logo
Sussexes ‘did not leak details of meeting with King's aide'

Sussexes ‘did not leak details of meeting with King's aide'

Telegraph13-07-2025
Team Sussex was not responsible for leaking the details of a 'peace summit' to a tabloid newspaper, sources insist.
Senior aides working for the King and Prince Harry took the first steps towards rapprochement by holding sensitive talks last week.
The meeting at a private members' club in central London, was an extraordinary development in relations between the two Royal households, which in recent years have been almost non-existent.
Details including the venue, timings and nature of the talks were leaked to the Mail on Sunday. This led to the aides being 'papped' outside the club, and even during the meeting, as they enjoyed drinks on a balcony.
The leak has jeopardised the fragile peace operation, creating further suspicion and distrust on both sides and potentially sending them back to square one.
Sources close to Prince Harry insisted that the Sussexes were not responsible. They acknowledged that having the details of the meeting splashed across newspaper front pages was hardly an ideal way to start what they had hoped would be a new period of peace.
Buckingham Palace declined to comment.
Meredith Maines, the Duke's new chief communications officer based in California, was joined at the meeting by Liam Maguire, who runs the Sussexes's UK-based PR operation, and Tobyn Andreae, the King's communications secretary.
The meeting was orchestrated in a bid to start afresh, with both sides recognising that an open communication channel would benefit them all.
A source told the Mail on Sunday: 'There's a long road ahead, but a channel of communication is now open for the first time in years.
'There was no formal agenda, just casual drinks. There were things both sides wanted to talk about.'
The meeting came weeks after the Duke told the BBC that he wanted to 'get my father and brother back'.
It was hoped that the peace summit, at the Royal Over-Seas League near Clarence House, would be a line in the sand.
Ms Maines and Mr Maguire arrived at the meeting by taxi on Wednesday afternoon, followed by Mr Andreae.
The trio were seen on the club's first-floor garden terrace before moving inside.
The source described the summit as the 'first step towards reconciliation between Harry and his father' and a 'a step in the right direction', adding: 'It was finally the right time for the two sides to talk.'
The feud began when the Sussexes left their royal duties and moved to America, amid furious negotiations over the terms of their 'exit deal'.
Since leaving for the US the Sussexes have shared intimate family revelations and made damaging allegations in a series of television interviews as well as in Spare, Prince Harry's memoir.
Senior royals became 'wary' of talking to the Sussexes for fear their words would be repeated in public.
The rift widened significantly following the Sussexes' 2021 interview with Oprah Winfrey, during which they alleged a member of the Royal family was concerned about their son Archie's skin tone before he was born.
Then the Duke claimed in his controversial memoir that his brother had physically attacked him and that the King put his own interests above Harry's and was jealous of Meghan.
Prince William, in particular, was angry about how the Princess of Wales had been portrayed and at his brother's betrayal for commercial gain.
When the King was diagnosed with cancer in January 2023, Prince Harry was shaken enough to make a transatlantic dash to see his father.
But the Duke's decision to take on the Government in the High Court over his access to state-funded police protection deepened the rift.
The Duke believed the King could intervene on his behalf to negotiate an arrangement, but the King was said to have been so worried about being dragged into the case that he was hesitant to engage with his younger son in case his words were repeated in public. Harry lost his appeal in May.
The 2027 Invictus Games in Birmingham is one opportunity for a public reconciliation being discussed by both sides.
The Duke is said to have sent email invitations to Buckingham Palace in the hope that it will give the King sufficient time to fit the event into his busy schedule.
The prospect of the monarch's attendance is understood to have been discussed by senior palace aides, aware that the Games could prove a timely opportunity to mend bridges.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

National living wage likely to rise to £12.71 next year, advisory body estimates
National living wage likely to rise to £12.71 next year, advisory body estimates

