Federal Court of Appeal to hear arguments in B.C. ostrich farm avian flu case
The B.C. ostrich farmers who lost dozens of birds in an outbreak of avian flu last winter will be heading to the Federal Court of Appeal on Tuesday as they try to stop the remainder of their herd from being culled.
Universal Ostrich Farm near Edgewood, B.C., was ordered by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency to cull approximately 400 birds after an outbreak of the highly contagious avian flu was discovered on the farm in December.
The CFIA maintains a 'stamping out' policy, which includes the destruction of animals and the disinfection of the premises, as defined by the World Organization of Animal Health. The CFIA says it is a critical part of maintaining not only animal and human health but also Canada's status as a reliable international trading partner.
In a statement posted to its website in late May, the agency said 'all avian influenza viruses, particularly H5 and H7 viruses, have the potential to infect mammals, including humans.'
It noted that the birds on the B.C. farm were infected with a 'novel reassortment' of the virus that had not been seen anywhere else in Canada.
The CFIA said keeping the herd alive 'increases the risk of reassortment or mutation of the virus, particularly with birds raised in open pasture where there is ongoing exposure to wildlife.'
Universal Ostrich Farm is owned by Karen Espersen and Dave Bilinski. A website dedicated to their fight against the CFIA says they've been raising ostriches for more than 30 years.
The pair says destruction of the herd would force them to shut down the farming operation altogether.
Until 2020, the birds were raised for meat. In recent years the ostriches have been part of a research project in collaboration with Dr. Yasuhiro Tsukamoto, president of Kyoto Prefectural University in Japan who is also known as Dr. Ostrich.
Tsukamoto's research focuses on the antibodies in ostrich egg yolk that can block infectious diseases.
The outbreak last winter killed 69 of the 468 ostriches, the farm's website says, and an anonymous tipster reported the farm to the CFIA. The agency ordered the remaining ostriches to be culled by Feb. 1.
The farm applied for an exemption for animals with rare genetics because of the research project, but the CFIA denied that application on Jan. 10.
The agency said it was not provided documentation, including active research trial logs or detailed research protocols, and said the location is not suitable for controlled trials or research.
The farm then sought a judicial review, and was granted a stay of the cull order in the meantime.
The CFIA has imposed 19 quarantine measures on the farm, according to the farm's website. It has also issued $20,000 in penalties for failing to report the outbreak and for failing to adhere to quarantine orders.
The CFIA said in a statement the farm's actions 'reflect a disregard for regulatory compliance and animal health standards.'
Supporters spent several weeks camped out at the property in the early spring and have vowed to fight the CFIA's order.
Over the weekend the farm hosted an event it billed as 'Farm Aid Canada,' with a range of musical performers playing over three days. They included Tamara Lich, an organizer of the 'Freedom Convoy' protest that brought downtown Ottawa to a standstill in early 2022, who was convicted in April of mischief for her role in the demonstration.
The farm's owners said online that the event was a way to fundraise for the legal fees and travel costs of getting to Ottawa for Tuesday's hearing.
The case has garnered international attention, including from U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and TV personality Dr. Mehmet Oz.
The farm's owners declined Dr. Oz's offer to relocate the herd to his own Florida property. Kennedy wrote a public letter to the CFIA's president, Paul MacKinnon, arguing there was significant value in studying the birds' immune response to the virus.
Universal Ostrich Farm applied to the Federal Court for a judicial review of the CFIA's order to cull the herd, and the court dismissed both applications on May 13. The judge ruled that the agency's decision to order the cull was reasonable and procedurally fair, and noted that it is not up to the courts to resolve scientific disputes.
The Federal Court of Appeal denied the farm's request for independent testing on June 20, and ordered an expedited appeal.
The hearing is scheduled for one day.
This report by Sarah Ritchie, The Canadian Press, was first published July 14, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Wildfire smoke from Prairies prompts air quality statement for London area Thursday
Smoke from wildfires in the Prairies has drifted into southwestern Ontario, triggering a special air quality statement for the London area on Thursday. The smoke is causing or is expected to cause poor air quality and reduced visibility throughout the day, said Environment Canada. Air quality can fluctuate significantly from hour to hour and vary over short distances, depending on the movement of the smoke. The federal weather agency said conditions should begin to improve from north to south as the day progresses. Residents are being urged to take precautions, especially those considered more vulnerable, including older adults, infants, people who are pregnant, those with chronic illnesses, and anyone who works outdoors. Symptoms of smoke exposure can include irritation of the eyes, nose and throat, headaches, coughing and even chest pain or wheezing in more serious cases. "If you think you're having a medical emergency, don't wait, seek immediate help," the statement reads. People are advised to limit time outside, especially during strenuous activities. If you must be outdoors, Environment Canada recommends wearing a well-fitting N95 or equivalent respirator mask to reduce exposure to fine particulate matter. Indoors, officials say keeping windows and doors closed can help, and using a certified portable air cleaner or a clean filter in your ventilation system is also recommended.
