logo
Russian Philosopher Aleksandr Dugin: Islamic World's Response to the Gaza War Was Pitiful and Disgusting; It Was a Defeat and We Should Not Call It Victory; Islam Will Become a Real Global Power When

Russian Philosopher Aleksandr Dugin: Islamic World's Response to the Gaza War Was Pitiful and Disgusting; It Was a Defeat and We Should Not Call It Victory; Islam Will Become a Real Global Power When

Memri14-02-2025

Russian philosopher Aleksandr Dugin said that he was disgusted by the Islamic response to Israel's war against Hamas and Hizbullah. 'Where is Islamic solidarity? Where is the Islamic world?', he asked, saying that only 'a small population of brave Houthis' demonstrated the 'Islamic warrior spirit.'
Speaking on the Hira podcast, posted on YouTube on February 3, 2025, Dugin said that he was 'depressed and disappointed' by the 'pitiful reaction from Turkey and other Islamic countries.' He slammed what he called the 'huge defeat of the Islamic world before the globalist liberal West and Israel,' and said that mainstream Islam is composed of different opportunistic and corrupt regimes. He further said that while Salafis could kill and torture innocent women and children, when it comes to the fight against Israel or the West, 'they are like domestic pets. They are kittens.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Iranian Shi'ite Regime's Built-In Religious Mechanisms For Dealing With Grave Military Threats: Tactical And Temporary Concessions – Which It Calls 'Heroic Flexibility' – That It Has Employed Seve
The Iranian Shi'ite Regime's Built-In Religious Mechanisms For Dealing With Grave Military Threats: Tactical And Temporary Concessions – Which It Calls 'Heroic Flexibility' – That It Has Employed Seve

Memri

time5 hours ago

  • Memri

The Iranian Shi'ite Regime's Built-In Religious Mechanisms For Dealing With Grave Military Threats: Tactical And Temporary Concessions – Which It Calls 'Heroic Flexibility' – That It Has Employed Seve