The Independent

time6 minutes ago

  • The Independent

National living wage likely to rise to £12.71 next year, advisory body estimates

The national living wage could rise by as much as 65p an hour next year, an advisory body has estimated, as the terms of its annual review of wage rates were published. Ministers are determined to deliver 'a genuine living wage', according to the Low Pay Commission's (LPC) latest remit for increasing the so-called national living wage – the UK minimum wage for workers aged 21 and older. At the moment, the national living wage is £12.21 an hour. The LPC estimates that this will need to increase to £12.71 in 2026 to not fall below two-thirds of median earnings: the threshold which the Government expects it to stay above. But the LPC acknowledged the national living wage could rise to as much as £12.86 an hour, or as little as £12.55 an hour, depending on changing economic conditions. Founded in 1997, the advisory body provides recommendations to ministers each autumn regarding how it believes the minimum wage should be changed. The Government ultimately sets minimum wage rates for the following April after this advice. A letter from Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner and Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the committee must take into account the cost of living as it reviews the national living wage. The two senior ministers insisted the Government was 'committed to ensuring that the minimum wage is a genuine living wage'. They added: 'We continue to recognise that our ambition should be backed by evidence, and that the minimum wage rate should be consistent with delivering inclusive growth for working people and businesses alike. 'We are therefore asking the LPC to recommend a national living wage rate that is at least two-thirds of UK median earnings for workers aged 21 and over, to apply from next April, which takes into account the cost of living, effects on employment and developments in the wider economy.' Elsewhere, the Government is pushing forward with plans to end 'discriminatory' age banding for the minimum wage, and has extended the LPC's remit to examine this. It said the LPC will consult with employers, trade unions and workers on narrowing the gap between the national living wage and the minimum wage rate for 18 to 20-year-olds, which is currently £10. There is also a minimum wage for those aged under 18, and apprentices, of £7.55. The LPC will report back in October with advice to the Government on how much the minimum wage should rise by in 2026. The Resolution Foundation, a think tank which works to improve living standards, suggested the Government was using 'ambitious language' on increasing the minimum wage, but in reality was adopting a cautious approach. Nye Cominetti, principal economist at the think tank, said: 'Despite the Government's ambitious language around 'delivering a genuine living wage', the new remit for the Low Pay Commission represents a steady-as-she-goes approach to the adult rate, after faster increases in the years preceding 2024. 'This caution is warranted given worrying labour market data, which is thanks in part to the Government's increase in employer national insurance contributions in April.'

What are the rules around police giving out a suspect's nationality?
What are the rules around police giving out a suspect's nationality?

BBC News

time6 minutes ago

  • BBC News

What are the rules around police giving out a suspect's nationality?

Ministers have said police should be more transparent about the nationalities of people who are charged. But what exactly are the rules?When a police force in England and Wales arrests or charges a suspect and they are thinking of giving information to the media, they need to have two things in mind: the laws about contempt of court which are designed to make sure suspects have a fair trial, and the College of Policing guidance on media of court laws are quite simple in this context. No-one should make public any information that might make a future trial unfair, for example giving out details of the evidence that police officers have collected. In most cases publishing the nationality of the person charged is unlikely to make the trial unfair, so the contempt of court laws are not often College of Policing guidance is more complicated. Before 2012 police forces made decisions on what information to give to the media on a purely case by case basis. These decisions were often nuanced, but were based on how much that information was considered relevant, and were sometimes simply dependent on the force's relationship with an individual journalist. But after Lord Leveson published his report into the ethics of the press in 2012 police forces became much more cautious abut what information they culminated in the College of Policing guidance on media relations which says that if someone is arrested (but not yet charged) police should only give the suspect's gender and age. The guidance does not say anything about nationality or asylum status at this stage. Once a suspect has been charged the guidance says police can give out information such as the name, the date of birth and the address of the nationality and asylum status are not mentioned, but the guidance says: "The media are aware of automatic reporting restrictions and it is their responsibility to follow them. Any information permitted under such restrictions should be released upon charge, including the following: name, date of birth, address, details of charge, and date of court appearance. "The person's occupation can be released if it is relevant to the crime - for example, a teacher charged with the assault of a pupil at the school where they work."So there is nothing in the guidance that prevents police giving information about that nationality, asylum status or even ethnicity of someone who has been charged. But there is nothing that specifically mentions them Warwickshire Police charged two men in connection with the rape of a 12-year-old girl, the force would not say whether the men were asylum seekers. The force said: "Once someone is charged with an offence, we follow national guidance. This guidance does not include sharing ethnicity or immigration status." While this last sentence is true, the guidance does not actually make suggestions one way or another on ethnicity and immigration UK leader Nigel Farage accused the police of a response, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Tuesday: "We do think there should be greater transparency. We do think more information should be provided, including on issues around nationality including on some of those asylum issues."The prime minister's official spokesman had earlier said: "Our position is that authorities, whether it is the police or whether central government, should be as transparent as possible on these issues."In truth, what information should be released to the media is largely at the discretion of the police force. As events in Liverpool in May showed, when forces think it is in the public interest they will release information about a suspect's ethnicity even before they have been charged. When a car ploughed into crowds celebrating Liverpool FC's winning of the Premiership title, Merseyside Police quickly said the man arrested was white and British, in order to quash rumours of a terrorist College of Policing said: "Police forces make challenging and complex decisions on a case-by-case basis and transparency is essential to prevent misinformation and reassure the public."It said that its guidance was "already under review" and that police forces were considering how to balance their legal obligations with "their responsibility to prevent disorder".The issue of what information police can release about a suspect came sharply into focus last summer when Axel Rudakubana was arrested for murdering three young girls, Alice Aguiar, nine, Bebe King, six, and Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, in first Merseyside Police did not release any information about him or his religion, which allowed false information that he was a Muslim asylum seeker to spread. Such disinformation was at least partly responsible for last summer's riots. At the time Merseyside Police said it was not giving out more information because of the contempt of court Law Commission has also been looking at contempt of court laws, with a review due to report next month.