CBC
4 hours ago
- CBC
Inuit Child First Initiative announcement imminent, says federal minister
The Indigenous Services of Canada minister says an announcement about the future of the Inuit Child First Initiative is coming, but she's remaining tight-lipped about the details for now. The Inuit Child First Initiative (ICFI) program has been in place since 2018 as a temporary measure to ensure Inuit children have timely access to essential supports and services while an Inuit-specific framework is being developed. It was set to expire earlier this year, but funding was renewed for another year. For much of last year, the program provided Nunavummiut with monthly food vouchers distributed by hamlets until that funding stream ended in March. The impact of that cut is clear, according to Kendall Aknavigak, co-founder of the Kitikmeot Friendship Society. The organization is one of several in Nunavut which helps people with their ICFI applications. "People are asking for donations for food because the food bank or their paycheck is not lasting long enough," she said. Individual requests for food support are still permitted, but Aknavigak said there are very few approvals now, and they're largely only for those with specific medical needs. Previously, people were getting requests approved for children facing financial hardship too. Aknavigak argues that by not supporting children who are hungry, the federal government is putting children's health at risk, which could further exacerbate people's demand for help. "If you're taking away the basic needs of children, you're further hindering their health needs and the needs of their parents — so it's a cascading effect," she said. In an interview with CBC News, Indigenous Services Canada Minister Mandy Gull-Masty said her priority, before the announcement, is to co-define a model with Inuit leadership to ensure any new programs the government introduces are robust. "It has to have fiscal sustainability. It has to have concrete funding in place … as something that you can access consistently," she said. Neither Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami nor Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. responded to CBC News' requests for comment. 'Not responding to that critical criteria' Gull-Masty said ICFI needs to be brought back in line with its original purpose, which is to meet the needs of the most vulnerable. That includes those facing food security issues, but she says the rollout of the hamlet food voucher program had issues. "In some instances, there were also uses of the program that were not responding to that critical criteria," she said. Vandna Sinha, associate research professor at the University of Colorado, Boulder, is part of a study reviewing the effectiveness of the hamlet food voucher program. A preliminary report cites 2022 Statistics Canada figures, which found 41.8 per cent of Nunavut children lived in households classified as poor based on the low-income measure. The welfare income available to a low-income family of four in Nunavut in 2023 was $36,783. Even with the top-up from the food voucher program, those households would still fall short of the poverty threshold for those on welfare income in the territory. "This is not a luxurious life that's being funded. The way that people talk about this is in very simple and very moving terms, such as if we're able to buy fruit," Sinha said. The study notes some flaws with the rollout of the hamlet food vouchers. They include the exclusion of seniors or those without children, and the need for more education about budgeting and buying healthy food. These are issues Sinha said could be worked on. "But to remove the hamlet food voucher programming without putting anything else in its place doesn't make sense," she said. Lack of legal protections Sinha also points out that the ICFI doesn't have the same legal protections as Jordan's Principle (JP), the program for First Nations children which the ICFI mirrors. Jordan's Principle is a human rights principle established by the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. In November 2024, the tribunal ruled that a child with no access to food or other basic necessities must be treated as an urgent case requiring action within 12 hours. But the report Sinha co-authored states that some Inuit children's immediate needs are not being addressed due to the number of children living under the poverty line, as well as the delays in approvals for grocery supports. "I think that if I was an Inuk parent … I would wonder why my child isn't also deserving of that kind of treatment that's offered to [other] urgent cases," Sinha said. Minister Gull-Masty acknowledges that ICFI doesn't have the same legally-binding mechanisms, but she said "it is one that this government has committed to responding to". Need for accountability Sindu Govindapillai agrees that the hamlet food voucher programs are only a Band-Aid solution, but they were needed in the absence of other support. She's the director of Qupanuaq, which helps people with their ICFI applications in the Baffin region. "None of us wants to be putting individual applications for clothing, for beds, for food. We know that ICFI is not the right tool to address chronic poverty across Nunavut, but we need substantial investment from the federal government to address the root causes of poverty," she said. To truly address poverty in Nunavut, she said the federal government needs to set targets to hold itself, and other organizations, accountable. "To this day, Nunavut does not have clear targets on what they want their child poverty rate to be. It was only in 2023 when we had the market basket measure that we were actually able to even measure poverty in Nunavut," she said. The market basket measure is used by Statistics Canada to set Canada's official poverty line by defining how much a family of four would have to earn to afford a basic standard of living.