Under various historical circumstances over the past 30 years, the leaders of Iran's Islamic revolutionary regime have made tactical concessions when facing a genuine military threat. The regime grants these concessions religious legitimacy based on Shi'ite Islamic history. It should be clarified that the Iranian regime is a religious-messianic regime that bases its activity on a systematic ideology and religious principles that it draws on as needed to justify its actions. According to the regime, such concessions are a tactical way to circumvent serious obstacles so as to achieve its strategic goals. Tactical concessions are essential when under Western pressure, so as to continue to pursue the aims of the Islamic revolution. Iran's nuclear program, which is aimed at acquiring nuclear weapons, is a strategic goal. It is aimed at ensuring the regime's survival and security, on the path to actualize the supreme goal of the Islamic revolution: a global Islamic civilization/Islamic world order led by Iran. It should be noted that Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei considers the figure of Hassan ibn Ali (625-670 CE), the Second Imam, as an role model. Khamenei draws inspiration from Hassan's actions against much more powerful political and military rivals and follows his example in similar circumstances while refraining from direct military confrontation with them. Khamenei translated into Farsi the book The Peace Treaty of Hassan[1] which analyzes the circumstances of Hassan's 661 CE concession on his demand to rule to his rival, the Umayyad caliph Mu'awiya ibn Abu Sufyan. The book justifies Hassan's decision to sign a peace treaty ceding the caliphate, because he was in a much weaker position than the Sunni Mu'awiya and his forces and feared that war with them would endanger his Shi'ite community and religion. The conditions Hassan set for his concession to Mu'awiya were aimed at ensuring that the peace would be temporary. For his translation of the book, Khamenei added to the title "The Peace Treaty of Hassan" the subtitle "The Most Heroic and Glorious Flexibility [narmash-e kaharmananeh, ] in History," underlining Hassan's tactical decision in negotiating with forces much stronger than his. The following are some examples of instances in which Iran's Islamic revolutionary regime made tactical concessions to boost its position when facing a stronger force. 1. During the regime of Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi, Khamenei, when in prison, began collaborating with the shah's security forces. He and his followers called this "heroic flexibility," narmash-e kaharmananeh (see Name Description (Sharh-e Esm) – Biography of Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Hosseini Khamenei). 2. In July 1988, the founder of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, agreed to a ceasefire with Iraq (UN Security Council Resolution 598) after eight years of war and economic devastation to Iran.[2] In October 2012, an article by Iranian Assembly of Experts member Ayatollah Mohi Al-Din Haeri Shirazi was published on Khamenei's website; it compared Khomeini's decision to stop the war to the Shi'ite Imam Hassan's decision to cede the caliphate to the Sunni Mu'awiya. In a July 2013 interview on the anniversary of UNSC Resolution 598, Expediency Council chairman Hashemi Rafsanjani, who was also Khomeini's right-hand man and president of Iran, compared Khomeini's decision to the Imam Hassan's decision to sign a peace treaty with the Sunni Mu'awiya. Also in 2012, Khamenei himself published several positive statements about Khomeini's decision to stop the war in 1988 due to Iran's severe economic situation, and stressed the achievements that followed this decision. 3. In 2003, as U.S. troops deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan and the Iranian regime leadership began to sense that it was besieged and faced an existential threat, the regime announced that it was temporarily suspending its nuclear program and accepting security conventions that it had until then rejected. 4. In September 2013, Khamenei used the term "heroic flexibility" – narmash-e kaharmananeh – to allow talks with the Obama administration despite Iran's nonrecognition of the U.S., the "Great Satan." This was aimed at obtaining international recognition for, and upgrading, Iran's nuclear program, and at getting the nuclear sanctions on Iran lifted. On Khamenei's website, the term "heroic flexibility" was explained as follows: "We do not oppose correct and logical diplomatic moves... I have for years believed in what is called 'heroic flexibility.' Flexibility is highly essential in certain places; it is very good. There's nothing wrong with it, but this wrestler, who is fighting against his rival, and in certain places shows flexibility for technical reasons, must not forget who his enemy is and what he is doing. This is the main condition [for concessions]." Khamenei made these statements to IRGC commanders on September 17, 2019. "Heroic flexibility means artistic navigation to achieve the goal. This means that if you walk in the path of God, you must... use various methods in all forms and all possible ways to achieve the Islamic goal and ideals... Some have interpreted this [term] to mean compromising on the Islamic regime's ideals and goals... This is a mistake... There are goals. The Islamic regime works to achieve these goals at every stage, to advance, to reach the excellent points and the summit, to create a great Islamic civilization... Of course, this is a gradual, piece-by-piece approach." Khamenei made these statements to 50,000 Basij operatives on November 20, 2013.[3] 5. In 2023, Khamenei again used the term "heroic flexibility" to allow talks with the Biden administration, with the aim of obtaining a lifting of all the American sanctions and U.S. recognition of Iran as a nuclear threshold state. On his website, he explained the term as "finding a way to overcome all the difficult obstacles and to continue on the path to achieve the goal." Khamenei said this on May 20, 2023.[4] 6. In February 2017, Iran removed a long-range ballistic missile that it was about to launch after the Trump administration issued an official warning. See MEMRI Inquiry and Analysis No. 1305, Facing Trump Administration, Iran Shows Fear And Military Self-Restraint, Halts Provocations, Threats, And Incitement – While Boosting Morale At Home And Delegating The Bulk Of Conflict To Its Proxies, March 20, 2017. It should be noted that now too, in the nuclear talks amid American and European pressure and President Trump's threats, Iranian negotiators are using ambiguous conciliatory statements, for example, that Iran "will not accept demands without something actual in exchange" and that "America has no choice but to recognize Iran's right to enrich [uranium] to the agreed percentage." At the same time, Iranian spokesmen have announced several times that "we have no intention of leaving the negotiating table." * Yigal Carmon is Founder and President of MEMRI; Ayelet Savyon is Director of the MEMRI Iran Media Studies Project.