Brussels will ‘punish' Britain for not following its demands as PM's deal pushes UK into clutches of EU, economist warns
Brussels will ‘punish' Britain for not following its demands as PM's deal pushes UK into clutches of EU, economist warns

The Sun

time7 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Brussels will ‘punish' Britain for not following its demands as PM's deal pushes UK into clutches of EU, economist warns

BRUSSELS will dole out punishments to the UK for not adhering to its demands, a top economist warns. Eurocrats are pushing Britain into the clutches of the customs union and single market without the ability to make our own rules, Catherine McBride says. The revelation comes after the UK and the EU agreed a new framework back in May on post-Brexit trading arrangements on areas such as farming, defence and trade. The expert insists that new documents outlining the EU Commission's full demands from the reset will see the continent take "retribution" through our current trading relationships. She says this will strip the UK of any ability to foster the latest farming techniques or even import food from non-EU countries. McBride says that the EU Commission will have control all over the UK's agriculture and industrial imports - and also affecting our independent trade policy with the rest of the world. McBride, in a Briefings for Britain article, writes: "The UK government has effectively given the EU a free pass to penalise or, more likely, fine the UK for any transgression. "The EU will be the lawmaker, the policeman and the Judge – there will be no jury." She even echoes comments from former Prime Minister Boris Johnson who said that Sir Keir Starmer was ready to make us the EU's "gimp". When Britain voted to leave the EU it left the single market, customs union and also left the freedom of movement arrangements. Shadow Foreign Secretary Priti Patel last night said: 'The stark cost of Labour's EU surrender plan is on full display. 'Keir Starmer and his cronies have bent the knee to Brussels at every turn, and no matter the price the British public will have to pay, and now the EU is coming back for more. 'The Conservatives will always defend the democratic will of this country, and won't let Labour give up anymore of our hard earned sovereignty without a fight.' A Labour source said: 'The report is riddled with nonsense claims. "If the Shadow Foreign Secretary wants to talk about surrender, let's look at how she designed a post-Brexit migration system that was supposed to be controlled, but led to record levels of net migration. "Labour is resetting our relationship with the EU - delivering a new deal that protects jobs, lowers bills, and strengthens our borders." A Government spokesperson said: "Since 2020, British traders and shoppers have faced red tape, rising prices and delivery delays. We set out to fix this with a new partnership with the EU that will add nearly £9 billion a year to the UK economy. 'We will always act in Britain's national interest and have been clear there will be no return to freedom of movement, the customs union or the single market.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store