Fire breaks out in Ujjain's Mahakal temple, no casualties reported
A sudden blaze erupted at the revered Mahakal Temple in Madhya Pradesh's Ujjain on Monday, but was soon tackled, and no casualties were reported in the incident, officials said.
The fire is reported to have erupted around noon at the control room situated above the pollution board's facility within the temple premises at the Avantika Gate, designated as Gate No. 1 of the temple complex. The flames consumed the structure soon, triggering anxiety among onlookers.
Billowing flames and smoke were visible from afar, sending waves of alarm through the vicinity.
Swiftly responding to the situation, authorities suspended the entry of devotees to ensure safety.
As the news of the conflagration spread swiftly across Ujjain, fire brigade teams raced to the scene to quell the blaze and succeeded in dousing it soon. However, they did not comment on the cause of the sudden fire.
Senior officials, including the District Collector and Superintendent of Police, arrived to oversee the situation.
"No human casualty has been reported so far," a senior official said.
Officials said that once the fire was extinguished, the temple gates would be reopened, restoring access to the devotees.
Preliminary assessments suggest an electrical short circuit as the likely origin, yet a definitive conclusion awaits a detailed inquiry.
The blaze is said to have sparked from the batteries of the Air Quality Management System operated by the pollution control board.
Each day, thousands of devotees make their way to the 'Baba Mahakal' (Lord Shiva) temple, and the unexpected fire created anxiety and disorder.
The Centre had developed the Mahakal Lok Corridor at the Mahakaleshwar Temple in Ujjain, with the 900-metre-long corridor expanding the temple premises from three hectares to 47 hectares, incorporating new pathways and upgrading facilities to enhance the spiritual experience for devotees.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
5 hours ago
- Indian Express
What Mizoram, Goa's ‘fully literate' tag under the ULLAS program means
Last month, Mizoram and Goa declared themselves to be 'fully literate' states under ULLAS (Understanding Lifelong Learning for All in Society), a literacy programme for people over 15 who may not have attended school. While Goa's literacy rate was 99.72%, Mizoram's stood at 98.2%. These states followed Ladakh, which was the first in the country to have declared itself 'fully literate' under the scheme in June last year, having 'achieved more than 97% literacy'. Launched by the Centre, the ULLAS scheme (also known as the New India Literacy Programme) is being implemented from 2022 to 2027. It aims to equip 5 crore 'non-literate individuals' over the age of 15 across the country with foundational literacy and numeracy skills, which means basic reading and writing and simple arithmetic learnt in primary classes. The teaching material is also meant to impart 'critical life skills' like financial and digital literacy. Working with schools and officials, states and Union Territories have identified people who need such education through door-to-door surveys. They are then taught by registered volunteers – school students, students from higher education and teacher education institutions, and community members. The NCERT has developed the learning material, and the states have done it in their local languages. A mobile app is available for teaching and learning, but it can also be done offline. ULLAS is the latest of the adult literacy programmes rolled out by the Indian government since the 1950s. This includes programmes targeting farmers and women in the 1960s and '70s, and a country-wide programme called the National Adult Education Programme for the 15-35 age group. Then came the National Literacy Mission from 1988 to 2009 for this bracket. The UPA government launched the 'Saakshar Bharat' (Literate India) scheme in 2009, and it ran until 2018. It equipped those aged 15 and above with functional literacy and was also linked to opportunities for skill development and further education. ULLAS also includes these goals. How has the scheme fared so far? Learners are administered the Functional Literacy Numeracy Assessment Test (FLNAT) – a 150-mark reading, writing and numeracy test, conducted in different languages. Upon passing the test, the learner is certified by the National Institute of Open Schooling (NIOS) as having acquired foundational literacy and numeracy. An official in the Ministry of Education said that from March 2023 onwards, 1.77 crore people have appeared for FLNAT across 33 states/UTs. While the Centre provides the question paper, states contextualise it and translate it into local languages. The ULLAS website says there are around 2.43 crore registered learners, and 1.03 crore people have been certified so far. Data from the tests conducted in 2024 show varying performance across states. In Tamil Nadu and Goa, 100% of those who appeared for FLNAT passed. The official said that nationally, on average, 90% of those who appear pass. In last year's tests, Gujarat and Tripura had a lower-than-average pass percentage – 87.07% and 75.97%, respectively. It stood at a little over 85% in Uttarakhand and Jharkhand, over 95% in Punjab, Assam and UP, and a little more than 99% in Delhi and Rajasthan. In Jharkhand, Tamil Nadu, Punjab, Uttarakhand, and Mizoram, more than 70% of those who appeared for the test last year were women. This figure is over 65% in Odisha, UP, Assam, Rajasthan, Sikkim, and Delhi. How is 'full literacy' defined? The Ministry of Education wrote to the states in August last year, defining 'literacy' and '100% literacy' for ULLAS. Literacy was defined as 'the ability to read, write, and compute with comprehension i.e to identify, understand, interpret and create, along with critical life skills such as digital literacy, financial literacy etc.' It added that achieving 95% literacy in a State/UT may be considered equivalent to being fully literate. The communication also referred to the National Education Policy 2020, which calls for government initiatives for adult education to 'expedite the all-important aim of achieving 100% literacy'. It mentioned the UN Sustainable Development Goals, which include ensuring that 'all youth and a substantial proportion of adults, both men and women, achieve literacy and numeracy' by 2030. States were urged to strive towards this goal. Goa, Mizoram, and Ladakh have said they surpassed the 95% literacy mark. Key to this is ensuring that people identified as non-literate after ULLAS take the FLNAT. According to an SCERT official in Goa, data from 116 of the state's panchayats and municipalities report literacy rates between 95% and 100%. In the remaining 89 panchayats/municipalities/ municipal corporations, the state identified 6,299 non-literate people, and under ULLAS, 2,136 were trained and cleared FLNAT. Not all identified people could be trained. Several were elderly and could not or did not want to participate, the official said. 