Galashiels revealed as Scotland's fastest-moving property hotspot
Two homes – both flats - were responsible for ESPC's fastest property sales transactions so far this year.
Each of the homes, located on adjacent streets less than 200m apart, were one-bedroom flats sold for £35,000 and £70,500 respectively.
ESPC, which covers Edinburgh, the Lothians, Fife, and the Scottish Borders, said that its research has shown many homes flying off the market in a matter of days.
It said that across its area 24 properties had sold within the space of just four days, with Edinburgh led the way with eight lightning-fast sales.
Galashiels saw two flats sold within 24 hours (Image: HELEN BARRINGTON) This is followed closely by the Borders and East Lothian, each recording six, and Midlothian with four.
These estate agent said that the figures show that while the capital remains a hub of market activity, demand for homes in surrounding areas remains strong, particularly for buyers looking for space, lifestyle change or better affordability.
Galashiels, which the main town in the Borders, is known for its rural charm and quiet streets. The town is home to the 'Braw Lads Gathering' each year, where riders take to horseback to commemorate the establishment of the Burgh Charter.
A former centre for textile production, many of its former industrial buildings have been repurposed. It is the area's centre for retail, with Marks and Spencer, next and Matalan present on its business park.
READ MORE: 'Prominent' city office and studio building put up for sale
Guest house with 'panoramic views' of Ben Nevis for sale
ESPC said that the quick turnover in traditionally less urbanised areas like the Borders and East Lothian may reflect an ongoing shift in buyer priorities, with people continuing to seek out properties that offer a blend of rural appeal and good transport links.
Galashiels lies one hour's drive from Edinburgh of the A7, and is also linked by train and bus services.
The homes that sold within this ultra-fast timeframe were fairly evenly split between flats and houses, with 12 flats and 11 houses making the list.
One retirement home was also included, highlighting that demand for speedy sales spans a wide range of buyer profiles.
ESPC said that the strong showing from flats - particularly in urban locations like Edinburgh - is consistent with a broader return to city living post-pandemic, as lifestyle habits shift back towards offices, cultural activities and amenities.
Galashiels, in the Scottish borders (Image: Getty Images/iStockphoto) Meanwhile, houses continue to attract families and professionals seeking extra space and gardens, particularly in East Lothian and Midlothian.
The majority of the properties (17 out of 24) were marketed at 'Offers Over,' suggesting that this pricing strategy is still highly effective at driving competition and accelerating sales.
Guide Price was used for four of the properties, with Fixed Price and In The Region Of used for the remainder.
The average sale price among the 24 properties was £218,025, with individual prices ranging from as low as £35,000 to as high as £415,000.
The average percentage of Home Report valuation achieved was 103.70%, with one property achieving 111% of its valuation.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
30 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Ash Regan to Elon Musk: 'Forget Trump and bring SpaceX to Scotland'
Musk has warned that the bill will increase the federal deficit and called it a 'disgusting abomination'. Trump criticised Mr Musk in the Oval Office, and before long, he and Mr Musk began trading bitterly personal attacks on social media, sending the White House and Republican congressional leaders scrambling to assess the fallout. As the back-and-forth intensified, Mr Musk suggested Mr Trump should be impeached and claimed without evidence that the government was concealing information about the President's association with infamous paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Now Ash Regan says that the country should 'be quick' to take advantage of such situations. The Alba MSP believes that with Scotland's emergence in the Space and satellite industries, attempts should be made to tempt Musk to relocate his business ventures to Scotland. With Trump's family and business ties to Scotland, her party said that such a move by Musk could 'prompt a bidding war between the President of the United States and one of the worlds richest men as to who can invest more in Scotland.' Commenting, Ash Regan said: 'The Scottish space industry, including satellite-related activities, is projected to be worth £4 billion to the Scottish economy by 2030. Glasgow is already known as the satellite manufacturing capital of Europe, and we are on the verge of becoming a global player in the industry. 'We have the sites, the people and the vision to match Elon Musk's aspirations for SpaceX so the Scottish Government should be opening the door and advertising Scotland is the go to place if he wishes to relocate his business ventures here if contract cancellation threats in the US are upheld. 'I previously proposed Scotland as the site for the next Tesla Gigafactory and unfortunately Elon Musk ruled out investment due to the policies of the UK Labour Government. However, the Scottish Government have been a key partner in the growing success of our satellite industry, so in Scotland we would have a much opportunity of attracting such investment where the UK Government has previously failed. 'Scotland has the potential for abundant renewable energy, which is needed to power emergent technologies. By creating innovative investment opportunities, we can then capitalise on Scotland's USP, ensuring we invest this bounty to benefit Scotland's businesses and communities. "No more being left behind as passengers while Westminster squanders the power of our own resources. We need to think independently and act like a forward looking nation to show our people we can thrive with independence.'