CBC
4 hours ago
- CBC
Canadians' health data at risk of being handed over to U.S. authorities, experts warn
Canadians' electronic health records need more protections to prevent foreign entities from accessing patient data, according to commentary in the Canadian Medical Association Journal. "Canadian privacy law is badly outdated," said Michael Geist, law professor and Canada Research Chair in internet and e-commerce law at the University of Ottawa and co-author of the commentary. "We're now talking about decades since the last major change." Geist says electronic medical records systems from clinics and hospitals — containing patients' personal health information — are often controlled by U.S. companies. The data is encrypted and primarily stored on cloud servers in Canada, but because those are owned by American companies, they are subject to American laws. For example, Geist points out, the U.S. passed the Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data (CLOUD) Act in 2018, which can compel companies to disclose customer information for criminal investigations, even if it's stored outside the United States. The law allows for bilateral agreements with the U.S. and other countries. Canada and the U.S. began negotiations in 2022. The companies have "Canadian laws that may say they've got to provide appropriate protections for that data," Geist said. "But they may have U.S. law that could compel them to disclose that information." Canada's laws, Geist says, have not yet found a way to respond to that. How health data could be used The CMAJ commentary says "serious privacy, security, and economic risks arise when companies in other countries hold and use Canadian data." Among them, the authors point to the potential use of that information for law enforcement surveillance, or by private companies seeking to use the data to make money. Health data is deeply personal, and ongoing Canada-U.S. political tensions may cause some to be even warier about where and how their information is stored and used, says Lorian Hardcastle, assistant professor in the law faculty and Cumming School of Medicine at the University of Calgary. "There is a compelling argument to be made to say, 'Well, you know, we just need to have this information stored in Canada and not have those dealings with American companies,'" said Hardcastle. Aside from the CLOUD Act, another concern Geist lays out is the potential for foreign companies to profit off of Canadians' health data. With the growth of AI, Geist says that data has become increasingly valuable — a tremendous pool of information that could potentially be used to generate AI algorithms. (The cloud companies say their customers own and control their own data.) "We should be the ones to benefit from that," Geist said. "We should be the ones who are entitled to appropriate privacy protections." Dr. Sheryl Spithoff, an assistant professor at the University of Toronto, says these risks highlight how Canada's privacy laws fall short. "This data is patient data. It belongs to patients. That should be used for reasons that are in their interests, that bring them benefit, that don't cause harm." Tech companies respond The CMAJ commentary says three U.S. cloud companies dominate: Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure and Amazon Web Services. Google told CBC News that "customer data belongs to our customers, not to Google Cloud." It says, like many tech companies, it gets requests from governments and courts to disclose customer information, usually as part of criminal investigations. The company says it follows a "transparent, fair, and thorough process" to respond. It didn't comment specifically about Canadian health data. "Google provides a response on a case-by-case basis, taking into account different circumstances and informed by legal requirements, customer agreements, and privacy policies," it said. "We are committed to protecting privacy while also complying with applicable laws." Microsoft said that in the second half of 2022, of the nearly 5,000 demands for "consumer data" it received from U.S. law enforcement, 53 warrants sought content stored outside of the U.S. "Microsoft's compliance team reviews government demands for customer data to ensure the requests are valid, rejects those that are not valid, and only provides the data specified in the legal order." Amazon said it "does not disclose customer information in response to government demands unless we're required to do so to comply with a legally valid and binding order." In a statement, a spokesperson for Amazon Web Services wrote "there have been no data requests to AWS that resulted in disclosure to the U.S. government of enterprise or government content data stored outside the U.S. since we started reporting the statistic." Limits to Canada's privacy laws Privacy experts say the failure of Canada's privacy laws to keep pace with changing technology has put the country's data sovereignty at risk. Geist says strengthening provincial laws and the federal Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, known as PIPEDA, could help create a guardrail against potential U.S. data requests reaching into Canada. In his commentary, Geist calls for "stronger penalties for unauthorized disclosure of personal information without consent and guidance that foreign court orders related to Canadian data are unenforceable in Canada." Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada says PIPEDA applies when transferring data across the border, but Geist says the law itself isn't robust enough. Geist also calls for the country to develop Canadian cloud servers for health data, and to ensure that data is hosted on Canadian soil. The wealth of health information generated by the health-care system should stay in Canada and benefit Canadians, Geist says. He and his co-authors see the potential for health AI algorithms to be developed in Canada by Canadian companies, with robust safeguards, to support health-care decisions "based on data representative of Canada's population."
