Astronomer Says the Object Approaching Us From Beyond the Solar System Is Not What We Think
While we're only beginning to understand the unusual object, dubbed 3I/ATLAS, the discovery led to widespread speculation, with some scientists suggesting that it may be almost as old as the Milky Way galaxy itself, and billions of years older than our own Sun.
Unsurprisingly, Harvard astronomer Avi Loeb — who has extensively written about 'Oumuamua, the second interstellar object ever discovered, notably hypothesizing that it might have been a relic from an extraterrestrial civilization — has now waded into the discussion.
In a blog post on Medium, he argued that it will take more observations to conclude the nature of 3I/ATLAS, which is likely either a comet or asteroid. However, Loeb didn't rule out the "tantalizing possibility" that it was "sent towards the inner solar system by design" — a conclusion that's already proved controversial.
Loeb chided the editors of Wikipedia and the scientific journal RNAAS for striking the hypothesis from his contributions, showing once again that his theories about extraterrestrial probes visiting our solar system remain as contentious as ever.
The astronomer has remained steadfast in his belief that 'Oumuamua, an interstellar object first observed in 2017, may have been sent to us by an alien civilization, garnering him enormous attention in the media. He has even gone on to hunt for pieces of what he claims may be an alien spacecraft, based on detections of a three-foot, interstellar meteor crash-landing near Papua New Guinea in early 2014, by combing the ocean floor with a modified ship.
In other words, his latest comments about 3I/ATLAS are very much in line with what we'd expect from him.
In his blog post, Loeb announced that he had authored a new paper about 3I/ATLAS' unusual size. Based on its "anomalously bright" nature, the astronomer concluded that the object was roughly 12.4 miles in diameter.
That would make it considerably larger than 'Oumuamua, which only measured anywhere from 330 to 1,300 feet long.
However, those calculations raise more questions than answers.
The interstellar object's ' "size estimate makes little sense for an interstellar asteroid because the interstellar object 1I/'Oumuamua was 200 times smaller, and based on the statistics of asteroids in the Solar system, we should have discovered a million objects of the scale of 1I/'Oumuamua before spotting one interstellar object that is [roughly 12.4 miles] in diameter," Loeb wrote.
"We know that [12.4-mile] asteroids are rare, because non-avian dinosaurs were killed by an asteroid half that size 66 million ago, whereas meter-scale asteroids impact the Earth every year," he added.
However, subsequent observations forced Loeb back to the drawing board. Given the lack of "spectral fingerprints of atomic or molecular gas," 3I/ATLAS likely isn't a comet, as Loeb had initially suggested.
"If 3I/ATLAS is not an asteroid — based on the interstellar reservoir argument in my paper, nor a comet — based on the lack of the spectral fingerprints of carbon-based molecules around it, then what is it?" Loeb asked rhetorically, highlighting his "by design" theory.
Fortunately, there's still time for the scientific community to get a closer look.
"The size anomaly of 3I/ATLAS will be easily clarified by upcoming data," Loeb wrote. As it "gets closer to the Sun, it will get brighter. If it is a solid object without a cometary plume of gas or dust around it, then its brightness will increase inversely with the square of the decreasing distance from the Sun times the square of the distance from Earth."
"The simplest hypothesis is that 3I/ATLAS is a comet and we are missing the spectral features of its gaseous coma because of its large distance from Earth," he added.
But without any observed cometary tail, Loeb suggests there's a chance we could be looking at evidence of an extraterrestrial visitor.
"Let us instead maintain our childhood curiosity and seek evidence rather than pretend to be the adults in the room that know the answers in advance," he concluded."Science does not need to feel like a lecture in a classroom, summarizing past knowledge. It could be far more exciting if the teachers would be willing to learn something new!"