'At the panchayat level, over 80 panchayats declared themselves to be 100% literate after conducting a survey. Considering the population from the last census, and the non-literate people who were identified (under ULLAS), the literacy rate of 99.72% was arrived at,' the official said. In Mizoram, an SCERT official pointed to data from the Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS). The 2023-24 PLFS annual report shows a literacy rate of 98.2% among those aged 7 and above. Mizoram identified 3,026 non-literate people in 2023, and 1,692 were trained under ULLAS. Ladakh had identified over 32,000 non-literate people under ULLAS. Around 7,300 learners appeared for FLNAT in Ladakh in the first phase, then over 22,000 in the second phase in 2023, and over 4,600 in the third phase in early 2024. In June 2024, it was declared 'fully literate' under ULLAS. What do other surveys show? According to the 2023-24 PLFS report, Goa has a literacy rate of 93.6%, while Ladakh has a literacy rate of 81% among those aged 7 and above. PLFS identifies a person who can both read and write a simple message with understanding in at least one language as 'literate'. The 2011 census reported a national average literacy rate of 74.04%, and an adult literacy rate (of those aged 15 and above) of 69.3%, up from 61% in 2001. This translates to 25.76 crore non-literate individuals, comprising 9.08 crore males and 16.68 crore females. In the 2011 census, Goa had a literacy rate of 88.7%, while Mizoram recorded 91.3%. The highest figure of 94% was recorded in Kerala. At an event last year, School Education Secretary in the Ministry of Education, Sanjay Kumar, said: 'We are trying that in those States where literacy levels are high, we can try and make them 100% literate via ULLAS. According to the figures I have with me, there is Goa, Mizoram, Daman & Diu and Dadra & Nagar Haveli, Chandigarh, Lakshadweep, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Puducherry.'
Indian Express
a day ago
- Indian Express
Vidarbha's ‘Zudpi' scrub lands are ‘forest' lands: how SC ruling has struck a balance between development and environment concerns
After several decades of litigation over about 86,000 hectares of Zudpi jungle (shrub forest) lands peculiar to Maharashtra's eastern Vidarbha region, the Supreme Court last month ruled that such lands should be considered as 'forest' lands. On May 22, the top court provided clarity on the usage of Zudpi lands, saying they cannot be converted without prior approval from the central government, and only after complying with the conditions laid down by the court. An official report referred to by the court says Zudpi is a Marathi word that literally translates to bushes or shrubs, and Zudpi land means an inferior type of unoccupied land with bushy growth. The term was used for all wastelands that were not occupied by individual farmers for cultivation and other purposes. According to the report, Zudpi jungle lands are peculiar to six districts of eastern Vidarbha (Nagpur division) – Nagpur, Chandrapur, Gadchiroli, Bhandara, Wardha, and Gondia – and have been used for non-forest purposes for the past several decades. These lands, traditionally used for grazing, were classified as Gairan under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. For decades, legal status uncertain Vidarbha's Zudpi lands remained in a legal limbo for decades due to administrative lapses, inconsistent government actions, and contrasting interpretations of India's forest laws. Initially vested with the Revenue Department, these lands were used for development, public amenities like schools, health centres, water pipelines, burial grounds, and for allotment to landless farmers. They were also used for infrastructure projects, including railways, defence, and irrigation. After the reorganisation of states in 1960, similar lands elsewhere in Maharashtra were recorded as Gairan or Gurcharan. However, in Vidarbha, they continued to be classified as 'Zudpi Jungle' due to bureaucratic inaction. The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 (FCA) prohibited diversion of forest land without the Centre's approval. However, in November 1987, the Maharashtra government issued an order declaring Zudpi lands as 'scrub forests' that would not attract the provisions of FCA, and handed them to the Revenue Department for afforestation and grazing purposes. This 1987 Government Order was challenged by the Bombay Environmental Action Group (BEAG) before the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court. While this plea was pending, the Centre in February 1992 changed and relaxed its earlier position. It clarified that Zudpi Jungle would continue to be treated as 'forest lands' under the FCA; however, for the part of Zudpi lands that were used for non-forest purposes, the state government shall make a proposal to the Centre seeking its approval under the FCA. Taking a cue from the Centre's decision, the Maharashtra government in 1994 withdrew its 1987 order. With these changing positions, ambiguity prevailed until the Supreme Court's December 12, 1996 judgment in the 'TN Godavarman Thirumulpad' case, which stated that Zudpi lands would also be treated as 'forest lands' under the FCA. In 1998, a High-Powered Committee appointed by the state government recommended that 92,115 hectares