Florida Imam Abu Usama At-Thahabi: Muslims Should Not Apologize for Jihad or Fear It; Obama Is a 'Devil'; We Must Show Non-Muslims the Dominance of Islam by Making Them Move to the Side of the Street
Florida Imam Abu Usama At-Thahabi: Muslims Should Not Apologize for Jihad or Fear It; Obama Is a 'Devil'; We Must Show Non-Muslims the Dominance of Islam by Making Them Move to the Side of the Street

Memri

time5 hours ago

  • Memri

Florida Imam Abu Usama At-Thahabi: Muslims Should Not Apologize for Jihad or Fear It; Obama Is a 'Devil'; We Must Show Non-Muslims the Dominance of Islam by Making Them Move to the Side of the Street

In a series of Friday sermons in May 2025 at Masjid As-Sunnah in Kissimmee, Florida, Imam Abu Usama At-Thahabi spoke about Muslims' relationship with non-Muslims and the concept of Jihad. In his May 16 sermon, At-Thahabi said that Jihad is part of a Muslim's manhood, emphasizing that Muslim men do not send their wives to wage Jihad on their behalf. He said that Muslims should defend their religion, not apologize for Jihad, and not be afraid of it. He added that Christians do not practice anything Jesus brought and that Jesus was not sent as a prophet to them. In a May 2 sermon, At-Thahabi said that while individuals such as President Jimmy Carter (whom he referred to as 'Peanut Man'), Mother Teresa, and Martin Luther King Jr. may have been 'great personalities,' they would not enter Paradise because they were born infidels and did not embrace Islam. He also called President Barack Obama a 'devil,' adding that Obama does not represent him or his community. At-Thahabi further cited a hadith stating that if a Muslim is walking down the street, he should compel non-Muslims to move to the more 'difficult' side of the path, in order to show them the 'dominance' of Islam.

Khomeini's Grandson On Hizbullah TV: Freedom Is A Core Iranian Value; Iran Was 'Subordinate' To Nasrallah – He Set Resistance Axis Policy
Khomeini's Grandson On Hizbullah TV: Freedom Is A Core Iranian Value; Iran Was 'Subordinate' To Nasrallah – He Set Resistance Axis Policy

Memri

time5 hours ago

  • Memri

Khomeini's Grandson On Hizbullah TV: Freedom Is A Core Iranian Value; Iran Was 'Subordinate' To Nasrallah – He Set Resistance Axis Policy

On June 6, 2025, Ali Ahmad Khomeini, grandson of the leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, appeared on Al-Manar TV (Hizbullah–Lebanon). He spoke about the core values of the Iranian people, saying that Iranians insist on the freedom to express their views, even when those views conflict with the official position of the state or with foreign powers. Khomeini explained that, whether or not it is fully realized, freedom of expression remains the Iranians' slogan. He added that when people say the Islamic Revolution still lives in the hearts of Iranians, it means that even its critics and rivals have not produced a more compelling slogan than that of its supporters. Khomeini said that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had claimed Hizbullah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah determines the policies of the "Resistance Axis," and he affirmed this statement saying that Iran was, in fact, "subordinate" to Nasrallah and described it as being "at the tail of the Resistance and Hassan Nasrallah." Ali Ahmad Khomeini: "The Iranians in particular are incapable of living in humiliation. This applies to most Islamic nations, but the Iranians are exceptional in this regard. Independence is very important to them. It's like oxygen, like air. The second thing is the freedom to be able to say what I want, even if it clashes with the position of the state or with domestic and foreign powers." Reporter: "The West portrays it as if there is no such freedom in Iran. The opposite is true." Khomeini: "Right, right..." Reporter: "This is what distinguishes the Iranians..." Khomeini: "What I want to say is that this is our slogan. In some cases, we have success, and in some cases not. But this is our slogan. When we say that the Revolution still lives in the hearts of the Iranians, it means that our dissenters and rivals do not have a better slogan than ours. [...] "[Netanyahu] said: 'We knew that the policies were decided by Nasrallah.' He said this to Trump. It means that the policies of the Resistance Axis in the region were in the hands of Hassan Nasrallah, and Iran was subordinate to Hassan Nasrallah. I know that this is true. Netanyahu was right." Reporter: "So the Islamic Republic leaves the decision to the people it supports..." Khomeini: "Yes." Reporter: "It leaves them the decision to confront the occupation the way they see fit." Khomeini: "We have fulfilled our minimal obligation. We were at the tail of the Resistance and Hassan Nasrallah."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store