More on 3I/ATLAS: The Interstellar Visitor Hurtling Toward the Center of Our Star System Is Unimaginably Ancient, Scientists Say
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Rare interstellar object the size of Manhattan could be an alien probe: Harvard scientists
It's probe-ably nothing. The newly discovered Manhattan-sized interstellar object zooming through our solar system has been identified as a comet — but two Harvard scientists argue there is reason to believe it's really an alien probe. NASA discovered 31/ATLAS on July 1, speeding through the inner solar system at 140,000 miles per hour according to observations from the ATLAS telescope in Chile — with experts clueless as to where it originated. Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb suggested in a new paper that the object — only the third interstellar object ever detected — could be an intelligently directed alien craft observing Earth with possibly hostile intentions. 3 The trajectory of 31/ATLAS, which passes right through the interior Solar System and will end up passing Jupiter, NSF NOIRLab 'The hypothesis in question is that [31/ATLAS] is a technological artifact, and furthermore has active intelligence. If this is the case, then two possibilities follow,' Dr. Loeb, Adam Drowl, and Adam Hibberd, wrote in a paper published on July 17. 'First, that its intentions are entirely benign and second, they are malign,' the experts opined, suggesting ETs. The paper presented several anomalous characteristics of the object, which could indicate that it is not a comet at all but instead a directed craft. One of the 'most puzzling' observations is that the object has 'significant 'non-gravitational' acceleration whilst having now 'cometary outgassing.' Loeb writes that 31/ATLAS 'approaches surprisingly close to Venus, Mars and Jupiter with a probability of <0.005%,' the paper claimed. 31/ATLAS's 'low retrograde tilt' would seemingly allow it to 'access our planet with relative impunity.' 3 31/ATLAS pictured by Gemini North. NSF NOIRLab The retrograde tilt 'means attempts by humanity to intercept it, or even more difficult, rendezvous with it, are extremely challenging,' while the route simultaneously gives 31/ATLAS easy access to 'certain key target planets,' the paper hypothesized. Loeb further suggests that the tilt and pathway would allow the intelligent life on the object to gather 'astrometric measurements, to determine the orbits and masses of the Solar System planets, allowing it to prepare an optimal approach strategy to the Solar System.' Another possible smoking gun is that 31/ATLAS will come closest to the Sun on October 29 — on which day the object will be completely blocked from Earth's view by the fiery ball. 3 31/ATLAS pictured by Gemini North. NSF NOIRLab The paper, presented in part as a 'pedagogical experiment,' embraces the 'Dark Forest' hypothesis regarding alien life — which assumes that other intelligent life would likely view Earthlings as a threat to be snuffed out. The Dark Forest hypothesis, coined in the 2008 novel 'The Dark Forest' by Cixin Liu, is a direct rebuttal to the Fermi Paradox, which suggests that contact with extraterrestrial intelligences is impossible.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
'Weekend warrior' workouts may reduce risk of death in diabetics
A "weekend warrior" exercise schedule can lower diabetics' risk of early death, a new study says. People with diabetes who get all their recommended weekly exercise in one or two sessions -- the "weekend warrior" approach -- were 21% less likely to die early from any cause than their counterparts who don't work out, researchers reported Monday in the Annals of Internal Medicine. They also were 33% less likely to die from heart disease, results show. "These findings reinforce the importance of flexible physical activity patterns for people with diabetes as they can improve insulin sensitivity and glycemic control -- especially for those who face barriers to maintaining regularly routine exercise," concluded the research team led by Zhiyuan Wu, a postdoctoral research fellow at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Boston. Exercise guidelines recommend that people get at least 150 minutes of moderate physical activity every week to maintain their health, researchers said in background notes. Moderate activity can include brisk walking, slow bicycling, active yoga, ballroom dancing and general yard work. However, it's not always easy to find time to work out, researchers said. "Many people struggle to engage in regular physical activity throughout the week due to time constraints," researchers said. "To overcome this, some condense their recommended (physical activity) into one or two weekly sessions -- a pattern known as the 'weekend warrior' approach." For this study, researchers analyzed data gathered from nearly 52,000 people with diabetes between 1997 and 2018 as part of the National Health Interview Survey conducted by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The survey included questions on people's exercise patterns. Researchers compared that to 2019 death certificate data, to see whether physical activity made a difference. Not only did "weekend warrior" workouts reduce risk of premature death, they actually appeared to be more effective than regular exercise spaced out three or more times across a week, the team found. Folks with diabetes who met exercise guidelines with three or more shorter workouts weekly had a 17% lower risk of death from any cause and 19% lower risk of heart-related death, compared with those who don't work out, results show. However, researchers noted that the observational study couldn't draw a direct cause-and-effect link between exercise and lower risk of death. Future studies should more comprehensively track people's daily physical activity, including the exercise they might get as a part of their work or commute, researchers said. More information Harvard Medical School has more on the importance of exercise for diabetics. Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Your odds of having a boy or girl might not be 50/50—here's what affects it