should be declared protected forests and 86,409 hectares that were unfit for forest use should be de-notified. Eight years ago, the state government again pushed to denotify Zudpi jungle lands. In 2019, the Maharashtra government, through the Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur, filed an interim application and sought the SC's approval to exclude the latter category of land from the purview of FCA. The SC formed a Central Empowered Committee (CEC), which filed its first report after site visits. Since some issues were yet to be resolved, the SC last year sought another report from the CEC. This report formed the basis of the SC's May 22, 2025 verdict. GOVERNMENT: The Maharashtra government argued that Zudpi lands were never forest lands, and due to the reorganisation of states and the inaction of certain officials, the revenue records were never corrected. As such, these lands continued to be erroneously described as Zudpi lands in revenue records. The state argued that denying it relief would lead to 'grave and irreparable damage' to lakhs of citizens, and would stall several projects. INTERVENER: Environmentalist Prasad Khale, intervener in the case, however, argued that de-notifying these lands would degrade healthy forests and disrupt wildlife corridors. He submitted that the 2025 CEC report had ignored ecological concerns, including those of wildlife corridors and the protection of scrub forests, which should not be used for non-forest activities. SC directives strike a balance The Bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Bhushan R Gavai and Justice Augustine Masih said that it could arrive at a solution to 'balance the rights of the citizens at large on one hand and the interest of the environment on the other hand' due to the efforts made by the CEC. The SC recognised that a large number of Zudpi lands in Nagpur city alone had public utilities such as the High Court building, defence buildings, state secretariat, graveyards, etc. It said citizens residing on these lands for years, or farmers could not be deprived of their residence or livelihood. Therefore, the Supreme Court held that Zudpi jungle lands would be treated as forests, but made exceptions for lands allotted for non-forest use before December 12, 1996. For such lands, where classification (purpose) hadn't changed, the state would be required to obtain the Centre's approval under Section 2 of the FCA for their deletion from the list of forest areas. The court said the Centre shall consider proposals without imposing compensatory afforestation conditions, and should not seek deposition of Net Present Value (NPV) levies. The court directed the Centre and the state to consult and finalise a proposal format within three months with prior approval of the CEC. For post-December 12, 1996 allotments of Zudpi lands, the Centre shall process proposals only after ascertaining reasons and ensuring action against the officers who took allotment decisions in violation of the SC's directions. Special Task Forces in each district will remove encroachments made after October 25, 1980, within two years. All commercial allotments post-October 25, 1989, are to be treated as encroachments. The court clarified no land may be diverted to non-government entities after scrutiny. The Revenue Department must transfer remaining Zudpi lands to the Forest Department within a year, which are to be used for compensatory afforestation. Other Zudpi lands will not be allowed for compensatory afforestation unless certified by the Chief Secretary. Benefitting the state's development plans The verdict has in some ways paved the way for infrastructure and other development works that the state government plans to undertake on certain tracts of lands, after obtaining approval from the central government. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis welcomed the ruling, calling it a boost to Vidarbha's stalled development. The CEC will monitor the transfer of forest land, as directed by the SC. States and Union Territories have been directed to reclaim possession of such lands from occupiers and hand them over to the Forest Department. The SC had said that if reclaiming possession is not in the public interest, the state/UTs shall recover land costs from occupiers and use them to develop forests.
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Goa to submit eco-sensitive plan to Centre, seeks fresh survey under PMAY
PANAJI : Chief minister Pramod Sawant on Friday said that Goa aims to be the first state to prepare and submit an eco-sensitive plan to the Centre. 'Goa will be the first state to submit an eco-sensitive zone plan to the Centre. We are working on sustainable development; there is no haphazard management,' said Sawant at the regional rural workshop for the Pradhan Mantri Awaas Yojana (Gramin). Sawant said that Goa govt is formulating schemes so that even people from the OBC and economically weaker sections can get proper houses in Goa. 'Under the PMAY , we have just 250 beneficiaries. Of those more than 240 houses were already built. But there is a need to conduct a fresh survey under this scheme,' said Sawant. He said that some of the prospective beneficiaries migrated to other states, while there are some people who did not qualify for the scheme even though they required houses. 'There are some people who are living in a joint family, and they cannot benefit from these schemes. We need to expand this scheme, extend the benefits, but these people must settle in the villages and not in the towns,' said Sawant. The chief minister said that people must be encouraged to stay in the villages. 'If people migrate from villages to towns, the ecosystem will be disturbed. For this ecosystem not to get disturbed, people must be encouraged to stay in the villages. I am sure the Centre will think about this too. It is necessary that people get houses in their own villages,' he said. Sawant said that Goa is the first state to ensure that all central schemes reach every citizen in the state. 'We succeeded in taking all the schemes to at least 90% of the people. There may be a few people who were not able to benefit from the schemes,' he said.