.jpeg%3Fwidth%3D1200%26auto%3Dwebp%26quality%3D75%26crop%3D3%3A2%2Csmart%26trim%3D&w=3840&q=100)
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
MSP says Elon Musk should ‘forget Trump and bring SpaceX to Scotland'
Calls are being made to create a bidding war for Scottish investment between the tech mogul and the US president. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Elon Musk should relocate his American business interests in Scotland after his public falling out with US President Donald Trump, an MSP has suggested. The pair have clashed in recent days over a bill which the tech mogul says will increase the US budget deficit - he has since become one of Mr Trump's fiercest critics. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Ash Regan MSP says Scotland should 'be quick' to take advantage of this and lobby Mr Musk to relocate his business ventures to Scotland. Elon Musk at the White House. | Getty Images The Alba MSP, who previously called on the billionaire to open a Tesla Gigafactory in Scotland, says Scotland is an emerging force within the space and satellite industries, and branded Glasgow the 'satellite manufacturing capital of Europe'. Due to Mr Trump's family and business ties to Scotland, Ms Regan believes such a move by Mr Musk could 'prompt a bidding war between the president of the United States and one of the world's richest men as to who can invest more in Scotland'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad This comes after Mr Trump threatened to cut US government contracts given to Mr Musk's SpaceX rocket company and his Starlink internet satellite services - in response, Mr Musk said SpaceX 'will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately'. He U-turned on this statement within hours, as SpaceX is the only US company capable of transporting crews to and from this space station using its four-person Dragon capsules. Cargo versions of this capsule are also used to ferry food and other supplies to the orbiting lab. Donald Trump and Elon Musk pictured at the White House in March (Picture: Roberto Schmidt) |Ms Regan said: 'The Scottish space industry, including satellite-related activities, is projected to be worth £4 billion to the Scottish economy by 2030. 'Glasgow is already known as the satellite manufacturing capital of Europe, and we are on the verge of becoming a global player in the industry. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'We have the sites, the people and the vision to match Elon Musk's aspirations for SpaceX so the Scottish Government should be opening the door and advertising Scotland as the go-to place if he wishes to relocate his business ventures here if contract cancellation threats in the US are upheld.' Scotland is currently developing multiple spaceports, including the Sutherland Spaceport in the Highlands and the SaxaVord Spaceport in Shetland - Ms Regan says both these sites are ready for Mr Musk to relocate his SpaceX operations to. The Alba MSP said other suitable sites include the proposed Spaceport 1 in the Outer Hebrides, the Macrihanish Spaceport Cluster and Prestwick Spaceport. She says Scotland cannot be left behind as passengers in this emerging industry, and added: 'I previously proposed Scotland as the site for the next Tesla Gigafactory and unfortunately Elon Musk ruled out investment due to the policies of the UK Labour government. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Edinburgh Eastern MSP Ash Regan's Bill would criminalise the purchase of sexual acts. Picture: Getty Images. | Getty Images 'However, the Scottish Government has been a key partner in the growing success of our satellite industry, so in Scotland we would have a much better opportunity of attracting such investment where the UK Government has previously failed. 'Scotland has the potential for abundant renewable energy, which is needed to power emergent technologies. 'By creating innovative investment opportunities, we can then capitalise on Scotland's USP, ensuring we invest this bounty to benefit Scotland's businesses and communities. 'No more being left behind as passengers while Westminster squanders the power of our own resources.
