they were victims of Weinstein's predatory ways — among them Gwyneth Paltrow, Angelina Jolie, Cate Blanchett and Lupita Nyong'o — with some accusing him of sexual misconduct and others sexual assault. Read the original article on People

Drone that fell in Poland probably came from direction of Belarus, prosecutor says
Drone that fell in Poland probably came from direction of Belarus, prosecutor says

Yahoo

time11 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Drone that fell in Poland probably came from direction of Belarus, prosecutor says

Drone that fell in Poland probably came from direction of Belarus, prosecutor says WARSAW (Reuters) -A drone which crashed into a field in eastern Poland most likely came from the direction of Belarus, a regional prosecutor said on Thursday, following the incident described as a provocation by the defence minister. The military drone fell into a cornfield overnight on Tuesday, scorching crops, shattering windows in nearby homes and adding to tensions at a crucial period in efforts to end the war in Ukraine. "There is a very high probability ... that the object probably came from Belarus," Lublin regional prosecutor Grzegorz Trusiewicz told reporters. A Foreign Ministry spokesperson told Reuters on Wednesday that initial findings of the investigation and some experts suggested a Russian version of the Shahed drone developed by Iran was involved in the latest incident. Trusiewicz said he was unable to confirm the model of drone involved. The embassy of Belarus in Warsaw did not immediately respond to a request for comment. There was no comment from the Russian embassy. Close Russian ally Belarus has backed Moscow's war in Ukraine. Early on Thursday, the Operational Command of the Polish Armed Forces said jets were scrambled due to Russian strikes on western Ukraine. However, it said that no violation of Polish airspace was observed. Solve the daily Crossword

Russia hits Ukraine with 'massive' drone, missile attack, Kyiv says

time12 hours ago

Russia hits Ukraine with 'massive' drone, missile attack, Kyiv says

LONDON -- Russia launched 614 air attack munitions into Ukraine overnight into Thursday, the air force in Kyiv reported, in what the country's Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha called a "massive combined air strike" on targets around the country. The air force said Russia launched 574 drones and 40 missiles in its overnight barrage, of which 546 drones and 31 missiles were intercepted or otherwise suppressed. Impacts were reported across 11 locations, the air force said. "Contrary to all efforts to end the war, Russia undertook a massive combined air strike on Ukraine overnight," Sybiha said in a post to X, saying that "civilian and energy infrastructure" were among the targets. "One of the missiles struck a major American electronics manufacturer in our westernmost region, leading to serious damage and casualties," the foreign minister added of the attack in Mukachevo, a city around 16 miles from the border with Hungary and and 25 miles from the border with Slovakia. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said the choice of the target was "very telling." "It was an ordinary civilian enterprise, an American investment," the president wrote on Telegram. "They produced such familiar household items as coffee machines. And this is also a target for the Russians." "It seems like there is no effort from the world to stop this war," Zelenskyy added. "A response is needed to this. There is still no signal from Moscow that they are really going to go into meaningful negotiations and end this war. Pressure is needed. Strong sanctions, strong tariffs." Ukraine's National Police said on social media that at least 15 people were injured in the Mukachevo attack. Sybiha said the site was "a fully civilian facility that has nothing to do with defense or the military." "This is not the first Russian attack on American businesses in Ukraine, after strikes on Boeing offices in Kyiv earlier this year and other attacks," Sybiha said. In the western city of Lviv, around 40 miles east of the Polish border, at least one person was killed and three people injured by Russian strikes, Mayor Andriy Sadovyi said on Telegram. Russia's latest attack was its largest since July 12, according to data published by Ukraine's air force and analyzed by ABC News, and breaks with the trend so far in August of smaller-scale nightly barrages when compared to figures from June and July. Wednesday night's attack was only the fourth of the war to date in which the number of Russian drones launched exceeded 500, according to the Ukrainian air force's data. The strikes again prompted the scrambling of NATO aircraft in Poland. Swedish Air Force JAS 39 Gripen fighters were among the resources deployed, Poland's Operational Command wrote in a post to X. "In connection with the activity of long-range aviation of the Russian Federation, conducting strikes on Ukrainian territory -- including with the use of hypersonic missiles -- aircraft of the Polish Air Force and allied aviation are operating in Polish airspace," the command wrote. Around three hours later, the command reported a "reduction in the level of threat" and a return to "standard operational activities." Russia's Defense Ministry, meanwhile, said its forces downed at least 71 Ukrainian drones overnight into Thursday. Voronezh region Gov. Aleksandr Gusev reported on Telegram that an energy facility was damaged by a falling drone and that the attacks caused delays to rail services in the region. The state-run Tass news agency cited Russia's atomic energy agency, Rosenergoatom, as reporting that one unit at the Novovoronezh Nuclear Power Plant was temporarily disconnected from the grid. In Rostov region, Gov. Yuri Slyusar said a fire broke out at an industrial enterprise after a drone attack. "So far, no one has been injured. Emergency services are on the scene," Slyusar wrote.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store