If you've ever joked that your family only makes boys, or been asked whether you're 'trying' for a girl, you're not alone. Many parents start to notice patterns in their children's birth sexes and wonder: Is it just chance, or something more? A massive new study from researchers at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health offers surprising clarity. After analyzing data from more than 146,000 pregnancies, scientists found that birth sex may be influenced by specific factors like mom's age or the sexes of older siblings. The odds, it turns out, might not be 50/50 after all. The study focused on biological sex assigned at birth, not gender identity, which can develop differently for each person. For families raising all boys or all girls, this could finally offer an explanation. And if you're hoping your next baby brings a different dynamic, this research offers a little insight—and maybe even a little peace. What the study found The research, published in Science Advances, drew on data from the long-running Nurses' Health Study. Rather than assume each baby has an even chance of being a boy or a girl, the researchers looked for patterns across families and found a few compelling ones. Here's what they found: Family patterns matter. Families with three or more boys were more likely to have another boy. The same held true for girls. After three girls, the odds of a fourth girl were about 58%. After three boys, the odds of a fourth boy were about 61%. Maternal age may play a small role. Women who began having children after age 28 were slightly more likely to continue having children of the same sex. This may relate to hormonal changes or shifts in vaginal pH. Genetics might be involved. Two genetic markers showed potential links to sex patterns, though researchers say these findings are early and need more study. While the study doesn't offer a formula, it suggests birth sex may follow subtle biological rhythms within families. Related: Why waiting to find out your baby's sex can be (surprise!) awesome Why some families may be more likely to have boys or girls At the population level, birth sex tends to balance out, with slightly more boys born worldwide. But zoom in on individual families, and a different picture can emerge. The researchers describe it like flipping a coin that's not perfectly fair. Some families seem to have a coin that lands on 'boy' more often; others, 'girl.' That tilt, it turns out, may be more biology than luck. 'If you've had two girls or three girls and you're trying for a boy, you should know your odds are not 50-50,' The study's lead researcher Jorge Chavarro told Washington Post, 'You're more likely than not to have another girl.' The same is true for families with three boys. While the difference is subtle, the large size of the study makes these findings hard to ignore. Related: Choosing Your Baby's Sex. What doesn't make a difference Just as important, the study helped clarify what doesn't appear to influence a baby's sex. Researchers found no meaningful connection between birth sex and: Race or ethnicity Blood type Body mass index (BMI) Height Natural hair color Lifestyle habits, certain foods, or timing methods weren't included in this study and remain unproven. Since the study only included maternal data, paternal influence is still unknown. Related: Gender disappointment is real—and if you feel it, you're not alone What this means for families When you're raising three boys or three girls, people tend to notice. The questions start early—'Are you going to try again for a girl?' or 'Hoping for a boy this time?' and while often well-meaning, they can be exhausting. The truth is, many families didn't plan to end up with all boys or all girls. And according to this research, these streaks may reflect a biological pattern. That can bring a sense of relief. It shifts the narrative from personal choice or superstition to something more grounded: biology doing what it's wired to do. TikToks from #boymom and #girlmom creators show just how many families are joyfully navigating this path. And while those hashtags celebrate shared experience, it's worth remembering: every child is unique—personality isn't shaped by birth sex alone. Related: 'I dreamed of a daughter': This mom's emotional story of gender disappointment is resonating with parents Hoping for a mix? If you're hoping your next baby brings variety, you're not alone. Many parents do. This study doesn't offer a strategy, but it does offer perspective. The pattern in your family might gently continue. It's not a guarantee, but it's worth knowing. And whatever feelings come up—joy, longing, even disappointment—can all exist alongside deep love for the child you're welcoming. Related: To the mama preparing her heart for baby #2: You are ready The bottom line Science is still uncovering how families take shape. But this research offers reassurance for anyone who's noticed a pattern and wondered if it meant something more. Whether you're raising a girl gang, a pack of boys, or something in between, there's no 'right' mix. Each child brings their own kind of balance. And every family, in its own way, is already whole. Source: Science Advances. 2025. 'Is sex at birth a biological coin toss? Insights from a longitudinal and GWAS analysis' Solve the daily Crossword