Sunday Post
3 hours ago
- Sunday Post
£80m for carbon capture shelved after Greens threatened SNP pact
Get a weekly round-up of stories from The Sunday Post: Thank you for signing up to our Sunday Post newsletter. Something went wrong - please try again later. Sign Up Vital funding to accelerate a carbon capture and storage project that could create thousands of jobs in Scotland was shelved after the Scottish Greens threatened to put their power-sharing agreement with the SNP at risk, we can exclusively reveal. It is one of a series of stark revelations uncovered by a Sunday Post investigation into why £80 million promised by the Scottish Government for the landmark Acorn project has yet to materialise. The Acorn project would see harmful greenhouse gas emissions piped under the North Sea and then stored, creating almost 5,000 long-term jobs and billions of investment for the Scottish economy. But we found squabbling between political factions and attempts to shift blame have caused the money to be held up at a time when the north east is haemorrhaging jobs. The SNP offered up the cash to encourage the UK Government to rethink after the Scottish Cluster, a group of decarbonisation projects focused on Peterhead Power station, missed out on funding in 2021. But earlier this year, SNP energy secretary Gillian Martin admitted there were no plans to pay out and claimed that investors do not currently need the cash. Previously unseen private communications, memos and briefing notes show: The Scottish Greens threatened to publicly disagree with the government's energy strategy if it handed out the £80m for carbon capture – a move that could have put the Bute House agreement in jeopardy. Emails sent between senior SNP figures and notes issued by special advisors indicate the funding was not originally conditional on UK Government support – as SNP ministers now claim. There was nearly three months of delay in discussing the funding at ministerial level while jobs were placed at risk. Net Zero secretary Michael Matheson was rebuked by UK energy minister Greg Hands for releasing details of their 'confidential' meeting so he could make an announcement ahead of an Environmental Information Request going public. Last night the GMB union described the revelations as 'shocking confirmation of ministers' inertia as a jobs catastrophe looms in the North Sea'. Meanwhile, nearly £22 billion has been promised over the next 25 years for Merseyside and Teesside, supporting thousands of roles. What does the Bute House memo say? A Bute House memo dated December 2022 – nearly a year after the £80m was announced – illustrates the power the Greens held over government energy policy at the time. It states the group had already been handed assurances of changes made in 'several areas'. The author, Green MSP Mark Ruskell, notes this is particularly the case in the Just Transition chapter of the government's plans. © KATIE NOBLE The note says the Greens would 'likely need to publicly disagree' with elements of the Energy Strategy and Just Transition Plan if it was published in its current form. It states the party would like to see any financial support for carbon capture and blue hydrogen come out of UK Government money, 'reallocating Scottish Government funding for other pressing priorities'. It adds that this includes reallocating the £80m projected spend from the Emerging Energy Technologies Fund on the Scottish Cluster. The Scottish Government had previously warned withdrawing the funding would give the impression that it no longer supports Acorn and would be contrary to the Bute House Agreement – an argument refuted by the Greens in the memo. Jobs 'still at risk' Scottish Conservative energy spokesman Douglas Lumsden said: 'This internal memo, hidden until now, shows the extremist Greens have had a veto on SNP energy policy for years. 'Although the Emerging Energy Technologies Fund promised £80m to develop the Scottish Cluster, the Greens said no. Then it was canned. 'Tens of thousands of Scottish jobs remain at risk because Patrick Harvie's paw prints are still all over Scottish Government policy.' © DC Thomson Environmental groups are sceptical of carbon capture and argue it props up the fossil fuel industry by hiding emissions, rather than cutting them. But the energy firms behind Acorn estimate the project will add £17.7 billion to UK GDP by 2050, create over 10,800 jobs during construction and sustain 4,700 long-term operational roles. It has been listed since 2023 as one of two new carbon capture projects awaiting formal backing by the UK Government following approval of the two clusters in England. Greens stand by carbon capture stance Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie said his party has always been sceptical about both the Scottish and UK governments putting too much reliance on 'untested' carbon capture technology, adding that it is firmly opposed to using it as an excuse for more fossil fuel extraction or burning. He said: 'At best – if it ever works – it could reduce emissions from the residual use of fossil fuel while we do everything we can to shift to renewables. 'But it's too often being used as an excuse for business as usual, which is why it's no surprise to see the anti-environment Conservatives backing it.' © Jane Barlow/PA Wire The Scottish Government claims the delay in handing over the money is linked to the UK Government taking so long to approve the project. However, internal memos and correspondence reveal no such conditions were in place when the money was first allocated. In a letter to Shona Robison in December 2021 – six weeks before the Acorn funding announcement – Michael Matheson said the Scottish Cluster would be supported without caveat by the same £80 million from the same fund. This is parroted in a number of other pieces of correspondence sent by Matheson that have subsequently been obtained by The Sunday Post. Around six weeks later, advisers began to gameplan the 'conditionality of funding point', adding that the 'key point to make would be that the £80m is not enough, and UKG support is still required in terms of access to business models etc.' SNP minister rebuked We can reveal officials were then left scrambling to put out an announcement because a letter from Matheson to UK energy minister Greg Hands referencing the cash was set to be released to the public through an Environmental Information Request. But Matheson was given a dressing down by Hands on January 19 2022 for making the announcement following what was supposed to be a confidential meeting. Hands wrote: 'You had been seeking a meeting with me for some days, which I agreed to, but at no point during what I understood to be a confidential meeting between two ministers, was it said that a media notification would follow the meeting. 'Instead, we had I thought, agreed at the meeting that the two governments would work together, which is what I believe the Acorn project would want, and the people of Scotland would expect.' © PA Hands says he told Matheson during the meeting that the £80m funding 'needs careful consideration but does not address some of the key challenges'. These include the likely burden of ongoing revenue support payments and practical constraints of supporting multiple carbon capture projects in three different areas of the UK to launch at the same time. Further correspondence reveals the Scottish Government was not notified the Scottish Cluster would not be included in a list of fast-tracked projects before the announcement was put out publicly. © Thomas Krych/ZUMA Press Wire/Shu Three meetings between Matheson and Hands were arranged and then cancelled around this time and there was no direct response to the funding offer in Matheson's letter to the Chancellor in October 2021 or a subsequent letter from the first minister to the prime minister the following month. This meant there was a nearly three month delay in discussing the funding proposal at a ministerial level. 'Inertia and inaction' GMB Scotland secretary Louise Gilmour said needless delays in driving through investment for Acorn exposes the abject failure of UK and Scottish governments to protect the sector or deliver new jobs in green energy. She said: 'Offshore production and onshore supply chains are in crisis with thousands of skilled jobs on the line but, behind the scenes, our ministers are apparently spending their time on spin and squabbles. 'There is clearly no joined-up thinking between our governments and no concerted plan of action. Instead, there are politicians playing games. © Andrew Cawley 'There is only inertia and inaction while thousands of well-paid jobs are in peril along with the families and communities that rely on them.' The Scottish Government said its Programme for Government 'made clear' that it is committed to the £80 million of support. However no actual funding was allocated and the project was not even mentioned in the 2025-26 Scottish Budget. The government added that the funding is 'contingent upon the UK Government confirming a full-funding package and timeline for the Acorn project at the Spending Review'.
